
Five Gheys burgers and fries
243 posts













Now is not the time to turn on President Trump. If the Iran conflict has you nervous, I implore you to expand your thinking. Our entire existence has been puppeteered by secret societies that worship dark entities. You don't just undo that over night.






אחיי ואחיותיי אזרחי ישראל, לפני שעה קלה יצאנו ישראל וארה״ב למבצע להסרת האיום הקיומי מצד משטר הטרור באיראן. אני מודה לידידינו הגדול הנשיא דונלד טראמפ על מנהיגותו ההיסטורית. במשך 47 שנים קורא משטר האייתוללות ״מוות לישראל״, ״מוות לאמריקה״. הוא הקיז את דמינו, רצח אמריקנים רבים וטבח בעמו. אסור שמשטר טרור רצחני זה יתחמש בנשק גרעיני שיאפשר לו לאיים על האנושות כולה. הפעולה המשותפת שלנו תיצור את התנאים לעם האיראני האמיץ ליטול את גורלו בידו. הגיעה העת לכל חלקי העם באיראן - הפרסים, הכורדים, האזרים, הבלוצ׳ים והאחוואזים - לסלק מעליהם את עול העריצות ולהביא לאיראן חופשית ושוחרת שלום. אני פונה אליכם אזרחי ישראל להשמע להנחיות פיקוד העורף, בימים הקרובים במבצע ״שאגת הארי״ כולנו נידרש לאורך רוח ולתעצומות נפש. יחד נעמוד, יחד נילחם ויחד נבטיח את נצח ישראל.





one thing I didn't get to spend much time discussing on the Space call was the $BBBYQ Statement of Financial Affairs and it disclosing RC's co-debtor status. first I want to establish the importance and legitimacy of this disclosure. the Statement of Financial Affairs (SOFA) is a document that must be filed with a Chapter 11 and has to be accurate; it is considered perjury to lie. the point of it is to give a history of financial transactions and activities leading up to a company's bankruptcy filing: "The Statement of Financial Affairs is designed to disclose relevant financial information to the bankruptcy court, the trustee, and your creditors. It helps establish an accurate picture of your financial affairs, including your income, expenses, assets, liabilities, and recent financial transactions. The form assists in assessing your eligibility for bankruptcy relief and aids in determining the best course of action for your case." jdsupra.com/legalnews/unde… I am trying to emphasize this point because you cannot dismiss the significance of seeing RC listed here and it is not a mistake. do you really think his lawyers would allow for that when he had two ongoing litigations involving the company? that is ridiculous. it is also not "because he is being sued", that argument is either repeated because someone was too lazy to look, they don't understand what they are reading or they are intentionally being misleading. it is laughable. I'll explain how we know: here we see RC listed opposite the plaintiff of his class action suit before the lead was changed to Bratya. it is listed. here is why you cannot dismiss finding RC in the sofa: because here we see RC listed again, separate of the class action and 16(b) lawsuits. unless you believe that a municipality where there used to be a $BBBY and Baby store location is involved in the litigations against RC, this is what is referred to as a "slam-dunk find." the previous comment was obviously a joke but in case you really did believe (or someone has claimed) that Tyler, TX and several other municipalities are involved in the lawsuits, further in the sofa we will see the city of Tyler disclose to the court exactly why they are in the creditor list: to no one's surprise, they are a taxing authority. do you remember the Texas Taxes and the Comptroller, for who the Plan reserved the right to pursue a third-party for taxes owed by the OldCo? who would agree to that? only an acquirer. RC is listed in the full financial disclosure presented to the US Court that he is a co-debtor of the Old $BBBY company, opposite of a municipality claiming they are owed for county taxes and water utility bills. do you really think that RC's attorneys would allow a "mistake" of this magnitude to exist, when he is being litigated relating to the same business? do you think the signatory for the Statement of Financial Affairs, would make the "mistake" of falsely attributing company debts to a third party, under penalty of perjury? of course not. that would be laughable. make no mistake, that is exactly what this says. RC is a co-debtor for the OldCo and a co-debtor is a person other than who is filing for bankruptcy, who is also legally responsible for paying the debts. there is no alternative interpretation. and you don't have to believe me, it is written at the top of the sofa itself: liable for debt nearly a year after he sold his shares. RC had a chip on his shoulder seeing how the former board treated him and his ideas for transforming the company. he could not turn away from the destruction of shareholder value resulting from the "October 2020 plan" and he held everyone to account as the Holder of Interests through the third-party release. look at the information filed with the US Court and decide for yourself. the facts are right there in front of you and they do not care how difficult it is for anyone "to get there" with their own opinion to believe them.










