Republicans for Ukraine

These Republicans know the importance of standing with our allies. They're calling on Trump and the GOP to do the same.

Q: "What incentive is there for Ukraine to give up any territory?" Trump: "Well, they already lost the territory, to be honest. The territory is lost."

Q: "A Kremlin spokesperson called the [new National Security Strategy] a 'positive step,' and said the adjustments they're seeing are 'largely consistent with Moscow's vision.' Do you think that's a good thing?" Trump: "Well I think he'd like to see a weak Europe…I have no vision for Europe. All I want to see is a strong Europe."

Trump: "[Zelensky's] gonna have to get on the ball and start accepting things. You know, when you're losing…" Q: "Do you think Ukraine has lost this war?" Trump: "They've lost territory long before I got here…They lost a whole strip of sea front, big sea front."

NATO has been a primary pillar of America’s national security for 75 years. The Administration appears to undervalue the Alliance, which is a mistake. America Only is a Weaker America. wsj.com/world/europe/t…

Rep. Don Bacon: " The initial peace agreement from last week was for Ukraine to give up more land, to reduce the size of its army, have to not be allowed to join NATO…It really was a surrender document."

Rep. Don Bacon: "I just don't see that moral clarity coming from the White House. We saw that WSJ article yesterday that many people around the president are hoping to make billions of dollars—these are all billionaires in their own right—from an agreement from Russia, if they get a favorable agreement with Ukraine. That alarms me tremendously."

Devastating @wsj report on the real Trump-Russia deal: betray Ukraine in exchange for privileged business benefits for Trump insiders. wsj.com/world/russia/r…

Go caucus with the democrats. This Republican Party does not deserve your affiliation. You have the power to do something.

When it comes to foreign policy, while every generation is important, certain generations have lived on this earth during times that have proven to be much more critical to the preservation of world peace than others. We are currently at one of those inflection points—a critical fork in the road. So which path will we choose? In making our choice, we need not hypothesize as to which is the better path—history has already answered that question for us, time and time again. We can choose Peace Through Strength, or we can choose War Through Weakness. History has already recorded our predecessors’ choices. And history will now record ours.

Americans know Ukraine is fighting for their freedom and their sovereignty, while Putin is the invader and hates America and what we represent. America should always be clearly on the side of freedom, free markets and rule of law. newsweek.com/donald-trump-u…

I wish to remind our allies that NATO was created to defend the West against the Soviet aggression, that is against Russia. And its foundation was solidarity, not egoistic interests. I hope that nothing has changed.

WSJ today. Multi-billion $$ business deals between Russian & American billionaires that forces Ukraine to give Russia more land, & make Ukraine a Russian vassal state. Greed trumps Ukrainian sovereignty. Churchill & Reagan are turning in their graves. wsj.com/world/russia/r…

Rep. McCaul: Zelenskyy Must Insist on Article-5-Like Security | Newsmax.com I 100% agree with my friend ⁦@RepMcCaul⁩. newsmax.com/politics/micha…

The following facts must be emphasized when assessing any proposed peace agreement: -Vladimir Putin has never once kept a single promise that he has made regarding Ukraine. Not once. Ever. And he’s not about to start now. Any agreement that requires any element of trust placed in Vladimir Putin’s “promise” is not worth the paper it is written on. -There are only two enforceable security guarantees: 1) NATO Article 5, or 2) a treaty that is passed by the U.S. Congress. Anything outside of this is just a Budapest Memorandum 2.0 — a completely unenforceable and empty promise that led to the invasion of Ukraine, and will lead to the future dismantling of Ukraine. -Any “forced reduction” of the Ukrainian military means future increased pressure, risk, and danger to the European, NATO, and U.S. military. -Any official recognition of Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory as “Russian territory,” and any official prohibition of Ukraine from being free to decide what alliances to join, would, for the first time in American history, create a brand new precedent of officially rewarding a dictator for invading a sovereign nation, and officially punishing a victim nation that was wrongfully invaded. What a terrible precedent to set. What a terrible message to send.

For those who oppose the Russian invasion and want to see Ukraine prevail as a sovereign & democratic country, it is clear that Witkoff fully favors the Russians. He cannot be trusted to lead these negotiations. Would a Russian paid agent do less than he? He should be fired.

This is horrible.

This is a plan that actually makes sense.

Brennan: "There are three prominent U.S. Senators who have gone on the record, including Republican Senator Mike Rounds, who said yesterday Secretary of State Rubio told him he was unaware of a threat to cut off U.S. support for Ukraine…Since those remarks were made and backed up by multiple Senators, I've received phone calls from multiple senior White House officials…saying 'That's not at all what Rubio said.'" Sen. Mark Kelly: "They have to clear this up…That plan is Putin's plan. This is a very good deal for Russia. It is a horrible deal for Ukraine, for our allies, and even for our own national security."

Some people better get fired on Monday for the gross buffoonery we just witnessed over the last four days. This hurt our country and undermined our alliances, and encouraged our adversaries.

Gross buffoonery.