Salty𓀡 𓊗

इतना कुछ कर ही रहे हैं तो रेगिस्तान की रेत के अंदर चलने वाली पनडुब्बी भी ले ही आइये मंत्री जी, कुछ भला मेरे राजस्थान का भी हो जाएगा🤔

@chixxsays To ab IT celliye kah rahe hai ki mileage giri hai. lekin utni nahi giri jitni bata rahe hai.

Sourav Joshi follows Dhruv Rathee and likes almost all of his anti government posts That’s why he is openly lying on his channel by claiming that his car’s mileage has dropped

केजरीवाल तो जो है वो है ही। तुम जो देशवासियों के साथ खुलेआम धोखाधड़ी कर रहे हो उसका क्या? पैसे देकर तक लोगों को तेल के नाम पर क्या मिल रहा है किसी को नहीं पता। भ्रष्टाचार के ऐसे तरीके निकाले हैं जो कांग्रेस का बाप नहीं सोच पाया था।

@amitsurg 2019 se vote kar raha hu. Har election me BJP ko vote diya hai. Lekin tum log to hamari gadi me mutne lage bc

@Evil__Salty Pappu ka pilla

Neither is Gadkari, it’s not his ministry that decided on ethanol blending. The policy was started by UPA and it is a correct policy. Just because sugar factory owners are benefiting from it, doesn’t mean it’s a conflict of interest.

@amitsurg Gadkari ka tatta

@Evil__Salty Tera baap hai mf

क्या हमारी गाड़ियां नितिन गडकरी जी और हरदीप पुरी जी के मंत्रालयों के अधिकारियों के "बाप की संपत्ति हैं", जिन पर उन्होंने हमारी इजाज़त के बिना एक्सपेरिमेंट किया? #EthanolScam BETA BADHAO YOJNA Via @Lallanpost youtu.be/_scxP-PUxTY?si…

@_kumbhkaran Paragraph me se answer likhna hai.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

A minister admits his sons make about ₹100 crores a year on a policy he has driven, THIS IS CONFLICT OF INTEREST! Also do you know our INDIA even imports ETHANOL ! What nonsense is this! Nitin Gadkari ji BETA BADHAO YOJNA #EthanolScam

Considering the powers and position you hold in the government, if you have anything above 0% share in ethanol production, then it's a clear breach of "Separattion of Duties".

@RShivshankar How E20 petrol is better than E0?

WHY DENY CHOICE? WHY NOT ALLOW MOTORISTS TO USE E10, E0? PETROLEUM MINISTER HARDEEP PURI: "Choice has to be to something better."..."I have never heard of choice being asked for to go back into something which is more toxic." Rahul Shivshankar: But critics point to Brazil. Brazil gives a choice. Hardeep Singh Puri: Yes, Brazil gives a choice but between E27 and higher Segments. Not the other way round.

@MeghUpdates This is like giving master level lectures to 10th grade students and claim as achievement.

This is a big achievement! 🇮🇳 India has achieved its 20% ethanol blending target **five years ahead of schedule**! From rolling out E20 material-compatible vehicles in April 2023 to fully E20 engine-compatible vehicles with minimum RON 95 standards from April 2025 — a massive win for 1.18 crore farmers and saved the country more than ₹1 lakh crore in foreign exchange through reduced oil imports. the ethanol industry, reduced crude imports, and India’s energy security.

@JaipurDialogues Why pay extra? Govt is already making so much profit. Look at the crude oil price and petrol price in neighbour countries. No need to pay extra.

Consumer should be given an option for E20 or Pure Fuel Even if he needs to pay extra for Pure Fuel

Double engine model!

हर पोस्टर पर मोदी का चेहरा होता है। हर काम का श्रेय मोदी को मिलता है। अधूरे राम मंदिर का उद्घाटन मोदी ने किया। राम मंदिर में चंपत राय को मोदी ने बिठाया। इसलिए 'चंदा चोरी' का श्रेय भी मोदी को ही मिलेगा।

@Tushar15 To E20 mat becho, hamne thodi manga tha. Petrol me milavat kar rahe hai aur 4 options ka infra nahi hai. Dalle chup ho ja.

Bro wants four petrol options at a single petrol pump. Next, bro will order petrol on the rocks with salted peanuts. 😀

@RShivshankar agar E20 petrol se nuksan nahi ho raha to gadi E10 aur E20 compatible hai kahkar kyu bech rahe ho? gadi E20 compatible kahkar bech rahe ho iska matlab jo gadi E20 compatible nahi hai usko nuksan ho raha hai.

