GeoDev

696 posts

GeoDev

GeoDev

@GeoDev1962

"Check out Guitar George, he knows all the chords" - Mark Knopfler

Katılım Nisan 2024
1.2K Takip Edilen282 Takipçiler
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@Chesschick01 And they would fail to learn to walk. Public schools are useless.
English
0
0
0
41
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@ATabarrok @VincentGeloso That's a clever and simple way of framing those who think reality is a zero-sum game and those who know better.
English
0
0
0
10
Vincent Geloso
Vincent Geloso@VincentGeloso·
Paul Ehrlich lost even within the environmental movement and few noticed. His original claim was stark: humans are mouths to feed, polluters, and ultimately trespassers in the ecosystem. If population grows too large, correction must come through die-off. Human ingenuity plays little role; at best, it is trivial. Humans are not creators, but burdens. From that premise, it follows naturally that some degree of population control ( including coercion) could be justified. The response from thinkers like Julian Simon was fundamentally different. Humans are not merely consumers; they are creators. Given the right institutions, they can solve environmental problems through innovation. The real question is not population, but the institutional framework within which people operate. From there, disagreement persists. One can argue, as I do, that markets are powerful forces for conservation and restoration. Others maintain that strong government intervention is necessary (regulations, management of commons, Pigouvian taxes) to correct misalignments between private and collective interests. A carbon tax, for instance, is justified on the grounds that pricing pollution induces behavioral change and innovation (aligning private interest with collective interest). But here is the key point: both sides reject Ehrlich’s premise. Whether one favors markets or regulation, both perspectives rest on the idea that humans are capable of creating solutions. Both assume that environmental outcomes depend on incentives and institutions, not on reducing the number of “mouths.” In that sense, both implicitly accept that humans are not parasites, but the ultimate resource. This was not always the case. The environmental movements of the 1940s through the 1970s were far more receptive to Ehrlich’s view. At the time, his premise was dominant. Today, it is not merely contested: it is largely abandoned, even by those who might never cite Simon. That is Julian Simon’s real victory: not that everyone agrees with his policy conclusions (Simon was a free market enthusiast like I am), but that his core insight -- that human beings are fundamentally creators -- has quietly become the shared starting point of the debate. Julian Simon not only won the bet that made him famous. He won the war of ideas and destroyed the most anti-Human idea ever (in both direct statements and indirect consequences through its application). Ehrlich died well after his ideas died.
English
7
44
156
12.5K
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@VincentGeloso Additional point: Those who advocate "strong government intervention" are not actually trying to solve problems. They are playing a "Crisis and Leviathan" game, where any Crisis, real or imagined, is an excuse to grow Leviathan. The pattern is obvious, once you've read the book.
English
0
0
0
63
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@Simon_Ingari Is it the company or the specific manager that is an entitled parasite?
English
3
0
7
9.9K
Simons
Simons@Simon_Ingari·
Manager: I have you scheduled for a meeting at 7 PM tomorrow. Gen Z: Is my attendance mandatory? Manager: Yes, we’re working with a client in another time zone. Gen Z: Okay, I’m happy to shift my hours to accommodate. Manager: Excuse me, no—you still start at 8 AM. Gen Z: If I’m working in the evening, then I’ll start later in the day. Manager: Okay, don’t watch the clock at this company. We work when we need to work. Gen Z: I’m contracted and paid for 40 hours a week, so that is what I work. Manager: That’s a career-limiting move. Tomorrow is a busy day; I’ll need you to start right promptly at 8:00 AM. Gen Z: Alright then, I will take the lieu time later this week. Manager: Again, that’s not how we operate at this company. You work hard when you need to, and you don’t watch the clock. Gen Z: Again, I work for the hours I’m paid for, and since overtime is not an option, I’ll go ahead and adjust my hours this week to accommodate the shift in the schedule. Manager: You’re not quite understanding the company culture we have here—we work all the time. Gen Z: And you’re not understanding that just because that is the way you do things does not mean that is how I’m required to do things as well. Manager: (Silence)
English
685
414
7.8K
1.6M
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@RockChartrand The "intervention" that you speak of, needs clarification. It's actually "coercive govt intervention". Great post - thanks.
English
0
0
2
19
Rock Chartrand🤑
Rock Chartrand🤑@RockChartrand·
The strongest ‘stimulus’ is removing the state’s power to try to engineer outcomes. You don’t get growth from intervention. You get it from letting people produce, trade, and keep what they earn.
English
4
26
138
1.4K
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@MikeBales I don't laugh at jokes very often, because I'm old enough that I've seen them before, or variations of them. This one made me laugh out loud, literally. Thanks.
English
3
0
10
1.8K
Mike Bales 🫡🇺🇸
A cardiologist died and was given an elaborate funeral. A huge heart, covered in flowers, stood behind the casket during the service. Following the eulogy, the heart opened, and the casket rolled inside. The beautiful heart then closed, sealing the doctor inside, forever. At that point, one of the mourners burst into laughter. When all eyes stared at him, he said, “I’m sorry, I was just thinking of my own funeral. I’m a gynecologist.” The proctologist fainted…
English
58
63
521
25.5K
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@PerBylund If you apply the "5 Whys" root cause identification tool to any failing social system, you will find coercive govt intervention, as the root cause. The initial design contained a feature that doomed it to failure.
English
1
0
1
23
Per Bylund
Per Bylund@PerBylund·
In social systems, it is rarely the case that a failure is due to the particular design's specific properties, which can therefore be solved by replacing it with one that is better, more sophisticated. The problem is that design failed.
English
4
3
14
791
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@RockChartrand I can't tell you how much I hate people that have a strong sense of entitlement. They are all useless pieces of sh*t, in my experience.
English
0
0
0
19
Rock Chartrand🤑
Rock Chartrand🤑@RockChartrand·
Socialists usually aren’t confused or unable. They just adopt a standard where need becomes a claim on others. That lets them treat outcomes they didn’t earn as something they’re owed, rather than something to produce. It’s not ignorance. It’s a premise: entitlement over earning.
English
7
8
51
795
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@BradRTorgersen Have you forgiven her yet? Just kidding, there are some good talents on that list. Where's her equivalent list?
English
0
0
0
8
Brad R. Torgersen
Brad R. Torgersen@BradRTorgersen·
Groups or artists I know (or at least know a lot better) because of who I married: - Steely Dan - The Who - Elton John - Pat Metheny - Bruce Hornsby - The Eagles - Joni Mitchell - Loggins & Messina - Sade - The Cars
English
7
0
25
635
GeoDev retweetledi
Brett Pike
Brett Pike@ClassicLearner·
Drugging boys because they won’t sit & listen to lectures eight hours a day is one of the grossest & most deranged aspects of modern society. Instead of acknowledging there’s a problem with the system, the system just chemically alters the brains of children. Disgusting.
English
16
117
549
4.5K
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@Simon_Ingari Or just walk out. Like I did, more than once, in my hot-headed youth. Company, you're fired!
English
0
0
1
38
Simons
Simons@Simon_Ingari·
Salary at 10 am, Resignation at 10:05 am Seriously, this is so shocking. People have no values these days Why did this person take 5 minutes to resign? The most important value for every employee is that their resignation mail should be in their drafts!
English
6
6
76
14.3K
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@AmmousMD Isn't it true that the cholesterol gathers at inflamed locations to help reduce the inflammation?
English
0
0
2
706
Dr. Ammous
Dr. Ammous@AmmousMD·
Inflammation in the body causes cholesterol to deposit in the arteries, leading to heart disease. This occurs regardless of the amount of cholesterol in the bloodstream. Reducing cholesterol numbers is irrelevant, the real fix is addressing the inflammation.
Dr. Ammous tweet media
English
71
138
783
60.5K
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@RockChartrand Let's send the Marxists, and only the Marxists, to a large island that has everything that humans need to survive, prosper and thrive. The Marxists will all be dead within a month.
English
0
0
0
15
Rock Chartrand🤑
Rock Chartrand🤑@RockChartrand·
Requiring Marxists to live by the standard they reject: earning their outcomes through voluntary exchange, not political force. Marxism doesn’t stand on its own. It survives on subsidies, exceptions, and moral guilt. Remove those, and it has to prove itself. It’s indifference to parasitism and a refusal to be made responsible for someone else’s demands. They’re free to try. They’re not entitled to compel.
Alice Smith@TheAliceSmith

