
Fra Girolamo
1.8K posts

Fra Girolamo
@FraGirolamo1
Ecce Gladius Domini Super Terram, Cito et Velociter



Please not the 1 Being, 3 Persons circle again, where you try to apply LDS definitions and thinking to the early Christian worldview. It refers to one being, and multiple figures claim it. I personally find the Trinity discussion kind of boring because (my sole opinion) I think the councils were more specifying what/who God is not, more than trying to define what/who God is. In other words, they were putting up borders, not necessarily making a positive claim. Maybe that’s just my own ignorance. My more relevant point was that you left out critical context that was in the video, I think to make your counter more palatable.



No Catholic should attack Joseph over the age of his wives. Their own canon law allowed these marriages in Joseph's lifetime. "Until 1917, canon law had basically considered anyone above the age of 12 capable of marriage. Thus, when the 1917 Code raised the minimum age for marriage in the church to 14 for girls and 16 for boys (1917 CIC 1067), the change was greeted as an improvement" Not to mention that 14 year old girls are STILL permitted to marry today. So why have Matt Fradd, Joe Heschmeyer, Trent Horn, and others used his brides ages against him?


Summer is here boys, you know what that means Fr. Youngtrad's time is up


Broke 110 today. May not seem like much, but it’s honest work.


There is one divine intellect and one divine will. Knowing and willing belong to nature and since God is one divine essence they share one act of knowing and willing. The persons are distinct only as relations of origin. The Father is unbegotten, Son begotten and HS proceeds eternally from these two. Hope that helps.





@ThoughtfulSaint What’s amusing here is that Jacob is admitting that as long you have a certain stature within Mormonism nothing can hold you back from drinking beer and sleeping with multiple women. And with that, the average Mormon lives a better life than Joseph and Brigham et al.













@ThoughtfulSaint IOW the “who” is functioning not in the Unitarian sense which demands I am speaking of one person. It is functioning in a less technical sense.







