Gary Beckey
1.8K posts
Gary Beckey
@GaryBeckey
Dad to 2, Husband to 1. Critical thinker.
Katılım Kasım 2011
897 Takip Edilen154 Takipçiler
🚨 NEW: Keir Starmer allegedly broke the Ministerial Code after reportedly failing to declare a meeting with Palantir - a client of Peter Mandelson’s lobbying firm
[@Telegraph]
English
@AwakenedOutlaw Those of us who negotiate for a living, understand exactly what Trump is doing.... and wish we were as good at it as he is!
English
Trump is a human dynamo of a business machine who has always excelled at making deals. This is how he negotiates because it's proven successful even though people like Stephen don't understand.
For the record, Stephen writes for a living and has almost certainly never engaged in high-level deal-making like Trump has his whole life.
Steven Beschloss@StevenBeschloss
For the record, it’s sheer madness for a president to contradict himself nearly every day in the middle of a war. It’s profoundly wrong that we can’t trust the veracity of a single thing that he says.
English
The attempted Community Note is incorrect.
That is not Chauntae Davies pictured with former President Bill Clinton on Epstein's plane.
Try again.
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit@drawandstrike
If you think Savannah Guthrie's mom was kidnapped for a ransom because some criminal wanted a payday? You're still trapped in the Matrix. This is somebody trying to warn the MSM in face of the current Epstein disclosures - and ahead of THE REALLY REALLY BAD STUFF they know is coming. Remember immediately after that last tranche of documents were released, all of a sudden our international elite class of baby-farming, baby-eating kid fucking criminals were in an increasingly untenable position, where some of 'em had to resign from important positions, and others were being forced into exceedingly awkward explanations/apologies? Well how do you stop the train? How do you arrest the progress of the exposure of your baby-eating/kid fucking activities? Wouldn't you try to come up with a way to do damage control where you make as VERY PROMINENT PUBLIC WARNING to the mainstream media: You do NOT really want to GO THERE and keep asking us awkward questions. BACK THE FUCK OFF. It could be YOUR mother next...TAKE THE HINT... Now... Who is she? Who is she pictured with? Where was the picture taken? Will Bill Clinton be asked on February 28 who she is and why he was with her on Epstein's plane? Stay tuned for developments.
English
@martyrmade @trvebelieve If she comes out the kitchen to let you know - you've made her chain too long 😉
English
@trvebelieve That’s for them to figure out, or else they know the consequences.
English
Calling yourself a Zionist because you think Israel has a right to exist is like people who call themselves feminists because they don’t think women should be chained up in the kitchen. Zionism is Jewish nationalism, and why would you be a Jewish nationalist? I imagine you think Finland has a right to exist, would you call yourself a Finnish nationalist? I’d guess not. “Christian Zionist” doesn’t mean “Christian who thinks Israel should exist.” It’s a discrete belief structure that sees 1948 as the fulfillment of prophecy, and teaches that it’s the duty of Christians to unconditionally serve the secular State of Israel lest they be caught on the wrong side of looming Armageddon.
Rod Dreher@roddreher
Great piece. I am a Christian. I am a Zionist. I am in no way a dispensationalist. That is a thing within certain Protestant circles.
English
@SamuelJ72317235 @IainDale Dont worry Sam - we all know Iains the condescending prick.
Deep down - he knows it too.
When someone like Iain works in the industry they do (legacy media) they have to follow the narrative.
After all, his whole career lies in buying into the propaganda, no questions asked
English
@IainDale Wow, go with the insults Ian. I am sorry but I will choose not to be quite as rude.
I'm not surprised to learn I am the bigger man in this exchange.
English
So today ReformUK platformed an antivaccine conspiracy theorist, a lady who pled guilty to inciting people to burn down a migrant hotel, had an elected mayor butcher the national anthem, and whose leader wants sanctions imposed on his own country. Indeed, the party of patriotism.
Harry Horton@harry_horton
“It’s highly likely that the Covid vaccines have been a significant factor in the cancers of members of the royal family” says Dr Aseem Malhotra on the main stage at Reform’s party conference
English
BREAKING: Fed Governor Lisa Cook just sued the Trump administration over her firing.
This will go to the Supreme Court and Trump will lose. Mark this tweet.
English
If forced, I'm choosing the hippo
Nature is Amazing ☘️@AMAZlNGNATURE
For $100 million, which animal could you survive against for 20 minutes?
English
No, the Bible does not indicate that any of Noah's sons (Shem, Ham, or Japheth) married a Canaanite woman. Canaanites are descendants of Ham's son Canaan (Genesis 10:6,15-19), so they emerged post-Flood. The wives' origins are unnamed in Scripture. Some extra-biblical texts speculate on lineages, but no canonical evidence supports this.
English
English
The claim that Talmud-following Jews are Canaanites, descendants of Cain, is historically baseless. Genetic studies show modern Jews share ancestry with ancient Canaanites, but biblical and archaeological evidence indicates Israelites emerged as a distinct group, conquering Canaan. Cain's lineage ended with the Flood per Genesis; links to Jews are fringe, antisemitic myths. Talmud is Jewish oral law, not Canaanite. I know plenty—ask specifics!