What is the best cure for Marxists?

English
6
15
88
2.4K
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@bigfatsurprise It's a damn good book. Wish I could shake the hand of the author and say Thank You.
English
0
0
0
10
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@TimePreference_ If you apply the "5 Whys" root cause identification tool to any societal ill, you will find coercive govt intervention, i.e., regulation, as the root cause.
English
0
0
0
4
Time Preference
Time Preference@TimePreference_·
'we need more regulation to fix the problems caused by regulation' this is the intellectual framework of modern economic policy kafka couldn't have written a better parody
English
5
24
91
1.3K
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
By accident, I was already reading when I entered kindergarten. Consequently, I was a voracious reader as a kid. I read way above my grade level and I had high comprehension. What I found interesting, is that when the school started teaching grammar, I already understood it implicitly.
English
0
0
4
85
Socratic Experience
Socratic Experience@socraticexp·
The low-hanging fruit in education is embarrassingly simple: more reading. If we could get a significantly higher percentage of kids to spend 2-3 hours a day reading from ages 7-8 into their teens, most would develop a more solid foundation for high school than do the bored, inattentive kids in lessons that most don't find engaging.
English
17
20
112
3.5K
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
I didn't read the original post yet. But I find it interesting to consider strong stories with some injected wokeness, e.g. The Loki TV series, Vs. the woke nonsense with some plot injected, e.g., Star Fleet Academy. Full Disclosure: I haven't watched SA - my stomach isn't strong enough.
English
0
0
0
8
Brad R. Torgersen
Brad R. Torgersen@BradRTorgersen·
Interesting read. Apropos of what I said about losing touchstones, and also us being in an entertainment quality trough beginning around 2010.
Rambo Van Halen@RamboVanHalen

