Felix Singleton Thorn

744 posts

Felix Singleton Thorn banner
Felix Singleton Thorn

Felix Singleton Thorn

@FSingletonThorn

I manage the data team at Oxfam Australia. On Wurundjeri Country. He/him. Active at https://t.co/Bl2FLdgH9H

Katılım Haziran 2017
734 Takip Edilen713 Takipçiler
Felix Singleton Thorn
Felix Singleton Thorn@FSingletonThorn·
If any data / science / psychology / metascience / etc folks want an invite to the other non-Zuckerberg microblogging site, DM me, I have a few. It’s … mildly better (and at least its CEO doesn’t actively do the opposite of what any competent comms advisor would suggest)
English
0
1
0
469
Felix Singleton Thorn
Felix Singleton Thorn@FSingletonThorn·
@Jake_Elder52 I think running lm on an ordered factor is equivalent to adding a n-th degree polynomial, with n = the number of factor levels (by default)? So the results are not going to be the same, the models are totally different. If you expect a linear relationship just model as numeric?
English
2
0
1
40
Jake Elder
Jake Elder@Jake_Elder52·
I guess it's close enough that perhaps it doesn't make much of a difference Was just kind curious if this would ever make a difference in treating ordered factor vs. numeric as IV
English
1
0
0
295
Jake Elder
Jake Elder@Jake_Elder52·
Someone has a ordered factor with levels [0,20,40,60,80,100]. I recommend they model the IV as an ordered factor with a linear contrast. They ask why they cannot treat as numeric What might differences in est be for an IV treated as ordered factor w/ linear contrast vs. numeric?
Jake Elder tweet media
English
6
1
6
4.3K
Felix Singleton Thorn
Felix Singleton Thorn@FSingletonThorn·
@NickEvershed I can’t believe the degree to which the ABC still relies on the worst kind of clickbait headlines. My favourite example (thankfully about a less serious topic) is practically a parody of itself:
Felix Singleton Thorn tweet media
English
0
0
4
697
Felix Singleton Thorn
Felix Singleton Thorn@FSingletonThorn·
@rogierK When errors were found, they were only updated in the group rows, but the p2…p5 data there was inconsistently filled in, so when data was missing you had to fill it in from the individual pt rows. The stuff of nightmares. 3/3
English
0
0
1
0
Felix Singleton Thorn
Felix Singleton Thorn@FSingletonThorn·
@rogierK If a group had more than 5 pts, they would have multiple group rows. The only way of telling which were “group” rows was if they had pt2…pt5 data, so 6 person groups were… difficult. Worse, this has been done manually, and was internally inconsistent including the pt IDs 2/3
English
1
0
0
0
Anne Scheel
Anne Scheel@annemscheel·
Some news: Just over a month from now I'll be starting as an assistant professor (tenured) in Methodology & Statistics at @UniUtrecht! Hard to contain my excitement about landing at such an amazing place. Looking forward to stealing all your stats teaching materials on here!
GIF
English
36
6
268
0
Felix Singleton Thorn
Felix Singleton Thorn@FSingletonThorn·
Statisticians finally did it! They solved sample size determination!
Felix Singleton Thorn tweet media
English
51
212
3K
0
Felix Singleton Thorn
Felix Singleton Thorn@FSingletonThorn·
(cont.) RRs came out as-if-not-more-highly rated on all outcomes. Caveats come from the fact that this is a naturalistic study comparing a smallish sample of very early RRs against a matched sample, so this is early indicative evidence and is far from the last word on the topic!
English
0
0
3
0
Felix Singleton Thorn
Felix Singleton Thorn@FSingletonThorn·
Our paper comparing Registered Reports vs. traditionally published articles is finally out! The tldr is after getting peer reviews of RRs and a matched sample of traditionally published articles (1/2)
Brian Nosek (@[email protected])@BrianNosek

New in Nature Human Behavior: We had 353 peer reviewers evaluate published Registered Reports versus comparison articles on 19 outcome criteria. We found that RRs were consistently rated higher on rigor and quality. Paper nature.com/articles/s4156… Green OA osf.io/preprints/meta…

English
1
2
12
0
Felix Singleton Thorn
Felix Singleton Thorn@FSingletonThorn·
Academic Twitter achievement unlocked, finally got a “Want to read the article before retweeting” on a paper I wrote
Felix Singleton Thorn tweet media
English
0
0
16
0
Felix Singleton Thorn retweetledi
Wolfgang Viechtbauer
Wolfgang Viechtbauer@wviechtb·
I just pushed a new version of the metafor package (version 3.0-0) to CRAN. This has been long overdue. This version includes a lot of updates that have accumulated in the development version of the package over the past 14-15 months. I will mention some highlights.
English
16
99
353
0
Felix Singleton Thorn retweetledi
Dr Hannah Fraser
Dr Hannah Fraser@HannahSFraser·
Hi folks, if you feel like critiquing the soundness of papers and predicting whether they will replicate I have the activity for you! Come to a @replicats bushel virtual workshop and assess some papers for us in exchange for $200USD grants!
@repliCATSproject@replicats

Hey everyone, we've opened EOIs for our next three bushel workshops: Jul - econ, mgmt, mkting Aug - crim, poli sci & soc Sep - crim, poli sci, public admin, soc USD200 grants available for all participants. Tell a friend! Info+sign-up here🔗go.unimelb.edu.au/uq4i

English
0
7
12
0
Felix Singleton Thorn retweetledi
Kou Murayama
Kou Murayama@KouMurayama·
I am hiring a 5 (3+2) year postdoc on data management and analysis of educational dataset. One critical project is to create a database of publicly available education data but you can pursue your own project too. Come to beautiful Tübingen!! tinyurl.com/58cctbrf
English
3
130
167
0
Felix Singleton Thorn
Felix Singleton Thorn@FSingletonThorn·
@drjbeaudry As sad as I am that we probably won’t run into each other as often in Melbourne, I am so thrilled to hear you’ve got such a great position! So many congratulations!
English
0
0
0
0