Felicia

I have a question for the supporters of the two muppets. Do you think that if he received 400 million dollars he would heal from the "trauma"?🤑💸🤡

@Adrian_l899 @gayJBfletcher Ugly and stupid. They look like Diane Dimond who is the worst tabloid journalist.

@gayJBfletcher Why are MJ haters always the most disgusting hideous looking creatures ever?🤣

All this praise for Michael Jackson recently actually has me so unbelievably pissed off. I’m sorry the man was a creep and I will die on that hill for years.

@big_Michael57 You are right

@Feluc1 You right about that, and my father and mother did marched with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr as well.

If someone did some serious research they would probably find out that his parents were in the KKK. And I suspect this crazy bastard sympathized with the KKK.

Hey @netflix where's your documentary on this guy Russell Brand? Oh wait i forgot he's white. And white sexual predators and paedophiles are always protected.. Yet you guys want to trash and exploit an innocent black man who was found not guilty on all charges.. Pathetic!!

@SaulMarch @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Why should I apologize to you? Because we have different opinions? I don't apologize to anyone. The journalistic hyenas need to apologize to MJ's mother for defamation and slander. And the accusing garbage needs to apologize to MJ's mother.

@Feluc1 @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz One day you will apologise to me and you will cry because you were fooled by MJ fan propaganda.

" D Dimond @DIDimond ,Ron Zonen, why did Janet Arvizo consult a lawyer in January 2000 to sue MJ for molestation — before she had ever met him (August 2000)? He was brought to trial by Mesereau. What is the explanation?"

@SaulMarch @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz You're not sure what happened but you want the world to know about MJ's "rape"? What the hell is wrong with you? MJ didn't rape anyone and those accusers deserve to go to jail for false accusations. Well, it's clear that the damn accusers want money. They're trash.

@Feluc1 @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Everybody knows about Epstein. Mission is accomplished there. Michael Jackson’s blood money and fake legacy must be teared down! The world must know he wasn’t a good role model. Raping kids wasn’t acceptable no matter how talented he was.

@SaulMarch @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Because they said they would press charges against MJ and not against MJ'Estate. That's different! And there is no law in the US that protects the deceased.

@Feluc1 @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz If they blackmailed why didn’t the Estate go to the police? Why did they instead pay them $16,5 million?

And what did that scoundrel McManus say? She had Vaseline all over her. The journalist bitches paid her to smear MJ And he had vitiligo creams.

Tonight's Sunday Address Having failed to stop "Michael" from becoming a huge success the white media, in the form of Netflix, is rushing to put out a hit-piece against him calling itself a "docu-series." Because calling it that means it's true...right? youtu.be/H4OIRm8h8O0

@SaulMarch @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz From your answers I can see that you don't know the truth. I tell you, leave MJ alone and focus on the real predators. For example, Epstein's accomplices, about whom you and the press are silent!

@Feluc1 @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz I’m not saying that happened. I’m just pointing out the 2005 case wasn’t the main case. It was the case he paid $23 million to get rid off.

@SaulMarch @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Secret payments because they blackmailed. After they received the money they asked for more money, hundreds of millions, and that's called extortion.

@Feluc1 @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz We don’t know. Secret payments could have been made. Fans thought the same after Leaving Neverland too. Then the devastating news came: $16,5 million was paid secretly in 2020.

@SaulMarch @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Between 2005 and 2009 no one accused Michael Jackson of sexual abuse. He was accused post mortem but it is clear that they want a lot of money to live a luxurious life

@Feluc1 @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Do you really think a 2005 not-guilty verdict is a permanent free pass that automatically clears MJ of every allegation ever made 🤦‍♂️?

@SaulMarch @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Unproven fact and usually you believe the accusations. His employees and Jackson's cousins ​​said that the Arvizo brothers broke down the cellar door and served themselves drinks and they also looked at magazines p.....o without MJ knowing.

@Feluc1 @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Why do you focus so much on the 2005 case? Getting a non guilty verdict in 2005 in a case that literally was about two handjobs and giving a minor alcohol isn’t the full story on the question of Michael Jackson’s guilt or innocence! ⬇️

@SaulMarch @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Ok. But is the fact that Tom Sneddon altered Arvizo's timeline to fit the "guilt" narrative still a myth? And how do you explain the fact that Arvizo accused MJ after the Living with Michael documentary?

@Feluc1 @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Mesereau raising something in cross-examination does not make it a proven fact. Defense lawyers test credibility and push interpretations all the time. The actual issue is whether evidence proved she planned an MJ molestation lawsuit before meeting him. It didn’t.

@SaulMarch @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Do you think if it was a myth Tom Mesereau would still be exposing this in court? Where do you think MJ fans found out? And the fact that Tom Sneddon changed Arvizo's timeline is also a myth?

@Feluc1 @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Another fan-myth. You have been fooled again you gullible idiot: There is no verified court finding that she was with “Chandler’s former civil lawyers” in January 2000. This is confirmed by Feldman’s testimony in 2005.

@MJJTruthSeeker you dumbasses do the same thing where you’ll use pieces of statements from the accusers, yet refuse to showcase and acknowledge the entire transcript bc you know it shows how deceitful and money hungry they are. themichaeljacksoninnocentproject.com/court-transcri…

guilters: mj fans don’t want you to see the evidence mj fans: read the court transcripts and fbi files guilters: none of that matters he’s guilty

@SaulMarch @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Why was Janet Arvizo in January 2000 with Chandler's former civil lawyers? And she met MJ in August 2000?

@Feluc1 @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz Claim: Janet Arvizo was “planning to sue MJ for molestation in Jan 2000.” Not proven. The record only shows a broad statement about consulting lawyers around that time. No filing, no case, no attorney testimony confirming any MJ molestation claim.⬇️

@SaulMarch @DiDimond @Magdalena_Niz gave you transcription images! You can delete your account

@Feluc1 @DiDimond There is no solid, verified evidence that Janet Arvizo consulted a lawyer in January 2000 specifically to sue Michael Jackson before any contact with him. This is fan-misinformation. I will delete my account on X if you can show me anything that proves it from reliable sources.

The information is real and that's why I'm sure the Arvizo case was staged for years. redblackghost.wordpress.com/2010/12/05/192/