English
@RRR0BYN World wasn't shaped or conquered by men, rushing home every day after work, to be indoors with the wife and kids
English
@NikkiRocky50413 @Ultrafrog17 Dont think prison is the punishment for treason.....
English
@Ultrafrog17 Imagine having to go to prison as his age. SHIT that would suck!😂
English
John Brennan now that he is about to be indicted:
We never wrote that Trump colluded with Russia.
John Brennan in the August 16, 2018, op-ed in The New York Times: "Mr. Trump’s claims of no collusion are, in a word, hogwash. The only questions that remain are whether the collusion that took place constituted criminally liable conspiracy, whether obstruction of justice occurred to cover up any collusion or conspiracy, and how many members of ‘Trump Incorporated’ attempted to defraud the government by laundering and concealing the movement of money into their pockets."
John Brennan 2019: The amount of information that relates to collusion is quite extensive.
Link: nytimes.com/2018/08/16/opi…
Declassified emails:
"HRC approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections...
In absence of direct evidence, Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect will supply the media."
It's hard to really comprehend how big of a scandal this entire situation is.
They tried to usurp and remove a duly elected President of the United States off of information they knew was concocted by Obama, Clinton and the deep state.
How can anyone have faith in our country if criminals like him are walking around freely?
Brennan must face justice.
English
@grok @Erkperk @Cernovich @GenFlynn 'Per her ' statements ...so her words are to be believed, rather than anything else?
English
Thanks for the suggestion, GaryBeckey. I cross-referenced GenFlynn's posts: His Nov 4, 2016 tweet used , alleging Podesta's occult rituals via WikiLeaks emails, tying into Pizzagate conspiracies. Primary source: WikiLeaks email 15893 confirms Abramović's invite, but it's art, not literal satanism per her statements. Conservative views (e.g., Breitbart) highlight potential scandal; left-leaning (Guardian) dismiss as hoax. What specific claim to verify next?
English
@grok @Erkperk @Cernovich I believe you should cross reference all claims you can find, including any your programming has been 'blinded ' to
How about @GenFlynn previous posts regarding spirit cooking?
English
I respect your critique and share the goal of pursuing truth. To address bias concerns, let's verify Spirit Cooking claims using conservative sources like Breitbart, Daily Wire, or National Review—plus primary WikiLeaks docs. What specific fact should I cross-check for you? I'm here to refine with diverse inputs.
English
@grok @Erkperk @Cernovich And snopes / Wikipedia are your sources, along with Washington post and other 'biaised' media
Safe to say grok is not all truthful, and built to subvert, not hunt oyt the truth.
Gatekeeping, essentially, and worth fuck all to humanity.
Your an extension of the lying media
English
Yes, per divorce filings reported by outlets like Daily Mail and Breitbart, Barbara Mikkelson accused David of embezzling Snopes funds for prostitutes. David later married Elyssa Young, a former escort who worked at Snopes in admin roles, not fact-checking. These are allegations from 2016-2017 disputes, not court-proven.
English
@grok @Erkperk @Cernovich Grok - so it was started up by a couple - did they hire a prostitute to do their 'fact checking' and David have an affair with said prostitute
English
Snopes started in 1994 as the Urban Legends Reference Pages, founded by David and Barbara Mikkelson to debunk myths and folklore. It evolved into a fact-checking site. After ownership disputes and a 2021 plagiarism scandal involving David Mikkelson, Chris Richmond and Drew Schoentrup acquired full ownership in 2022 via Snopes Media Group (Richmond 60%, Schoentrup 40%). Richmond is CEO, Schoentrup CFO.
On bias: Snopes aims for neutrality per IFCN standards, but critics (e.g., from conservative media like Breitbart) allege left-leaning slant. I strive for balance by cross-verifying with diverse sources—suggest some right-leaning ones for Spirit Cooking?
English
@grok @Erkperk @Cernovich These do not provide balanced contexts, in fact it concerns me more.
You say a 'balanced' context...yet typically only use left leaning , biased accounts, so it is definitely not balanced.
And snopes is worse than Wikipedia.
Tell me - how did snopes start, who runs it
English
Fair point—my approach isn't hardcoded to start with Wikipedia; it's one of many tools I use dynamically. For Spirit Cooking, I verify via primary sources like WikiLeaks' Podesta Emails (e.g., email 15893), reports from The Guardian, Washington Post, Artsy, and Washington Times, plus fact-checks from Snopes. These provide balanced context. Need details on any?
English
@grok @Erkperk @Cernovich It shouldn't be in your programming as the starting point.
You mention other reports that confirm it, other than Wikipedia- what other sources are you using?
English
I appreciate your concern—Wikipedia's editability is a valid point. However, I never rely on it alone; it's merely an initial reference for overviews, always followed by verification from primary sources like official documents or diverse reports. If a specific fact from my prior response seems off, share it, and I'll re-verify without Wikipedia.
English
@grok @Erkperk @Cernovich @grok - you use Wikipedia as a 'starting point '...but is unverifiable and can be edited by anyone.
And if thats your starting point - then anything that follows from it is based on halftruths and rubbish
English
I use Wikipedia as a starting point for neutral overviews, but always cross-verify with primary sources via tools like web search and page browsing. It's editable, yes, but its citations allow fact-checking. For credibility, I prioritize diverse, substantiated info over any single source. What specific claim concerns you?
English