FarmBoy

@pokey917 @TonyDungy Actually- you actually answered your own question. Jesus Christ. That's who cares. Jesus Christ. Just Sayin'

@DefiantLs Decidedly false as many of them have already died of heart disease, cancer and more

Paul Anka: “Every child born after the year 2000 will live over 100”

@JoshuaN82858394 @RevTChristopher That’s an incredibly low iq take son. I won’t justify it with a response. PS, DC is far from my hero. He took the PC way out and let GF out of the back seat. I would have jammed him in the car slammed the door and brought him to the pokey. None of this kinder gentler crap

@Farmboy1972 @RevTChristopher 5 cops do not need to be there lol they caused a secen to let every body know what they were doing they pissed off a whole lot people for that your hero DC would not be in jail if he had not been there to kill gf cause he is dark skinned.

Funny how they never talk about why!!!! What led up to George Floyd. m.youtube.com/watch?v=1QTTNX…

@JoshuaN82858394 @RevTChristopher One caveat to that is that our FIRST priority is scene safety, so if our safety is at risk if we were to start doing cpr, we are not supposed to do it

@JoshuaN82858394 @RevTChristopher Here’s what I WILL say as a first responder myself- Chauvin should be responsible for neglect to render aid. There appeared to be a point where GF was in cardiac arrest and Chauvin has a responsibility to render aid. Wouldn’t have mattered, but he should have tried.

@JoshuaN82858394 @RevTChristopher His knee on the upper back is procedure for controlling someone who is resisting, and he constantly was. It wouldn’t happen to me. For two reasons: I wouldn’t use drugs so I wouldn’t be irrational And I would behave like an adult. YES, It IS his fault.

@Farmboy1972 @RevTChristopher Tell me why the cop was there to put his knee on his neck bet you can't explain that to me with out blaming gf cause I know you will blame gf what if it happened to you farm boy smh 😡

@QuantumFlux1964 He liked chicken skin and breading?

@Farmboy1972 Not really, according to the autobiography of this guy

Bone-in wings are for people who like to eat skin and breading. Boneless wings are for folks who actually enjoy meat.

@JoshuaN82858394 @RevTChristopher Finally, what happened to George was what would happen to any nearly 50 yo guy with 70% Blockage to his heart and a system full of drugs… His heart gave out from the strain of acting like an absolute imbecile fighting the cops. I would say God rest his soul, but I have my doubts

@JoshuaN82858394 @RevTChristopher No, if you’re a drug addict, you’re not a decent citizen if you were wondering. No, it wasn’t a cold blooded killing, five cops had to be there because this huge guy refused to be taken into custody and was acting insane with a threatening crowd around the scene

@newstart_2024 The best research data known to man (the Bible) says moderation in all things is the key. I’ll go with that.

Andrew Huberman dropped a very direct take on alcohol. Alcohol is poison. Zero is better than any amount. If you drink, two per week should be your absolute ceiling. Beyond that, UK Brain Bank data shows measurable brain shrinkage and nerve loss with every extra drink. We love the idea of “moderate is fine,” but the brain imaging data is getting harder to ignore. Every extra glass quietly chips away at your brain over time. Do you think two drinks a week is realistic, or is zero the smarter long-term move?

@PopCrave nope

Pride Month begins in one week.

@farmingandJesus Well you see, when a man loves a dog… Lol

I cannot understand this

@RepThomasMassie @sunnyright

@sunnyright Nothing left but a wonderful family, 30 patents, 2 engineering degrees from MIT, a farm with a peach orchard, a herd of Wagyu cattle, a dozen inventions in my head, a clucks capacitor roaming my fields, and investors lined up to back whatever I invent next.

Your reminder that Massie has been living off politics for upwards of 16 years, so it was either this or a podcast because he's got nothing else left

@carvajalez_1340 @MrCasey62 What words are his?

@Farmboy1972 @MrCasey62 Those are the words of Jesus haha

Beautiful refutation of Sola Scriptura, taken directly from the life and writings of St. Paul:

@johnpauldickson There’s a reason Paul ties Eve being deceived to the instruction that women should not teach or hold authority over a man. It’s not narrow

See, you are doing the interpretive moves that others do in a different direction. We all have to do that. On your "teaching" point, you will discover that some make a decent argument that "teaching with authority" might not be the same thing as a sermon - and that "prophesying" and "exhorting" are closer to the modern sermon. That is a view that must be grappled with. It would change things a bit.

Why some of us can rejoice in women “pastors” even if we pretty much disagree with the idea. First, take a less fraught example: baptism. Suppose you’re 80% convinced the Bible endorses only believer’s baptism, not infant baptism. That still means you think there’s a half-decent chance you could be wrong. Since this is a matter of church order rather than morality, perhaps that possibility should be enough to let you attend the baptism of your friends’ infant child and even find some joy in it. After all, there’s a meaningful chance this practice is biblical, as many thoughtful, biblically serious Christians believe. Likewise, suppose you’re 80% convinced the Bible restricts women from doing pastor-like things. That still means you think there’s a half-decent chance you could be wrong. Since this too is a matter of church order rather than morality, perhaps that possibility should be enough to let you sit under the preaching and ministry of a gifted woman and maybe even find some blessing in it. After all, there’s a meaningful chance this too is biblical, as many thoughtful, biblically serious Christians believe. At least, that’s how I’ve come to think about it.

@johnpauldickson Notable that none of these examples is “teaching” and other than prophesying, these examples are all Old Testament. Which doesn’t invalidate them but we are under a new covenant now. It’s not that women have nothing to offer, but leading the flock spiritually is a tall task

But, obviously, you 'interpret' those other passages - a woman leading God's people Israel, a woman ratifying what is the word of God, women prophesying in public, etc - in a way that does not conflict with the texts about women 'teaching', right? That being so, you should be in a position to imagine who someone else might interpret the latter texts so as not to conflict with the former texts. Both sides hold to the inerrancy of Scripture; neither should hold the inerrancy of their interpretation.