@AManHasNoCare @fatiguedguy @cirnosad For starters the pack of fighters they fly with are going to ensure defense systems can’t get a missile near the b2
English
Fuque
2.2K posts
Holy sh*t did Iran shoot down a B-2?
Arya Yadeghaar@AryJeay
WATCH: Iran shot down an Israeli/US aircraft in the area of Damavand. Looks like a drone, but the explosion indicates it had a lot of fuel.
English
@tr80016825 @RealForkskin @ViktorSanRoman @cirnosad Or just read up on how it was shot down and stop being a retard
English
@RealForkskin @ViktorSanRoman @cirnosad Tell me you work for a defence contractor without telling me. Get fcked, ya homo!
English
@xndrshr @CostanzaGe14366 @b_talesz Friendship, dating, etc. if you know someone beyond a surface level it isn’t hard to tell which way they swing on the political pendulum.
English
@xndrshr @CostanzaGe14366 @b_talesz Does it ever occur to you that people in a relationship are aware of each other’s political standings? She knows where he is and she’s very likely right there with him
English
@FiniteKnoledge @Johnm1291 @hamptonism Satellites use RTGs which use Pu-238 mostly and are not safe. Ones I think you’re referring to are good for hearing aids and pacemakers
English
@Johnm1291 @hamptonism Actually it uses nickel 63, which beta decays into basic copper, making it basically harmless, it’s not entire useless either, it could be used for satellites and such but it’s very underpowered for our purposes and ideas. It’s also not really that new technology
English
@Chbuisi @m_Xage @Johnm1291 @hamptonism What does this have to do with the batteries not working because the laws of physics?
English
@JoshuaM12450 @ponderlest @hamptonism Lmao yeah it used Pu-238 which is like 200x more radioactive than the isotope used in nuclear bombs
English
@TFS_Rogue @ponderlest @hamptonism You would need about 10k of these batteries for a phone. You’ll be dealing with a hell of radioactive safety risk at that point
English
@ponderlest @hamptonism By optimizing shelf life to 50 years, they could scale up the theory (prolly not perfectly tho). While it is revolutionary for nanotech and small drones, it is a sign of breakthroughs possible for large scale battery reliability
English
@BlossomLord @ravener96 @hamptonism Do you ever think about how energy is converted to electricity from a reactor, or why they have feet of concrete and lead around them? If so let me know how you can make a safe to handle battery out of that
English
@ravener96 @hamptonism Use your critical thinking skills (if you have them) for a second here and REALLY think about it.
English
@nobodyhere23 @fra_boxthislap @F1REAKS Largely because with or without one you’ll still lose your teeth if your hit with a stick or a puck if it were to happen. Chances of it are low so players wager their luck
English
@Fuqueman @fra_boxthislap @F1REAKS Yet, football players wear mouthpieces & hockey players do it optionally.
The creepiest thing is boxers wear mouthpieces, but some hockey players don’t.
English
i’m so confused, do they not wear mouthguards? do they have a dentist on standby? how are they not in pain????
SportsCenter@SportsCenter
Teeth lost 🦷 Gold medal acquired 🥇
English
@nobodyhere23 @fra_boxthislap @F1REAKS Well for starters football players wear face cages and hockey players don’t
English
@fra_boxthislap @F1REAKS But it works for football players? Why are hokey players so special?
English
@LPaulson7 @redanddead12345 @MagnoGetMoney If your going to shoot up a school I don’t think you care about the legality of a full auto mod
English
@redanddead12345 @MagnoGetMoney No you can’t make one….unless you have an FFL or want to spend time in federal prison and never be able to own a firearm again…
English
There have been exactly zero school shootings with fully automatic rifles
🩺 Dr. Napervillain Bunny🐰@Type07Safety
Give me ONE good reason any American should own fully automatic rifles.
English
@brieche52084083 @TennesseanProud @OnDisasters Interesting, regardless it truly is a beautiful aircraft
English
@Fuqueman @TennesseanProud @OnDisasters I was in the logistics and maintainability section, we were building a lot of maintainability into the design, studying battle damage vectors to protect the internals while hardening the external surfaces. She would've been just as supportable as any other airframe.
English
Looks don´t win air battles, but the YF-23 looked way better than the F-22 Raptor
English
@brieche52084083 @TennesseanProud @OnDisasters Didn’t it also have to do with the yf22 also just being more servicable? I’ve also heard the yf23 was just too fine tuned and intricate to easily maintained the aircraft.
English
@TennesseanProud @OnDisasters I worked briefly in a department on the YF-23 ATF project, and can vouch for it being much superior to YF-22, but you're correct that it was politics against Northrop & McDonnell Douglas that killed a great aircraft
English
@HlpMeRhondaYa @Civil_war_Law @SamTarvc @prinkasusa Why are you so belittling as if you’re right? It takes two to tango, women are equally responsible for a pregnancy just as much as the men are.
English
@Civil_war_Law @SamTarvc @prinkasusa Wrong. Men have the power to wear condoms or not have sex. If you're too stupid to figure out condoms then maybe you should stop having sex until you figure it out.
English
if abortion is ILLEGAL, men abandoning their pregnant partners should be ILLEGAL too. if women can’t opt out of PREGNANCY, then men shouldn’t be able to opt out of FATHERHOOD either!
ً@prinkasusa
what unpopular opinion can put you in this position???
English
@kcaloriezxx @Sureshock00 @HlpMeRhondaYa @SamTarvc @prinkasusa And in the instance of a failure, then what?
English
English
@TheOnlyFronk @__iDio @Kekius_Sage The formula for special relativity causes an asymptote at light speed, either you don’t know what that means or somehow created a new formula that doesn’t have one.
English
@Fuqueman @__iDio @Kekius_Sage The energy becomes so high that we cant calculate how much it would require, but that doesnt mean it is mathematically impossible. We just dont know how much.
English
If light has no Mass... why can't it go faster than 299,792,458 m/s?
English
@TheOnlyFronk @__iDio @Kekius_Sage Based on the equation, you still can’t. Energy required becomes an asymptote as it approaches light speed.
English
@Fuqueman @__iDio @Kekius_Sage Sure it is. Add enough thrust to an object in space and it theoretically can reach light speed if the thrust is high enough to keep accelerating it. The problem is that the thrust required is infinite, so its only theoretically possible if you have infinite thrust.
English
English
@__iDio @Kekius_Sage Answer: We will never have a spacecraft that goes the speed of light or anything close to it. It is only theoretically possible in our made up constraints of physical reality. In reality there are hard physics limits to the simulation and no matter will ever move that fast.
English
@LordDanielGud @UnboundConman @afrocosmist I’ll give it to you, you’re right. And they expect to create nuclear plants to somewhat clean up their emissions. However don’t act like they don’t produce a wild amount of co2 (which they admit they’ll keep doing) or that it is somehow excused because of expansion and progress
English
@Fuqueman @UnboundConman @afrocosmist Because the industry is growing faster than renewable energy. Give it time
English
i never want to hear anything from white people about other peoples destroying the environment
Noah Ryan@NoahRyanCo
God gave us an ocean full of fish and the Chinese had to ruin it with microplastics and mercury
English