გიორგი ყიფიანი 🇺🇦🇮🇱🇺🇸🇵🇸🇮🇷🇮🇳🇷🇺🇵🇰

@protonmailer999 @0xE1 @The_Davos_Man nexusnewsfeed.com/article/geopol… thechiseler.org/home/banking-o… In later edits wiki even deleted some interesting facts and tried to justify that US and GB did it for good reasons en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_…

@GeorgeKifiani @0xE1 @The_Davos_Man Where is this claim of Banks funding?

- The Holodomor - The Great Terror - The 1946 famine - The ethnic cleansing of Western Ukraine - The ethnic cleansing of the Tatars - The denial of Ukrainian culture and russification - Violent suppression of dissent - Chernobyl I guess that's what communists call "flourishing"

@United24media And of course the document itself is not shown.... Just a girl putting some promo papers on doors and taking photos. Btw, have not Russia not kidnapped all people from there, killed 99% of the population and destroyed the city, who they are asking to take citizenships then ? 🤔

🔴 Russian occupation authorities evict Ukrainian locals who refused passports. In Mariupol, officials are forcing residents from their apartments and taping eviction notices to doors for declining to obtain citizenship documents.

Fidel Castro responds to Forbes ranking him among the world's richest rulers: "I challenge them all. That little thief Bush, the CIA, the 33 US intelligence agencies. If they can prove I hold a single offshore account -- even one dollar -- I resign immediately."

@MatthewMcCrac18 @ShoahUkraine It was not sabotage on purpose, it was internal war between ideologies, Whites were heavily supported by Brits, who even invaded Russia to distract Red socialists, also famine was not just in USSR, in Poland where Kulaks and OUN formed by them caused in Poland and eastern Europe.

I can't disprove this but it does not make sense to me. By the 1930's the Stalinist policies were in place and rapidly growing. They were implementing the agricultural policies that were largely based on the US industrial-agricultural model. I have no doubt that there was sabotage and friction with the "kulaks." This had occured during the rapid industrial expansion. I had read a lot of accounts and books from this era and there is nothing that indicates that millions of people were dying from a famine during this period. No photos either. There were some western journalists that suggested this but nothing concrete. It wasn't until the Cold War that this "Holodomor" got legs. And it was it was during the 80s. The claims being made were ridiculous. It got so ridiculous that during the 90s there were western "scholars" who settled for a middle ground and cut the death toll from 12 million to a 6 million. My contention is that they should not be no meeting halfway since the "scholarship" was ridiculous and driven by an agenda in the first place.

