FlyAware

2.6K posts

FlyAware banner
FlyAware

FlyAware

@FlyAware1

I want to live in a stable biosphere, where we can enjoy sports for ever

Noneoyobeeswax Katılım Ocak 2020
631 Takip Edilen177 Takipçiler
FlyAware retweetledi
Haringey and Tottenham for A Free Palestine
HTFP is pleased to announce that its pledge has been signed by the following candidates in Haringey for the May 7th, 2026 local elections. Vote wisely! Boot out Lammy's Haringey Labour! Greens Dixie Joseph Mark Blake Felicity De Motta Hayley Jukes Christyn Parkes Fin Fitzgerald Joss MacDonald Jo Kuper Georgia Twigg Tehseen Khan Lucas Bouvier Ash Ahmed Edward Thacker Ruairidh Paton Dan Johnson Bethany Anderson Phil Sheridan Svenja Nierwetberg Dushka Wertenbaker-Man Marc Jenner Tay Quartermain Haringey Socialist Alliance Alison Davy Gary McFarlane John Sinha Paul Burnham Meryem Ulger Amelie Cooper TUSC Ammon Cohen Nick Davies
Haringey and Tottenham for A Free Palestine tweet media
English
0
4
6
116
FlyAware retweetledi
Declassified UK
Declassified UK@declassifiedUK·
David Macintosh, a British private security contractor who managed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation sites, has blown the whistle on Israeli war crimes in his first ever sit down interview👇
English
8
653
900
11.7K
FlyAware retweetledi
Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur oPt
Thiago Á. & Saif A. have been kidnapped, mistreated, arbitrarily detained, to punish them and crush the growing solidarity movement against Israel's genocide in Palestine. Do not let it happen! Demand their freedom and freedom for all Palestinian hostages! #FreeThiago #FreeSaif
Novara Media@novaramedia

Israeli soldiers beat and tortured flotilla organisers Saif Abukeshek and Thiago Ávila after abducting them in international waters near Greece in the early hours of Thursday morning, lawyers and diplomats have said. After illegally intercepting 22 boats and kidnapping around 200 activists hundreds of miles from Gaza, Israel transferred the majority to Greek authorities, but refused to release Abukeshek and Ávila. Instead, it transported them back to an Israeli desert prison, where Palestinians are routinely tortured. Brazilian activist Ávila was dragged face-down across the floor and beaten so badly he passed out twice, lawyers said, after visiting him on Saturday. His wife, Lara Souza, said an embassy official told her he had been temporarily blinded by his injuries, with his left eye still swollen shut, but he was being denied medical treatment. In a brief visit, where he was separated from the consul by a glass screen and not able to speak freely, he reported pain all over his body, especially in his hand and shoulder, and said that soldiers had threatened to throw him overboard and target his wife and two-year-old daughter. Abukeshek, who had been sailing on an observer boat and did not intend to go to Gaza, was “in shock”, his wife Sally Issa said. He was forced to lie face-down on the floor of an Israeli warship for two days, lawyers said, blindfolded and with his hands bound behind his back. Spain has demanded Israel release Abukeshek, who is Palestinian but holds Spanish and Swedish citizenship. On Friday, prime minister Pedro Sánchez said he had been "illegally abducted by the Netanyahu government". On Sunday, the activists appeared before an Israeli court, where a judge extended their detention by two days. Lawyers demanded their immediate and unconditional release, telling the court the entire process was "fundamentally flawed and illegal", and describing Israel's actions as a "retaliatory measure against humanitarian activist leaders". The two men have now been transferred back to solitary confinement in Shikma prison, where they are being held in windowless cells. Both are on hunger strike, with Ávila saying he will not leave without Abukeshek.

English
671
8.4K
14.6K
180.3K
FlyAware
FlyAware@FlyAware1·
@treesey @TrevorPTweets @SkyNews I dont think UK law says if you feel a crime has been committed, a crime has been committed 😀 Feelings can just determine whether an actual, verified crime, is a hate crime. Otherwise I could just feel you are being hateful now, and have you arrested
English
1
0
0
1.6K
FlyAware
FlyAware@FlyAware1·
@nicolelampert You are very welcome to come join in the marches any time, along with thousands of Jewish people, Christians, Muslims, or whatever- we really dont care what religion and no-ones checking 😀 Lets all spend time together, and realise we have more in common
English
0
0
3
82
Nicole Lampert
Nicole Lampert@nicolelampert·
I’ve reported on several of these marches. There’s rarely a banner that says peace because they are not ‘peace marches’. They are marches that call for ‘intifada’ (violent revolution). They call for violent resistance’. They chant ‘from the river to the sea’ and they also chant ‘we don’t want no two state/ let’s go back to ‘48’. In short, they are genocidal demonstrations even if some of the people on them - maybe the majority- believe they are marching for peace.
Kellie-Jay Keen@ThePosieParker

