ETB

@FracturedLight0 no body in the comments seems to get it. Hes saying if Kamala won it would fuel the right , middle and middle left to turn on Washington sparking a revolution. W/ Trump MAGA gets the illusion of change and eventually the left comes back into power and reverses / nothing changes

Nick Fuentes is asked if Kamala would have been better than Trump and explains to the MAGAtards for the 100th time. Will they ever get it? “How much more can we explain it? That mindset is how they keep us controlled.” “If you can’t understand that go watch Steven Crowder and they will tell you vote red, hate blue for the rest of your life. While you’re being replaced. While you’re being enslaved by debt. While we are fighting and dying to build Israel. While our country collapses. You will keep voting and working and paying your taxes until you are dead.”

Tell me your UFO theory and I’ll rate it and respond #ufo #ufotheory #ufotwitter #ufoX #uap

So the full report from (SCU) on the Nimiz encounter and the Tic Tac has been released .... its ginormously long ... so I'll summarize some key points, ... so the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU) took raw radar, FLIR, and telemetry data, reverse-engineered it using known aerospace principles, and came up with one unavoidable truth: this object not only existed, it operated far outside the realm of any known physics ...and it did so repeatedly, with intent. The object was precognitive in behavior. The radar data from the SPY-1B system showed that the Tic Tac descended from 28,000 feet to sea level in 0.78 seconds, a feat requiring acceleration up to 5,880 Gs. But here's what no one focuses on: that data was correlated by both radar and infrared, meaning this was not a sensor glitch or hallucination...it was a multi-spectrum-confirmed, real-world event. And what’s worse? The object decelerated to a dead stop… mid-air. Bonkers! The FLIR camera picked up zero exhaust or thermal signature. That means no jet wash, no chemical heat, no electromagnetic discharge. The report even mentions the object's lack of doppler radar shift...implying it had no moving parts or air displacement. It wasn’t flying through air. It was displacing position without pushing against anything. Either it’s manipulating gravity directly...or cheating spacetime altogether. The object didn’t react randomly. It anticipated the pilot's rendezvous point before they even arrived. SCU modeled this with geospatial plotting and concluded that the Tic Tac reached the cap point hundreds of miles away...instantaneously. Not seconds faster...instant. No aircraft does that. No drone. No hypersonic glide vehicle. At least that we know of. That’s either wormhole level displacement or a kind of dimensional bleed-through. And every sensor confirmed it happened...?!?! This report isn’t classified. It’s open. You can download it. But almost no one reads it because it’s dense, mathematical, and damning. So here’s the conclusion: we’re not dealing with “unidentified flying objects.” We’re dealing with objects that violate known physics, outmaneuver our best tech, react intelligently, and might not be from our dimension at all. This is not speculative. It’s sensor-verified, pilot-confirmed, multi-system data. Really think about that...

@shanefrakes Quantum jujitsu is craaaaazy

This is who you are paying to give you information?

They want to manipulate you and create a false narrative about the upcoming geophysical disaster by assigning dates like 2026, 2027, 2030 etc. The truth is, no one knows the exact date or hour—the geophysical event is a highly dynamic phenomenon that depends on multiple factors and chains of reactions. The weakening of the Earth's magnetic field, solar flares, cosmic radiation, internal processes within the Earth's core, and other variables all play a role. We know the event is approaching, but it could happen now or anytime within the next 100–200 years. Everything is connected to the geomagnetic excursion—just look at how the pole shift accelerated after 1990. This is a thread so no one can manipulate you with exact dates! (1/8)🧵

We have received Breakthrough Device Designation from the FDA for Blindsight. Join us in our quest to bring back sight to those who have lost it. Apply to our Patient Registry and openings on our career page neuralink.com

@StephenGe0 @Blackbeard_Goat You think she’s fodder or important? I’d side on significant

#ONEPIECE1125 How he felt walking in the room 😭

@MrHustleMCR @kyle_ferriter John Mack revealed a lot of suppressed sexual trauma manifested in these “abductions”. I think Charlie is right some of them are lying. But I think some of them do see phenomenon but also lie pretending to know what it is

@kyle_ferriter I think they’re all lying. They’re all forming UFO companies to make that dough!

Real👇

@OMApproach Agree with everything except maybe that last part. What purpose is there to learn good and evil in an illusion / dream. What purpose for the creator is there to do something like that?

It’s impossible for something to come out of nothingness; therefore, our materialistic universe is born from the infinite thought of the Supreme Creator, which has no end and no beginning. The light (electromagnetic waves) creates the materialistic illusion; we are living in a dream, and our souls are here to learn the knowledge of good and evil.

