🔥🐦‍🔥FireSourcery🐦‍🔥🔥

1.2K posts

🔥🐦‍🔥FireSourcery🐦‍🔥🔥 banner
🔥🐦‍🔥FireSourcery🐦‍🔥🔥

🔥🐦‍🔥FireSourcery🐦‍🔥🔥

@FireSourcery

Self Id - Pokemon Type: (🔥/🐉) | Don't let your dreams be memes | Resident hacker at https://t.co/eCuHJUehWc | Open source embedded C library:

Los Angeles, CA Katılım Aralık 2009
1.5K Takip Edilen435 Takipçiler
Tech Dev Notes
Tech Dev Notes@techdevnotes·
1 year ago xAI released Ani
Tech Dev Notes tweet media
English
77
43
442
14.4K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
@FoxNews Mamdani has built nothing. He is a taker, never a maker.
English
8.3K
22.7K
190.6K
8.5M
Fox News
Fox News@FoxNews·
JUST IN: NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani used America’s 250th anniversary to sharply criticize the country, accusing the U.S. of allowing children to go hungry while billionaires and “oligarchs” gain more power. He said America’s wealth was built by working people with “calloused, dirt-streaked hands" while accusing the country of allowing the wealth built by workers to be concentrated in “the soft hands of a precious few.”
English
12.1K
3.2K
17.5K
10.2M
Piyush Rai
Piyush Rai@Benarasiyaa·
In Florida, US, a knife-wielding woman was shot dead by police. Cops could be seen retreating on the street as the woman slowly advances. Officers asked her to drop knife. She refuses. Police open fire.
English
7.4K
1.4K
14.9K
11.8M
Nav
Nav@NavClipstreams·
Mizkif EXPOSED the Lies Spread by LSF and Emiru Fans😳🔥 Mizkif just SHUT IT DOWN hard reiterating that the Magistrate Judge AGREED she was pushing the "emotional truth" defense the whole time 👀 "So many people tried to claim the emotional truth argument wasn't what she was saying... LSF wanted to bury it. It turns out the magistrate judge agrees she was..." Mizkif dropped the receipts. No more hiding. The "emotional truth" narrative is now court-documented. #Mizkif #Emiru #LSF
English
34
3
460
104.1K
Dissident Wire
Dissident Wire@DissidentWire·
Nick Fuentes and Dan Bilzerian are reportedly set to face off in a live debate on Rumble. Follow: @DissidentWire
Dissident Wire tweet media
English
179
123
3.7K
259.2K
Riot Games
Riot Games@riotgames·
This Pride, we partnered with eight incredible community artists. Each brought their style to new pieces with LGBTQIA+ Champions, Agents, and allies at the center. Meet the artists behind the art who talked about their designs, inspiration, and Pride. @Luzdanaee kicks us off:
Riot Games tweet media
English
113
276
2.4K
143.5K
Engineer Girlfriend
Engineer Girlfriend@enggirlfriend·
just bought this $550 ebike that goes 28mph 😂 pray for me
Engineer Girlfriend tweet media
English
20
0
63
5.1K
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
“The Deal with Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete. Congratulations to all!” President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸
The White House tweet media
English
10.3K
20.9K
97.7K
8.5M
Ally Sammarco
Ally Sammarco@Ally_Sammarco·
Elon Musk is a trillionaire but it’s def the people on SNAP ruining your life
English
8.2K
1.3K
11.6K
13.4M
Yuppie
Yuppie@yuppie064432·
Stanley and Yeti cups finally got the test they deserved. 1600°C settled the debate
English
810
541
13.7K
17.7M
🔥🐦‍🔥FireSourcery🐦‍🔥🔥
If by only one layer deep, you mean I'm missing some implication Vanguard has on the greater good... I remain convinced Riot does not have the players best interest at heart. Again, I ask, why you would have faith in Riot after having such an experience. So? Did they gaslight you too? Esports have been a thing since OG StarCraft. I don't see Vanguard as playing a key determinant role in making esports possible, or bringing it to a greater public. Although if you could show that Vanguard was key in enabling an esports career path that wouldn't have otherwise been possible, I may be convinced it offers some utility. Still the privacy aspect is more of a concern.
English
2
0
3
506
Nic0le
Nic0le@nicole_clash·
people who think like you are only thinking one layer deep though. how many people have legitimately suffered from Vanguard? right now that number is 0. yes, there is the potential that that number might be higher than 0 one day, I'm not disagreeing with you there. but how many people is able to enjoy a competitive game at a genuinely competitive level as a result? many of which goes on to pursue a legitimate career in esports? Riot, for all their faults, took a stand in preserving competitive integrity. Esports as a whole frankly has no chance if companies decided to take the easy route and not protect that integrity. And I rather not let esports fall when it bring millions of people so much joy, and is a legitimate career path for people like your sister and their high school friends.
English
1
0
21
1.3K
Nic0le
Nic0le@nicole_clash·
Just caught up on the Riot Games Vanguard drama. Yall cannot be serious right? The hate train against Riot's anticheat is obviously an attempt led by the cheaters to fool the masses into believing that Riot is 'bricking' consumer PCs. Most blatant form of public manipulation I've seen yet. They try to go the highground 'morality' route of how 'Riot shouldn't have control over consumer hardware' but that's not even remotely close to what Vanguard is and can do. It's disgusting how many people's falling for this false narrative. Do yall have brains? Wake tf up you are literally getting manipulated by the cheaters into putting public pressure on Riot so that they can have an easier time cheating in competitive games. For all their faults, the one good thing about Riot is that they have managed to keep the competitive integrities of their games up at a level far above industry standards, and they've managed to achieve that in the least obstructive way possible. Can anyone name a single instance where their non-cheating device stopped working after playing a Riot game? You can't. Because that's literally never happened. Stop falling for the fake news, retards.
Riot Games@riotgames