This is one of the most important articles I've spent weeks to research and write that proves the following thesis : The Holodomor Was Not an Ethnic Genocide. Part 1: The Specific Claim at Stake: The Holodomor was not an ethnic genocide in the sense that the Holocaust was. The Nazi state identified Jews through racial laws based on ancestry, applied its destructive policy to Jews regardless of class or political behavior, built dedicated extermination infrastructure, and documented its intent openly in its internal records. None of these conditions was present in Soviet Ukraine in 1932-33. The Soviet state did not define Ukrainians as a racial enemy, did not apply its policy on the basis of Ukrainian ancestry, did not build dedicated machinery for Ukrainian destruction, and did not document any such intent. The man who first argued the famine was ethnic genocide, Robert Conquest, abandoned the thesis before he died. The Soviet apparatus that enforced the famine in Ukraine was staffed at every level by ethnic Ukrainians. Kazakhs, under the same Soviet collectivization policy, died at three times the proportional rate of Ukrainians without anyone calling that genocide. The regime that allegedly destroyed Ukrainians as a nation had spent the preceding decade aggressively building Ukrainian-language schools, publishing, and party institutions, and would spend the following decade expanding Ukrainian territory, granting Ukraine an independent United Nations seat, and presiding over Ukrainian demographic recovery. The internal documents of the Soviet state from 1932-33 do not speak of destroying Ukrainians. They speak of class war and grain procurement. Every major archival historian who has worked the post-1991 Soviet record (Davies, Wheatcroft, Tauger, Cameron, Pianciola) has rejected the ethnic genocide thesis. This article examines the evidence against it. The famine that swept the Soviet Union in 1932-33 killed millions. The best demographic estimates place Ukrainian losses between 3.5 and 5 million, with comparable proportional devastation in Kazakhstan and mass mortality across the Volga, the North Caucasus, the Kuban, and Western Siberia. It was caused by Soviet policy: forced collectivization, ruinous grain procurement quotas, and an ideological refusal to relieve the catastrophe as it unfolded. Stalin and the Soviet leadership are responsible for these deaths. None of that is in dispute here. What is in dispute is something far more specific. The claim that the Holodomor was an ethnic genocide, that Stalin engineered the famine to destroy Ukrainians as a national group, is a much narrower historical and legal proposition. It is the thesis of Robert Conquest's The Harvest of Sorrow (1986), of Timothy Snyder's Bloodlands (2010), and of Anne Applebaum's Red Famine (2017). It has become the official position of the Ukrainian state and, increasingly, of Western parliaments. It is also wrong. The evidence (geographic, demographic, institutional, and documentary) does not support it. The most rigorous archival historians of the famine, working from materials unavailable to Conquest, have rejected it. The post-Soviet opening of the archives, which the genocide camp expected would vindicate the engineered-famine thesis, produced the opposite result. What follows is the case against the ethnic genocide reading, point by point, set against the strongest evidence and historians the opposing camp can muster.

@stormer1914 @h_navis_aeria @The_Davos_Man Thank you for proving my point, on paper it was USSR, while as your document stated USSR was unable to control the outskirts (okraina) post revolution. Btw, does femines in eastern Europe also were caused by USSR ? In Poland for example and declaration of OUN?

@GeorgeKifiani @h_navis_aeria @The_Davos_Man No

@protonmailer999 @0xE1 @The_Davos_Man Manipulation of truth, it included ally armies, Brits included, but instead GB banks funded Polish-German invasion into Czech to cut the USSR from its ally... Ironically British and US banks were funding Nazis up to 1943, while GB was at war with Nazis.

@GeorgeKifiani @0xE1 @The_Davos_Man Those attempts to form alliances included suggestions that the polish allow large numbers of troops into their countries... you can see why that wasn't received well.

Según la Universidad de Brown, solo en Irak, Afganistán, Siria, Yemen y Pakistán, EEUU mató a más de 4,5 millones de personas, desplazaron a 60 millones de personas y provocaron 7,6 millones de niños hambrientos. El 81% de las guerras desde 1945 fueron provocadas por EEUU... estos son los verdaderos millones de muertos que no te cuentan, los del capitalismo.

@adamson_ma88843 @ShoahUkraine But yes, to call something an Ethnic killing or Genocide it should be done by race, religious or ethnic reasons, everything should have their names. If someone is killed in revolution for ideological reasons it should be named do and not devaluate meaning of Genocide.

@ShoahUkraine Love how Communists conduct these subtle exercises in moral reasoning. “Sure we killed millions of people, but we killed them because they were FARMERS, not because of their race! Whole ‘nother thing. Lots of people hate farmers, amiright?”

@adamson_ma88843 @ShoahUkraine Not farmers, but land owners (Kulaks), farmers unite with collectivists and exactly farmers were quite brutal against Kulaks, while Stalin wanted to relocate land owners (Kulaks) and use them as workers on dirty and dangerous works, like mines and oil industry in Siberia.

@MatthewMcCrac18 @ShoahUkraine Not really, it was an ideological war between Whites and Reds that really ended just when WW2 began, and it's really quite a question which one was more bloody, anti-collectivists or collectivists...

@ShoahUkraine You are being too kind. I doubt that millions died as a result of this "soviet collectivization" policy.