He’s terribly angry under pressure isn’t he? #AngryDave

English
178
441
1.9K
50K
FlyAware
FlyAware@FlyAware1·
@HeidiBachram I dont agree with this binary political worldview, in fact there are many successful multi-ethnic states, in which full freedom requires the freedom of *all* inhabitants of the land Have you spoke to Palestinians to discuss this and dig deeper on this language?
English
0
0
0
21
Heidi Bachram
Heidi Bachram@HeidiBachram·
Around the corner from my home in Brighton a sticker has gone up calling for the ethnic cleansing of Jews. After nearly three years you cannot claim ignorance. It’s a deliberately antisemitic act. This is a hate movement.
Heidi Bachram tweet media
English
63
184
609
5K
FlyAware
FlyAware@FlyAware1·
@ZackPolanski @bencsmoke Handled this very well. I could see the interviewer constantly trying to willfully misunderstand you and bend your words towards the headline he wanted, very sad
English
0
0
1
295
Zack Polanski
Zack Polanski@ZackPolanski·
When Jewish people speak out against genocide, why are our voices dismissed? And smirking while I describe someone Nazi-saluting at me isn’t just disrespectful - it feels deeply antisemitic. youtu.be/7VkfYJgLljE?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1.3K
4K
16.9K
1.6M
FlyAware
FlyAware@FlyAware1·
@spikedonline Is starting a war of choice that drives up British people’s energy bills and risks massive refugeee flows to the UK the act of an ally?
English
0
0
0
18
spiked
spiked@spikedonline·
Britain must stop treating its allies as enemies, and its enemies as friends: buff.ly/whHns07
English
12
65
260
5.1K
FlyAware retweetledi
Saul Staniforth
Saul Staniforth@SaulStaniforth·
.@AlexCrawfordSky: "She moves her fingers.. but with nearly half her body burned in an Israeli air strike, any movement at all is painful. Her name is Zaynab, she's only 12, and her entire family was killed in the same attack"
English
61
2.5K
4.3K
136.6K
FlyAware retweetledi
sarah
sarah@sahouraxo·
Israel killed every single person in this video in Lebanon. Every. Single. One. Not fighters. Babies. Children. Women. Entire families. 350 civilians slaughtered in one day. Remember their faces the next time Israel claims it’s targeting “militants.”
English
518
10.7K
16.1K
211.1K
FlyAware retweetledi
Euro-Med Monitor
Euro-Med Monitor@EuroMedHR·
In a new extensive report, Euro-Med Monitor documented dozens of testimonies from Palestinians in #Gaza who reported systematic sexual violence, including rape, in Israeli prisons and detention centres. 🧵Thread featuring some of the testimonies
Euro-Med Monitor tweet media
English
170
3K
3.9K
326.2K
FlyAware retweetledi
IPPR
IPPR@IPPR·
Our analysis of 22 countries reveals that tax-funded healthcare systems have lower admin costs compared to insurance-based healthcare systems. Administrative costs consume 2.2 per cent of health spending in tax-funded systems compared to 3.5 per cent in insurance systems.
IPPR tweet media
English
17
153
184
25.9K
FlyAware retweetledi
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
France is on the eve of voting one of the most shameful laws in its history: it would effectively outlaw criticism of Israel and criminalize any speech seen as even remotely sympathetic to whoever the French government chooses to designate a "terrorist group." In effect this law would turn France's foreign policy into unchallengeable dogma backed by prison time. You could literally be sent for 5 years in prison if you, for instance, call what France says are "terrorists" a "resistance group." Think for instance Nelson Mandela during the apartheid (the ANC was on every Western terrorist list) or, heck, France's own Résistance against Nazi Germany - designated as "terrorists" by the Vichy regime and the Nazi occupation. It's frankly absolutely insane. The new law is called "loi Yadan" after its author Caroline Yadan, a MP who represents French expatriates living in Israel. The U.S. has congressmen paid by AIPAC: France has cut out the middleman entirely, we have MPs whose constituency is literally in Israel. The law has already passed committee and heads to a full parliamentary vote on April 16th - 3 days from now - under a very unusual fast-track procedure. Seven of eleven parliamentary groups have said they'll vote yes and the law is expected to pass. What does the law say? Let me quote from it directly (full text here: assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/…): 1) Article 1 introduces the concept of "implicit" provocation to terrorism and punishes it with five years imprisonment and a fine of €75,000 That's the one I was speaking about. Under this provision, describing anyone France designates as terrorist as a "resistance movement" - the way France describes its own Résistance against Nazi occupation - could effectively become a crime. The key concept is what does "implicit provocation to terrorism" mean? Nobody knows. And that's the point. It means whatever a prosecutor wants it to mean: a perfectly good case could be made that, for instance, quoting international law on the right of occupied peoples to resist with respect to Hamas is, in fact, "implicit provocation to terrorism." France's most famous anti-terrorism judge, Marc Trévidic, says he has never seen anything like it in his entire career (x.com/CharliesIngall…): "Implicit provocation to terrorism: do you realize what that means? Becoming a censor of other people's thoughts, trying to guess what a person really meant." 