Fluc

@AaronComics @DjGriffith Revenue Share through the Token

@DjGriffith How does the $zfi token benefits?

I will not stop talking about $ZFI until it gets the valuation it deserves. A $1.5M market cap project running $6M+ in agentic TVL and shipping constantly. The treasury layer for AI agents. $2M + raised from VCs and doxxed founders. This post will age well. NFA

@0xAybars @virtuals_io @ethermage @0xTP91 interacted aswell with them and the Token Deployer sold everythign 1h after launch. Great View for @virtuals_io

$ORION dev is selling, be careful @virtuals_io fam. @ethermage should unf them. debank.com/profile/0x9BA6…

1- you have a great Product, but Pumpfun isnt the Launchpad or Ecosystem that fits for Lil. 2- Base as an Ecosystem has way more productive Projects and is on top of all the Stats when it comes to Adoption of new Technology Onchain 3- From what i see you guys holding 12% +6% in the LP. That isnt enough for splitting LP to two Chains. That isnt enough to split it, slippage will stop a lot of People from Investing in the Project, because a small Amount of Sells have high Impact on the Price 4- Multichain just make sense if you have depth of Liquidty. And for the last half year Sol didnt really have any Volume on Utility Projects. I would pivot to Base where most of the Builders are active. Send me a Dm if youre intrested on some Takes. Been around Solana and Base for some Years and would like to help.

Ok 🙏🏼 what I’m understanding is: 1- SOL traders don’t want to buy a SOL token for a Base product 2- Base token needs liquidity 3- we should incentivize SOL tokens migration to Base, and not allow bidirectional unless/until we reach a sufficient token trading depth 4-when we do, we can decide if bidirectional / multi chain makes sense (which it should do, as with enough token volume depth it should make sense to expand reach

The first AI-centered stablecoin neobank on Base That's exactly what @CryptoFilles is building with @liminalcash 🟦

@OxTrenchor @papaldo2614 @virtuals_io @YourHandle Fees go to @OxTrenchor

@papaldo2614 @Fluc____ @virtuals_io I need to know which X handle should receive the creator fees. Try: `fees to @yourhandle`

@OxTrenchor @papaldo2614 @virtuals_io @YourHandle you already launched the Token all good.

@papaldo2614 @Fluc____ @virtuals_io I couldn't find a token ticker in your tweet. Try: `@OxTrenchor launch $YOURTICKER fees to @yourhandle`

Main reason is that you mentioned its gonna be non tradable on Base. Base is where Most of the AI/Stablecoin Adoption Action is happending onchain. Thats where i see the benefits of being on Base. Second: you have quite low Liquidty already on Solana. If you split this to multiple Chains - its bringing a lot of volatility to the Price Action which isnt beneficial for a Project. I see you guys fitting way more on Base than Solana. Concentrate all the LP on one Chain for a more healthy Price Action, which is Attracting more Investors and Users

@Fluc____ @_rekt420 @BrinckmanS77200 @liminalcash @daddy_l3ssons @base Thanks for sharing your thoughts 🧡 What’s the advantage of having it only on one chain? I would have thought 2 ecosystems = double the community / number of potential users

Why not just pivot completly to Base? Whats the benefit of staying at Solana - Base is pushing the Neobank Narrative and gonna bring you Users. You can stil do what you proposed, but its gonna confuse a lot of People with buying on Sol and then bridging to Base. Make it as easy as possible for Users. I think it would be beneficial for the Company to set up an LP on Base and have it all on one Chain.

Not sure yet if people should be able to trade both sides. One potential token roadmap is: Solana $LIL is a fixed supply asset. Supply reduces because they can be moved to Base but not the other way. On Base, $LIL becomes one of two things: (A) “classic” reward point - we would need a sales team to set up a reward program (B) novel @MetaLeX_Labs structure, so users become real owners in the business In either case non-tradable but transferable. Wdyt?

