Restore Britain Enthusiast

6.8K posts

Restore Britain Enthusiast banner
Restore Britain Enthusiast

Restore Britain Enthusiast

@GenosCharlie

Our journey is long, but our cause is righteous | 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 | @RestoreBritain_

London Katılım Eylül 2024
548 Takip Edilen442 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Restore Britain Enthusiast
Restore Britain Enthusiast@GenosCharlie·
Until we have an iron-clad, unbreakable, unchangeable law that White British has to be at least 90% of the total population, nothing else matters.
English
13
3
52
10.7K
samldn
samldn@ms_samldn·
@lucymarionbrown Mine tells me Nigel's dodgy backers did it to take the heat off him.
English
27
0
119
55K
Lucy Brown
Lucy Brown@lucymarionbrown·
My gut tells me this Ann Widdecombe thing is really, really bad
English
414
249
8.6K
1.3M
solobolo22
solobolo22@thaddeusmacabee·
@saurs0uffle @ShansDaBoss Never succumb to the collective amnesia of this country. They will prove they’re racist the next time an opportunity rears its head, as they have done time and time again despite whatever an ethnic person has done
English
4
5
299
11K
Femi
Femi@Femi_sorry·
@Matronincharge Please keep proving my point. You racist scumbags don't get to celebrate England winning in the world Cup, because you would have most of the team deported if they didn't play football.
English
161
24
590
56.8K
Femi
Femi@Femi_sorry·
Oh shut the fuck up you RACIST PRICK. Your spokesperson just refused to rule out deporting me because I'm black. You don't get to celebrate the success of black English people while telling us we don't belong in England. Keep the name Jude Bellingham out your Nazi mouth.
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10

Jude Bellingham.

