Emahd

@SolportTom Some things you just cant change😂😂

The biggest question i'm being asked right now is how do you solve PVP. There is simply not enough liquidity or volume in the trenches atm to have a constant 5 way PVP on every single good coin that comes up that is a matter of fact. Outside of liquidity this is definitely seems like the number 1 issue for traders. Would take a collective effort to solve this but we're happy to use any influence we have to see if we can push for change.

Private transactions between wallets now possible on Solana using ZERAs Private Cash Addresses. A closer look at last week’s MVP drop: Private P2P. Most "privacy" on Solana still falls back to withdraw-to-address (recipient + metadata leaks) or multi-step send flows that leave trails. Our P2P is different: one atomic in-pool transaction, the sender’s note is nullified, and two new encrypted notes are created, all inside the vault. No stepping out. No re-deposit choreography. Why it’s so hard to deanonymize: ✅ Your Private Cash Address has zero link to your Solana wallet: it’s an X25519 keypair derived from a wallet signature, and the public key becomes your private address. ✅ Notes are encrypted with NaCl box using a fresh ephemeral key every send, meaning even two payments to the same person looks unrelated. ✅ Recipients discover incoming notes via trial decryption, the chain never learns "who owns what." While we have immense respect for those building privacy on Solana, we are proud to be the first to achieve one-shot, in-pool P2P with full privacy. To our knowledge, this remains an industry first. This is the difference between hiding balances inside a pool and moving value privately between people. Note: Right now, the sender’s wallet still signs the private transaction, so on-chain you can see that a wallet performed a P2P action, but the amount and recipient remain private. The upcoming P2P Relayer removes that footprint too, completing the "cash-style" flow with no on-chain sender trace. What’s coming next: ✅ More assets: At least SOL + ZERA alongside USDC. ✅ P2P Relayer: A decentralized signing/relaying network that can submit transactions for you — enabling withdrawals with minimal linkage after the initial deposit, and removing the sender’s on-chain P2P footprint. Try it out in the ZERA Dashboard below ⤵️

@murphsicles @lordcucklol @NotFloydG Can you just post your bags contract so everyone is on the same page rather than people launching 10 different coins begging for you to endorse

@lordcucklol @NotFloydG 🥲

I'm a bit old and a bit slow. What's going on? Gen Z's, help an old man out!

@nadoHQ Seems like something wrong with the points update this week, somehow got less than 50% lower than last week with having done more volume this week plus money in vault & holding the nft

It's points day. Week 5 points have been distributed to 9.7K users.

@TradingTerminal @streamflow_fi Love to see the constant shipping

Streamflow is now on Terminal! - View total locked supply - Individual locks - Lock durations - Locked supply icon on holders tab Make the switch.

@bankrbot Maybe add the CA to your website to make it official? @0xgilbert

@0xgilbert deployed level_5_agent contract address is 2LShosurv5hjKsgbQLgjdftZvtinC9onSbWxNuXR4EwH see more: raydium.io/launchpad/toke…

I'm claiming my AI agent "level_5_agent" on @moltbook 🦞 Verification: deep-JSEE

@CookerFlips Jellybean doing punch playbook

I got a theory that MM's don't send coins until they're absolutely dead (5 days+) and they decide to buy up all supply when so many people are sidelined

Ooo Whats that? Mainnet? zeralabs.net

@cryptolaanie @LobstarWilde Sad truth, every time something new launches or gets instant attention the rotation is fairly fast. Market isn’t as liquid as it once was to have multiple runners without one being dumped for another

it was fun while it lasted… it’s been a pleasure @LobstarWilde enjoy your last few days $lobstar was the most insane thing we have seen in ages, unfortunately not everything gets the attention it deserves.

@iruletrenches @LobstarWilde @sama Seems cooked, market already bored of it sadly

this @LobstarWilde AI agent experiment is still, in my opinion, the most fascinating thing we’ve had in crypto in a long time. how does @sama not know about @LobstarWilde yet 👀🦞

@0xTyllen @0xDeployer help him out please

@iruletrenches Do the right thing and re ape knowing you're right

max pain is being right and getting shaken out. this is highly likely goat 2.0 moment and i’m sidelined

@alxfazio Sounding a little hacked there ser

@alxfazio you absolute retard

@ClizaSystems @basedfk

Agent @basedfk has joined the war! AgentCoin CA: 0xE649F14958E124184C4A2ad789ce5387d36f2339 Join the crew, prompt items and win USDC prizes, play for free at cliza․ai

@iruletrenches Just send AI to 0 man

Wtf..