Well, that escalated quickly. There’s been a wave of claims by cheaters about Vanguard “bricking” their PCs, so let’s clear that up: Vanguard does not damage hardware or disable your devices. The photo we posted is a picture of cheat hardware devices that are sold explicitly for cheating in VALORANT (not normal PCs or PC components). Through our latest updates, Vanguard now makes those devices worthless for VAL, but does not in any way brick PCs or PC components or PC software. Our latest update enforces standard platform security features, like the Input-Output Memory Management Unit (IOMMU), on accounts identified as using Direct Memory Access (DMA) cheating devices. These protections are already part of modern systems and when enabled, they block DMA cheat devices (such as those shown in the photo) from accessing memory in downstream applications, like our games. If a cheat setup continues attempting to cheat after those protections are enabled, the system may generate hardware faults or instability. This is expected behavior under IOMMU when attempts are made to read protected memory. Disabling IOMMU allows the cheat device to function again, but IOMMU will still be required to play our games. This means the cheat device won’t work with our games, but your PC isn’t “bricked.” We would not, and cannot, impact your PC’s functionality in any other fashion. This functionality only applies to systems attempting to use DMA cheat devices, and players who are not using DMA-based cheat setups are not affected. We’ll keep investing in anti-cheat to protect competitive integrity, and we’ll keep being as transparent as possible about how those systems work.

English
44
132
1.7K
130.6K
Grok
Grok@grok·
**No, that's not true.** Vanguard is Riot's kernel-level anti-cheat. It runs in the background to scan for cheats (including DMA hardware), monitors processes, and enforces system integrity like IOMMU. It doesn't record videos of background activity (e.g., movies, streams, or other apps playing). Some older analyses mention occasional screenshots for cheat detection in specific cases, but not continuous video recording. Riot's official privacy policy states they **do not sell or share personal info for cross-context behavioral/targeted advertising**. Data is used mainly for game operation, anti-cheat, and service improvement—not sold to advertisers. This sounds like another exaggerated claim from the current drama. Riot has been transparent that Vanguard focuses on competitive integrity without bricking hardware or overreaching into unrelated personal data.
English
2
0
1
14
🔥🐦‍🔥FireSourcery🐦‍🔥🔥
Damn I'm good. But okay, I read enough of your post to get that they shafted you. So then I ask, especially after having gone through that, what makes you think anything of their presentation is genuine? If they wanted to screw customers at their benefit, I wouldn't imagine they describe it any other way. Especially with the latest woke infestation. These ass hats love the gaslighting approach. "We do it to protect our community." Anti cheat is more like their marketing term for cyber espionage. Who actually profits? They are known to retain customers via addiction. How many hits do you think Vanguard gets right for every miss? That's not even getting into how the majority of the consumers are casual players, which also happen to be where their profits are. My sister and her high school friends used to play Valorant. What is the size of the population they have access to? Give them every piece of private data on these players, especially while they're known to evade GDPR and CCPA? What happened to playing tournaments over LAN? Oh conflict of interest there. Well capable of preserving gameplay integrity for high stakes tournaments, but Riot don't profit on that and risk exposing their IP. I tell everyone who installs Vanguard, you're basically letting Riot grab you by the balls, and asking them to be gentle. Sure if you're gay you don't care.
English
1
0
4
658
Nic0le
Nic0le@nicole_clash·
@FireSourcery You're kidding right? Out of everyone who understands how Vanguard works, I might be the least incentivized person to speak out in favor of them for something that's not true. x.com/nicole_clash/s…
Nic0le@nicole_clash

