Fahad Iqbal Ahmed

A post that should simply make you happy. @SIN3R6Y, an independent developer and a fan of @RichardHeartWin and PulseChain, is putting his full passion into building great infrastructure for PulseChain on so many levels. But while I feel deep gratitude that someone like Alex still exists on PulseChain after everything that has happened, I also reflect on the sadness that comes with the realization that PulseChain apparently needs some independent dev for infrastructure to move forward, while for three years now there has been absolutely ZERO notable chain development or even infrastructure expansion coming from the visionary and the developers of PulseChain. I have no idea whether anything is being worked on in the background and whether something will eventually come, but three years without the vision of wanting to get better and without any growth progress from the founding level is not just too little, it is a no-go. It has to change. If the founding circle actually thinks, “The Alexes of this world will take care of it,” then that creates an external perception that massively blocks the growth of PulseChain. But, thanks Alex! 👇 x.com/SIN3R6Y/status…

❤️💛💚💙 “So you’re saying we actually did have an Altseaon?” “Yes, habib.” “But it was actually in our Friendships made?” “You got it.”

Just look at the difference between an interview with CZ (Binance ceo) and a proposal interview with Richard Heart Richard dominates everyone in crypto, just the best.

@SIN3R6Y Appreciate

When PulseChain launched, the one thing I knew we were going to be missing was infrastructure. Not hype. Not another token. Not another chart. Infrastructure. Ethereum had years to build out the tooling, RPCs, indexers, data services, dashboards, wallet support, integrations, and all the invisible pieces that make a chain actually usable. PulseChain needed a lot of that on day one. So that’s where I focused. It is a relatively thankless part of the ecosystem. Most people only notice infrastructure when it breaks. It does not really have a flashy narrative. It does not pump because a node stayed online. It does not trend because a backend service quietly handled traffic for another app. But a lot of projects depend on it. That work was hard, and for the most part, I do not really make anything from it. I did it because I thought it needed to be done. At this point, I consider a lot of that infrastructure work done. Or at least done enough that I can start shifting more attention toward the next missing pieces. Software is like an onion. There are layers upon layers. Most people only see the final app, the interface, the button they click, or the thing they directly use. But underneath that are all the other pieces that have to exist first: RPCs, APIs, data services, indexers, contracts, routing logic, security assumptions, UX standards, integrations, and a dozen other things nobody really wants to think about until something breaks. Some software cannot properly exist until other software exists beneath it. And when those lower layers are missing, someone has to build them. That is a lot of what my work on PulseChain has been. Not just building the thing people see, but building the things the visible thing depends on. That also means I have had to put my own personal opinions aside in a lot of cases. There is software out there that I do not personally agree with. There are projects I would not use myself. There are decisions I may not like, products I may not believe in, and approaches I may think are wrong. But infrastructure has to be agnostic. If you are building foundational layers for an ecosystem, you cannot only support the things you personally like. You cannot alienate every project you disagree with. You cannot build in a way that says, “This only works for my corner of the chain.” That is not how we grow. A real ecosystem needs room for different products, different opinions, different strategies, and different types of users. Even when I disagree with someone, that does not automatically mean they should be cut off from the infrastructure layer. That is not always easy. But I think it matters. And to be clear, I see a lot of devs working very hard on a lot of things. I do not like shitting on people who are actually building good things. I can personally disagree with someone’s direction and still respect the work they are putting in. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. There are projects I might not use myself. There are design choices I might not make. There are products I might think should go a different direction. But if someone is showing up, writing code, solving problems, and trying to make the chain more useful, I respect that. The beauty of software is that none of this has to be winner-take-all. If another dev does not like Cappy, but they like a feature in it, they can implement that idea in their own way. If they think I missed something, they can improve on it. If they think my approach is wrong, they can prove it by building something better. That is how this should work. And in cases where there is strong overlap, I will even help where I can, as time allows. That is how you grow. That is how you get taken seriously as a chain. In my opinion, anyway. I can be wrong. That is part of why I’m building Cappy. If you do not like Cappy, you do not have to use it. I mean that sincerely. I am not building a wallet because I think everyone has to agree with my taste, my priorities, or my product decisions. I am building the wallet I personally would want to use. That may not be the wallet you want to use. That’s fine. Some people like Microsoft Word. Some people like Google Docs. Some people like Rabby. Some people like MetaMask. Some people want something simple. Some people want something powerful. Some people want every possible feature. Some people want as little friction as possible. There is no single perfect answer for everyone. But the wallet I wanted to use on PulseChain did not exist in the form I wanted it to exist, so I decided to build it. A lot of the pieces of this chain, I honestly thought other people would eventually figure out. In some cases, they did. In other cases, not really. I thought we would attract more external devs. I thought more projects would port over. I thought more teams would support their forks. I thought more of the obvious gaps would get filled over time. Maybe I was wrong to expect that. Maybe I should have seen it differently from the beginning. Either way, it is what it is. At some point, I stopped waiting for other people to build the things I wanted to see exist. That does not mean I think I am always right. I am not infallible. I am sure I will make decisions some people disagree with. I am sure some people will not like the way I build things. I am sure some people will think I should be working on something else. That is fine. You can dislike the software I write and not use it. It really is that simple. But I am going to keep building the things I believe are important. People ask, “What about Sigma?” I am working on it in parallel with Cappy. People ask, “What about Cross Chain IcosaHedron?” I am working on it in parallel with Cappy. People ask, “What about the other ten pieces of software the ecosystem still needs?” That is exactly the point. These things are not always separate in the way people think they are. A wallet needs infrastructure. Cross-chain systems need reliable data. DeFi products need tooling. User-facing apps need lower-level services that most people will never directly touch. Some things need other things to exist before they can function properly. And if those other things do not exist, someone has to make them. I am not randomly jumping between projects. I am building the layers that make the next layer possible. I have been told many times that I should run a foundation, or try to organize things, or try to be some kind of public face for the ecosystem. I do not know if I would even be good at that. Maybe I would. Maybe I would not. What I do know is that I am at least decent at software. So that is where I am putting my energy. I can try to do the things I wish more people were doing. Am I the happiest with Richard right now? No. Do I respect what he has built? Yes. Am I still hopeful for the future? Yes. Those things can all be true at the same time. I have more or less put everything on the line to move quickly and build things I think matter. The infrastructure phase was the first big priority, and I think that work is now far enough along that I can focus more heavily on actual products people can touch, use, critique, and hopefully benefit from. Many of you support me, and I see that. I do not take it lightly. All I can really promise is this: I am going to keep trying to give this ecosystem the best software I can. Not because everyone has to use it. Not because I think I am the answer to every problem. Not because I agree with every project. But because I still believe PulseChain deserves better tools, better infrastructure, better user experiences, and more people willing to actually build the missing pieces. That is what I am trying to do. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. I hope you like the things I do. None of this is any kind of advice, especially financial and P.S. Cappy comes with a block explorer that (hopefully) people find fast and functional enough to like. It was a requirement to make Cappy work. Modified Blockscout fork.

