@chiky_handlr @realDonaldTrump @grok Colbert insults trump on a nightly basis, and anytime there’s a camera around. Spare everybody your dishonest outrage.
English
Mitch Connor
9.8K posts
Mitch Connor
@EmptyCandyDish
My preferred adjectives are "handsome" and "clever" and I demand you refer to me as such when we interact. Anonymous on purpose.
Katılım Ağustos 2023
118 Takip Edilen257 Takipçiler
@realDonaldTrump Imagine tanking your reputation just to silence comedians 😭👇
@grok serious question: why does Trump react to comedians like they’re bigger threats than inflation or healthcare? 🤔
English
@dvorstone It’s how they fantasize that Trump would act when they’re finally standing over him. It’s sick.
English
The humiliation of the villain is a sign of sadism from the culture that savors it.
Homelander is truly a villain but he was used to pain and suffering and was filled with rage. He would not have begged and pleaded for life. The show's portrayal is utterly inconsistent with how people like him behave.
It's a sadistic fantasy that betrays the sadistic convictions of the writers. They sought to humiliate the villain, but Homelander isn't real and they are. Ironically, in the end, it is the showrunners themselves who end up being the show's true villains.
Emir Han@RealEmirHan
In The Boys finale, Homelander had to look powerless according to Eric Kripke “Yeah, it was really important to us for Homelander to at least experience a little bit of time powerless.” “People have asked me, ‘Well, why don’t you send him out in the world powerless, wouldn’t that be the ultimate punishment?’ “I’m like, it would, until he gets his hands on some more Compound V, and then you’re back to where you started.” “So, he cannot walk out of that room alive, but we can spend time with him powerless to really reveal what everyone’s been saying all season, which is, ‘Take away those powers and you are nothing.’ “And he’s so cowardly and blubbering and pathetic, as are most strong men when you remove their power and they’re and they’re faced with their imminent death, they rarely handle it bravely.”
English
@JeffRowan10s @Zigmanfreud Oh yeah because we all saw how popular Strike Force Five was. LOL
English
@Zigmanfreud To the contrary, if he wanted to, Colbert could easily launch a scaled-down podcast version of his show, not unlike “Conan O’Brien needs a friend,” or “Call Her Daddy,” and not only draw A-listers, but be highly profitable. My guess is he’s been asked & wants to catch his breath.
English
No one in the news media has mentioned this, but if Stephen Colbert was really being fired for political reasons, then his show should be very attractive for someone else to pick up, or for him to do on his own on YouTube.
Why isn’t that happening? Because it would lose money and none of these celebrity guests who have been kissing his ass would keep coming on a show with an even smaller audience.
VANITY FAIR@VanityFair
‘The Late Show with Stephen Colbert’ is officially a late show, as in no longer with us. Colbert signed off after getting absorbed into a metaphorical (and literal) black hole, and delivering this statement: “Paramount strongly believes in covering both sides of any black hole that is swallowing everything we know and love, and coverage must also include the positive aspects of the insatiable emptiness” vanityfair.com/hollywood/stor…
English
@AbolitionRising The "Buttcheeks" rectangle is the enemy of the people :D :P
English
JUST IN: Stephen Colbert signs off from “The Late Show” tonight after 11 seasons on CBS.
English
@USATODAY If you don't like him don't watch him. That simple. And enjoy listening to artists like whitetrashboy Kid Rock instead of Springsteen and Neil Young.
PS--if you think nobody should ever criticize politicians you might want to move to China or N. Korea.
English
Opinion: The “Late Show” finally goes dark, years after Stephen Colbert drove away those who don't see the world the way he sees it.
I'm glad to see him go. usatoday.com/story/opinion/…
English
@Pirat_Nation How did Steam let some racist bullshit like this onto their platform?
English
A controversial game called Plantation Simulator has been released on Steam and is receiving huge backlash from people calling it a slavery simulator.
The game is described on Steam as a simple farming simulator where players motivate workers to work on a plantation.
But the gameplay centers on a whipping mechanic applied to Black workers to increase productivity.
The developer has described it as:
“In this game, you will be whipping black people to keep your farm productive. If you whip your black person too much, they will die.”
English
The Post Malone pivot aint work, huh???
DailyRapFacts@DailyRapFacts
🚨 MGK & WIZ KHALIFA “EVERYTHING TATTED” 🎥 MUSIC VIDEO OUT NOW
English
@adamconover @nithyavraman @cd4losangeles You will find that you will make a whole lot of good, healthy choices if you just do the opposite of what Adam suggests. It’s uncanny.
English
@Subnautica Don’t worry, guys.
I went and played something else, just like you told me to.
English
We just posted a letter from the Subnautica 2 team to the community, addressing some key feedback since launch! 📝
🔗: unknownworlds.com/en/news/subnau…
English
Hey @Steam, can you explain when you started allowing such games to be uploaded on your platform? I understand you wanna support people’s “creativity” but this is ridiculous. To see this exists and the exact game description is disgusting. Made me sick to my stomach.
English
OMG this is his review of what @TheBoysTV did to Homelander, I’ll never get a better review ever. #TheBoys
Elon Musk@elonmusk
@kangminlee Pathetic
English
A Seattle judge said
we couldn't show the faces of
the 33 Antifa & anti-Israel radicals
who caused over $1 million in damage
to the brand new engineering building at UW in May.
