Kerberos

My (Raparia Jat) AT2 qpAdm static runs along with Hunter Gatherer breakdown and 4 AT1 rotations done by @sapphiregnm I got WGS from @SequencingCom and sent the FASTQ files to @YseqDNA . They generated HG19 BAM for a fee and I used pileupCaller on that HG19 BAM with -q 30 -Q 30 quality filter to generate the EIGENSTRAT format file that @sapphiregnm merged with v66 2M AADR dataset. Output from pileupCaller: 1.8 million + SNPs (multiple times higher than total RAW SNPs in NGS kits let alone after merging with AADR) Output of each AT1 rotation along with qpfstats log and fstats is provided in pastebin links in description of each image.

The left-coded responses to this are all tacit admissions that my position is correct but they think it is a good thing because it affects their perceived enemy. The right-coded criticism is worth addressing. When confronted with perspectives critical of marriage as an institution in the 21st c., it is common for people on the right say it is an anti-civilisational mindset, that marital problems are downstream of da kultcha, that women are "naturally submissive" and you just need to be more a alpha masculine leader and she will not only 'submit' to you but LOVE it. The problem with all of these retorts is they are completely toothless. You can have all of the right ideas, the most reasonable position, the correct understanding of the civilisational importance of not only having a high fertility rate but rearing your children as a cohesive family unit. Expecting this to materialise into any sort of legitimate contract which enforces these terms leaves one relying on a verbal agreement with the sex to whom such things mean absolutely nothing. The moment a woman's feelings change, for any reason whatsoever, such an agreement means nothing. The history of marriage as a legal institution is one of the state offering men legal and financial incentives to accept the loss of freedom entailed by domestic life to ensure the reproduction of the race. Legal marriage now offers none of these benefits, nor does it protect men's most basic dignities, but the cultural idea of marriage which was shaped by these legal incentives over two thousand years is still invoked as a henpecking mechanism against skeptical young men who stand to gain nothing. You are 'supposed to' get married because marriage is 'supposed to' be a certain way. So you find a woman who "agrees with you" (lol) about what marriage is "supposed to be." You have three children with her. And then you lose your job. Now she tells you that she never *actually* agreed with you. Maybe she says she was just young and dumb when she said that. Maybe she says she just wanted to make you happy when she said that. Maybe she decides retroactively in a fit of resentment that you were abusive, and she only said it because she was afraid and felt like she had to say things to appease you. No, of course, YOURS isn't like that! Naturally, you are too masculine a patriarch for this to happen to you. YOUR wife would never do this. Your wife would never decide those completely non-binding verbal agreements which have outlived their personal benefit to her and no longer give her tingles and butterflies need to be honoured. But if she did, what's going to stop her?

@dercollie18 Naturally this is a terrible and frightening thing. But it is separate from my point. Assuming the boyfriend in question was an upstanding, successful individual, a man still ought to have final say over whether he permits any “step-father” into his children’s lives.

Men who are active and present in their children's lives, who did not initiate divorce, who would take full custody of them as single fathers in a heartbeat, can have "step-fathers" injected into their children's lives and there is no legal basis for saying "I do not want this."

Marriage is a bad deal for men under all circumstances short of ownership over wife and children. Status quo not only permits no fault divorce, but considers it an inalienable right to introduce "step-parents" into children's lives. You have no legal defence to object to this.

Finally, I note that DATES doesn't actually need particularly accurate admixing sources. Ie admixture in Hazara will be better inferred by using diploid modern Italian and Japanese as sources (obviously incorrect) that a few low coverage ancient Afghani / Mongolian samples 3/3

@Dfire8801 @wacistwigga Normally Yfull is €44, through YSEQ you get it for €41 (tax not included).

@GenoPlinker @wacistwigga How much is it?

I recently got my YSEQ WGS back, and these are my results I fall under a very rare Roman era Greek clade (T-CTS3767) with multiple Greek samples downstream, with mine being placed Directly with I7833. These are the Populations I used to compute the PCA (pastebin.com/tLeKvQsh) They were mainly inspired by this paper nature.com/articles/s4156… #SmartPCA #qpAdm #Ancestry #DNA

@Dfire8801 @wacistwigga You also get a discount on Yfull if you're a YSEQ customer. Join the Yfull group on YSEQ, then just have to provide YSEQ kit number to Yfull.

After I gave YSEQ link to my FASTQ file pair, they generated HG19 & HG38 BAM (I bought both) & gave me link to the files. They gave me PLINK file (compatible with 1240k AADR) as well as well as lots of other small files other than just the BAMs. You should request your FASTQ files from YSEQ (send them a mail), then you can generate T2T BAM or have DNAGenics do it for you, for better theyTree or Yfull analysis.

@Dfire8801 @wacistwigga YSEQ has a paid option for FASTQ to HG19 mapping. That's how I got my HG19 BAM. One can also use useGalaxy platform for FASTQ to HG19 mapping, if one wants to DIY.