🚨 JUST IN 🚨 The PulseChain Rabby fork “Cappy” may release in beta within the next few days. Founder Alex McWhirter states: “I’m working to publish the first beta release of Cappy this weekend if possible.”

Richard Heart just explained Bitcoin and HEX in the simplest way possible… and now people are arguing everywhere. 👀 Bitcoin miners get the inflation for running expensive machines and burning electricity 24/7. ⚡️ HEX? The inflation goes to people who LOCK their coins instead. No warehouses. No mining rigs. No massive power bills. No pollution. Then he explained T-Shares… T-Shares work like company shares. The earlier you got in, the more ownership power you have. And unlike Bitcoin mining hardware… they become harder to get over time. 📈 Most people hear this and think it sounds complicated. It’s actually one of the simplest concepts in crypto: Bitcoin pays miners. HEX pays stakers. The people who understand tokenomics early usually win first. 🚀 #RichardHeart #HEX #Bitcoin #Crypto #PulseChain #DeFi #Tshares #CryptoNews #PassiveIncome #BullMarket #Altcoins #CryptoTikTok #Investing #FinancialFreedom

@Hexologist31 @miketherealme @InternetMoneyio @BrotherKDG I see this sence before

@miketherealme @InternetMoneyio @BrotherKDG

If you think PulseChain $PLS is a dead chain, or isn't going anywhere, take a look at all the action going on with the community, builders, and devs. -You got @InternetMoneyio and @BrotherKDG with full support in their crypto wallet, constantly pushing updates and listening to HEXICAN feedback. -You got @LibertySwapFi and @zkxwallet building a privacy wallet and gasless swapping features to align with Richard Heart's vision. -You got @SIN3R6Y building a powerful wallet, that maybe be an equivalent to Rabby, only better with full PulseChain support! -You got NFT marketplaces like @MintraAI and @THESTAKERCLASS (thestakerclass.com) built for PulseChain. -You got @liquidloansio running their lending protocol and stable coin, and the founder @Crypto_Crazey speaking at conferences. -You got long time influencers like @cryptocoffee , @yourfriendsommi , @hexologist369, @rhmaximalist , @MatiAllin , @TamTamHEX etc.. represting the HEX and PulseChain ecosystem and core values. -You got a founder @richardheartwin who, against all odds, is still here, fighting, winning, active on X, still building, still posting, still interacting with the community. 💪 PulseChain.com 🗽

Since the launch of $PLS, $PLSX has burned 9.26 percent of user circulating tokens. At sac rate, that's equivalent to $250 million dollars. That means, roughly 20 percent of the total sac value would have been bought and burned. $PLS $PLSX $HEX $PRVX

Hey @RichardHeartWin …. Let’s do it.

