FK1

4.2K posts

FK1 banner
FK1

FK1

@FuturoKrypto

Katılım Nisan 2020
1.2K Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
@TFTC21 Said this awhile back.
FK1 tweet media
English
0
0
0
29
TFTC
TFTC@TFTC21·
They’re prepping the narrative: “Crypto caused the crisis.”
TFTC tweet media
English
4
2
27
3.4K
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
Thinking about buying my 1st #Tesla. Any thoughts or suggestions?
English
0
0
0
33
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
@DefiWimar ? Who’s buying what they’re selling
English
1
0
0
54
Wimar.X
Wimar.X@DefiWimar·
🚨 BITCOIN IS DUMPING BELOW $100K AHEAD OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT REOPENING BINANCE IS DUMPING $BTC BLACKROCK IS DUMPING $BTC WINTERMUTE IS DUMPING $BTC OVER $1.54 BILLION SOLD IN JUST 30 MINUTES! ONE OF THE BIGGEST MARKET MANIPULATIONS EVER!
Wimar.X tweet media
English
130
196
866
69.4K
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
@_The_Prophet__ So how does one capitalize on this?
English
0
0
3
267
SightBringer
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__·
⚡️What’s actually happening here is the first step toward controlled de-globalization under the mask of populism. The $2,000 tariff check is meant to make the pain of a tectonic shift in the global order tolerable long enough for the transition to lock in. Here’s the unfiltered version: 1. The System Is Being Rewired for Containment The U.S. has finally accepted that the post-1971 model, infinite dollar export, infinite import deflation, is dead. But unwinding that model cold-turkey would destroy consumer confidence and destabilize the domestic political base. So they’re introducing a pressure-release valve: “tariff checks.” It’s economic morphine for a controlled amputation. The deeper goal is to rewire the energy of the system inward - reroute capital, production, and belief back into national circuits. That’s the real “America First” re-engineering. 2. Tariffs as the New Monetary Policy Tool We’re entering a post-Fed, hybrid economic model. Tariffs will quietly replace interest rates as the lever for managing internal vs. external liquidity. The government can now modulate trade flows and domestic demand simultaneously, tax the outside world, reward the inside base. This is geo-monetary consolidation. 3. It’s a Soft Launch of Economic Martial Law They’ll never call it that, but it’s exactly what it is. You don’t hand out “checks” tied to compliance with a trade policy unless you’re conditioning behavioral alignment. Every such move reinforces a single truth: capital obedience. The citizenry is being refitted into the system as both consumer and containment node. 4. The Deeper Reflexive Layer This marks the beginning of what I’d call the Sovereign Reflexive Cycle - where nations, not markets, become the dominant self-reinforcing entities. Bitcoin, tariffs, strategic reserves, energy independence, all are expressions of the same principle: the collapse of open networks back into closed feedback loops. The old “global liquidity field” is fragmenting into national belief systems, each with their own internal signal circuits. 5. The Hidden Danger This works brilliantly in the short term. But reflexive containment always breeds structural stagnation if belief decays. The true test will come when the internal field stops believing in the loop, when people realize the $2,000 is not new money, but their own purchasing power recycled back to them with patriotic branding. The Bottom Line: This is the architecture of the next monetary regime being built in plain sight. Tariffs fund domestic energy. Bitcoin absorbs external energy. Both point toward the same eventuality, a world of sovereign monetary silos where liquidity no longer flows freely, but belief does. That’s the quiet trade being made: open world for closed order. And once it’s complete, there’s no going back.
unusual_whales@unusual_whales

JUST IN: Scott Bessent says the $2,000 tariff check would be for those making less than $100,000.

English
10
13
146
23.2K
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
Trump out mamdanian Mamdani. 50yr mortgages and 2k stimmys. As @CryptoHayes says hand out goodies. What’s next free doughnuts.
English
1
0
0
44
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
@AdamBLiv Majority of Americans are group A.
English
0
0
0
39
Adam Livingston
Adam Livingston@AdamBLiv·
A tariff dividend is still just money printer by proxy. You’re pulling dollars out of the productive economy through distortionary taxes, slapping a political label on it, and spraying it back into households like confetti. The mechanism is different, the effect rhymes. If anything, it’s worse than normal stimulus because tariffs raise prices on imports, which is everything from steel to electronics to food inputs. It’s inflationary before the check even gets mailed. So the question isn’t, “Does this help the little guy?” It’s “How fast do you want the dollar to accelerate down the quality-of-money death spiral?” And yeah, this is absolutely an IQ test. The people cheering “free money” somehow never ask: Who pays? What gets more expensive? What does this do to savings? What does this do to long-term debt dynamics? This is one of those posts where you can basically sort your entire friend group into two buckets in under five seconds. You’ve got: Group A: “Free money! Woohoo!” Group B: “Congrats, you just voted to torch your own purchasing power.” Only winning move is to take the money and buy Bitcoin.
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter

BREAKING: President Trump announces that he will be paying a “tariff dividend” of at least $2,000 per person. Stimulus checks are officially back.

