FQxI Physics

19.9K posts

FQxI Physics banner
FQxI Physics

FQxI Physics

@FQXi

Exploring the foundations of physics & cosmology with Zeeya Merali & Gabe Fitzpatrick, of the Foundational Questions Institute, FQxI.

At the edge of reality. Katılım Temmuz 2009
5.1K Takip Edilen19.9K Takipçiler
FQxI Physics retweetledi
Ananyo Bhattacharya
'Genuinely new ideas remain beyond the reach of current LLMs, instead leaving the machines to mine the literature for rare gems where humans missed a relatively simple approach. “My guess is we’re about to find out they’re actually not that rare,” says @littmath.' --@sciam story
Ananyo Bhattacharya tweet mediaAnanyo Bhattacharya tweet mediaAnanyo Bhattacharya tweet media
English
2
2
10
725
FQxI Physics retweetledi
Michael Merrifield
Michael Merrifield@AstroMikeMerri·
To out myself in the arXiv debacle, there are references in papers on which I am an author that I *haven’t* read. That’s because some of my work involves things like collaboration with instrumentation specialists, so I devolve sections of the paper in which I’m not an expert. 1/2
English
9
2
143
16.1K
FQxI Physics retweetledi
Crazy Colorz
Crazy Colorz@CrazyColorz5·
@memecrashes This was mentioned in the release article.
Crazy Colorz tweet media
English
0
2
339
21.5K
FQxI Physics retweetledi
FQxI Physics
FQxI Physics@FQXi·
Nicola Jones spoke to arXiv's steward Greg Morrisett on why arXiv is becoming an independent non-profit after 35 years, and how it aims to tackle AI slop.
FQxI Physics tweet media
English
1
0
1
205
FQxI Physics retweetledi
Sabine Hossenfelder
tho the arxiv ban on fake citations also kills jokes like this which is a shame
Sabine Hossenfelder tweet media
English
52
55
848
25.7K
FQxI Physics retweetledi
Mike Aubrey
Mike Aubrey@michaelgaubrey·
Humanities scholars learning entire languages in order to do their research and engage with the secondary literature are horrified everywhere.
Lenka Zdeborova@zdeborova

@eiszett Have you read all the sources you ever cited? During my PhD we, along with dozens of other papers, cited a paper that I later found did not contain the result for which it was commonly cited. I should be banned I guess.

English
19
307
2.6K
200.6K
FQxI Physics retweetledi
FQxI Physics retweetledi
jim does x
jim does x@jimdoesx·
@ReddCinema A, b and c in the Pythagorean theorem
GIF
English
1
81
1.6K
36.8K
FQxI Physics retweetledi
Redd
Redd@ReddCinema·
this is how x, y and z felt after leaving the alphabet and joining mathematics
English
113
4.1K
21.5K
6.4M
FQxI Physics retweetledi
BOOMIE !! 🎵
BOOMIE !! 🎵@boomieboxx·
I've got a scary math joke but i'm 2² to say it
English
352
11.1K
90.1K
1.3M
FQxI Physics retweetledi
we will always choose Earth 🌎
You could not waterboard this out of me 😭 So many PhDs telling us they don't know how to fucking do the thing they're being paid to do which is research
Lenka Zdeborova@zdeborova

@eiszett Have you read all the sources you ever cited? During my PhD we, along with dozens of other papers, cited a paper that I later found did not contain the result for which it was commonly cited. I should be banned I guess.

English
15
352
4.5K
56.9K
FQxI Physics retweetledi
microplastics rectifier
microplastics rectifier@facetedcarapace·
The first step to any research project is a literature review, which includes actually reading the existing papers about your topic of study. This was covered on the first day of my research class in graduate school.
Lenka Zdeborova@zdeborova

@eiszett Have you read all the sources you ever cited? During my PhD we, along with dozens of other papers, cited a paper that I later found did not contain the result for which it was commonly cited. I should be banned I guess.

English
31
696
7.5K
91.1K
FQxI Physics retweetledi
Timothy Gowers @wtgowers
AI has now solved a major open problem -- one of the best known Erdos problems called the unit distance problem, one of Erdos's favourite questions and one that many mathematicians had tried. openai.com/index/model-di…
English
72
595
3.5K
1.4M
FQxI Physics retweetledi
Sam Rodriques
Sam Rodriques@SGRodriques·
I have spent my entire life working on this and thinking about this for the past 4 years. I don't know what will happen in 20 years, but I can promise you that on the 5-10 year timescale, scientists are not out of their jobs. AI is going to massively accelerate the pace of science, increase productivity, let individual scientists make way more discoveries way faster, and is going to make science overall more fun. But the model is going to be collaboration between humans and AI, not replacement. The key difference here between science and e.g. software engineering is that science is not verifiable in any rapid/convenient way (unlike software), unlike programming. We still need humans for their scientific taste.
Dr. Thomas Ichim@exosome

Today we all lost our jobs..... Three Nature papers showing that scientists in the conventional sense are obsolete At least read the first one.... the AI replaced all things that the scientist does .... nature.com/articles/s4158…

English
41
177
1.1K
154.5K
FQxI Physics retweetledi
FQxI Physics
FQxI Physics@FQXi·
Gabriela Frajtag is twenty years old and won the Undergraduate Special Prize in FQxI's $53,000 USD essay competition that asked the question: "How Quantum is Life?"
English
1
3
13
59.9K