Evan Clark

63 posts

Evan Clark

Evan Clark

@Evn_Clark

Katılım Ağustos 2009
86 Takip Edilen7 Takipçiler
Evan Clark
Evan Clark@Evn_Clark·
@PedroRivie95096 @MuseZack No, but I'd like to visit some day. Well wherever you are you should be getting something for shilling the Kremlin line so diligently.
English
1
0
5
158
Zack Stentz
Zack Stentz@MuseZack·
I'm reading about the Two Ocean Navy Act of 1940 & how the fleet needed to defeat Germany & Japan was already under construction when Pearl Harbor happened & from today's perspective it's impossible to imagine America's political establishment being that strategic & prescient.
English
44
92
1.3K
46.8K
Pedro Riviera
Pedro Riviera@PedroRivie95096·
@MuseZack "keeping missiles out of Ukraine and Ukraine out of NATO was off the table"
English
1
0
1
355
mamamo
mamamo@mothemama2·
@Evn_Clark @yacineMTB Talking to a professional because I enjoy spending my days with my kids? 🤔
English
1
0
1
59
kache
kache@yacineMTB·
You should send your kids to daycare by the way
English
134
2
217
256.4K
Evan Clark
Evan Clark@Evn_Clark·
@mothemama2 @yacineMTB I would consider talking to a mental health professional. Taking a day away from your children should not be heartbreaking.
English
1
0
3
68
mamamo
mamamo@mothemama2·
@yacineMTB Why would you have kids just to have someone else raise them? I’ve left my kids twice in 3 years. Once was to have my second baby (2 days in hospital.) and one was for an emergency appendectomy. Back the next evening. Both absolutely mandatory and heartbreaking.
English
1
0
1
872
Evan Clark
Evan Clark@Evn_Clark·
@IterIntellectus "if you love them and attend to them they'll barely cry". Opinion discarded.
English
0
0
0
26
vittorio
vittorio@IterIntellectus·
"sleep training" a newborn means letting a defenseless baby scream for its mother in the dark until it's either exhausted or has given up on life. the attachment literature is clear that before 6 months, a baby crying with nobody coming learns exactly one thing, that calling for help doesn't work and you even have parents bragging about how they tortured their kid into an 8h sleep you need to attend to every need of your child. they don't have a prefrontal cortex able to understand what's happening. if you love them and care for them, they'll barely cry, and when they do there's a clear reason you can address right away
English
1.3K
1.9K
28.9K
3.2M
Evan Clark
Evan Clark@Evn_Clark·
@domplerhotline You said it's a skit. So I assume you're unbothered by the mom's eating disorder because you think it's like a costume that she changes out of when the skit is done.
English
1
0
0
412
wells
wells@skin2skin2bones·
how could u possibly feel comfortable broadcasting ur mom’s obvious eating disorder this way
English
143
535
47.3K
3.9M
Evan Clark
Evan Clark@Evn_Clark·
@EvansRyan202 I think it's impossible to engage with these people, they're not acting in good faith. Best to just ignore them at this point, you've addressed they're arguments. They'll never be satisfied.
English
0
0
7
438
Ryan Evans
Ryan Evans@EvansRyan202·
People are doing worse to Brad than they are to me, posting pictures of his family, home, address, and where they think he parks his car at work. This is completely inexcusable and can only be interpreted as threats to the safety of Brad and his family. Any direct or veiled threats against safety are vile and inexcusable.
Andrew Gross@grossap

It doesn't matter if you think Brad Duplessis embodies everything that is wrong with the Army, or if you think Cynical Publius is a giant clown, if your reaction towards their statements is to send them veiled threats, then it's you that is the problem.