English
2.9K
2.2K
23.3K
1.2M
Albion
Albion@AlbionsWrath·
@BritBoy95X You going to take this @Steve_Laws_ from this mudblood Larping?! Restore is taking the piss out of you. Fuck them off.
English
5
0
35
2.2K
BritBoy95X
BritBoy95X@BritBoy95X·
"WHO is Steve Laws?!" "Just some twitter account?" "Not very bothered by what Steve Laws Says" 🤣 Restore Britain devouring itself.
English
39
20
161
70.7K
Dre Guevara
Dre Guevara@DreGuevara3·
a lotttttt of fussy chuds in the comments trying to pretend like they didn't get molested by the capitalists they worship 😭 yall are fuckin cattle man
Dre Guevara tweet media
English
49
19
770
27.4K
alex
alex@alexmcole_·
If you reserve a seat on a train and actually ask someone to move so you can sit there I genuinely think less of you as a person
English
2.6K
148
6.4K
8.9M
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
Badenoch's Purge is a Mercy Killing, not a Massacre For years the Conservative Party's problem was not policy. It was character. It kept promoting people who talked like conservatives and voted like technocrats, who nodded along to net zero targets they privately doubted and treaties they privately resented. Kemi Badenoch has just done something rare in British politics: she has looked at that habit and called it what it is. Cowardice dressed up as pragmatism. Her decision to block former MPs from standing again if they still cling to net zero, or still defend Britain's subjection to Strasbourg, will be painted by critics as ruthless. It is not ruthless. It is honest. A party that lost catastrophically in 2024 does not get to relitigate that defeat by recycling the same faces and the same instincts. Voters did not reject the Conservatives because the party wasn't nice enough to its old guard. They rejected it because it had stopped standing for anything distinguishable from the consensus it claimed to oppose. Net zero and the ECHR are not minor technical disputes. They are the clearest tests going of whether a politician actually believes in national self-government, or merely enjoys the theatre of it. A candidate who still insists Britain must hit arbitrary carbon targets, whatever the cost to industry and household bills, has not learned anything from a decade of rising energy prices. A candidate who thinks Strasbourg's rulings are compatible with controlling Britain's own borders is not being moderate. They are being evasive. What makes this striking is the alternative Badenoch is proposing. Not more career politicians, not more special advisers who have never run so much as a corner shop, but people who have actually built things, taught in classrooms, served in uniform, or kept a small business afloat. It is an unfashionable idea: that competence and conviction matter more than polish. But it is exactly what a party trying to prove it has changed needs to demonstrate, not merely announce. Compare that with the government it is up against. Much of the current Parliamentary Labour Party arrived from the charity sector and NGOs, backgrounds built around advocacy and institutional compassion, not the harder trade-offs of running a country. It shows in the instincts on display: a preference for managing sentiment over confronting problems. Badenoch's bet is that Britain needs fewer people trained to represent a cause and more who have had to deliver a result. There will be a cost. Some of the rejected will go to the papers. Some will drift to Reform, adding to a defection story that has already dented the Tories once. Badenoch's response, "so be it", is the correct one. A party terrified of losing people who do not agree with its direction will never have a direction. Every serious political project involves deciding who does not belong in it. The Conservatives spent the last parliament unable to do that, and the country noticed. Contrast this with the alternatives on offer. Reform's vetting has produced candidates that make its own leader wince. Labour, with over four hundred MPs, could not find anyone better to replace Starmer than a man who once lost to Jeremy Corbyn. Against that backdrop, a party willing to say no to its own former MPs looks less like an act of cruelty and more like the first sign of a functioning institution. None of this guarantees electoral success. Polling still has the Conservatives level with Labour and behind Reform. But recovery has to start somewhere, and it rarely starts with comfort. Badenoch is betting that voters can tell the difference between a party performing seriousness and one practising it. That bet is worth taking.
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
228
373
1.6K
113.3K
GB Politics
GB Politics@GBPolitcs·
🚨NEW: Pakistan has said that it will not take back the Rochdale grooming gang leader "under any circumstances"
English
834
196
1.9K
1.9M
Restore Britain Enthusiast
@mikeysmith The left: “Binface will be your only opposition, everyone look at Binface!” Reform: “Ok, we will criticise Binface” The left: “…..you’re shouting at a Bin!”
English
0
0
6
184
Mukhtar
Mukhtar@I_amMukhtar·
The reason why the name Muhammad tops the list of boys’ names is very simple. This is a long post to explain it because some people struggle to understand basic maths. Imagine 10 boys are born in a town: 3 boys are from Muslim families. 7 boys are from non-Muslim families. The 3 Muslim families choose different spellings of the same name: 1 boy: Muhammad 1 boy: Mohammed 1 boy: Mohammad That’s 3 different boys with the same name spelt differently. The other 7 boys are: 1 boy: Noah 1 boy: Leo 1 boy: Luca 1 boy: Theo 1 boy: Oliver 1 boy: Ethan 1 boy: Elijah The name Muhammad appears as the most common. It does not mean that most boys have that name. In this example, 7 out of 10 boys are still not named Muhammad. In reality, around 5,000 children are named Muhammad out of roughly 220,000 boys born.
Mukhtar tweet media
English
435
452
4.1K
398.8K
Aaron Bastani
Aaron Bastani@AaronBastani·
“It’s claptrap” isn’t an argument. You would have heard the same regarding VAT, income tax, CGT…everything. Anything that’s new is ‘claptrap’ to a person whose job was helping people dodge taxes, sure.
Samuel Leeds@samuel_leeds

Gary Economics has just ruined its credibility and proven that it clearly knows very little about economics. The absolute tax legend @DanNeidle destroyed Gary in his own documentary. The very documentary just a compilation of Gary being proven wrong time and time again about his "solution" to economic inequality. Let me know if you have watched it. The Dan Neidle debate has gotta be one of the best moments in the show!! #garystevenson @Channel4 @garyseconomics

English
375
153
1.9K
362.3K
Restore Britain Enthusiast
@JacobCollierMP @CountBinface The country’s going to shit, our economy is tanking, our NHS is a joke, we can’t build anything, young people can’t get a foothold in society and we are being replaced…..but look at the funny bin!
English
0
0
1
25
Claire Lehmann
Claire Lehmann@clairlemon·
When people see The Odyssey they will find out that Helen of Troy actually plays a very minor role in the story and that the female protagonist is played by this woman.
Claire Lehmann tweet media
English
371
57
2.1K
178.8K