THE E20 DEBATE: FACTS VS HYPOCRISY. HERE'S AN UNDENIABLE FACT: The E20 programme did not begin under the Modi government. Ethanol blending was approved years earlier, during the UPA. The difference is in execution. Blending remained stuck at roughly 1–1.5% for years before accelerating significantly under the NDA. So, let's first get the politics out of the way. If ethanol blending was acceptable in principle then, why is it suddenly portrayed as anti-people now? Now, let's look at the arguments being presented by critics: CRITICS ARGUMENT 1: E20 FUEL IS BEING PUSHED BY NDA TO KEEP SUGAR CANE FARMERS HAPPY. There's no doubt Ethanol is creating an additional income stream for sugarcane farmers. But governments have always handed out subsidies or incentives to farmers. + MSP exists for 23 crops. Sugar cane farmers get SAP or State Advised Price. + Fertiliser subsidies. + Cheap or free electricity. + Irrigation subsidies. + Procurement policies. If these benefits to farmers are accepted as legitimate public policy, why is E20 policy being targeted in isolation for market distortion? CRITICS ARGUMENT 2: ETHANOL PRODUCTION IS WATER CONSUMING. Yes, sugarcane consumes a great deal of water. But so do + Paddy cultivators. Just look at the tumbling water tables in Punjab, Haryana. + AI and data centers. + Semiconductor manufacturing. + Steel and cement production. The question is not whether something uses water, but whether the benefits justify the costs. Again why are critics holding E20 alone to a test that they don't set for others? CRITICS ARGUMENT 3: THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT MAKE E20 MANDATORY. LEAVE IT TO CHOICE. We're in a democracy and choice matters. But governments routinely make decisions that we, the people have no choice but to accept. + Taxation rates + Emission norms. + Fuel quality standards. + Safety regulations. + Identity Proof. These are often choices imposed to achieve broader national goals. Shouldn't E20 should be judged in the same way? Here's how E20 usage serves NATIONAL INTEREST: + India imports 85–90% of its crude oil. E20 seeks to address that by replacing up to 20% of petrol volume with domestically produced ethanol, helping diversify the fuel mix and reducing import costs. + With E20 NDA estimates saving Rs 1 lakh crore in foreign-exchange. CRITICS ARGUMENT 4: COST OF CAR ENGINE WEAR AND TEAR, MILEAGE INEFFICIENCY OUTWEIGHS BENEFITS. It is true that Ethanol has about 34% less energy per litre than petrol. But because E20 contains only 20% ethanol, the overall energy content of the fuel falls by roughly 4%–7%. So at 5% a car that gives 20 km/L on pure petrol will give 19km/L. But usage also improves air quality. Which increases longevity in humans and lowers healthcare costs over time. That is s fair trade-off. CONCLUSION: Every policy is a trade off. E20 isn't perfect. But if agricultural subsidies, procurement, irrigation policy and fuel regulations are accepted as legitimate public policy, then judge ethanol using the same yardstick.

@rishibagree bhikhariyo se kyu compare karna? China se karo.

Per Capita Income reality check: 2014 → 🇮🇳 $1,550 🇵🇰 $1,460 (Gap: only $90) 2026 → 🇮🇳 $3,060 🇵🇰 $1,510 (Gap: $1,550 - exactly 2x) Congress kept India and Pakistan at the same level for decades. The difference after 2014 is impossible to ignore.

@JaipurDialogues Kitne sal se ek promis kar raha hai bhosdika

Positive News but will it really happen….

@amitmalviya Pure petrol ka option dedo bhosdiwalo

The outrage over E20 fuel is driven more by politics than facts. Ethanol blending in India has never been a sudden switch. It has been a carefully phased transition over the years: • E10 rollout began in phases and became the nationwide standard. • E12/E15 levels were introduced progressively in several regions. • E16 and E18 followed as blending levels increased in a calibrated manner. • E20 has now been introduced in a phased manner, not overnight. This means the ethanol content in petrol has increased gradually over the years, not in one dramatic jump. So, those claiming their car’s mileage has suddenly collapsed or that their vehicle has suddenly developed problems because of ethanol-blended fuel are making a claim that simply doesn’t align with how the rollout has actually happened. If a vehicle has been running on progressively higher ethanol blends for years, blaming E20 for an abrupt overnight change is political opportunism, not evidence-based argument. Facts matter. Fearmongering doesn’t.