Elliott Rushforth
17.1K posts

Elliott Rushforth
@Erushforth1
Sessional coach at Pro Player Centres |UEFA C Coach| Sports Coach/PE Teacher at Lambrook School
Bracknell Katılım Şubat 2012
1.6K Takip Edilen863 Takipçiler

@CoachRobPorter @BreakthruSoccer @CoachingAt @SessionShareNet @JustcoachMD @CoachResources8 @cutinside @HubFcc @FAgeCoaching @CraigRudders @JB_SoccerCoach @coach_kevin_m I firmly believe you can run any session with any age group as long as you adapt it and use appropriate language for the context 🙏🏻⚽️
English

@CoachingAt delivered this practice recently, and a few days later, I watched Oxford United's first team run a variation!
My U19s loved it, then I used it with U8s on Wednesday, and, with some patience it worked well with them.
Great outcomes on playing forward & forward runs.



English

@The_CoachingLab So true when delivering pe lessons my first consideration is how can I make this a game or something fun and competitive
English

@AbamiBoy @Wanalyst007 @JoeCummuskey So why did they check it all then ? That’s clearly not what happened lol
English


@StefanBrown4 @poculumwinecup This would be fair enough but the audio shows they aren’t just looking at that the keeper is my point. If the keeper is the only relevant part then why are they discussing other fouls
English

@Erushforth1 @poculumwinecup The thing is Ell, you’re argument makes a lot of sense if you’ve not watched any football this year and also don’t accept that the goal keeper is always and has always been the one they’ve focused on in situations like these. By every metric of this season, it’s the correct call
English

A lot of people were crying about the holding infringements. The referee looked at them and said "that's nothing". This aligns with how they've officiated set pieces for 99% of the season.
The 44 ⚽️@The_Forty_Four
The full VAR audio of West Ham's disallowed goal against Arsenal 👀🍿
English

@poculumwinecup @StefanBrown4 Maybe not but if your checking it all show the whole clip or stipulate what you are checking for, makes it clearer for everyone imo
English

@Erushforth1 @StefanBrown4 By Trossard? I'm not convinced he'd have given it anyway but fair point.
English

@poculumwinecup @StefanBrown4 The replay they show doesn’t show the main foul is my point. They are better off clearly stipulating we think there is a foul on the keeper and that’s it. Makes it easier for everyone to understand
English

@Erushforth1 @StefanBrown4 There's no doubt that they're all fouls. The point I'm making is English referees have given defenders license to hold from set-pieces for the entire season. The fact he even gets to see a replay and still says "that's nothing" says it all!
English

@AbamiBoy @Wanalyst007 @JoeCummuskey Oh right and Trossard was lol the audio released yesterday is brilliant because it shows that they did see other stuff going on and chose to ignore it
English

@Erushforth1 @Wanalyst007 @JoeCummuskey Pablo wasn’t challenging for a ball. He just wanted to prevent the keeper from catching it and he achieved his aim. Unfortunately for him what he did is illegal 😂😂
English

@StefanBrown4 Most people aren’t saying it’s not a foul; questioning the logic of why other fouls are ‘irrelevant’ is what I don’t get. Pablo is only there because Trossard he dragging/holding him the whole time so just curious why that’s not significant?
English

@Erushforth1 I can’t keep arguing over a call that was a stone wall foul cuz you rivals just hate us 😂 it’s actually mental lol
English

@JoeCummuskey Laughable saying they aren’t also fouls lol
English

@StefanBrown4 You could quite easily say that Pablo being held the whole time is relevant as he’s the player on the attacking team that’s challenging for the ball.
English

@Erushforth1 It’s coz he’s the one directly impacted. If saliba came and headed it away I’m sure VAR would have looked at Rice and given that as a pen. That’s exactly how it’s been reffed all year
English

@AbamiBoy @Wanalyst007 @JoeCummuskey Yeah I can think and it doesn’t make you more intelligent to just jump on the opinions that suit what benefits your team lol. You could just as easily say that Pablo is significant as he’s the west ham player immediately challenging for the ball and his held well before
English

@Erushforth1 @Wanalyst007 @JoeCummuskey None of the other ‘fouls’ are relevant or obvious as the one on the keeper cos the ball was coming to the keeper and he would’ve easily caught it if he wasn’t being grabbed and tugged at. It’s not rocket science mate ffs can you think ???
English

@StefanBrown4 That’s the point how can you then pinpoint one. Not being thick lol I just don’t get how that is ok but raya being weak is the one given
English

@Erushforth1 I bet you if I showed you a slow motion video of every single corner this year I could pick out 5 fouls that could be given either way. The league need to look at it next season but can’t start in game week 36 let’s not be intentionally thick
English

@MiguelDelaney Apart from the fact that the player closest to raya is also fouled before this
English

@AbamiBoy @Wanalyst007 @JoeCummuskey Where in the laws of the game does it say ignore all clear fouls if the keeper gets touched lol and those fouls happen well before this anyway
English

@Erushforth1 @Wanalyst007 @JoeCummuskey Foul on the goalkeeper supersedes everything else especially as the ball was going to literally land in his hands if he wasn’t being impeded
English

@HandofArsenal Sharing stills when Pablo is being held and rice is holding two players before the ball arrives lol
English

@JoeCummuskey @Wanalyst007 Arsenal fans are hence the sharing of stuff lol and pablo is being held by Gabriel and trossard not looking an the ball the whole time so why is one ok and the other not is what I don’t get
English

@Erushforth1 @Wanalyst007 The foul happens on Raya first so the ref has to give the first foul committed…. Even so I’m not bothered in the slightest if people think it is or isn’t a pen😊
English