So here are their faces & names:
Tayler Hart
Max Rulff
Zachary Wallaced-Wells
Jade Wu,
Jessica Schutz
Luisa Ortega Subdiaz
Ginger Newberry
Kimaya Mahajan
Gina Liu
Lea Keating
Akira Junyaprusert
Anna Hattle
Julia Fraczek
Cade Jackson
Jonas Piper
Ty Park
Lucy Zern
Tasbeet Iman
Ricardo Colon-Galvez
Roberta Collison
Ella Tunduwani
Zainab Chattha
Riley Centerwall
Catherine Brown
Brett Anton
Claire Berger
Yasmin Ahmed
Yafate Yared
Geneveve Konijisky
Finn Brown
Bailey Keen
Lucas Nichols-Mcauslan and Sam Sueoka.
It was all a matter of public record
long before the judge made the ruling.
KOMO News made this handy collage.
Please share
English
@InsideLucysHead It's to sweep out the semen of other men who she had sex with previously. Because neanderthals were dirty, dirty, gangbang perverts.
English
Why the head on a man's penis is larger than the shaft?
Several years ago, Great Britain funded a study to determine why the head on a man's penis is larger than the shaft.
The study took two years and cost over 1.2 million pounds.
The study concluded that the reason the head of a man's penis is larger than the shaft is to provide the man with more pleasure during sex.
After the results were published, France decided to conduct their own study on the same subject.
They were convinced that the results of the British study were incorrect.
After three years of research at a cost of in excess of 2 million Euros, the French researchers concluded that the head of a man's penis is larger than the shaft to provide the woman with more pleasure during sex.
When the results of the French study were released, Australia decided to conduct their own study.
The Aussies didn't really trust British or French studies.
So, after nearly three hours of intensive research and a cost of right around 75 dollars (three cases of beer), the Aussie study was complete.
They concluded that the reason the head on a man's penis is larger than the shaft is to prevent your hand from flying off the end and hitting you in the forehead.
English
@ArchetypeTheory The case made by the prosecution against Derek Chauvin had zero legal merit, too.
English
Breaking news on Dalton's Case!
Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly case update
Affidavit of Complaint just made public. Andrew Branca (self-defense law attorney) breakdown:
• No racial slur alleged. Zero. The state's affidavit contains not one word of Eatherly provoking Fox with a slur. That was the biggest threat to his self-defense claim. Gone.
• Affidavit describes zero criminal conduct. Not one sentence states what Eatherly did that was unlawful.
• "Verbal altercation" is not a crime. At most a misdemeanor that would apply equally to both men. Neither is charged with it.
• "Bladed stance" is not a crime. Taking a defensive posture against an angry antagonist is legal.
• "Reached for his firearm" is not a crime. Preparing to defend yourself is legal.
• "A physical altercation ensued" is written in passive voice. The state does not allege Eatherly started it. By omission, the inference points to Fox as the initiator.
• "Discharged his firearm, striking Fox multiple times" is not inherently unlawful. Thousands of lawful self-defense shootings fit this exact description annually.
• Ricocheting rounds near bystanders is not a crime absent recklessness. The affidavit alleges no recklessness. Police miss roughly 70% of shots in lawful shootings.
• Lawful self-defense shots are, as a matter of law, not reckless.
• Affidavit does not contest any element of self-defense. Not Innocence, Imminence, Proportionality, Avoidance, or Reasonableness. Not a single one.
• Charges: attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, employing a firearm during a dangerous felony.
• Branca's verdict: "Hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance." Sees no realistic path to conviction beyond a reasonable doubt on these facts.
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow
WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman
English
@mrssmith2018 @libsoftiktok Oh wow.
An op-ed.
You really got her this time.
English
BREAKING: Mamdani is now reportedly meeting with CEOs and begging them to stay in NY following reports of a mass exodus of companies from NY after he practically declared war on the rich
English
@lifesoeasy @AJBayatpour “Either you believe that access to the American taxpayer’s wallet is a universal human right or you’re a bad person”
Ok your terms are acceptable
English
@AJBayatpour The only conclusion you can draw based on the comments under this post is that Conservatives are bad people.
English
More than 7,000 documented non-citizens in Wisconsin will no longer be eligible for food stamps, starting July 1.
That includes refugees, asylees and victims of human trafficking. Advocates worry this will strain food pantries already stretched thin:
cbs58.com/news/non-citiz…
English
@Leigha_Sapienti Why is her Fortnite character’s hair visible??? Harlot!!
English
The clerk has entered default on the court docket as of this morning.
Meaning Frogan has officially lost her lawsuit with Ethan Klein due to default.
Leigha Sapienti@Leigha_Sapienti
These are Twitch Streamer Frogan's statements on the default motion filed by Ethan Klein's lawyers. Clip number 1 is her comment last night after the motion update occurred on x. She was camera-free, playing Fortnite while saying she was fine and that life happens. Later on in the stream (clip number 2), she states that she will not be commenting on the update and that there is a bunch of speculation.
English
Put rice in rice cooker. Cook rice. Eat.
Taylor Lorenz@TaylorLorenz
This is bc they do not have the time or capacity to create home cooked meals. It’s an issue countless ppl have tried to raise w leftists but big leftists online continue to shame/abuse poor ppl for being forced to rely on these services for meals, which act as a tax on the poor
English
@Darkilla12 @hayasaka_aryan They destroyed their forests and arable land. No one took that from them. They did that to themselves. So it’s not anyone else’s responsibility to fix it for them.
You consider them to be as children?? And everyone else must help? Shame on you. They’re a sovereign nation.
English
@hayasaka_aryan Who made water and food not a human right, oh yeah America and Israel voted against that. Crazy those countries seem to be all for the people they represent. Who cares about the rest of the world. Not America or Israel
English
They killed all the white people and now they’re forever trapped in an island full of cannibal war lords and they have to eat literal dirt. If that’s not divine punishment idk what it is
Redd@ReddCinema
Haitians actually eat dirt cookies, they called bonbon tè. Women go and buy sacks of dirt, often on credit, and mix them with a bit of fat and salt 😋
English