Matt Dratch

1.6K posts

Matt Dratch

Matt Dratch

@DratchCap

Macro Equity PM @ multi-strat | Dartmouth Football ’08 “Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid.” Views my own.

NYC Katılım Aralık 2010
219 Takip Edilen3.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Matt Dratch
Matt Dratch@DratchCap·
AI’s Shadow Output Gap While Washington obsesses over debt and inflation, AI is already ushering in an age of abundance (Part 1) ⸻ The political and economic establishment can’t stop talking about deficits, debt, and the CPI. Capitol Hill hearings, FOMC minutes, and financial news all pulse to the same beat. Yet this fixation ironically coincides with the arrival of the most powerful productivity engine in human history: generative AI. Its impact is creating a shadow output gap — an invisible but rapidly widening expansion of supply-side capacity. Policymakers, especially at the Federal Reserve, act as if the boom doesn’t exist. The real risk is not inflation. It is a stealth supply shock that pushes prices, wages, and term premia down. Deficits may prove too small. Monetary policy may already be too tight. ⸻ Productivity Everywhere — Except in the Data This is Solow’s Paradox, redux: “We see the computer age everywhere except in the productivity statistics.” Only this time the curve is ten-times steeper. Previous tech waves required hardware diffusion—mainframes, PCs, smartphones. AI requires none of that; it arrives through an app. That frictionless uptake already generates latent productivity that never reaches GDP because it appears as: •lower input costs (fewer billable hours), •consumer surplus (time saved, spending skipped), and •silent substitution (high-skill labor quietly displaced). Illustrations abound: •A patient triages symptoms with ChatGPT and skips four clinic visits. •An analyst masters a new industry without three costly expert calls. •A five-person start-up closes a seed round with no CFO, lawyer, or recruiter—AI fills those roles off the books. Each case creates real value, but none is logged as “output.” ⸻ Counting the Invisible Token Economy Tokens — the fragments of text an AI model processes — are the kilowatt-hours of knowledge work. Track them and you watch the shadow gap in real time. •Google’s token throughput grew 50-fold year-over-year as usage soared and per-token cost collapsed. •OpenAI’s models now sit in support desks, research departments, and legal teams worldwide. •Rapidly falling costs are unlocking accelerating demand across every provider. The data-center capex from Nvidia, Microsoft, and other hyperscalers is simply the physical expression of this surge. (1/2). $NVDA $AMZN $GOOGL $MSFT $TSM $CRWV $NBIS
English
5
6
37
77.3K
Shanu Mathew
Shanu Mathew@ShanuMathew93·
This. Entire discourse in that WSJ article is annoying. Bloomberg in Finance has turned into a status thing where people feel like they've made it as a front office investment professional. In reality, many are frustrated with lagging AI capabilities, dated GUI, and have wanted an alternative for years especially given how expensive it is. Bloomberg did a lot of the hard work decades ago of integrating itself into the true workflows and DNA of how firms operate. It's even become the standard for regulatory/compliance-approved comms, trade flows, etc. But to say it's irreplacable is odd + why wouldn't you want some competing platforms that drives the overall experience for all users into a better spot? Better and more customizable interfaces, faster data loading/handling, better integration into other platforms, better GUI, etc. I could go on...
kwak@dnlkwk

As someone who used Bloomberg at multiple firms, I have a ton of admiration for the terminal. But anyone who says a useful alternative cannot be built (esp with AI) until it has all X connectors is being dishonest. Most of us use it as a glorified dashboard + Snapchat.

English
3
3
17
8.4K
Matt Dratch
Matt Dratch@DratchCap·
The Meh 7 is the most under-owned it’s been in years just as everyone is leaning into index shorts, i.e. folks are ‘double short’ them. Perhaps then the generals lead when the war premium comes out. And of course we all know narrative follows price. 🤔
English
1
0
16
1.4K
Matt Dratch
Matt Dratch@DratchCap·
I think you’re over-optimizing for spread and under-optimizing for sequencing. NBIS is monetizing rich stock vol now, keeping cash interest low, and preserving secured capacity. In the ‘order of operations’, secured capacity remains open during macro wobbles when equity / converts don’t.
English
1
0
1
103
Horse
Horse@AspiringChef1·
@DratchCap Secured debt will eventually come, it’s an order of operations question. If they did that first they’d pay less on the converts wrt to dilution to equity holders.
English
1
0
1
72
Matt Dratch
Matt Dratch@DratchCap·
Much (GPU) appreciation 😉 to $NBIS mgmt today for solid execution. Sold stock to Jensen at $95 (best possible dilution), printed a large $META deal w/ a *backstop* on more capacity (blueprint?), and now closing 2026 funding gap w/ an *unsecured* low coupon convert struck 45-50% up. From pain will come pleasure. @romanchernin
English
3
0
16
2.3K
Matt Dratch
Matt Dratch@DratchCap·
@AspiringChef1 Lower cash pay + non secured debt = structurally better for an emerging company w/ a big buildout ahead.
English
1
0
2
180
Horse
Horse@AspiringChef1·
@DratchCap They should have done straights on a DC revenue commitment, this is high cost of capital paper at implied spreads. They have contracted revenues and they should take advantage of that. Agreed will end up better than worse, but they could have gotten more value from debt markets.
English
1
0
1
178
dfddd
dfddd@vivekmehtagyat·
@DratchCap 1.4GW isn’t that big anymore tbh
English
1
0
0
106
Matt Dratch
Matt Dratch@DratchCap·
A monster 1.4GW LOI from Mr Softy $msft. IF this is legit (and not $Amzn / $frmi 2.0), two thoughts. 1) rev the engines on 2027 capex), 2) expect more “state sponsored” deals where builders get permit certainty in exchange for breaking ground. nscale.com/press-releases…
English
2
0
13
2.2K
Matt Dratch
Matt Dratch@DratchCap·
@altcap Actions > polls. They’re certainly using a lot of tokens.
English
1
0
2
360
Brad Gerstner
Brad Gerstner@altcap·
AI is deeply unpopular. According to Pew, sadly only 17% of Americans think AI will have a positive impact. In China, 83% believe AI will be positive. A token tax & political backlash is coming unless the narrative changes. 🇺🇸👀🧐
English
408
114
1.8K
773.4K
Matt Dratch
Matt Dratch@DratchCap·
In the supposed new age of cheap intelligence, you increasingly get what you pay for… sloppy, uncurious takes optimizd for views (self worth boost?). The amount of reposts of “activity near Taiwan!” with zero context (this happens all the time) is perfectly representative of low signal engagement bait across media. And in a double ironic twist, the anonymous commentariat are now as bad as the MSM that seeded them. Revolution always devours its children I suppose.
POLITICO@politico

