想Peach
884 posts

想Peach
@Freedom_Lover88
让世界充满爱 | 让我们拥有自由 | 创意天才🧑🎨 | DeFi小鲨鱼🦈


the core issue here is, AMM is a weird mix of a bad fund manager (who runs a rebalancing portfolio that loses money for any price movement) and a bad market maker (who loses money on every trade, and wish to win it back in fees) when applied to PM, the fund manager part of AMM is destined to lose ALL of it, because one of the outcome token is going to 0 this makes it almost impossible for the market maker part to make it back now you ask, what not become a better fund manager? in that case you’d need to trade against your users, and very often it’d mean NO LIQUIDITY at all. this is the price efficiency issue noted in the original post, but I suspect it will be so insurmountable that the pool will be non-tradeable @danrobinson and @paradigm designed pm-amm, which only created a market maker that’s as bad as one for regular assets (before it was even worse), without addressing the fund manager part. and that means, it’s really hard











Buidlpad 第3次续杯(第四期) 5分钟后开始! 吸引力越来越差了 也就 锁仓金库里 Base链 存 $ETH 还有点兴趣 固定6% APY ,但限额 $1M 价值的 $ETH 等会抢一下试试 不锁仓金库的收益 性价比也不怎么样 估计第五期会更难玩 @buidlpad

🌳 The future of finance likely won’t be purely centralized or decentralized. It’ll be hybrid. The real challenge for protocols is balancing decentralization, security, and scalability while still building products people actually use. Benji shares more at @consensus_hk 👇















