
Orthodox Mason
2.3K posts








I find it interesting the different ways people have been interpreting this video. What fr. SDY said is what we believe. if you are a Protestant in your own Protestant country with no Orthodox Church then you’re more likely to be saved. The moment you send missionaries to an orthodox country or have an Orthodox Church near you, we no longer view you as Christian. God works with what is available to you.



@DeuceBigalowEO @NewsNFTU @Ludwigstarken @seanye24 @BashlinCore I was baptized in February of 2023 at the Holy Transfiguration parish in Mammoth Spring, Arkansas. Do not accuse me of lying or being “fallacious,” especially after I’ve been charitable towards you in presuming you’re simply ignorant of these things and not acting in bad faith.


@Deth2Compromise In my experience in ROCOR over time, there has been such a miserable shift in how the Old Calendarists are viewed and treated. ROCOR uncs view them warmly as fellow struggling brothers, and this last decade of converts think that they are worse than infidels and heathens.




You'll see a lot of doctors come out "against" this kind of broad screening system. They can even get quite agitated about it. This resistance stems from a well-established clinical consensus: traditional population-level imaging fails to improve health outcomes because false positives and invasive follow-ups do more harm than good. But this view suffers from an obvious blind spot. Existing studies rely on static data and completely ignore time-series imaging. And time-series is ignored because we haven't been able to afford to do high frequency imaging at population scale. Clearly, time series is going to be immensely more valuable than a single image. If you drop costs, value can go from 0 -> 1. On a more fundamental level, the argument against screening rests on an obviously false precept "More information is bad" -- just clearly untrue. More information better, you just have to interpret it correctly.














Calling Fr. Stephen De Young a heretic for stating how the Church approached Patristics in the 1st Millennium is ridiculous. That Pope is not Canonized, and he's talking here about Vernacular Liturgy. Not Patristics, which the Church did not translate into Vernacular language and still read only in Greek, Latin, and Syriac in the 9th century. The idea of reading Patristic Theology separate from the language each Holy Father wrote in is a very modern concept.