Taiwan reports large-scale Chinese military aircraft presence near island dlvr.it/TRVf0X

English
0
0
4
1.4K
Will Manidis
Will Manidis@WillManidis·
@buccocapital @travisk please vms sell off more, please vms i would like to own even more of the basket at even lower prices
English
2
0
13
8.1K
BuccoCapital Bloke
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital·
People are destroying SMB B2B software but there’s a meaningful chance HUBS/INTU are AI winners: I was listening to @travisk who recently said: “LTV:CAC with a sales machine, especially if you go [after] small businesses, is life on hard mode. Anybody who’s crushed it on SMB, those guys are special individuals who've made that happen. Because life in the SMB B2B world is no joke." Hard mode. Sounds moaty to me. Some thoughts on how the market could be wrong re: HUBS/INTU 1. SMB is brutally, brutally hard to make the math work, so counter intuitively there’s less competition. And in some sense the survivors are anti-fragile. They keep consolidating share during downturns 2. They have aggregated the customers and have the scale economics 3. AI will encourage full-platform adoption as agents benefit from max surface area and clean data 4. SMB are less tech savvy. Will just want tech that works. 5. Can either roll up space or launch incremental features cheaply w AI 6. Low cost/freemium competition is not new. Vibe coding doesn’t change that. 7. AI will cause an explosion in small business creation
English
33
11
396
113.2K
Matt Dratch
Matt Dratch@DratchCap·
Great points. Most underestimate human adaptability. There’s also something almost anti-American about the doomer framing. The U.S. runs on risk-taking / founder culture. New domains and tools historically means new opportunities. Scalable, cheap intelligence should compound all of that
SouthernValue@SouthernValue95

This podcast with @dylan522p is a terrific rebuttal to the Citrini doomer scenario by playing through the real world constraints of a fast-ish takeoff (I know it wasn’t intended as such). The constraints to producing enough AI tokens to be disruptive to society will slow it down and let the world adopt at a more digestible pace. But more importantly, we should not think of AIs impact on the world in a zero sum manner. As AI becomes more capable, the value of producing more tokens goes up, every corner of the energy and semis supply chain will need to ramp capacity, and in doing so, will invest / hire and grow GDP. This somewhat small example of a tech entrepreneur using AI to develop a cancer vaccine for his dog highlights that things that were not before possible or practical may now be. What if we suddenly find 300 new disease cures in the next 2-3 years? We will have a biotech boom that makes the COVID era look like a warmup, and a manufacturing boom to produce the drugs, more hiring and more GDP growth. It’s not crazy that we could be facing skilled labor shortages for many years. theaustralian.com.au/business/techn… (thanks @ElliotTurn ) The broader point is there will be lots of growth in new areas that didn’t exist before, and we will need people to do new jobs and to build those companies. If society can do everything we do today with fewer people, and reallocate some amount of people to new tasks, that’s a very good thing. That’s a productivity boom that potentially increases the quality of life for everyone on the planet.

English
0
0
14
2.4K
Matt Dratch
Matt Dratch@DratchCap·
@ShanuMathew93 The retention rates actually means the gap between ARR and eventual rev has never been so small…
English
1
0
2
234
Shanu Mathew
Shanu Mathew@ShanuMathew93·
Isn’t the implication of this (if true across cohorts) that all the AI labs quoting each incremental $ of revenue as an annualized revenue addition figure grossly overstating financials?
Apoorv Agrawal@apoorv03

ChatGPT's retention is in a league of its own. 71% of users still active at Month 10... nearly 2x the next closest AI app. Most consumer apps would kill for these numbers. Full analysis in Part 2 of our State of Consumer AI series 👇 x.com/apoorv03/statu…

English
2
1
16
4.9K
Matt Dratch
Matt Dratch@DratchCap·
@evrgn11112231 Capex is going much higher than guidance, imho. That may scare some people, but an accelerating core business should offset (assuming it’s strong enough). I also think 🥑 is still on track despite the headlines. $meta
English
0
0
2
581
Evergreen
Evergreen@evrgn11112231·
$META right now is probably one of the best examples I've seen in recent memory of Buffett's "dollar bill on the sidewalk in front of you". People will contort themselves to no end to not buy something with a bad chart IMO. Same group will buy this at $1000. In the meantime, thanks for the $.
English
15
6
120
40.6K