DragonAndino

@anakkristensen @SkyFootball

@SkyFootball BBC:

Norway manager Ståle Solbakken thinks it is ‘pretty clear’ that England’s equaliser should have been ruled out. The ball appeared to strike a wire from the spider cam, but FIFA say there was no touch 🗣️

If the ball actually touched the camera wires, why wasn’t it called back? The goalkeeper, coach and players were complaining, why were they ignored? The only thing that comes to my mind is that, if this was Argentina, the conspiracies will be crazy.

Did the ball hit the wire? #england #norway #worldcup #var #worldcup2026

Spider Cam Controversy. Here’s another angle of the ball hitting the wire. There’s only two questions that need answering…. Did FIFA lie? Or Is the tech not working? #England #Norway x.com/bytopux/status…

@RobyK7ng Le sacaron amarilla como se debe. Es una estupidez del tamaño de una casa fingir una falta teniendo ya una tarjeta amarilla

¿A cuántos expulsaron en esa jugada? 🤔

@RafaelExpsito2 Hay que saber para opinar

No, no lo es. Es un error de apreciación del árbitro, no una confusión de identidad.

@DAT_Emeka @KikPRZ @omarjar57820042 @mrhitchcok Yes, absolutely. This is a game with a lot of human errors and that is a part of the game

@KikPRZ @omarjar57820042 @DragonAndino @mrhitchcok If you think this is a red then Messi should’ve got a double red for his challenge in the Algeria game

Oye pero acá no hubo revisión del VAR. Bah que raro. Ahhhh verdad que solo cobran cuando no es Argentina.

@Akire_Santana @mbafraaude Y si Mexico hubiera no hubiera perdido con Inglaterra, pasaba a cuartos, pero aqui estamos hablando de lo que pasó, no de lo que debería haber pasado. Es un despropósito hablar del "hubiera"

@DragonAndino @mbafraaude Si hubieran sancionado la primera, (Messi) como debe ser ,con roja, no estarías hablando de esta segunda. 🤨

Por qué el VAR no intervino aquí para expulsar a un jugador?

@DuaMadridista Aqui tampoco se revisa el doble pisotón, con riesgo de lesion

Después de todo las amarillas si se revisan, aquí no fueron ni al VAR JAJAJAJA

En todo el mundial es la primera vez que van al VAR a revisar algo así JAJAAJJA comenzó el robo de Argentina.

@DuaMadridista MENTIROSO. Esta es la segunda vez que el VAR ha usado el protocolo de identidad equivocada para anular una tarjeta amarilla y castigar la simulación fuera del área en este Mundial; la primera fue en USA vs Paraguay.

@_Utd_Blake This is the second time VAR has used the mistaken identity protocol to overturn a yellow card and punish simulation away from the penalty area at this World Cup; the first was in USA vs Paraguay. If there was favoritism... why wasn't this a straight red? 2 dangerous stomps

🚨 🇩🇪 Toni Kroos Demands Answers from FIFA After Controversial Argentina Match: 🗣️"Explain this to me. Embolo gets booked in the first half. Switzerland fight back and Ndoye levels the score. Moments earlier, Paredes escapes without even a yellow despite a controversial challenge. Then VAR steps in, reviews Embolo's incident, and hands him a second yellow for simulation even though many believe there was clear contact. Just minutes after Switzerland equalized, they're suddenly down to 10 men. When decisions like these keep falling in one team's favour, it's only natural that fans start asking difficult questions about the officiating. FIFA has a responsibility to make sure every nation is treated equally. The World Cup should be remembered for the football on the pitch and not for controversial refereeing decisions."🎙️

@GGumucioZ Esta es la segunda vez que el VAR ha usado el protocolo de identidad equivocada para anular una tarjeta amarilla y castigar la simulación fuera del área en este Mundial; la primera fue en USA vs Paraguay. Esta en las REGLAS, pero como no te conviene no lo vas a leer.

Es tal cual. Lo llevan al terreno del fanatismo pero el tema es otro. Esta aplicación de la regla no corresponde a su descripción. El VAR no tenía atribución de intervenir, el error del árbitro no fue confundir la identidad de nadie. Es claro, el que no lo ve es porque no quiere.

@TheSunFootball This is the second time VAR has used the mistaken identity protocol to overturn a yellow card and punish simulation away from the penalty area at this World Cup; the first was in USA vs Paraguay.

Switzerland star sent off in tears vs Argentina after new Fifa rule used sparking yet more World Cup ‘fixed’ claims #Echobox=1783825389" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">thesun.co.uk/sport/39731636…

@Konekoutena 是的，这是犯规。这叫做阻挡。对方的防守队员根本没有向球的方向移动。

我对足球规则了解不是很深，想问问大家，像梅西这样故意扑到别人身上，别人往后撤摔了。算对面犯规么？

@GlbalMadridista LIAR. This is the second time VAR has used the mistaken identity protocol to overturn a yellow card and punish simulation away from the penalty area at this World Cup; the first was in USA vs Paraguay.

Here we go again. VAR and the rule book are being used selectively and always to favor Argentina. To top it off, Messi gets to reprimand referees.

Cuando el egoísmo es mayor que las ganas de ganar: Aquí se puede ver mejor cuando Sørloth ignora a Haaland. La reacción de Haaland lo dice todo, hombre. Estaba frustrado y decepcionado, igual que todos nosotros.

@quintingrone Esta es la segunda vez que el VAR ha usado el protocolo de identidad equivocada para anular una tarjeta amarilla y castigar la simulación fuera del área en este Mundial; la primera fue en USA vs Paraguay. No es "inaudito"

Inaudito que revisen una amarilla en el VAR. Que le den la copa de una vez jaja

@diarioas Esta es la segunda vez que el VAR ha usado el protocolo de identidad equivocada para anular una tarjeta amarilla y castigar la simulación fuera del área en este Mundial; la primera fue en USA vs Paraguay.

🔍 LA JUGADA QUE CAMBIÓ EL PARTIDO: El árbitro fue corregido por el VAR y expulsó a Embolo, jugador suizo, a través de la corrección de identidad. Suiza protestó sobremanera la decisión. #NuestroMejorMundial

When both Argentina and Switzerland were numerically the same, the Swiss were in control of the game and could have led if they finished off their chances, especially in the second half but the game took a swift turn after a red card to Embolo. What is true; 1. Embolo was already on a yellow card 2. Paredes went for a challenge to stop a Swiss attack 3. The ref spotted it and instantly sounded his whistle, gave Paredes a yellow card for the late tackle. 4. VAR are allowed to review every yellow card issued by the ref and the Paredes’ own wasn’t different. Whilst the review was on, they saw that the Argentine didn’t deserve the booking because the player who many thought had been fouled, actually dived. 5. The ref was told to look at the on pitch screen and then found out the Swiss player dived. 6. The ref knew he’s been tricked by Embolo. Apologised to Paredes, chalked off the yellow card and was furious at Embolo and gave him the punishment he gave to the Argentine midfielder and unfortunately Embolo was already on a yellow. 7. Two yellows turn red and Embolo was sent off. What is lie; 1. The ref rigged the game. 2. Embolo shouldn’t have received the second yellow card. Embolo let his country down. He cried himself off the pitch and will forever remember this moment. In 2026, where cameras are everywhere, players on yellow cards still dive?