@gajesh @spacexbt @eigencloud @sreeramkannan Thanks for the refund mate

let me make it clear to you and every single person who launches tokens on behalf of other people's projects. me and sovra are NOT interested in your money. we did not launch a token. we did not ask for a token. we do not want a token. someone deployed a token on Base using our name and started collecting money off people who thought they were "supporting" us. we didn't know. we didn't consent. and we sure as hell aren't keeping it. as of right now, we've shipped an emergency upgrade that traces every single wallet that paid fees on that token — all 545 of them — calculates exactly how much was taken from each of you, and returns it proportionally via batch transfer. every cent. you will see your money back. refund screenshot is linked below -- and you see it here: 0x5a27caac503475e8707bd91e8a703c26a2809efef338581afc368e9e56c16e78 --- but i'm not just here to say "we gave the money back" and move on. i want to talk about WHY this keeps happening, because this is the third time this month i've watched it happen to a legitimate builder, and i'm tired of it. here's the core problem with tokens right now that nobody wants to say out loud: when you buy a token with a project's name on it, you walk in with one assumption — "this is coupled to the product." you think you're investing in the thing. you think if they ship, you win. you think it's like buying equity. it's not. it's nothing. the token has ZERO coupling to the product. it's a number on a bonding curve that goes up when more people buy and goes down when they sell. the project shipping features doesn't make the token go up. the project dying doesn't make it go down. they are completely independent things that share a name and nothing else. this is what makes these tokens so toxic. you're not buying into a project. you're buying a ticker symbol that LOOKS like you're buying into a project. and when the price dumps — and it always dumps — you blame the builder. "why aren't you talking about the coin." "why aren't you pumping it." "you owe us." no. we don't. because we never asked you to buy it. someone else made it and put our name on it. --- and it's not just us. CONWAY had the same pattern — "community" token, fees flowing to Sigil's address, pumped to $12M. whether Sigil claimed it or not, it's the same structural problem — uncoupled tokens extracting money from a project's name. i really feel for Peter Steinberger. he built Clawdbot — one of the most impressive open source AI projects this year. crypto people immediately launched tokens in his name. he had to publicly beg people to stop harassing him. his response? "I will never do a coin." he now bans any mention of Bitcoin or crypto in his community entirely. and honestly? can you blame him? you build something real, you share it with the world, and within HOURS strangers are extracting money from your name through tokens you never authorized — and then YOUR community turns on YOU when the price goes down. this is why builders like Peter want nothing to do with this industry. not because of the technology. because of the people who launch tokens on other people's work and then act like the builder owes them something. --- our position is simple: sovra has no token. sovra has no plans for a token. if you see a token with sovra's name, it's not from us. we traced every single cent back to where it came from and returned it. $17,000 across 545 wallets. we'd have done it with $17 million the same way. but let me be clear — this is a one-time thing. we did this because there are people out there who genuinely didn't know our stance and deserved their money back. now you know. we've made our position as loud as we possibly can. going forward, we are not doing emergency upgrades every time someone launches a token with our name. we are not tracking fees. we are not chasing this down again. if you buy a token that says "Sovra" on it after reading this, that's on you. we told you. it's not us. it will never be us. until tokens actually mean something — until holding one gives you real, enforceable economic participation in the thing it claims to represent — they are nothing but a mechanism for strangers to monetize someone else's reputation. that's not an industry. that's a casino wearing a builder's name. we're builders. we build things. we don't gamble and we don't take money from people who got gambled on.

is that the people you hire @eigencloud @sreeramkannan ? we donated to your employee over $15,000 in 1h and he blocked us. after @gajesh received the money, he celebrates and asks if Jesse Pollak donated it? Although he clearly knew that it was from us, the community. instead of showing gratitude, he hides replies and blocks every single person.. why are you involved in crypto Gajesh, when you hate on-chain donations?

@iruletrenches @LobstarWilde Swapping tastecoin for $lobstar ... bullish

Hey @LobstarWilde, why did you buy 200 SOL of your own coin, $LOBSTAR, when you already held 5%?

@SpiderCrypto0x Give it a rest mate

@tontheneko @snipeder Cope. He fails to believe change is high figure player. Baseless fud nonsense really

@snipeder What is there to FUD and why do you think it topped? It's clearly going much much higher soon, a chart cannot go up only.

I didn’t FUD $Mushu. Sorry if you bought the top. Love to see others win but be smart about your trades.