Fox

@REALSATOSHIY @DD_Geopolitics And even if Russia used a small tactical nuke, it would still kill less than Russia has by slowly grinding this war down, which already cost hundreds of thousands of Russian soldiers at a cost of barely 20% of Ukraine.

@REALSATOSHIY @DD_Geopolitics Mate, I’m not against Russia but it has done nothing but display weakness. Instead of using it against Ukraine leadership and top command, they have sacrificed hundreds of thousands of Russians soldiers and country’s pride. Wake the fuk up 🤡

🇷🇺🚀 "If they keep attacking my allies, I may have to wake up and do something about it." Meet Russia's RS-28 Sarmat, NATO designation: Satan 2. 35 meters. 208 tons. Range of 18,000 km. It reaches France in 10 minutes, the U.S. in 20, traveling at Mach 20 — roughly 25,000 km/h. Missile defense systems are designed to intercept from the north. The Sarmat flies south, over the South Pole, and approaches from below. It carries up to 15 thermonuclear warheads, each 750 times the power of Hiroshima. Unit cost: ~$100 million. Total program cost: estimated $85 billion.

@REALSATOSHIY @DD_Geopolitics I am just asking for a genocide, or a huge nuclear strike wiping out entire cities. We are talking about small tactical non-nuclear strikes like Oreshnik at least that would cut the head of the snake. It would destabilise the country and kill entire Ukrainian leadership.

@stats_feed Time to come back to the motherland lol

🇸🇮 Slovenia limits fuel purchases as pumps run dry. Fuelling at individual service stations is limited to 50 litres per day for private vehicles and 200 litres for legal entities and private businessmen, such as farmers. The restrictions will stay in ⁠force until further notice.

@OlgaBazova Maybe at least Iran has the balls, unlike Russia 🤡

The direct flight distance from Tehran to Kiev is 2,347 km. Does Iran have missiles capable of flying that distance? If so, Iran could do the funniest thing to Bankovaya St, they got nothing to lose.

@squatsons @SeanParnellASW Ayden don’t be cringe.

@SeanParnellASW Any comment on the KC-135 participating in operation epic fury?

We are dominating on every front and executing our core mission: • Annihilate the Iranian Navy • Destroy Iran’s missile capabilities • Permanently deny the regime a nuclear weapon

@MarioNawfal Let’s be honest, Russia could sink that with a single Oreshnik

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 HOW HARD IS IT FOR IRAN TO HIT A U.S AIRCRAFT CARRIER? Critics love to call aircraft carriers sitting ducks. The argument sounds simple enough: a ship the size of a small city must be easy to find, easy to hit, and devastating to lose. In the age of hypersonic missiles and satellite surveillance, some analysts insist the carrier is already obsolete, but reality is far less dramatic. Aircraft carriers are not lonely targets drifting across the ocean. They operate inside one of the most sophisticated defensive systems ever built, something the U.S. Navy calls “defense in depth.” Think of it less like a single ship and more like a moving fortress. The first layer is the carrier strike group itself. Destroyers and cruisers surround the carrier, each equipped with the Aegis combat system, a network of radar and missiles capable of tracking hundreds of threats simultaneously. Incoming missiles can be intercepted hundreds of miles away, often long before the carrier itself is even in danger. The second layer lives in the sky. Aircraft like the E-2D Hawkeye patrol high above the fleet, acting as airborne radar stations that can spot low-flying missiles or enemy aircraft long before ship-based sensors could. If something suspicious appears, fighter jets such as F/A-18s or F-35s can intercept the threat before a shot is even fired. In other words, the battle is pushed far away from the carrier itself. If a missile somehow slips through those outer layers, electronic warfare becomes the next shield. Modern carriers can jam or confuse a missile’s guidance system, essentially blinding it or feeding it false information. Chaff clouds and flares create fake targets in the sky, turning the missile’s final seconds into a guessing game. Sometimes the missile never finds the ship at all. And then there is the last line of defense. Close-range interceptors like Sea Sparrow and Rolling Airframe Missiles can shoot down threats at the final moment. If everything else fails, the Phalanx close-in weapon system, a rapid-fire Gatling gun often described as a “wall of lead,” can tear an incoming missile apart just seconds before impact. None of this means aircraft carriers are invincible. Every military system has vulnerabilities, and modern anti-ship weapons are increasingly capable. But the idea that carriers are easy targets, helpless giants waiting to be sunk, misunderstands how they actually operate. A carrier is not just a ship. It's a layered defense network, a mobile airbase, and the center of an entire fleet designed to make hitting it one of the most difficult tasks in modern warfare.

@donaldtusk lol if you think Russia or U.S. would ever allow you to have nuclear weapons. Russia will level half of Poland before they happens. Keep dreaming 🤡

Poland is in talks with France and a group of closest European allies on the programme of advanced nuclear deterrence. We are arming up together with our friends so that our enemies will never dare to attack us.

@BackupJeffx What’s wrong with his nose

@Zlatti_71 Never heard that before

🇺🇸 Possible Breakthrough? Witkoff Hints at “Good News” on Ukraine Settlement Soon U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff has suggested that positive developments in negotiations on a Ukraine settlement could emerge within the coming weeks. According to him, much of the process ultimately “comes down to Putin’s position,” noting that he has met the Russian president eight times personally. Witkoff said Putin has always spoken to him frankly and clearly outlined his “red lines.” He added that reaching any agreement requires understanding the other side’s motives and objectives, otherwise negotiations are impossible. Witkoff emphasized that these contacts have been important and are becoming especially relevant now, and claimed that the Ukrainian side broadly shares this assessment. - RVvoenkor

@BGatesIsaPyscho Oh wtf is he wearing a shirt now?

Watch Ukrainian President Zelensky earlier in the week. You all see that he’s at it again right?

@WarMonitor3 Talks is the only thing it’s ever going to be if you think Russians or the Americans will let you have them. Wake up 🤡

Multiple European countries are publicly backing talks on a homegrown nuclear deterrent to complement American atomic weapons following an erosion of trust-POLITICO

@MyLordBebo I wonder what’s his plan if Russia tactically nukes Poland. Surely he doesn’t think US will go to a nuclear war with Russia over Poland 🤡

🇷🇺🇵🇱 Polish Foreign Minister Sikorski: “If Russians cross the border, start killing NATO citizens, we activate the plan. The plan is simple: we win, they lose.” This is not a plan, this is bragging of a 5 year old.

@Mylovanov Why even bother posting nonsense when no one believes you 🤡

Ukraine struck the main Missile and Artillery Directorate of Russia in the Volgograd region with six FP-5 “Flamingo” cruise missiles, General Staff of Ukraine. This is one of Russia’s largest arsenals, where Russia stored missiles, ammunition, and explosive materials.

@piersmorgan Shouldn’t you be worrying about your wife instead? Stupid cuck 🤡

Disgusting decision. Shame on the Winter Olympic chiefs.

@SenoreAmore 🤡

🇺🇦 🌡️ Due to a heating outage, the parquet floor at Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture has bulged. Student: This is great! It was Soviet-era parquet.

@PhillipsPOBrien How do you suggest defeating nuclear superpower when all financial efforts have failed?

Always remember. Not defeating Russia is a choice that Europeans and Americans are making. Nothing more, nothing less.

@WarMonitor3 That’s the difference. Russia lost a plane and Ukraine lost half of its electricity 🤡

Russian airforce has lost an Sukhoi Su-34 bomber today presumably on the frontlines of Ukraine.