Eric Von Zipper

If Democrats are actually thinking about doing this.. Let’s see if Democrat leaders come out and unequivocally deny this. They absolutely should.

NAILED IT: Brad Todd on Redistricting: “In 2018, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which is partisan and elected at the ballot box and majority Democrat, redrew Pennsylvania's map to help Democrats take over Congress in 2018. Democrats were not outraged by that.” “Mark Warner, who just decried this Virginia decision, the decision was written by Justice Arthur Kelsey. You know who put him on the appellate bench? Governor Mark Warner. This is selective outrage from Democrats.” “North Carolina has redrawn their lines about six times in the last six elections. Why? Because Democrats always go to court and always try to get new lines that are favorable to them. Sue 'til blue. That's the mantra that they use.” “Sue 'til blue. Democrats will sue on any map until it's blue. They do their mid-decade redistricting in the courts. And we have seen it for many years.” “And that is what's happening here. They've gone to Utah this cycle and sued to get the map drawn for themselves.”

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP DROPS TRUTH: We need to STOP pumping babies full of endless vaccines “I believe in vaccines, but I don't believe that you have to have a mandate for all of them... I look at these beautiful little babies, and they get a vat — like a big glass of stuff — pumped into their bodies, and I think it's a very negative thing!” @RapidResponse47 Important for MAHA 🇺🇸

This man is so greasy. He has a problem when democrats are held accountable. So now’s he’s out trying to manipulate the public into being outraged.

Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Socialists A Sarah McLachlan Parody

This may be the most articulate response I’ve ever heard to this question.

You mean like you were pressuring the Fed to cut rates before the 2024 election? 2024 Elizabeth Warren: Jerome Powell needs to cut interest rates. 2025 Elizabeth Warren: Trump needs to stop calling for Jerome Powell to cut interest rates.

Bill Maher: “[Charlie Kirk] was shot under a banner that said ‘Prove Me Wrong.’… To many people, the way to do that… is to just eliminate you from talking altogether. So the people that mocked his death or justified it — I think you’re gross. I have no use for you.” Ben Shapiro: “Whatever you thought of Charlie’s views is irrelevant… He was literally in the middle of answering a question — picked up the microphone and was shot in the throat. We do have a serious problem in this country with people that believe violence is the proper response to speech… We’ve come to some place incredibly dark in our nation’s history. I weep for the country and I weep for Charlie. It’s horrific!”

After more than two years of Milei, the international press still does not understand what is happening in Argentina. The narrative abroad is "shock therapy, social pain, fragile coalition." That frame misses the actual mechanism. Argentina did not have a budget problem. It had a printing problem. From 2003 to 2023 the central bank financed deficit after deficit until the peso lost 99 percent of its value against the dollar. Annual inflation hit 211 percent in 2023. Half the country was poor. That was the floor. What changed is not vibes. It is arithmetic. The fiscal deficit was eliminated for the first time in 16 years. Monthly inflation fell from 25 percent to low single digits. The central bank stopped printing to fund the Treasury. Country risk dropped from over 2,500 basis points to a fraction of that. Argentine sovereign debt, which used to trade like a default option, began behaving like normal emerging market paper. Critics say poverty rose. It did, briefly, because removing price controls and subsidies revealed the real prices of energy, transport and food that the state had been hiding with debt. Once measured honestly, poverty has been falling fast. Real wages are recovering. Mortgages in pesos are reappearing, something that had not been possible in a generation. This matters beyond Argentina. It is the clearest live experiment in whether a developed-style economy can be rebuilt by pulling the state out of places it never belonged. Spain, Italy and France should be paying attention. A country does not get poor because it lacks resources. It gets poor because its political class learned to live off printing money and calling it social policy. Argentina spent 80 years proving that. It is now spending two years proving the opposite.

Never deleting this app.

Bill Maher: “I was [Trump’s] most virulent critic. I had dinner with him, told everybody that, he's very different in person and he's not as crazy as he seems, but kept right on criticizing where I thought. And then he got mad at me again and now he's pulled other stuff but I still supported the idea of going into Iran.” “You cannot bribe me or incentivize me. While he was attacking me, I was saying, ‘No, I'm one of the few liberals who thinks, yeah, we needed to do this with Iran.’” 
“It's so liberating not to have to check what your opinion is supposed to be.”

Elon Musk just reposted this video to his 229 million followers: “If a state won’t share data on criminal use of SNAP benefits, it won’t get a dollar of federal SNAP administrative funding” THIS IS A HUGE WIN FOR AMERICA Do you support this? YES or NO?

Cut foreign aid and end welfare for non-citizens.

The DOJ has ONE WEEK left to charge Anthony Fauci for the worst cover-up in modern medical history. He lied to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan. Millions died. Trillions were spent. And Fauci walked away with book deals and fawning media coverage instead of handcuffs. I re-upped my criminal referral to the DOJ because the evidence is overwhelming, and justice has been delayed long enough. RT if you’re ready to see Fauci behind bars.

@roseone18552855 @CaryKelly11 Can you share the oncologist office that you used?

🚨BREAKING!!! 46 IPCC Scientists REBEL: The Climate Narrative is Crumbling from Within!🚨 Forty-six scientists tied to the IPCC have stepped away or spoken out because their evidence-based views clashed with the official alarmist script. They weren’t “listened to.” Their data didn’t fit the doom-and-gloom story pushed in the Summaries for Policymakers. Don’t trust me, read their own words here! ⬇️ Dr. Robert Balling: “The IPCC notes that ‘No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.’ This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.” Dr. Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.” Dr. John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.” Dr. Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.” Dr. Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.” Dr. Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.” Dr. Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.” Dr. Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 ‘scientists’ who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.” Dr. Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.” Dr. Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.” Dr. Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.” Dr. John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.” Dr. Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.” Yet the grift rolls on. New grads, indoctrinated in universities, keep repackaging the same scares for the next generation. “Consensus!” “The Science says!” Endless control through manufactured ignorance. Meanwhile, nature doesn’t care about the narrative. Natural forcings rule. The Sun is cooling. Jet stream gone meridional. Cosmic rays surging, seeding clouds. Result? Wild swings, then global cooling. The emperor has no clothes, and the scientists who know it are finally speaking up. 🔥 Original work from The Dragons Breathe Substack: open.substack.com/pub/thedragons…

Dilbert 10 Years Ago

🚨 JUST IN: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is being praised nationwide for dropping this TRUTH on leftism and "progressivism" "Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence, and hence our form of government. It holds that our rights and our dignities come not from God, but from government." "It requires of the people a subservience and weakness incompatible with a constitution premised on the transcendent origin of our rights." You NAILED IT, Justice Thomas! 🇺🇸 This guy is the true GOAT.

After each time that Trump was indicted during the Biden years, Democrat politicians and the MSM would warn that it is irresponsible, even dangerous to make accusations of lawfare. Least surprising thing ever to see them all making accusations of lawfare now.

🚨 REP. WESLEY HUNT (R-TX) just gave the PERFECT response: Q: There won't be any black Republicans left in the House? HUNT: "It's not relevant." "I'm not here because I'm black." "I am here because I am a qualified representative for Congressional District 38." "The American people choose who they want to choose." "I don't want to get into this game of RACE BAIT all day, every day." "If there's 4? If there's 10? If there's NONE." "I represent a white majority district that President Trump would have won by over 20 points, and I won by over 25 points." "I'm being judged not by the color of my skin, but the content of my character." 🇺🇸🇺🇸 📽️ @PabloReports @WesleyHuntTX