Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️

@UFOTofu42 Just this one theguardian.com/australia-news…

@ExposingNV curious, has there been any significant wins for the antivax cookers over all the cases you've been aware of?

Well I thought all of the court challenges to COVID vaccine mandates were done and dusted! Boy was I wrong One more case to go! This one is being heard in the QLD Civil and Administrative Tribunal as a human rights case

@AshBinAus No unfortunately

@ExposingNV Interesting. From the brief explanation you've shared this over looks a bit more strategic, well managed and focused than some of the others. Do you know when it's being heard?

@josiegirl62 @tweeter_vee @MumOfEliNoah33 @cptcapt Alex is missing the point entirely. A bunch of people on Twitter have met him, some more than once. But 99% of those people want nothing to do with him now. Perhaps Alex should reflect on why that is…

@tweeter_vee @MumOfEliNoah33 @cptcapt I won’t deny staying at his house and helping with the #istandwithdan campaign, and going to the party. That’s also where I met Pat. She is lovely.

Give up loser. Alex I bring receipts you bring the intellectual abilities of an IQ of 60 (sixty)

I am not dealing with this again.

@cptcapt “I have more photos” Yikes. That is clearly a threat. Threatening women - what scum

Alex is so stupid he can't provide evidence of his claims. As for the comment about the picture window, LOL you claim to be a "Interior architect" and you can't even design a simple floor plan. See the 3 highlighted doors on the first floor simply open and drop to the ground 😄

@cptcapt Is the tradie mate in the room with us now?

Don't take financial advice from Clowns who don't put a $ in front of a number when talking about money.

Former Senator Rod Culleton fined AGAIN for giving a false statutory declaration on his election nomination form “Culleton, who represented himself, gave contradictory explanations for his false declaration”

Just in! Judgment in the Tickle v Giggle appeal will be delivered this Friday!

🚨 The federal judge’s order dismissing Andrew and Tristan Tate’s $50 million lawsuit against Meta is absolutely scathing. Some of the most brutal passages: The judge says the Tates’ complaint quoted sections of Meta’s terms of service that apparently did not even exist in the documents they cited: “the quoted language is not included in the Terms of Use attached as Exhibit A to the Complaint as represented.” And during oral argument, the judge says the Tates’ lawyers could not explain where the language came from: “Plaintiffs were unable to identify how that error was included in the Complaint or where the quoted language came from.” It gets worse. The judge describes: “many minutes of silence while Plaintiffs' counsel scrolled through all the potentially relevant documents on his computer” trying to find support for their claims during oral argument. The court ultimately concluded: “Plaintiffs have no good faith basis for this assertion.” The judge also dismantled the Tates’ First Amendment arguments, stating plainly: “Meta is a private actor and thus its conduct constitutes private abridgement of speech to which the First Amendment does not apply.” And regarding allegations of government coordination: “Plaintiffs conceded their vague allegations were insufficient to allege Meta acted in concert with a government actor.” The order repeatedly states the lawsuit is barred by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, with the court writing: “Meta’s conduct can be boiled down to deciding whether to exclude material that third parties seek to post online, and is therefore immune from liability under section 230.” Perhaps most damagingly, the judge cites Rule 11 standards regarding frivolous filings and factual support, writing: “Plaintiffs’ oral argument statements reveal neither they nor their counsel have a factual basis” for major allegations in the lawsuit. The case was dismissed without leave to amend, meaning the court concluded amendment would be futile. This is not just a loss for the Tates - it is one of the most brutal judicial rejections you will ever see in a high-profile influencer lawsuit.

Andrew Tate's silly lies destroyed by community notes

@cptcapt @colonelhogans @blowingtom2 @AJT2010 @BLUEfingers2021 @GutterTwits He also abuses children too - was called out by (then 14-15 year old) Leo for threatening him and also threatening to sue Leo’s dad. Who threatens a child??

Looking forward to @colonelhogans appolgising to my mother. The likes of @blowingtom2 @AJT2010 @BLUEfingers2021 @GutterTwits as members of the gay community can speak of my credibility as an ally. What I will not tolerate is Alex who purposely miss represented what I said 1/3

Oooh the last line 🔥

@ExposingNV 🤣🤣

Just in! ABC has called the Farrer by election for One Nation

#BREAKING 🚨 6 News projects One Nation will win a House of Representatives seat for the first time, defeating the Liberals in tonight's Farrer by-election David Farley leads independent candidate Michelle Milthorpe with a two-candidate-preferred vote of 60% to 40%

@Leo_Puglisi6 @cptcapt Haha that was quite a time

@ExposingNV @cptcapt Remembering the "Morrison will delay the 2022 federal election" talk on here

LOL Lil Alex's bullshit tweet about nothing. He so desperately wants some legal avenue to use for people calling out his stupidity but you are stupid. I'll prove it! There's a church and a shack in the middle of no where, a fibro shack on a flood prone island all of which can't/ won't sell. Welcome you're.

@claychuckyclay The court was convinced an injunction was necessary. If it thought the AEC was jumping the gun, it would not have granted one.

@ExposingNV They couldnt get the authoriser on the phone when they wanted. Just a bit weak really. Yet Bowen is allowed to use Orange coloured signs in a desperate One Nation copy tactic.

Federal Court empowers AEC to take down fake signs targeting independent theage.com.au/politics/feder…