@GenoPlinker @wacistwigga The worst part about YSEQ is that they output the BAMs in HG38 format, so I had to spend 19 hours remapping the BAM to HG19

@Dfire8801 What service is the haplo tree in second picture from?

@Dfire8801 @wacistwigga If you're willing to pay extra, Sequencing(dot)com will give back results very quickly. I got mine within 2 weeks from the date my sample reached them. I asked YSEQ, they use 150 PE reads using MGI machines, same as Sequencing.

@wacistwigga Nah, use TellMeGen (there is a 5-7 month waiting time for YSEQ)

3rd paragraph correction: multiple times higher than total RAW SNPs in genotyping kits using microarray chips

My (Raparia Jat) AT2 qpAdm static runs along with Hunter Gatherer breakdown and 4 AT1 rotations done by @sapphiregnm I got WGS from @SequencingCom and sent the FASTQ files to @YseqDNA . They generated HG19 BAM for a fee and I used pileupCaller on that HG19 BAM with -q 30 -Q 30 quality filter to generate the EIGENSTRAT format file that @sapphiregnm merged with v66 2M AADR dataset. Output from pileupCaller: 1.8 million + SNPs (multiple times higher than total RAW SNPs in NGS kits let alone after merging with AADR) Output of each AT1 rotation along with qpfstats log and fstats is provided in pastebin links in description of each image.

@Kagen_27 @PChad1239399 It was a bhumihar account who posted his wife's picture. That bhumihar had fight with different bhati rajput but posted his rudrabhoj's wife's photo claiming the different rajput account is rudrabhoj's anon account.

@PChad1239399 no idea. She was doxxed when he pissed off some jat kanger account

@/rudhraboj put on a little more of those whitening filters would ya ? Cvck

@WolfCatacomb Some (not all) of the non Indo-European part.

If Jats had any Chamar ancestry, let alone 1/2, it would show up everywhere, f3, IBD etc. In actuality Jats have lowest blood relatedness (what IBD measures) with Chamars out of likes of gujjar, kamboj, pathan, khatri. Note IBD is not influenced by ancestry %es, if someone actually has ancestry from population A but he mixes with Neanderthals (not even humans), IBD will still show affinity. This directly addresses this basaloid's claims. If I do what he's doing then see the second picture (made with population averages spreadsheet, if one puts in more time, distance will be lower).

@_reading_club @JTsarwanath Pachhada = PB jatts that migrated east into hindustan

@GenoPlinker @JTsarwanath Is pachhada a separate caste or jatt ?

Chitrangada, a dark skinned North Indian Punjabi Jatt Sikh girl, shows that while skin tone matters, but the bone structure matters a lot more. She has a clean Caucosoid face and bone structure, and therefore looks good despite the darker skin stone. Skin can be lightened, bones are hard to change.

@JTsarwanath @_reading_club She's pachhada. Source: a majhail jatt

@_reading_club She is hindu jaat. Was married to sikh jatt.

He's defining Steppe weirdly, which is why I asked his buddy to define what he means by Steppe. He's comparing Yamnaya in Europeans to Yamnaya+EEF in indics. The kind of Steppe ancestry that indians have ~20% (sindhi) to ~24-25% (khatri) to ~30% (highest scoring public brahmin sample from gangetic plains) of, Europeans have 80%+ of.

@arya_charwaha @GenoPlinker @K12569Vinod @AdityaS03270408 u guys are all talk, at least provide some proof for what you’re saying. Show the breakdown of euros

Jat and Jatni 😂 @ indus )punjab

@arya_charwaha @K12569Vinod @AdityaS03270408 @tarchar12352114 Oh I forgot to mention, Scythians were Iranians (Aryan) as well and OG Scythians had 0% SC_Asian Farmer/BMAC ancestry. They were entirely Steppe + Khovsgol (mong*loid population).

SC Asia and Anatolia are completely different regions BTW. Turkey ones you're talking about, Mittani, didn't have anything to do with Indians. They only had Indo-Aryan superstrate. Not to mention, ANF has nothing to do with IVC or Sapt Sindhu. Pure ANF went extinct by Iron Age anyway. Oldest mention of "Aryan" is meaningless when the groups in question do not have similar tradition preservation methods. Steppe_MLBA guys, like ancient north Europeans and other pastoralist nomads preserved their traditions orally, so there's no reason to expect you'd find oldest mention of Aryan with them. It's not because they weren't where Aryan identity comes from but because they didn't write like settled southerners who had scribes or equivalents to note things down, or create inscriptions.

AASI didn't exist 60000 years ago. There was no zagros. 60000 years ago, there were no West Eurasians or East Eurasians. Ancestors of Chinese, Europeans, Indians were one at that time. So the population in which F originated, didn't have anything to do with AASI or SE Asian Negritos. H is Basal Eurasian, most likely.

@GenoPlinker @K12569Vinod @AdityaS03270408 @tarchar12352114 Ha to AASI 60 k se lekar ab tak kewal AASI hi h with haplo F or D H also belongs to dravid ( Iran N)