Greg
35 posts


@Tiggersdad2 Bankruptcy is exponentially closer than $1…great leadership @rogerhamilton
English

@SmallCapBob2 @Genius @rogerhamilton These shares are worth less than the quarter you put into a shopping cart to go get groceries…atleast with that $.25 investment, you get an apparatus to load and carry for your goods, a service and convenience that makes your life easier.
What’s GNS offer you? Pathetic company
English

Wait till you see WHY @Genius Canceled 20M Shares, Equal To 16% Of Its Public Float and WHAT @rogerhamilton has up his sleeve 🤫
See you soon 😉
$GNS
SmallCapKing - aka “Bob”@SmallCapBob2
$GNS Watch for a follow up press release after-hours by @Genius 🤫 @rogerhamilton
English

@stockandbe1900 2026 price target is A) not going bankrupt or B) R/S.
English

@rogerhamilton at what point do you think your stepping down will be the actual best thing for shareholders?
English

@Ohitskaykay_St Amazing how terrible GNS’ legal team is vs a company who is bankrupt…embarrassing, really.
English

$GNS [UPDATE]
Genius Group Limited v. LZG International, Inc., Michael Moe, and Peter Ritz
+
VStock Transfer, LLC
This letter marks an aggressive, high-stakes tactical maneuver in a federal lawsuit between Genius Group and LZGI. Genius previously won an arbitration award against LZGI, but because that award has not yet been officially confirmed by a court, Genius remains a general, unsecured creditor without a legal lien on any specific LZGI property.
Upon discovering that LZGI was about to receive a $600,000 cash payout from a separate legal settlement, Genius rushed to the judge privately without giving LZGI advance notice to secure an emergency Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to freeze those funds before they could be spent or hidden.
LZGI’s lawyers immediately intercepted the order and fired off this urgent letter-motion to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil to get the freeze undone before it goes into effect.
Their defense relies on a landmark 1999 Supreme Court precedent, Grupo Mexicano, which strictly dictates that federal courts lack the legal authority to freeze a defendant's unencumbered assets purely to secure a potential money judgment, even if the defendant is completely bankrupt or actively trying to dissipate their funds.
LZGI heavily criticizes Genius for omitting this binding Supreme Court authority from their emergency paperwork, implying that Genius violated its strict duty of candor to the court by intentionally keeping the judge in the dark.
Moving forward, the immediate focus is on the judge's impending reaction to this letter, which could result in a sudden pause or vacation of the freeze before it takes full effect.
From there, LZGI is scheduled to submit its formal opposition papers by June 22, 2026. The entire dispute will then come to a head at a scheduled court hearing on June 26, 2026, where Genius's legal team will likely face harsh questioning from the judge regarding their omission of controlling Supreme Court law.



English

@GeoffreyBe55012 @Ohitskaykay_St #GNS
No worries GNS Fam....I got this one...
Long-from FUD Burial piece incoming directly answering this and Tony Lil D's latest FUD framing.
English

$GNS [SEC Filing]
Genius Group has bought back 6.6 million of its own shares. They did this through a private deal with an independent investor, rather than buying them on the open stock market.
Even better for the company, they got these shares at a discount, paying less than the current market price.
Now, Genius Group plans to permanently delete these shares, which means fewer total shares of the company will exist.
The main result of this move is that it shrinks the total number of shares available. Because the company’s overall value is now divided among fewer shares, each remaining share automatically becomes worth a little bit more.
Looking forward, the company hopes this is just the beginning. They have a plan to remove a total of 43.3 million shares by combining future buybacks with shares they hope to claw back from ongoing legal battles. If they succeed, they will wipe out about 36% of the shares currently trading in the public market.
This is a very positive move for Genius Group and its current investors. By buying their own stock at a discount, the company is using its money wisely to give remaining shareholders a bigger piece of the pie. It also sends a strong, confident message to the stock market that the company's leaders believe their stock is currently priced too cheap.
Finally, by taking so many shares off the market, it reduces the supply, which can help drive the stock price up and protect it from dropping easily in the future.
ir.geniusgroup.net/news-events/pr…
English

@Ohitskaykay_St @Tony_Denaro Usually, when you sell a house, a boat, a car lease, an art collection for PENNIES ON THE DOLLAR, you want out. Especially on perpetual eve of BREAKING NEWS! Why would someone sell
6.6m shares right now!? Why!?
English

@Tony_Denaro @GeoffreyBe55012 Don't move the goal post and deflect now. Answer the question why you came with the assertion "someone wanted out"?
English

@Ohitskaykay_St @Tony_Denaro So, someone with 6.6m shares needed money sooo bad, they decided to sell a “future 10x stock” for Pennie’s on the dollar below all time lows, nack to the company directly. So either ZERO conviction in Roger getting it done or they’re so fucked, they need the cash that bad…
English

@Tony_Denaro @GeoffreyBe55012 No single investor "wanted out so bad" that they dumped shares on the open market below the current price; rather, the company itself initiated a share buyback
You are no a good faith actor and now you'll be exposed for misleading FUD.
Shame on you.
English

@Ohitskaykay_St This is getting pathetic my man…not anything to do with you, but Genius Group’s actions as a whole.
Ambulance Chasing as a business strategy because they’re incompetent otherwise.
Makes sense multiple board members refuse to own personal shares of the company they “serve”
English