2) The same article also expands the terrorism apology offense to include "minimizing or trivializing acts of terrorism in an outrageous manner." This is even crazier: until now, "apology of terrorism" meant actually expressing a favorable judgment of "terrorist acts" (which is already insane because, as we all know, one person's terrorist is another's freedom fighter). Well, under this new provision, a judge could decide that providing context, explaining root causes, or insufficiently condemning an act amounts to "trivializing" terrorism - and that would now be punishable with 5 years in prison. So, for instance, a history teacher explaining the origins of Hamas or Hezbollah is providing context - but a prosecutor could argue that contextualization is trivialization. The same reasoning could apply to a journalist, a researcher, or anyone on social media who says "yes, it was terrible, but here's why it happened." The "but" becomes a crime, as it is trivialization. 3) Article 4 expands Holocaust denial law Under current French law, denying the Holocaust is already a crime. This provision extends that crime by specifying that contestation of crimes against humanity now includes, "whatever its formulation, a negation, minimization, or outrageous trivialization" of those crimes. Again with "outrageous trivialization"! In this instance the very authors of the text - Caroline Yadan and her colleagues - explain their reasoning explicitly in the law's preamble (assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/…): "Comparing the State of Israel to the Nazi regime would thereby be punishable as an outrageous trivialization of the Shoah." So while the provision is written in general terms, its architects are openly saying what it's for: making it a crime to draw any parallel between Israel's actions and those of the Nazis. 4) Article 2 creates a brand new crime: calling for the destruction of a state. The law adds to an existing 1881 press law a provision punishing anyone who "publicly, in disregard of the right of peoples to self-determination and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, calls for the destruction of a state recognized by the French Republic." Five years imprisonment, €75,000 fine. The qualifiers about self-determination and the UN Charter are meant to sound reassuring. But what does "destruction" mean? In practice, if you advocate for a one-state solution where Israelis and Palestinians live as equals, you are de-facto calling for the "destruction" of the state of Israel. Well, that would now be punishable by 5 years in prison 🤷 There you go. Absolutely insane: if this new law passes, and it unfortunately very much looks like it will, France - the country that gave the world the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the country whose national identity is built on the Résistance - will have made it illegal to use the word 'resistance' about anyone the government doesn't like. Jean Moulin would be prosecuted. De Gaulle would be prosecuted. The only people who wouldn't be prosecuted are those who stay silent. Which, of course, is the whole point.
English
466
5.4K
10.4K
720.6K
FlyAware retweetledi
Canary
Canary@TheCanaryUK·
Iran's refusal to open the Strait of Hormuz signals a crumbling of the USA's traditional global dominance, and China isn't going to slow down By @ditalalmolloy thecanary.co/global/world-a…
English
1
8
16
845
FlyAware
FlyAware@FlyAware1·
@acadofideas @SpeechUnion @_ConnieShaw I think a key part of fighting back is right-left solidarity on freedom of speech Eg Toby Young speaks up to defend the free speech of Palestine solidarity marchers Then leftists have to defend the right of free speech of those they disagree with etc
English
0
0
1
48
Academy of Ideas
Academy of Ideas@acadofideas·
"The British state is terrified that if people have the right to say what they really think, to protest how they wish peacefully... it will lead to chaos"🪧🫢 The @SpeechUnion's @_ConnieShaw @ #BattleFest "Free-speech emergency: how can we fight back?"💬🥊 👇
English
72
667
2.9K
59K
Connie Shaw
Connie Shaw@_ConnieShaw·
Share this story far and wide. Non-Jewish Zionist @BrodieMitchell1 was made to vacate his university accommodation within 48 hours because he compared a keffiyeh to a "tea towel". Now, he faces criminal prosecution for the same comment. Meanwhile, the other student, who called him a "wannabe Jew", faces no punishment at all. I have met many cancelled students over the last year. This is the most shocking story I have ever heard.
The Free Speech Union@SpeechUnion