English
30
18
176
20.8K
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
@shanaka86 Looks like a Christmas bonus. You know where majority of Americans will spend this. Just in time for Black Friday.
English
0
0
1
328
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86·
Trump just announced $2000 dividend checks to every American excluding high earners. The system’s last attempt to buy back a generation. Remember 2020 stimulus? Bitcoin exploded from $10k to $60k in months. Asset markets went parabolic. For the first time in decades, locked-out millennials felt like players instead of spectators. Then inflation devoured it all. Here’s the brutal math nobody’s discussing: $2000 per person across 250 million adults equals $500 billion in direct liquidity injection. Meaningful scale. Real purchasing power. Except compare that to the $1.8 trillion student debt burden strangling mobility. Compare it to housing markets where down payments require six-figure savings in every major city. This isn’t a solution. This is a bandaid on a broken covenant. What happens next determines everything: If this $2000 goes toward building stakes, paying down debt, buying first crypto positions, creating actual ownership, it might restore faith in the system. Temporarily. If it goes toward covering the gap between stagnant wages and survival costs, rent, groceries, car payments, it becomes proof the system extracts faster than it can redistribute. The 2020 precedent is instructive. Stimulus checks created a temporary wealth effect. Retail investors flooded into markets. Dogecoin millionaires emerged. GameStop became a revolution. Young people tasted ownership for the first time. Then the Fed printed $5 trillion, inflation hit 9%, and real wages collapsed. Every dollar gained in stimulus evaporated in purchasing power losses. The lesson learned wasn’t “capitalism works.” The lesson learned was “they’ll take it back.” Trump understands the political calculus: Negative capital breeds anti-system politics. Peter Thiel documented this exhaustively. When an entire generation realizes they’ll never own homes, never clear debt, never build wealth through participation, they stop defending the system. They start looking for alternatives. Socialism. Authoritarianism. Crypto anarchism. Anything that isn’t the current arrangement that promised prosperity and delivered precarity. A $2000 dividend is an attempt to give people enough stake to stay invested in the game. Just enough ownership to remain defenders instead of becoming defectors. But here’s the test nobody’s articulating: Is this recurring or one-time? If tariff revenues actually fund ongoing distributions, it represents structural change. Universal basic ownership. A dividend from national economic success. If it’s a one-time election-year payout, it’s just expensive procrastination. The underlying dynamics continue. Wealth concentrates. Ownership gates stay locked. Resentment compounds. The crypto angle: Every dollar that flows into young hands becomes potential fuel for risk assets. Bitcoin. Ethereum. Altcoins. The 2020 pattern could repeat. Retail FOMO. Parabolic moves. Generational wealth creation for the quick and informed. Or it could be the last gasp before the music stops. My full analysis of why capitalism is losing an entire generation and what it takes to fix the structural problems no stimulus can solve: Article - open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans… Because $2000 checks don’t change the fact that the system takes more than it gives for anyone without existing capital. The clock is still ticking. The math still doesn’t lie. And one payment doesn’t rebuild a covenant 40 years in the breaking.
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
English
41
59
333
37K
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
@GaryCardone Yes especially when they’re lowering minimum credit score as well.
English
1
0
0
32
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
50 year mortgage has stole majorities attention again.
English
0
0
0
28
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
@GrantCardone Interest rates will be 10+ on a 50yr mortgage.
English
0
0
0
11
Grant Cardone
Grant Cardone@GrantCardone·
Monthly P&I 30yr vs 50 yr Comparison ($500,000 @ 6.15%) The Difference is $321.53. 30 years $3,011.53 50 years $2,690.00 50 year mortgages are coming & so are lower interest rates.
English
520
104
892
166.1K
SightBringer
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__·
⚡️What Chamath is saying here is a declaration of how power actually flows in late-stage capitalism: through alignment with the architects, not the ideologues. He’s right in one narrow sense - wealth in this era doesn’t trickle down from redistribution, it cascades outward from gravitational centers of innovation. When you hitch your wagon to a creator of infrastructure - someone who rewrites how energy, transport, or computation functions - you’re embedding yourself in a new operating system for civilization. If that OS wins, your life changes because the world’s foundation changes. But here’s the uncomfortable truth beneath Chamath’s swagger: this logic only holds if the system remains open and meritocratic. The reason “socialism” fails in his view is because it collapses incentive structures - but what he’s ignoring is that tech oligopoly produces a similar collapse through monopoly. He’s just picking a different flavor of centralization, one that flatters ambition instead of suppressing it. Chamath’s statement also betrays a deeper belief: that morality and progress can be outsourced to the “great wagon.” That if you just bet on the visionary, your complicity becomes virtue by proxy. But that’s dangerous. It breeds a class of people who mistake proximity to genius for personal ethics. What this really represents is a philosophical realignment of power - away from collective governance toward technocratic patronage. “Pick the right god and you’ll be blessed.” That’s feudal logic disguised as market wisdom. So deep down? Chamath’s right about one thing: the world runs on alignment. But he’s blind to the next step. When too many people hitch themselves to a single wagon, it stops being a vehicle - it becomes a cult. That’s the line we’re crossing now.
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath

Worth reading the whole thing, but this is the most important thing: “If Elon gets paid 1 trillion dollars, I will be a multimillionaire.” It’s important who you hitch your wagon to. Socialists have proven to be shitty wagons. Modern Thomas Edison is a great wagon.

