Fed Informant

463 posts

Fed Informant

Fed Informant

@Fed_Informant

I work with Nick Fuentes and Lucas Gage

Katılım Mayıs 2026
45 Takip Edilen5 Takipçiler
Frank McCormick
Frank McCormick@CBHeresy·
Chud last week: “You’re a n*gger! You gonna chimp out, n*gger?!” Chud today: “T-t-t-t-t-thank you s-s-s-s-s-sir… I promise not to ch-ch-ch-ch-ch-ch-chimp out. No sir. N-n-n-n-not me. I’ll be on my b-b-b-b-b-best behavior.”
Frank McCormick tweet media
English
210
100
1.4K
132.9K
Gate
Gate@Gate06964439·
@EuropeanHerSoc @GreatestTwo @MyronGainesX I am good faith so the first part is true. But white men's BOND was always Christ and to say it's ONLY the alc is completely bs. If anything it divided us more because drunk kings and leaders caused more wars. YES porn is a big issue rooted in loneliness but alc doesn't help it
English
2
0
1
143
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
@basedkletus I understand where you are coming from, but race doesn't guarantee superiority, as far as I'm concerned what matters is individual IQ, currently amongst ALL races on Earth brain size and average IQ are dropping (reverse-Flynn effect) we lost natural selection, science can fix it.
MR. OBVIOUS tweet media
English
7
0
13
1.4K
MR. OBVIOUS
MR. OBVIOUS@ObviousRises·
Let me explain why asmongold is right that Chud The Builder acted in Self-Defense. First lets make one thing clear: Chudthebuilder is 100% an asshole streamer and provocateur. THAT BEING SAID. When he was attacked he was walking away. The black guy punched him in the back of the head (mind you this is the thinnest part of the skull) punches to the head can be (and have been) 100% lethal, so he defended himself, shot the guy ONCE (I would have mag dumped) even tho the black dude (despite being shot) literally kept punching and fighting him—what do you think his intentions were if he had not been shot? He would have tried to kill Chud, already that's Self-Defense. BUT WAIT—DERE'S MORE! A lot of people are throwing around legal terms they don't understand, "provocation" isn't a get-out-of-jail-free-card its literally an legal argument, one usually to talk down a charge (like assault which the black guy did) to a lower level, let me explain why this is ultimately a self-defense situation. Chud was attacked, AFTER, he was actively walking away (Chud also never committed any violence) in legal terms this is known as de-escalation and it is the GOLD STANDARD for Judges to determine fault, do you know why its NOT provocation in this case? Even if he was saying mean words or asking "Are you gonna chimp out?" (tbh lets be real words still don't justify violence) the LEGAL DEFINITION of provocation basically requires that a person acts in the HEAT OF THE MOMENT. Had the black guy attacked him WHILE Chud was talking shit (to his face) THAT would be provocation but he didn't, he didn't act on impulse—he waited for Chud to have his back turned/his guard down so he could sucker punch him (like a weak pathetic coward) that shows premeditation and intent. Now lets talk about reasonable force/restraint, both of these matter legally, A LOT. Despite having every right to fear for his life (he had no way of knowing if he would be gang assaulted) he defended himself by firing ONE TIME, he showed both reasonable force to defend himself and restraint, despite the black guy assaulting him (assaulting him) the entire time—both are important in establishing Self-Defense. (depending on the state) Let me sum this up. Words are not illegal. Its called Free Speech for a reason. It doesn't give you legal justification to do violence, but even if we pretended it did, Chud was the victim the moment he walked and got attacked from behind. NOTHING. ELSE. MATTERS. (including any previous social media posts) because of the circumstances, I actually a wrote a whole post about Black culture and their version of "Izzat" very recently, and why they often turn and resort to such lethal violence. #1 thing from that post: If you have seen ANY clips online of fights in the black community you know that they do not show restraint, they stomp on heads after someone is knocked out/basically show ZERO restraint. THE ONLY PEOPLE SAYING THAT CHUD SHOULDN'T HAVE SHOT OVER A PUNCH LITERALLY DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT BLACK CULTURE AND WOULD 100% DIE IF THEY FOLLOWED THEIR OWN ADVICE—IRONICALLY THESE ARE SHELTERED LIBERALS/NEOTARDS WHO HAVE NEVER EVEN HAD A SINGLE BLACK FRIEND AND PROBABLY GREW UP IN A RICH/WHITE NEIGHBORHOOD. Is Chud an asshole? Yes. Is he Racist? Probably. And although I can sympathize with his frustration (black-on-white crime is INSANELY high, 5x higher that white-on-black crime, 25x higher per capita) he's COMPLETELY unjustified in treating all black people the same—believe it or not, not every person of ANY group, are all bad. But here's the thing, being an ass, saying mean words, hell even be "le reecist" IS. NOT. ILLEGAL, this isn't the UK where recently (100% true story) police literally ARRESTED and handcuffed a DYING MAN who was BLEEDING to death after a Sikh (Indian) migrant claimed (didn't prove) the white man called him a slur—he literally died because they arrested him instead of calling an ambulance. Obviously they will 100% try to make this a political/race thing and throw the book at him because he's white (meanwhile they keep releasing black repeat offenders who attack/SA/murder white people) but make no mistake, if Chud goes to prison this sets a HORRIFIC precedent—basically anyone is allowed to kill anyone over mean words, just lie and say you were called a slur, I hate to use this phrase (it makes me uncomfortable) but if you wanted an actual "race" war, that is how you get one. at the end of the day asmongold is right, if someone tries to physically assault you, you should be able to shoot them, regardless of race or mean words, its that simple
