Manny (but dont call me manny)

@xUnrational @UberEats I had this happen once. I had to select that i put in the wrong address/moved addresses for it to be cancelled. I cancelled my membership right there and then and deleted the app. Will never use Uber or Ubereats for any reason again.

@BelugaNeck @jakatak4 @MarioJoos 💯

@jakatak4 @MarioJoos What changed? Your content didn't evolve for the better and instead got worse. Now all you have is mostly hate watchers. Maybe you should do a "Job Hunting Wars" series next?

⚠️IMPORTANT READ: If YouTube doesn’t solve its AI problem quickly, we won’t have many human creators left. (+ research insights) If you’re wondering why it feels like you’re seeing more AI content, and why human creators seem to be disappearing, here are the numbers from a real study by Goldberg and Lam. They analyzed what happened to the stock image market after generative AI was introduced. I’ve added an image showing what the data looked like month by month. Every single month after AI entered the market, 1 in 4 creators exited because the economics stopped working for them. Now, it wasn’t bad for everyone. Total consumption on the platform went up by 39% per month. But sales of human-made content dropped every month. The platform won. The buyers won. The human creators… didn’t. Think about what that would look like on YouTube. AI can already generate scripts, voiceovers, thumbnails, talking-head videos, and entire channels at a fraction of the cost and time it takes a human creator to produce a single video. The algorithm doesn’t care whether a video was made by a person who spent three days filming and editing or by a system that generated it in 20 minutes. This isn’t about being anti-AI. AI helps a lot of creators improve their output. But it is about protecting the type of content people actually want to watch. And I’m not just talking about removing AI slop. I’m talking about making sure human-driven channels are protected and prioritized over AI-driven content. The stock image market already ran the experiment that YouTube hasn’t fully felt yet. Don't ignore that. Here’s my ask to one person: @nealmohan I know you’ve seen some of my work (algorithm, platform changes, etc). I respect what you’re doing for the platform, but this is your moment to stand for human creators. It’s time to put public effort into protecting them. Not just AI labeling or low-lift solutions, they don't solve the problem in a meaningful way. No, we need a genuine, real, and public effort to preserve what YouTube was built on. You’re one of the few people in a position to set a precedent for every platform. Let’s talk. For those interested in the actual research, check out Samuel G. Goldberg and H. Tai Lam's paper called "Generative AI In Equilibrium: Evidence From A Creative Goods Marketplace"

@CODMunityGG Yea I agree. Love playing it but hate watching. I love watching other comp tournies and ranked tho because that’s a true expression of skill if everyone has 95% of the same loadout.

I’m probably going to make enemies just by saying this, but the more the game is close to a traditional BR, the more boring it becomes TO WATCH. If I watch a tourney on the big TV and on my couch after work, I want to see things happening: fights, movement on the map, etc. Not someone holding an angle with a covert Maddox with 2 upgrades and scared about the team that found the level 3 armor. A good BR eSports format has something more than just winning the game

Black Ops Royale custom tourneys are very boring to watch. There’s no economy, no interesting missions, players are just trying to survive with the first guns they find 🤷🏻‍♂️ I really enjoy the mode, especially since solo mode, but as viewer the competitive experience is just boring

That's Troy Polamalu

@bunnyboi0_18 @foreverimbetter thats the joke

@foreverimbetter "It looked artificially flavored" twinkies ARE artificially flavored 😭 this site never gets old

I ain’t seen a soul post this

🤣

@CODMunityGG Gold armor is still too strong otherwise I liked the solos games I played. I’m not a solos player but I love this mode so much I’ve gotten a few games in to practice.

So, what do you think about Black Ops Royale solo mode? I enjoyed all of my games earlier and think it’s really good. Needs more players for sure. Also, what a terrible mistake it was to launch with quads only, the experience has been completely different when you don’t need to rely on randoms. And first impressions are everything in this community

사고는 내가 치고 수습은 주인이 해주길 기다리는 중ㅋ🐶

If I see another tornado thirst trap I’m gonna fucking lose it STOPP

@BearPigCentral Agreed.

After a few days of playing Blackout Avalon and reading people’s thoughts on the mode here I’m going to be honest, other than tweaking loot spawn rates and adding solo’s, I don’t think anything else needs to be changed at all. The mode is good.

@charlieINTEL It's mostly fun. Needs more loot, more upgrade kits, and more revive towers. It's my favorite mode right now and the only reason I'll play the game.

Now that's been a few days, what's your thoughts on Black Ops Royale in Warzone?

@ModernWarzone It’s fun. I like it. I can only find 20 kogots and 50 grapple hooks at every POI though. Should be a tad more loot at small poi’s for regains.

Give me your honest opinions on Black Ops Royale / Blackout 2.0 🤔 Don’t hold back.

@JGODYT Also, the perks not saying anything after you stow them is a bad design choice. Should show up or down arrows or plus or minus with minimal text in inventory for when you’re quickly cycling thru mid fight.

@JGODYT My friends like that you don’t need loadouts. Me personally as the only cod grinder, I think it’s very fun but there’s barely loot besides 4 kogots, 20 grapple hooks and 3 burst pistols at every POI. Need increased loot for sure.

Now that people can play Black Ops Royale, thoughts?

drinking with the only ngga that ever understood me

it been 12 hours and no response

Ready for Marathon

what if we were cutlery taking a nap together