$GNS [UPDATE]
Genius Group Limited v. LZG International, Inc., Michael Moe, and Peter Ritz
+
VStock Transfer, LLC
This filing is part of an ongoing, real-time court battle in New York between two companies, Genius Group and LZGI. Earlier, the two companies went through a private trial called an arbitration to resolve a major business dispute over an acquisition deal that fell apart. Genius Group won that private trial completely, and the private judge (the arbitrator) ordered LZGI to give back over $8+ million in cash including massive legal fees and return 7.3+ million of shares of stock.
Genius Group took that win to a federal court to turn it into an official, legally binding judgment. This specific document is LZGI’s formal counter-attack. LZGI is asking a federal judge to completely throw out the arbitrator's decision. LZGI argues that the arbitrator went completely rogue, rewrote the rules of their contract, and ignored clear New York laws to favor Genius Group. Because this is a brief written by LZGI’s own lawyers, the arguments inside it are technically just LZGI’s side of the story rather than undisputed facts.
LZGI's main argument centers on a concept called "anti-sandbagging." They claim that Genius Group’s executives knew about the company's debts and financial risks before they officially closed the deal, but chose to sign anyway and then sued over those exact same problems months later. LZGI points out that the contract explicitly banned Genius Group from doing this. They claim the arbitrator completely ignored this rule, double-counted the damages, and illegally forced LZGI to pay for Genius Group's separate legal battles.
To counter this, Genius Group's winning argument relies on the legal principle that deliberate acts of fraud break a contract. Under the law, if a seller intentionally lies or conceals vital information to trick a buyer into a deal, that fraud tears up the rulebook. Genius Group argued and the arbitrator agreed that LZGI's intentional deception completely broke the contract, meaning LZGI cannot use the contract’s protective "anti-sandbagging" clauses to shield itself from its own fraud.
Despite LZGI's aggressive arguments, Genius Group is currently in the much stronger position. In the U.S. legal system, federal courts almost always uphold private arbitration decisions. A judge cannot overturn an arbitrator's ruling just because the arbitrator made a mistake or misread a contract. LZGI faces a steep, uphill battle to prove that the arbitrator didn't just make an error, but intentionally chose to ignore the law.
Next, Genius Group will file a response defending their win, both sides will likely argue in front of a federal judge in Manhattan, and whoever loses that round will almost certainly appeal the decision to a higher court.




English

@GeniusGroupLtd_ perhaps time the board invests into the vision like the the investors!? Crazy idea, I know.




English

@Caddy519 @rogerhamilton Couldn’t agree more, it’s a free fall…no support technically or fundamentally with a leadership group milking millions in Comp for…performance?
English

I thought it was safe to buy $GNS at .45-.34-.27-.24-.23- I honestly don’t think I can buy any more until @rogerhamilton gets this precipitous fall under control. This is ridiculous!!
English

@SenSanders Fix congress Bern Dawg. Then we’ll talk. Corrupt muh f**kas
English

@SenWarren Why not look at the fraud problems in congress first, yeah?
English

@Ohitskaykay_St @SEMoney8 So why haven’t the shares been returned yet, the cash frozen yet? What is everyone waiting for if this is such a slam dunk? Sorry you’re answering these questions and not the board or CEO…
English

$GNS [UPDATE]
Ritz v Genius Group Limited, Roger Hamilton and Eva Mantziou
&
Genius Group Limited v Ritz (+ Moe) - Countersuit
This document is an official update sent to a federal judge showing that Genius Group’s legal team is aggressively moving forward to get the answers they need. Both sides are confirming exactly which lawyers will be attending a virtual court hearing.
Essentially, Genius Group’s legal counsel are making sure the court is ready for a major showdown where they intend to hold the plaintiff, Peter B. Ritz, fully accountable.
The meeting is happening because Genius Group filed a "Motion to Compel," which is a powerful legal move to force the other side to cooperate. Genius Group has already questioned Mr. Ritz under oath once, but his answers were likely incomplete, evasive, or left out crucial facts. Genius Group is refusing to let him off the hook and is asking Judge Rochon to step in and legally force Mr. Ritz back into the hot seat for a follow-up interview so the real truth can come out.
The implications are highly favorable for Genius Group. It shows that their legal team is actively exposing gaps in the plaintiff's story and refusing to back down. If the judge grants this motion, it will be a significant victory for Genius Group, forcing Mr. Ritz to face intense questioning once again and preventing him from hiding behind vague answers. It signals that Genius Group is successfully driving the narrative and keeping the pressure on the opposition.
Next up is the actual virtual hearing tomorrow. Genius Group’s powerhouse legal team will lay out their arguments to the judge, explaining exactly why Mr. Ritz needs to be questioned further. Once the judge gives the green light, Genius Group will schedule the new questioning session to extract the missing information, clearing a major hurdle and strengthening their position as they push forward to win the case.


English

@Ohitskaykay_St Respectfully, they haven’t even awarded anything or won any convictions…ever. All speculation and bias narrative to frame Genius as morally righteous…but they can’t seem to get an actual court to side with them
English

With all due respect, your take is completely off. I've read several of your posts over the past few weeks and aware of you spreading misleading FUD.
Genius Group won a sweeping ICC arbitration case that proved LGZI and its executives of fraud. The defendants have not been in good faith to pay back what's due which is why Genius Group is going to the federal court to enforce the win.
English