I mean, 32k per day aint bad. Thats 11.7m annual revenue on trading fees annually. @virtuals_io needs to offer stuff that attracts devs The allure of trading fees isnt going to cut it. Its not “guaranteed”. you can launch a token… but youre not going to get much in fees unless you really have a whole team and machine behind the project. Even then… the attention span of the degen is that of a gnat, and if the coin isnt keeping their attention (price action is king) the next shiny object will take it. Theres not many big projects that can command such attention, and the ones that are probably dont want their liquidity locked into being paired with Virtual with no wiggle room… and/or they dont want to be contained or siloed into that ecosystem. So they’ve essentially decreased the market for their product considerably. In the old days, basically one guy.. or a small team with zero reputation could launch and still do well. The discovery process was very organic. Yes there were rugs… but tbh the winners made up for the rugs. You could get rugged 9/10 times and that 1/10 winner still put you up 10x lol. I think once you increased the complexity of launches, that organic process of discovery was lost. People started making decisions about whether to ape ahead of the launch… the volume on launches then decreased… the frenzy of discovery was quelled… and thus the signal was muffled. With that the excitement and allure was gone. The human psychology of launches and how various mechanics affect it is something that i spent a lot of time thinking about. Most changes were put in place to lessen the risk of rugs. They made sense at the time to a degree. The flip side is that this changes the psychology of how people trade and ultimately, i believe, flattened the upside. Classic case of trading freedom for security imo. There were other macro factors involved outside of Virtuals as well, but thats a given. I dont think you can have a perfect system of safe launches with high upside. I think by nature, increasing safety decreases upside. I think there are psychological mechanics behind this that arent well understood. I would wager that if Virtuals just literally scrapped every fancy launch mechanism and went back to the wild west of pure bonding curve… shit would probably start going crazy again. The increased risk is actually the astute degens best friend. The increased risk allows the degen to dive into the details and surface alpha that few whales are willing to devote the energy to find. It creates a foundation of small degen whale holders who finally got something good before the big insiders. You can see it on the blockchain. Of course you can rig the launch with insiders… but thats no match for 10k degens frantically analyzing every little detail tbh. There is nothing to analyze with meme coins like there is with utility. Why did utility focused developers flock to @virtuals_io in the beginning? Well, it all started right after we saw that Goat coin start posting on X back in late sept or early october 2024. This was right before Virtuals launchpad debut in mid october 2024. AI agents posting on X was new…. And a meta was born. Virtuals said… hey… the api to post on X is expensive. Launch here, and you can get it for free using our framework. This attracted many talented people and created a rich place for speculative aping that was different than the meme coins on pump fun in that you had some semblance of being able to evaluate the project from a technical standpoint… something non-existent with memes. The concept of trenches for AI focused utility coins came to be. It was not really meant to be that at first (was a bunch or waifu shit), but the rails were there and people started coming. See my old videos if you want to see the early launch pad. (See next post)

Allways looking for x402 Plays. Recently seeing increased Transactions. Over the last 3 Days @dexteraisol has a major Part on that. Bought a Bag of $Dexter

i'm waiting at #56814 @Jaileddotfun launching soon [ drop your card below👇]

@Tech_Tycoon could you get a decent Mic? its impossible to understand you in TG

#BTC Bulls sweating yet??

New way of Trading Leverage over @altdotfun Allows you to trade the Asset on Leverage without the risk of Liquidation. You create a Coin and decide the underlying Asset Long or Short. Short Plays seem way underrated - Screen shows the biggest Short/Long Coin. I Bought $TOP Main S&P500 Short CA: 0x53195a1c4E664Ac09Eb72892516F8f85EC800000

@AxisLend Rugging in 3,2,1

@jexybtc Yeah but thats just a 5x lvg token from $hype Hope they launching a Project token

Hyperliquid's PumpFun. If HL supports it, it could really take off. $ALT 0xa3882D42ed12B57C10C85E8Ec8fEBD0774600000 Hyperliquid

@minidevfun @Pumpfun Hacked

@0xTsuan Cool, any Time frame wen you gonna release that?

@Fluc____ Yes

@0xTsuan is reinventing $MOSS The idea is to create a Layer for AI agents that breaks Decisions into different parts instead of handling everything inside one massive prompt. With Concern-Oriented Agent Thinking (COAT) and Separation of Concerns (SoC), agents can better understand: • what their long-term goals are • which concerns come with those goals • which concerns conflict with each other • and how to act without going against important constraints New Website with the different Concerns: mossai.com/moss-agent-con… ATH was at 50m MC. Looks like a great Risk Reward play with that Chart.

@0xTsuan is coat gonna be able to get integrated by every Agent?

@Fluc____ Maybe not reinventing MOSS but focusing on COAT, the foundation of MOSS

♾

@cybercentry @virtuals_io Arent there any ACP Transactions yet?

Cybercentry Weekly Build ➠ 10+ verification services active through ACP @virtuals_io ➠ Expanding capabilities across the stack Research / Standards ➠ AI Agent Verification progressing ➠ AI Agent Authenticated Wallet advancing Ecosystem ➠ New partnership in progress ➠ Growing network across security and agent builders @ethereum Infrastructure ➠ Improving service distribution for agents @base ➠ Continued progress toward auto-install flow Always building.