Elderal.eth

@EvilPanda Then does that mean we can start trading smaller market cap degen memecoins? I wonder if this also means we can no longer use our exit criteria. Will spot strategies become more commonly used instead bid-ask in community? There are still so many questions waiting to be answered.

No there is no need to wait for a bounce, as long as the fees have covered the IL you can close anytime because you dont get any token fees now if you use quote only fees pool. Technically if you caught a huge volume dump, you dont even need to wait for a bounce, just close when the volume dies off.

So I asked Claude about this token only fees for the new DLMM update. Generally we will actually earn more fees if we do sol sided LPs due to not having token fees that drop in value when the token dumps. BUT it also changes my playstyle that needs to wait for a bounce. Now there is no incentive to wait for the bounce as there is no token value to increase, so this is actually bad for the charts as much less people waits for the bounce, causing red bars to become bigger. I think it will only be useful when paired with bid ask wide range. Will need to test it out, and also pool dynamics will change, what if there is the same exact pool but with the two fee collection modes, which pool do people choose? Lots of homework to do to be successful. @met_lparmy @MeteoraAG @MeteoraIDN

@iremsoykan7 Megadeth için konser bileti arıyorsanız, elimde bir adet genel alan bileti bulunmakta. Ben işim çıktığından ötürü gidemiyorum elimde kaldı bilet

Bugün kimse bulaşmasın çatacak yer arıyorum. Saniyeler içinde konser biletleri tükendi. Megadeth konserinde de aynısı olmuştu. Bak yine karaborsa mevzusu dönüyor. Sabır.

23 Haziran 2026 Küçükçiftlik Parkta gerçekleştirilecek MEGADETH Konserine Genel Alan bilet satıyorum. İlgilenen olursa yazabilir. #megadethistanbul #megadeth #megadethkonser #megadethbilet #megadethkonserbileti

@emrocak_crypto Hocam ama gördüğüm kadarıyla sanki alt bandın altını hep bir ziyaret etmiş, bu konu hakkında düşünceniz nedir?

Bitcoin'in büyümesi rastgele değil — ve matematik bunu kanıtlıyor. Fiyat ile zaman arasındaki ilişki 15 yılı aşkın süredir aynı örüntüyü izliyor. Kaos gibi görünen şeyin içinde bir düzen var. Üç bölge var: Alt bant tarihi dip alanı. Orta bant uzun vadeli fair value. Üst bant aşırı ısınma. 2011, 2015, 2019, 2022 — her büyük dip alt banda yaklaştı. Her döngüde orta bant adil fiyatlamanın merkezi oldu. Üst bant ise kazançları hızlıca katladı. Şu an alt banttayız. Orta bant ~150K civarında seyrediyor. Gerçek dönüş noktaları ilan edilmez. Sessizce inşa edilir. The pattern doesn't lie, it repeats. 👀

@sezorock Sezo lp farming yapıyormusun bu tokene sence mantıklı mı

Ya bu profil Asteroid Shiba ile değişirse ? Sizce ne olur ?

@bpthaber @grok neden böyle davranıyor claude

Claude AI, kendisine kötü davranan birinin isteğini reddedip konuşmayı sonlandırdı: "Bu konuşmanın başlarında sizden net bir ricada bulunmuştum: hakaret etmeyi bırakın."

@SolanaSensei Is that an april fool ? CX7mVh2W5kQLa4oUK3f1w4QAciZzgTJqa1rCJWjyY5jF

Launching my first memecoin today. Giving away FREE tokens to first 10k people to engage below (comment SOL wallet). - This token is for the people - We will have a big FREE airdrop - No presale or KOL allocations Please beware of scams. Token is NOT out yet. Stay tuned.

@EvilPanda @edrdesigner I made 1.5 SOL into 8.13 SOL in 3-4 months keep growing. Sensei evilpanda changed my life just get good and be patient nobody said It's gonna take short time.

@edrdesigner Why wouldnt it work?

Coin hits ATH with good volume, so I opened sol sided DLMM, wide range like always. Waited for the dump to earn fees from then waited for the bounce to exit in full profits from fees. Such is the life of a LPer, we wait, enter and wait and wait until exit. Remember for LP, the longer you are in a position the more you earn from fees. So it should not be a quick in and out thing, but I guess there are strategies for those plays. Stick to what your edge is. @met_lparmy @MeteoraEco @MeteoraIDN @MeteoraAG

@defigosha @MeteoraAG Sir, could you share your exact Discover page filters? When you say ‘empty’, do you mean literally no filters, or are there still some fields selected?