@BrainXpansion @AMAZlNGNATURE Not for 12 days

@AMAZlNGNATURE Herd animals sometimes do this. Reindeer often form a cyclone and constantly walk around one and another in order to deter predators from singling individuals out.

Hundreds of sheep were seen walking around in circles for 12 days in Mongolia

@CrazeKaaBaap @BrainXpansion @AMAZlNGNATURE Yes but typically you would see some of the sheep passing out or dying which I did not see reported during these 12 days. Supposedly after this time they all just went back to normal

@MrHustleMCR This is tough because if I could without a shadow of a doubt prove aliens are flying around Earth I would have to think about the implications of showing others that proof. Especially if I suspect the aliens are bad 😅

If you had absolute proof for aliens flying around earth, what’s your first move?

@mrjeffknox It’s because he was in government / military. A lot of the public will put on the census they don’t trust our government but yet the masses always flee to these sources for information

It's absolutely insane people line up to ask Doty questions like he has truth to drop. Here is all you need to know: He makes it all up. It's bogus.

UFO twitter have anything weird or cool to say about this?

@theblackvault You ever think they redact some of your FOIAs to get you chasing your tail? Hoping you go down the wrong rabbit holes

Just in: #FOIA Appeal WIN on the AOIMSG press "briefing card" I got released last year. I fought the redactions, and won. Why did they redact it in the first place?

@Fortean777 White rooms

@MrHustleMCR Or we can come out with 16 part multi season docu series. Which obviously will have a cliff hanger at the end

🚨Do your own research!!🚨 I will not be presenting my evidence for aliens and spaceships!! #ufotwitter

Many of you are asking for my reaction regarding the just released @DoD_AARO report. There is much to say. I want to think carefully before saying more. I am not unsympathetic to US National Security needs in this. In February of 2023, @joerogan invited me for four hours onto the world's largest English Language program (episode #1945) to describe in detail the mystery of potential US Government involvement in UFOs and Post-Einsteinian physics during the mysterious "Golden Age of General Relativity". It has been seen and discussed by millions as expected. I was thus eager to see how thorough this report would be by combing it for search strings raised in my research. REFERENCES: "Glenn L Martin Company": 0 Bryce Cecile DeWitt: 0 Institute for Field Physics: 0 Research Institute for Advanced Study: 0 Louis Witten: 0 Roger Babson: 0 Agnew Bahson: 0 Gravity Research Foundation: 0 Gravity: 1 (pg. 32) Rennaisance Technologies: 0 UNC Chapel Hill: 0 Solomon Lefschetz: 0 Freeman Dyson: 0 Herman Bondi: 0 Negative Mass: 0 "Scientific and Intelligence Aspects of the UFO Problem" Australian Intelligence 1971 Report: 0 Australia: 0 George Rideout: 0 Edward Teller: 0 Robert Oppenheimer: 0 David Kaiser: 0 Wright-Patterson Air Force Base: 1 (pg. 18) Curtis Wright Aerospace Buffalo: 0 Pascal Jordan: 0 Mansfield Ammendment: 0 Joshua Goldberg: 0 Office of Global Access: 0 University of Texas, Austin: 0 Center for Dynamical Systems: 0 Physics: 5 (pgs. 16-17, 53) Relativity: 0 Albert Einstein: 0 George Bunker: 0 Welcome Bender: 0 George Trimble: 0 CONCLUSION: This report purports to have studied the questions raised surrounding UFO/UAP related research of the US federal Government. It, in fact, appears to have studied a carefully chosen SUBSET of the claims selected from among those which appear to have mass appeal to the so-called "UFO Community." It completely, or nearly completely, avoided reporting on all questions surrounding issues which have been raised in serious research and by PhD level researchers who have raised scientific questions in this area. This continues the pattern of using PhD level government scientists who appear to avoid the actual research questions most likely to involve sensitve Special Access Programs and Stovepiped Research which are compartmentalized by design. Whether the omissions are due to issues of avoidance, misdirection (e.g. so-called Limited Hangout strategy), ignorance or incompetance cannot be discerned from the information given. RECOMMENDATION: It is simply not possible to treat the current AARO report as historically complete or comprehensive. To gain the public trust, the successor to AARO would have to expand and redo this analysis with input from domain professionals who are trusted by the public not to have an apparent agenda or government background (e.g. Prof. David Kaiser of MIT or Dr. Nima Arkani Hamed of IAS, Prof. Brian Keating of UCSD, Avi Loeb of Harvard) Otherwise, it is relatively easy for scientists to "Follow the Silence" in government reports to see what is *not* being addressed or discussed.