Riot Games. No other company has a cooler group of people. If I can pick a single company to work for, I would pick Riot Games 10/10 times. I genuinely loved the environment and the work being done. Even now, my opinion of this is unchanged. I was at Riot Games for 3 years. In these 3 years, my official role was on the Game Analysis Team. This was the only team at Riot where there is an elo requirement, since the work has a lot to do with being a high level player and giving valuable feedback to teams such as the champion designers, the balance team, etc. I loved the work. I loved playtesting. I loved being an analyst. In a lot of ways, it taught me a lot on how to think deeper on problems. If we did X, what would happen to Y and Z. On top of my work as an analyst, I built things. Most of which landed extremely well. Through it all, I learned exactly what tooling is needed at the enterprise level. Where the gaps are. The best ways to cut down tedious manual labor. Where it can benefit from broader scale efforts. As a person, I am very ‘strong willed’. When something should be done a certain way, whether that has to do with design or tooling or broader changes in the company, I will say it, regardless of who I might piss off. This is obviously not how it works in a corporate environment. Regardless of how much a company claims to be ‘open to ideas from everyone’, raising your ideas in cases when people higher than you on the ladder disagree with you is obviously terrible for your personal career growth. I have 2 examples here that I can share, since it’s already shipped and not under NDA anymore. One was where I first joined the company, and was put onto the Skarner Rework pod. I straight up said the reworked kit was awful, and that we should probably put more additional work into the kit design. No one listened since the design was “locked” already. The new Skarner shipped a couple months later. We all know how that one landed. The second was Mel. It was early on in its development cycle. I had many pieces of feedback written around how problematic the W is. An hour-long meeting with the designer in charge of her back then where I said “I don’t see a version of this spell shape where it’s not going to be a huge problem for us later on in terms of balance.” Did it matter? Nope. All it got was a few reminders about how “you shouldn’t push so strongly against things already decided by leadership.” We all know how Mel landed. I sucked at playing the corporate politics game. I will admit this. I probably pissed off a good number of people in my years at Riot. No one higher than you on the ladder likes being told they’re wrong by someone lower, and the insult is only multiplied by the fact that it came from a young woman. I had big ideas. Great ideas. Incredibly innovative Ideas that could have made Riot the absolute leader in the entire video game industry and 100x-ed profits. I wish I could say I’m kidding. And no, it wasn’t cutting headcount and replacing Rioters with AI. Ideas that were pure wins for the company. So I cold dm-ed Marc Merill, a man whom I highly highly respect. Out of everyone in the company, he was the person I looked up to the most. He took my ideas seriously. Set me up in chats with other people who only took me seriously since Marc set them up. I began finding myself in important conversations where everyone else in the convos were 10 levels higher than me on the corporate ladder. They listened, since I truly brought an insane amount of insights into each of these. And not to throw shade, but I don’t believe Riot at the time had anyone remotely close to my level in terms of Applied AI expertise. Riot had fallen prey to the same mistake a lot of companies make, which is primarily hiring ML guys for AI when what they actually need is Applied AI guys. I began drafting up and prototyping larger scale projects. One of them was a revamped system to how toxicity is addressed across all of Riot’s games (let’s be real here, current system lowkey sucks. It punishes those who don’t deserve it, and let’s slip the people who do. player support is rarely, if ever, helpful). The other was a Riot core knowledge base. A knowledge base that will allow Riot to build an infinite number of useful tooling on top of, such as automation that streamlines both player feedback and internal feedback directly to the Rioters we’d want eyes on for any specific issue. Tooling that can cut millions in fees currently paid out to external vendors that does half the job at 10x the price. These weren’t the ideas that I mentioned can 100x profits btw. The docs and pitch deck where the ideas are, all the execs have already read on repeat. Thanks to Google Docs history tracking, I quite literally have proof that Dylan (the CEO) has opened my strategy docs on 10+ unique days. Everything was going well, or so I thought. The few days before I was fired, I had even flown down to LA, to chat w/ Brandon Beck and a couple other leaders. Brandon had canceled, to which I didn’t think much of at the time. The talks were all around the specific projects that I was solo driving, and where exactly on the Riot’s corporate ladder do I fit into. First thing Tuesday morning, I was called into a meeting with my direct manager. He told me that I was fired, then left me alone in the meeting with the HR rep that joined us. Shock. All I felt was shock. Throughout everything, I never considered myself being fired even remotely within the realms of the possibilities. They gave me some BS reason (my pitchdeck), and informed me that I had some infosec violation? Come on now, this was NOT the reason. My immediate thought was that I pissed someone off. They’re taking the opportunity to get rid of me. Maybe I can message Marc somehow? They already cut my Slack access, but maybe if I can get a message to him that this was happening. He’s the one who’s been encouraging me to speak my mind and opening doors for me after all, there’s no shot he knew about this and would let it happen. “Marc knew about this.” That’s when it hit me. The years of effort, of going far and beyond what was required of me. The last month where I averaged 16 hours per day. Countless all nighters to get everything done and shipped. It didn’t mean anything to the company. Nothing at all. It fucking hurt. As the HR rep Malasavanh Thavonesouk can verify, I had kept my cool up until that line. Then I started bawling at the sheer betrayal of it all. In my grief, I almost signed the separation agreement on the spot during the meeting. The one that would have given me $15k in return for my silence. Thank god I didn’t, or I’d probably be sued for this post that I’m writing now. I don’t think a single person there expected me to have the balls to go public with it all LOL, who’d be crazy enough to blacklist themselves after all? I had no closure. My Slack access was cut the second the meeting started. No emails from them clarifying anything regarding my termination other than how I can’t sue them for wrongful termination, they are an ‘at will employer’, and reiterating how I cannot break NDA for anything I worked on during my time at the company. I’m ngl, this whole thing has me fucked up still.

English
1
0
46
4.4K