Jan Reimers

@pickover @jn3008 Can matter get through? Can information get through?

Mathematics. Geometry. Tunnel, or wormhole, to a parallel universe. By @jn3008, jn3008.com, Used with permission.

@chh02416057 @codek_tv 👍🎯Also my question.

@codek_tv Isn't this a chaotic mouvement?

Rolling Wheel Pendulum

@Johhny22052135 @mathhub_vn 🎯🎯

@mathhub_vn 13... real value, 12w +1 and 12w^2+1, w being cube roots of unity

Math Test: If you solve this, you're different

👀

@MBAeconomics1 🎯🎯This is the essence of fiscal dominance. Gold should when rates rise ... and also when rates are forced down with QE. Right now the trading algo machines on Wall St. only understand 1/2 of this story.

The reason why Federal Reserve raising rates is actually BULLISH for #gold is that it raises the USA’s interest exp. The USA has $40T in debt and the yearly interest exp. is approaching $1.5T per year. The USA only collects $5T in taxes. The insolvency risk benefits gold.

@mathemetica Wow! right? You can make it even bigger by expanding the determinant of the metric tensor in each of the last three terms. 🤣 And then there is the 10D string theory version where all indices range from 0 to 9.

Einstein’s field equations (with cosmological constant) in fully expanded form. Gμν + Λgμν = 8πG/c⁴ Tμν The large panel below shows the complete coordinate expansion of the Einstein tensor Gμν expressed entirely in terms of the metric tensor gαβ and its first- and second-order partial derivatives - the explicit differential equations at the heart of general relativity.

Comex Digital Silver Up $16 in six days. Down $13 in less than two days.

@piit79 @Math_files Yes it certainly does. It hints a fast algo for finding large primes ... but unfortunately it is not.

@EntanglementEnt @Math_files But... but... It feels a lot less magical if it applies to all these ordinary odd numbers and not just primes :)

All odd prime numbers can be expressed as the difference of two squares uniquely. For Example: 3 = 2² - 1² 5 = 3² - 2² 7 = 4² - 3² ... ... ...

@PhilosophyOfPhy 👍The wave function in QM is also not directly observable (and never will be?). But it always gets the right answer.

Should science believe in invisible things if they explain visible facts better than anything else? Ludwig Boltzmann’s story begins with a bold idea: heat is not a substance. Heat is motion. In the 19th century, scientists already had equations for heat, pressure, temperature, and entropy. But Boltzmann wanted to know what was happening underneath. He argued that these visible effects came from the motion of countless atoms and molecules. A cup of tea may look calm, but at the microscopic level it is chaos. Molecules are rushing, colliding, and exchanging energy nonstop. You cannot follow every molecule, but you can understand the crowd. Temperature comes from their average motion. Pressure comes from their tiny impacts. Entropy comes from the many hidden arrangements that can produce the same visible state. The problem was that atoms could not yet be seen directly. Some major scientists, including Ernst Mach and Wilhelm Ostwald, resisted the idea. Their attitude was basically: “Atoms? Have you seen one?” Boltzmann’s answer was simple but powerful: if an invisible model explains the visible world better than anything else, it deserves to be taken seriously. That question still lives in modern physics. We talk about quarks, fields, neutrinos, dark matter, and wavefunctions, things we do not see directly, but trust because they explain what we do see. Boltzmann was attacked because his evidence lived below human eyesight. History proved him right: reality does not owe us visibility.

@LensScientific The speed of light is just too damn slow!

The Fermi Paradox asks a simple question: if the universe is so vast and likely filled with intelligent life, why haven’t we found any sign of it?

@SemperVigilant1 @zerohedge

@zerohedge Started at the LBMA

Did Comex catch fake China silver bars?

@TruePatriotsGo @Math_files Thanks TP. You are a math buff ... awesome.

@EntanglementEnt @Math_files Good catch. True.

@pickover Is the hotel still full if one guest leaves Hilbert's hotel?

Mathematics. The Woman, the Finger, and the Circle: A Math Puzzle that Will Make You Question Everything. "Does a circle with one point removed have fewer points than the original circle? Is it still a circle?"

@pmbug @potassium_phd 👍 My amateur plan is to keep $ back for three tranches. I usually wait patiently (especially for silver 😂) before jumping in on the 2nd tranche and often miss it before price goes back up ... which is also fine.

@potassium_phd "Yes, I bought the dip. If it dips more I’ll buy more." Yes, I'll post it again. I doubt it'll be the last time either.

Silver 🥈 — wicked down to $76.84 overnight 🎯 Called this four days ago👇👇 Thought it would come a bit sooner than it did. What’s a couple days when the whole strategy is to buy the dips and do nothing? 🤷🏼‍♂️ Keep it simple. Silver is back in an uptrend. Pullbacks are normal. $76.84 is a new higher low after making a new higher higher. $61 ➡️ $83 $83 ➡️ $71 $71 ➡️ $89 $89 ➡️ $76 $76 ➡️ …$96? Yes, I bought the dip. If it dips more I’ll buy more. When $96? Maybe June, maybe July. Hardly matters. Buy silver, do nothing 🧘🏼‍♂️🥈 For the good of the order 🫡

@Macrobysunil I contend that the Wall St. trading machines are understanding the gold/bonds relationship precisely backwards.

The bond selloff has started to hit Gold again today. The impact is still less intense compared to the previous leg, but the message is clear: Gold is not completely ignoring rising yields anymore. When yields push higher and Gold starts reacting, it usually means the macro pressure is slowly leaking into precious metals. This doesn’t break the long-term structure, but it does confirm one thing: Gold is entering a more sensitive zone where reserve selling starts to matter again.

Students are taught that any number raised to the zero power equals 1, and that zero raised to any positive power equals 0. However, many mathematicians consider 0⁰ to be undefined. If you try to graph xʸ, you’ll notice a discontinuity at the point (0, 0). The discussion about the value of 0⁰ is quite old, and the controversy around it was especially intense throughout the nineteenth century.

@mathemetica 👍 Why are Euler and Gauss often depicted wearing funny hats? 😅

Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777–1855) derived the exact value of cos(2π/17) This remarkable expression was part of his proof that a regular 17-gon is constructible with compass and straightedge; one of the great achievements in the history of mathematics. cos(2π/17) = [-1 + √17 + √(34 - 2√17) + 2√17 + 3√17 - √(34 - 2√17) - 2√34 + 2√17] / 16

@SolvingForZ ln(exp(20))

Math test 🤯 comment your answer 💯