English
13
14
151
18.4K
Bojan Tunguz
Bojan Tunguz@tunguz·
@Noahpinion Because you are only paying attention to the success stories.
English
5
0
9
1.1K
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
When you argue with anti-vaxxers, what they do most of the time is a sort of feint, a rearguard maneuver, where when they get debunked, they move on to some qualification that shows that leaves them vulnerable to accusations of being inept and unqualified. The example of 'We need trials in vaccine-naïve kids' speaks to this. What anti-vaxxers are suggesting is that there might be some sort of interaction. But obviously if the new vaccine ends up fine and harm signals don't emerge for the earlier, widely-adopted vaccine, then there's nothing to worry about. So, why do they worry if there's obviously nothing to worry about? I really think it's because they haven't thought through, or might find it too hard to understand, the methodological point they're missing. Say a population universally vaccinates with safe-vaccine 1. When we go to estimate the effects of novel vaccine 2, V2, the placebo group's log risk model is \alpha + \beta_{V1}. (And given V1 was tested against an inert placebo, we \beta_{V1} = lower risk than \beta_{V0}). The treated group, on the other hand, has risk \alpha + \beta_{V1}+\beta_{V2}+\beta{V1,V2}! The estimated log-relative risk that trial-runners have access to is \beta_{V2}+\beta{V1,V2}! You effectively absorb the interaction variance into the point-estimate for V1, which has no or little variance because of widespread adoption. This means interactions are formally inestimable unless you stop vaccinating kids and seek out samples of the unvaccinated to randomized on--highly unethical--but it also reassures, because it means that whatever the interaction effects, they must not be meaningful, because we keep seeing new vaccines work. If there were big, negative interactions, vaccines would either need to be so beneficial as to overcome them, or we would see the effects. Is it realistic that they'd just overcome any interactive harms? Not really. Why would, for example, producing antibodies against hepatitis B interact with producing antibodies against COVID? Cross-reactivity is very easy to elicit and test for experimentally, and when it does show up, we tend to become aware of it. Because of all this and the fact that adoption has been widespread, we know that there are, at most, extremely minute interactions, and more likely from a biological plausibility and effect size angle, none.
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil

The funniest cope about this is that you need to do trials in vaccine-naive children. But what's the argument here? That we should take some kids and not vaccinate them normally so we can test vaccines? We already know there aren't interactions, so what's the point? Death?

English
7
7
73
19.2K
Philippe Lemoine
Philippe Lemoine@phl43·
@Evn_Clark @CTankie1917 I'm sure that's true, but I'm not really interested in what the market thinks right now, I'm more interested in what it will think in a few days and I think information on much oil is moving through the strait right now is relevant for that.
English
3
0
1
289
Evan Clark
Evan Clark@Evn_Clark·
@phl43 @CTankie1917 My understanding is that irregardless of current oil flows the price drop is the market signaling they think Trump will make a deal soon. So even if nothing was coming through now, they think that won't be the case in the near future.
English
1
0
0
276
Philippe Lemoine
Philippe Lemoine@phl43·
@CTankie1917 I understand that but surely how much oil is currently flowing through the strait is relevant to that, as it tells you something about Iranian behavior and capabilities, for instance.
English
1
0
6
1.3K
Ryan Evans
Ryan Evans@EvansRyan202·
He was talking about when the invasion operation would run out of offensive potential. And he was right! Dead on actually. It culminated later that month.
Ami@uppal_aminder

@MrKevinRothrock I'll be skeptical of Koffman's "predictions"

English
13
19
750
70.3K
Big Boris
Big Boris@BigBoris_2·
Gonna be honest, I don’t think you guys are virtue signaling your way out of this one. You guys completely embarrassed yourselves last night, and normal Americans think you’re all psychopaths.
Brian Allen@allenanalysis

Mark Kelly staring down Donald Trump was pure indictment. No applause. No fake respect. No playing along. Just the look of someone sick of hearing immigrants turned into enemies. That stare was every person with a conscience in that room.

English
320
588
12.7K
267.6K
Evan Clark
Evan Clark@Evn_Clark·
@BlueRepublik Oh they knew, they just threw the dice and lost anyway. Pre-war German analysis was that the red army had to be destroyed before it withdrew across the Dnieper. Their logistics would not sustain them past that point.
English
0
0
2
34
🔰Chief Georgist Shill 🔰
🔰Chief Georgist Shill 🔰@BlueRepublik·
Perhaps the number one reason Hitler’s campaign against Russia failed was because they were really bad at calculating the necessary logistics
English
3
2
63
1.7K
Evan Clark
Evan Clark@Evn_Clark·
@shortmagsmle Esprit de corps tends to be pretty high when the spreadsheet boys build a system that puts a USS Baskin Robbins in every task force.
English
0
1
60
1.5K