English
145
199
1.5K
37.4K
Fed Informant
Fed Informant@Fed_Informant·
@ObviousRises Another faggot that has to use qualifiers and desensitize before he can say anything
English
0
0
0
1
Bobby T
Bobby T@EuropaAeterna01·
I don’t know who needs to hear this but: You can just not have a view on something Like, if you don’t know about something just don’t choose a side I say this because way too way people support a side they don’t remotely understand simply for the sake of having a side
English
5
7
40
521
Mula Mule
Mula Mule@MulaMule300·
Bormann isn’t Hitler 😂 His personal letter calling Christianity poison is exactly why historians treat his heavily edited Table Talk notes as unreliable garbage. Goebbels was anti clerical too yet both operated under the official NSDAP 25 Point Programme Point 24 that literally declared Positive Christianity the Party’s standpoint. Hitler publicly endorsed it multiple times. Private rants and Telegram screenshots isn’t state policy lol. Basic theology + primary sources > cherry picked subordinate cope. Once again, read the thread
English
2
0
2
44
Mula Mule
Mula Mule@MulaMule300·
Warning to everyone: Just blocked @Ehrenkrieg2 after watching him drown in his own cherry picked misinformation for days. (or really years as he built his entire channel on it) The dude can’t even read basic German from the primary sources he demands, yet he acts like an expert as he ignores the context from someone that actually can. He spams random memos while completely ignoring the official Platform policy, Hitler’s own speeches, the entire historical record of the regime’s policy, the tons of books and actual scholarship, just to suit his false narrative. He’s a toxic atheist edgelord who cherry picks to push hatred on Christianity, brainwashes people with half truths, and distorts National Socialism into godless materialist garbage. While trashing Christianity without even knowing the basic’s of theology. These people are truly dangerous for the cause. And have more in common with jews than they might think, or accuse Christians of. If you follow him, i suggest to unfollow. You’ll end up suffocating in the same pool of misinformation and cope he’s trapped in. The topic of National Socialism and Christianity is genuinely complex as sources often contradict each other, key documents have been mistranslated or selectively edited, false propaganda images float the internet, and history has been heavily distorted by multiple sides to fit their own narratives. That’s exactly why you must read the primary sources, books and serious scholarship yourself instead of blindly trusting loud accounts with big followings. Knowledge is power. Real National Socialists respect the historical truth. Positive Christianity was official policy and there is enough proof to back that up. Which is also why there are far more Christians in the movement than atheists and pagans. Don’t let cherry pickers and agenda driven clowns drag you into atheist larping hatred disguised as the “truth.” Stay based. Stay truthful. o/
Mula Mule tweet media
English
47
12
86
3.7K
Valkyrie Mist
Valkyrie Mist@DameHolle79·
@MulaMule300 @MUHTableTalks @Ehrenkrieg2 Hey, I support NatSocs who are pagan or Christian but not atheist. Atheism kills the vril. But I've followed this guy however, I don't really see his posts much. Thanks for the heads up!
English
3
0
20
327
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 NOW: President Trump announces he's looking for a GOP primary challenger to Rep. Lauren Boebert in Colorado, because she's campaigning for Thomas Massie "Anybody who can be that dumb deserves a good Primary fight!" "Even though I long ago endorsed Boebert, if the right person came along, it would be my Honor to withdraw that Endorsement, and endorse a good and proper alternative. Just let me know, or announce your Candidacy, and I will be there for you!" "Is anyone interested in running against Weak Minded Lauren Boebert in Colorado’s Fourth Congressional District? You remember Lauren moved to the District when it became obvious that she couldn’t win in her original Congressional District (The Third!) — A Carpetbagger, indeed!" "Boebert is campaigning for the Worst “Republican” Congressman in the History of our Country, Thomas Massie, of the Great Commonwealth of Kentucky."
English
803
2.4K
9.5K
496.3K
European ⚔️ Revolution
European ⚔️ Revolution@EuropeanRevolt·
Dan Bilzerian is even less White than most Western Jews. First of all he is 1/8 Jewish. And then adding in his Armenian ancestry: the man is not a racial European. I can't be a race traitor for not liking Dan Bilzerian. It's physically impossible.
Dr. Karl Reinhardt@DrKarlReinhardt

@EuropeanRevolt You are a philosemitic race traitor.

English
3
1
17
768
Aidan
Aidan@aidannonx·
There’s a type of guy that is permanently seething that Nick is relevant There is a power law where, for all the shame people use against Nick to make him repulsive to average people, at a certain equilibrium it creates a negative effect where people are drawn to him
Devon Stack@Black_Pilled

My favorite truth about race is that nick is 0% related to my ancestors (or any founding stock Americans) and that people like Benjamin Franklin wouldn’t consider him white at all but rather a mongrel abomination, the product of swarthy mud people rutting in the shallow end of the gene pool.

English
16
2
40
3.8K