Ran Neuner officially wants to make a interview with Richard Heart This would be huge!! #PulseChain make some noise if you want this 🔥🔥🔥 $PLS $PLSX $HEX $PRVX

Something to talk about with Cappy.... It's quite honestly, expensive. It's what I was alluding to with why Rabby dropped #PulseChain support. But regardless of that expense, I feel like we need these features. One way of making this able to exist long term, is actionable fees. Like on swaps. But honestly, while it's probably a requirement to have, I personally dislike egregious fees. So most of those, I will be capping at 0.25%. Which is the Rabby default and something I agree with as reasonable. But I also want to try to do something better. So I am also playing with the idea of adding Cappy Pro. This will be fully on chain settled, self swapping to stables (it will auto dump what you put in). Cappy Pro would be a subscription, $5/30 days of enablement. At minimum it will offer 3 things for up to 3 addresses. 1. Reduced fees on swaps and such (0.1%) 2. Proxied Private RPC. Cappy's API will strip metadata from your TX's and proxy the TX through its API RPC backend. So no other RPC or actor will know your IP or other identifiable information. Just that you used Cappy to sign the TX. (and maybe later will round robin that through various VPN's so they don't even tie back to Cappy). 3. TX watcher, something we all love to do. Add a list of addresses you want to monitor and it will concatenate the view of TX's involving those addresses. With label support. (maybe push notifications in the future). 3a. (Maybe) whale watching. Put in a token address and it will show live TX history of any movement over a certain balance size. Do you agree with this, disagree with this? Are these features things you would like to see exist? I'm working to publish the first beta release of Cappy this weekend if possible.

One can dream...

❤️💛💚💙 My most watched video from April: 👉🏻 Richard Heart PulseChain removed from Europe INTERPOL (🛎️SUB: @yourfriendsommi" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@yourfriendsom…)

Alex has made another comment regarding the upcoming Rabby fork for PulseChain. He says he could have prevented a user from losing over $300,000 after Rabby’s simulator stopped working for PulseChain. “Cappy is that fix... I’m keeping everything that made Rabby good, and rebuilding the parts #PulseChain needs.”

My coverage on $eHEX seems to be popular so here is some more data... the daily chart is getting very interesting. I’ve added BBWP and stochastic to this chart because they work well together when looking for a potential expansion move. BBWP is now extremely compressed, sitting around 0.80%. That means volatility has been squeezed hard. It does not predict direction by itself, but it tells us the chart is behaving like a pressure cooker. Energy is building. The stochastic then helps hint at which direction that pressure may release. Right now, stochastic has started lifting from the lower range, which suggests momentum is beginning to wake up. Price is also sitting near the end of a long descending wedge, with the daily EMA/VWMA cluster just above current price. Key area I’m watching: 0.00062–0.00065 A daily reclaim of that zone, followed by a clean break of the descending trendline, would be the first serious sign that the next move is starting. If BBWP begins expanding upward at the same time stochastic continues rising, that would be a much stronger confirmation. This is the kind of setup where $eHEX can look dead for weeks, then move 30–80% very quickly once volatility expands. Potential timeframe I’m watching is the next 1-10 days... for the first initial pulse up, this could be the catalyst for a 10-12x move over the coming weeks that leads to the $PLS and the $pHEX move. Not a guarantee. Not a prediction. Just reporting what I see. Compression, momentum, and structure all moving toward a decision point.

9,000 USDC worth of PCOCK has been bought back from the market in the last 24 hours by LibertySwap. Let’s see how this goes.

$HEX is only cheap because people don't understand what they hold. $HEX pumped hard when it was in an extremely inflationary environment, now that the coins are becoming scarce, just a slight shift in sentiment, people are going to be fighting over the remaining supply of $HEX. Understand what you hold Full video: youtu.be/hCMzaJ2fh4s?si…

How are you gonna feel when HEX is 6 cents again and you missed a 100x for a second time? Waiting is hard...

❤️💛💚💙 🍿 Ivan on Tech covers Richard Heart and HEX on his show today: “If you’re in with Richard Heart then you’re totally rekt”. He also shows a PulseChain HEX Community member comment who went from $1.08M down to $28K