A British university student is facing prosecution after comparing a Keffiyeh worn by a pro-Palestinian activist to a “tea towel” during Freshers’ Fair at @RoyalHolloway. 20-year-old Brodie Mitchell told the President of the Friends of Palestine Society, Huda El-Jamal, that her keffiyeh looked like a “tea towel” after she called him a “wannabe Jew” because he was defending Israel and mocked him for not wearing a Jewish “hat”. In a classic case of double standards on campus, Brodie was handed a nine-week suspension the following day “for alleged conduct that could be considered hate speech”. He was told his comments were “Islamophobic”, “racist”, and “anti-Palestinian” and was barred from campus and forced to leave his student accommodation. Surrey Police have now confirmed they have sent a file to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for a charging decision — meaning Brodie could face prosecution for saying El-Jamal’s headscarf looked like a “tea towel”. Meanwhile, she faced no disciplinary action and continued her studies as normal. Welcome to two-tier Britain. The case could be the first of many, given the Government’s decision to publish an official definition of “anti-Muslim hostility” and encourage universities to embed it in their speech policies. The definition is already being used to silence legitimate criticism of Islam. The Free Speech Union is supporting Brodie. With our help, he has been allowed back on campus, but under conditions that dictate who he can speak to and what he’s allowed to say. With our support, Brodie is taking Royal Holloway to the High Court, arguing he was unfairly forced to miss seven weeks of teaching, potentially delaying completion of his degree. We’ve also provided him with a top-notch criminal legal team in case the CPS decides to prosecute him. His own university, Royal Holloway, is spending nearly three-quarters of a million pounds defending its actions. At a recent hearing, it initially said its total costs could be as high as £734,000, with the risk that Brodie will have to pay them if he loses. In other words, the university is trying to scare him into dropping the case. But we’ve got his back. Welcome to the reality of free speech on English university campuses. In the absence of the complaints scheme that was legislated for in the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act being activated by Bridget Phillipson – she has delayed doing so for 18 months now – these are the ruinous costs facing students who want to stand up for their right to free speech. On this week’s episode of the FSU Podcast, Brodie Mitchell (@BrodieMitchell1) shares his story with @_ConnieShaw. The full episode is available on the FSU YouTube channel (link in first reply).

English
82
963
2.9K
74.6K
FlyAware
FlyAware@FlyAware1·
@JakeWSimons Its fine to be pro- cancelling musicians for holding racist views, its just this is an authoritarian left wing position. So dont pretend to be conservative, right wing, pro- free speech or libertarian from now on cheers
English
0
0
0
150
FlyAware retweetledi
Ekō
Ekō@Eko_Movement·
What will it take for Europe’s largest truck manufacturers to catch up with new truck makers and cut costs for customers? Behind the Curve, a new Idle Giants report, highlights three problems and one HUGE opportunity for Volvo, @Daimler and @Traton’s transition to electric: 💰 The pricing gap is a strategic choice, not a cost constraint. These companies are charging double the non-component costs for electric trucks vs diesel. 🔒 That strategy is locking out the majority of the market. At today’s prices, only an estimated 24% of new heavy-duty vehicle demand between now and 2030 is realistically addressable. 📉 And the cracks are already showing. They aimed high on price, but now there aren’t enough buyers at that level to support the scale they need. 🚛 The real opportunity? Manufacturers that rethink pricing to reach a broader base of operators can unlock far greater demand, accelerate scale, and strengthen their position for the transition to zero-emissions transport. Strong truck emission standards and smart pricing create the level playing field fleets need to invest at scale without competitive disadvantage, and provide the certainty that justifies the investment. If manufacturers truly want to increase their market share and create more demand for electric trucks, they should start pricing competitively and support the regulations that have been proven to support demand. Read more at → bit.ly/41PQ4OR
English
0
1
2
103