I put in 25 years. It would be 26 but I haven't worked yet this year and I'm not sure I'll ever work in entertainment again. The writing has been on the wall for quite some time. But it's a sad thing--especially since the collapse of Hollywood is (mostly) self inflicted. Outsiders like to blame the unions and burdensome regulations. That's not exactly wrong, but the big reason is that Hollywood stopped making a product that people wanted to consume. Film is a funny thing. On one hand it's art. But on the other it's a mass consumer product--like a car, or a soft drink. But unlike a typical consumer product, it was something we consumed together. We went to a special place, and sat with strangers, and watched stories. And those stories infected us. They entered our minds and our souls and they implanted things. Deep things. Ancient things. Timeless things. Things like heroism and beauty and love and fear and sex and death and adventure and tragedy and pain and injustice and all the things that make up our dreams. There's a thing we call "cinematic language". It's how we tell a story with images. (And BTW if you want to learn more about the language of visual media, read Scott McCloud's excellent book Understanding Comics.) An odd thing about cinematic language is that it's the same language as dreams. There's a scene in Christopher Nolan's Inception where Leonardo DiCaprio is explains to (the tragic) Ellen Page how dreams work. But what he's really describing is cinematic language. Inception is really a movie about movies BTW. While it's far from my favorite film, I think it's the perfect film. Because the suspension of disbelief is perfect. You believe the plot about dreams because you're familiar with how movies work--maybe not consciously--but you know. Everyone knows. Maybe not everyone has seen a movie, but everyone has dreams. Another odd thing about film: you don't "watch" a movie, you look into it. And you put yourself inside it. Now you're in the dream. And you're hypnotized. Because movies do that too. The motion--the moving images--they hack your brain. We're programed to pay attention to moving things. Even when the things aren't real. Even when they're just light reflected off a screen. So we'd go to these special places--these movie theaters--these temples--and we'd sit, and we'd "watch" and we'd enter the dream. And we did it together. And after the movie was over--and the lights came on, and we'd file out over the sound of popcorn crunching under our feet--we were different. We had become transformed. Sometimes we were changed in minor ways. But sometimes not. Sometimes we were changed in profound ways. And we did it together. Before the movie we were a room full of strangers. But after--on the way out the door--we all had something in common. Because we shared an experience. We'd shared the dream. And we'd all become transformed. And then tech got involved... Streaming turned movies from a communal experience to a personal experience. And that's an issue, but they did something else too. They started developing movies as if they were tech products. But you can't apply a KPI to a dream. At least, not successfully anyway. Because dreams don't work like that--nor does any sort of art. And that's a funny thing about making movies. You try to make the best film you can, but at the end of the day you have no idea if it's good or if it's going to be successful. You just have to hope the audience likes it. Now, you can design a movie that will appeal to a preexisting audience. Marvel movies are like this. There's a large group of fanboy nerds that will see every single one. You can count on them every time. Just like you can count on the Gay Oscar Bait crowd (for example). But those movies are slop. But Hollywood became specialists in slop. Because slop is safe. Because you could apply KPI style metrics to slop. As a result they lost the audience. And the audience is probably never coming back. I wrote a book in 2024 (that was published in 2025). While writing, I thought of it as my farewell to the industry. But looking back, what I was actually writing was a eulogy for Hollywood--the place where dreams were made. And so it goes...

English
3
1
14
757
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@mattdykema Yup, been there, done that. Sometimes you have to forcibly slow down the pace and protect your guys from the pressure. This often increases productivity, despite the counter-intuitive nature of the approach.
English
0
0
1
60
MattD
MattD@mattdykema·
Production Supervisors in CNC shops be like “We’re behind schedule… run it faster.” No setup time fix No tooling strategy No program optimization No training plan Just pressure Meanwhile -Tools are smoked -Offsets are guessing games -Setups take 2x longer than they should -Scrap quietly climbs And they still wonder why delivery is late. A real supervisor -Controls the process -Protects the machinists -Fixes the bottlenecks
English
5
3
32
1.4K
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
True story: my friend's stepfather was old, sickly and on many meds. He needed a procedure that required all meds be temporarily stopped. When the meds stopped, he found himself feeling great. After the procedure, my friend said Don't resume the meds. But the man's daughter, a nurse, forced him to get back on the meds. He's passed away now.
English
2
3
36
4.6K
Dr. Ammous
Dr. Ammous@AmmousMD·
Your parents getting old and frail: 1) Take them outside. 2) Feed them animal protein with every meal. 3) Take them off meds.
Dr. Ammous tweet media
English
15
52
326
7K
GeoDev
GeoDev@GeoDev1962·
@cboyack You are correct, except that too many employers are unaware of this, themselves. And wouldn't have a clue how to screen for it.
English
0
0
1
34
Connor Boyack 📚
Connor Boyack 📚@cboyack·
Emotional intelligence Conflict resolution Adaptability The three skills employers want most and schools teach least.
English
11
4
72
2K