Frederick Gramcko

DNI Tulsi Gabbard confirms an investigation into Anthony Fauci, focusing on alleged perjury and links to gain-of-function funding tied to the Wuhan lab as part of the COVID-19 origins probe.

All the large accounts that present themselves as truth-seeking journalists or commentators, then quote posts like this and act utterly baffled—“What the hell!?” “WTF!?” “What’s going on here???”—are frauds. It took me less than a minute to see what the court documents actually said and understand what they meant. They do not show that the bullet was not fired from the gun. They show only that the bullet was too fragmented to confidently link it to ANY gun. This is not uncommon, and DOES NOT mean the bullet didn’t come from Robinson’s gun. Of course the defense attorneys are going to spin this as evidence that Robinson is innocent. That is what defense attorneys do. They scrape together every possible fragment of doubt and present it as if it were fully exculpatory. It’s not. Defense lawyers are paid to downplay or ignore evidence pointing to guilt, exploit people’s cognitive biases, and make fallacious arguments sound persuasive. This information about the bullet doesn’t erode the case for Robinson’s guilt in any way. It is totally neutral on that front. And it in no way invalidate the mountain of positive and mutually corroborating lines of evidence we do have for Robinson’s guilt. You should expect more from the commentators you follow, and hold them accountable by refusing to give them your attention in the future. If they could not be bothered to spend even one minute checking the facts before spreading confusion to you and millions of others on X, they do not deserve your attention. They are nothing more than grifting engagement farmers.

"We refuse, absolutely, to be the only people in the world which consents to having its fate decided by others." ~ Former Israeli PM Golda Meir.

Candace Owens says she’s ready to testify in Charlie Kirk’s assassination trial to defend Tyler Robinson and prove his innocence. She insists there’s no solid evidence linking him to the shooting, calling Robinson nothing more than a patsy set up by the FBI. “I’m 99.9% sure Tyler Robinson didn’t shoot Charlie Kirk from that rooftop alone.” “My goal is to find Charlie’s real killer.”

🇮🇱 | Israel and the U.S. say they are attacking Iran because of its financing of terrorist groups, including Hamas. Meanwhile, Netanyahu funded Hamas with $35 million a month from Qatar - suitcases filled with U.S. dollars, every single month. Over time, more than $1 billion flowed to the group controlling Gaza. At the same time, his strategy was to keep Gaza under Hamas and the West Bank under Fatah, ensuring Palestinians remained divided and could never unite politically. According to investigators, he described the method himself: confuse them, mislead them, lie to them - and then hit them.

ok now im totally convinced Candace is an op First why go after Nick Shirley at all more importantly, why discredit his work, implying he fakes his news coverage this is fucking wild

WOW🚨: Candace Owens launches a surprising attack on citizen journalist Nick Shirley. In her latest episode, she dismisses his hard-hitting investigative reporting as: • Stupid • Dumb • Completely made up She even mocks him for being a "nice looking white boy" who couldn't possibly infiltrate or expose these stories on the ground. Meanwhile, Shirley's viral video uncovered massive alleged Somali-run daycare fraud in Minnesota — complete with receipts — sparking national outrage, helping push Tim Walz out of politics, freezing federal funding, and prompting congressional scrutiny. One video delivering real results vs. endless commentary with zero impact? The contrast is clear. What is she so JEALOUS about???