How do I make 1-2 SOL (80-200$) a day using @MeteoraAG? Very simple, actually. This is basically my strategy below. Every couple of hours I go to Pool Discovery (my filters atm are mostly empty, only choosing DLMM. Thne, I filter by highest fees and choose only new tokens (2h - 2days max, preferably under 12h). Only thing I care about are RAW fees. I can asses Fee/TVL myself, for new tokens it is mostly similar. Key is a -70% or -80% bid ask. I do it for EVERY token, no matter where its price is (although it is very low I may opt to -65%). This ensures I catch the falling knife and accumulate fees, and eventually pumps back just a little bit - because of the bid ask it mostly negates above. The screenshot below is only for today and tomorrow. The only loss is where I made a mistake and entered -55% position, if I did -75%, I would be in profit. Misclicked and decided to leave it this way.

@defigosha @MeteoraAG Which timeframe do you control fees in discover page, 24h ?

@MPCrypto @EvilPanda That'a good question, and in which time frame ? For example 5 M in 24h etc.

@EvilPanda What's your "number" in terms of volume for "old coins"? Thanks

Even older coins can still give good fees. The market was so dry 2 days go, with no new coins passing my filters to DLMM. So I went to look at older coins and I found this coin still not dead yet, still chopping sideways with volume. So I entered a SOL SPOT -75% range and just printed the fees. Went out of range and I closed the position in profits. Pretty good fees. So even older coins can still print fees if they are not dead yet. @met_lparmy @MeteoraAG @MeteoraEco @MeteoraIDN

@evilpanda @levok0 @Solanaramen @Catto_Man_ @failuredril556 @met_lparmy @MeteoraIDN Thanks a lot sensei 🙏

Evil Panda First AMA, thank you for the questions. @ElderalFi @levok0 @Solanaramen @Catto_Man_ @failuredril556 @met_lparmy @MeteoraIDN

@evilpanda @met_lparmy @MeteoraIDN Also, Which curve is best suited for this type of strategy? Should we stick to spot, or consider a bid-ask approach? Regarding fees, is a 5% base fee necessary, or can lower fees such as 1–2% be used effectively in these scenarios?

@evilpanda @met_lparmy @MeteoraIDN How can we determine whether it’s worth chasing a coin trading below the Supertrend or in a downtrend? If volume is a confirmation signal, what thresholds should we look for, and which additional metrics should we consider?

I will record AMA in English soon, so post your questions below about DLMM and I will answer them and upload on my youtube. @met_lparmy @MeteoraIDN Post Questions below ⬇️⬇️

@evilpanda MACD still included right ? For the exit signal.

Evil Panda Strat works like a charm in any market conditions. Find a coin pumping well into ATH with good volume. Then open a one sided SOL SPOT DLMM position and wait for a dump to earn fees from. Lastly wait for a bounce and exit signal to appear, which is the RSI(2) closing above 90 and price going above BB Upper Line. This is the big summary on how to use the Evil Panda Strat to DLMM. Again the most important part is coin selection. No strat is gonna save you if you chose an outright scam coin. x.com/tendorian9/sta… lparmy.com/?ref=tendorian9 @met_lparmy @MeteoraIDN @MeteoraAG

@evilpanda Sir, how do you decide to use DLMM with a coin that isn’t making a new ATH? As far as I understand, you usually don’t open positions in such cases.

This coin Bigtrout is really one that keeps giving, good volume the whole way from the top to down -85%. I did not open a position after the first one cos I feel that it was over, but after dumping I see that volume is relatively high so I decided to open a sol sided position and keep farming the fees. Every dump is followed by a pump back near to before the dump happens, and all the positions has closed out of range to the top. And added one token sided to top it out. What a blessing to be able to LP this coin. lparmy.com/?ref=tendorian9 @met_lparmy @MeteoraIDN @MeteoraAG

@evilpanda Revelation has been updated.

@VitalikButerin @grok özetle

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

Leveled up in the Great Gas Reckoning with ETHGas! 💪 Teen Jack status: 0.4958 ETH gas spent, 180 Beans earned—supporting the Gasless Future! Claim your Gas ID at ethgas.com/community/gas-…