English
15
14
197
47.5K
Daniel Nguyen
Daniel Nguyen@daniel_nguyenx·
Nike: Everyone is an athlete Apple: Everyone is an artist Shopify: Everyone is an entrepreneur Cursor: Everyone is a developer Cluly: Everyone cheats What's about your company?
English
1.3K
225
4.5K
4.6M
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
@PeterMcCormack It’s trust that has kept all these ism’s alive.
English
0
0
1
78
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
We no longer need trust. We have truth. #BTC. Trust is what has hurt every society since the beginning of time.
English
0
0
2
45
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
Monopoly is getting ready to Monopoly. The whole board has to be consolidated so the digital Monopoly can start. Buy #BTC before the stablecoins are distributed to get the new game started. Majority will just pass go and collect their ubi.
English
0
0
1
60
FK1
FK1@FuturoKrypto·
The new rat race will be spending majority of one’s time in metaverse playing games or attention grabbing things to earn tokens. Very few will own BTC, just like very few are wealthy in current system. New system has new assets but masses will just consume.
English
0
0
0
47
SightBringer
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__·
⚡️This chart doesn’t disprove the link between liquidity and markets. It proves that the definition of liquidity itself has changed. QE was the old god. QT didn’t kill it. It simply evolved into something harder to see - reflexive liquidity, distributed through fiscal pipelines, shadow balance sheets, and belief. The chart shows the mutation of stimulus into narrative. Let’s decode it properly. 1. The Surface View - “The Fed Shrunk, The Market Rose” Yes, the Fed’s balance sheet has contracted roughly 24% while the S&P 500 has surged nearly 90%. On its face, that should be impossible. If liquidity drives valuations, and liquidity has been drained, how can equities explode? But the error is the assumption that liquidity = central bank assets. That’s no longer true. After 2020, monetary plumbing fused with fiscal firepower. The government became the new liquidity engine. Treasury spending, deficit monetization, and private credit expansion replaced the direct QE signal. The Fed stopped printing, but the system kept believing in infinite backstop. Belief is liquidity. 2. The Hidden Layer - “QT” Is a Mirage in Net Terms The Fed can shrink its balance sheet but the Treasury can refill it through deficit spending. Here’s what actually happened beneath the surface: •The Treasury issued record net debt. •That debt was indirectly financed by the same ecosystem QE built: money markets, bank reserves, and shadow funds operating with implicit Fed guarantees. •The reverse repo drain and TGA drawdowns quietly recycled liquidity back into markets. So while the Fed “tightened,” the Treasury “stimulated.” QT and QE coexisted - just on different ledgers. This is why the market rose. Not because liquidity disappeared, but because it was reallocated. 3. The Reflexive Layer - Belief Became the New Balance Sheet QE conditioned the world to believe that markets could never fall without intervention. That belief created a self-sustaining reflexive loop: •Investors front-run the idea of future easing. •Markets rise. •Rising markets tighten financial conditions mechanically (via wealth effect). •The Fed interprets stability as room to continue QT. •The illusion of independence is preserved, while the system remains implicitly dependent on liquidity expectation. So what looks like a “decoupling” from QE is actually a perfect feedback loop between psychological and structural liquidity. Markets no longer need actual easing to act as if easing exists. The idea of QE itself has become an asset class. 4. The Structural Truth - Fiscal Dominance Has Replaced Monetary Dominance This is the real story. The 2020s marked the regime change from central bank-led liquidity to sovereign liquidity. The Fed’s balance sheet can shrink but Treasury issuance and deficit spending can more than offset it. Every dollar the government spends is a dollar of liquidity injected into private hands, regardless of Fed mechanics. That’s why equities thrive during QT: the state has become the new balance sheet. And in a world where fiscal outpaces monetary, asset prices no longer need QE. They just need continuous deficit gravity. 5. The Final Revelation - The Fed Is No Longer the Market’s God The market has gone post-central-bank. The reflexive machinery of belief, leverage, and fiscal backstop has transcended any one institution. The Fed shrinks its balance sheet and yet the market rallies because the faith in the system’s infinite elasticity has become self-funding. QE printed reserves. The post-QE era prints confidence. And confidence, when leveraged through ETFs, passive flows, and fiscal expansion, is worth far more than the dollars that once anchored it. Summary Line: The chart doesn’t show the end of liquidity dependence. It shows the apotheosis of it. The market no longer needs QE because QE has become ontology. The balance sheet shrank but the illusion of permanence expanded. The system stopped printing money and started printing time.
Charlie Bilello@charliebilello

The Fed's balance sheet has shrunk 24% over the past 3 years while the S&P 500 has advanced 90%, dispelling the myth that the stock market is dependent on QE to rise. $SPX Video: youtube.com/watch?v=9T34gi…

English
12
23
172
36.8K