A foreign billionaire just did the job the entire British press wouldn't. @elonmusk asked the question every newsroom in this country should have been screaming for months. Who are the officers that handcuffed a dying boy and let him bleed out in the street? Who are they, and why are they still in a job? Not the BBC. Not Sky. Not GB News. A bloke in Texas with no stake in this country. They had the story. They let it die. He picked it back up, called it unconscionable, and offered to fund a wrongful death lawsuit. The answer to his question? Silence. Still. This is Henry Nowak. First year student. Walking home from a night out with his football team. A wounded teenager telling officers he couldn't breathe, and the response was handcuffs, not an ambulance. A boy dies like this on a British street and it should never have left the front page. It should have been the reckoning that didn't stop until someone answered for it. Instead it took a man who owes us nothing to drag it back into the light. Not one officer named. Not one suspended. The watchdog is investigating now, and only now, because the pressure came from a website and not a single news desk in this country. Ordinary people never needed permission to care. They raised over £40,000 for Henry at a charity football match in his memory. That is the Britain that still has a pulse. The one that doesn't wait to be told who's allowed to matter. When the richest man on earth has to do your journalism for you, what exactly is the British press for? So let me ask you the question they wouldn't. Did you see Henry's name on the news? Or did you have to find it here? Henry Nowak. 18 years old. Walking home. He should have made it.

One of the most horrific scenes in human history has been leaked. When Israel forced thousands in Gaza to run after a loaf of bread under a hail of bullets. A moment the world should never forget.

Ustedes me secuestraron en altamar. En la cárcel me separaron del grupo, me metieron a un contenedor, me esposaron, botaron al piso y me golpearon por más de tres horas hasta causarme una conmoción cerebral. Esos son sus valores, estas fotos sólo son propaganda

@tak_ya_anna @EmmanuelMacron @Europarl_EN @Europarl_FR @wilde_frank @aidefranceukr Anekeenka ? Wtf, he's Ukrainian... Also he said not jail, but pre-trial detention center (СИЗО)....

The whole world must see this. A Ukrainian serviceman released on May 15, 2026, testifies to torture, starvation, denial of medical care, and deaths inside the Kamyshin detention center in Russia. Ukrainian prisoners — both military personnel and civilians — are being held in inhumane conditions. International organizations are denied access. The world must act immediately. #SaveUkrainianPOWs #HumanRights #Ukraine

@DakdaR22 He's right, it's a war, but you should not cry when Russia sends over 1500 drones and 600 missiles into Ukraine...

„If Russia had not launched the war, Ukraine would not have to hit targets in Russia. Ukraine’s strikes against targets in Russia are completely legitimate.“ - Petr Pavel President of the Czech Republic 🇨🇿 I think it's clear enough....

@ViktorBruhNorge @joe35353643 @CaolanReports It's fake that came from UA side, there was no such proposal from Russia, even more, Ukraine can do that and prove the existence of those children, or holding enemy PoWs is more important than rescuing "kidnapped children" ??? They can easily save them now...

@joe35353643 @CaolanReports Well, for one, for the recent prisoner of war exchange, the russians proposed to replace Ukrainian PoWs with Ukrainian children that they, guess what, kidnapped. They can talk about "rescuing" all they want, but they actually did that, they'd give them with no preconditions.

russia openly kidnapped tens of thousands of Ukrainian children.

@Mattxduchak @NichtQ @Bizzalt138823 @Podrivel @CaolanReports Not really, this is specific to how courts work, that was preparatory hearings (main hearings are delayed again for 3 years already), that can give a recommendation of arrest, not the final verdict that can only apply after main hearings.

@NichtQ @Bizzalt138823 @Podrivel @CaolanReports Yes, the ICC is known for issuing warrants without evidence

@Mattxduchak @Podrivel @CaolanReports Why are main hearings still are delayed ? It's the first case in ICC that had main hearings delayed for more than 6 months btw, 3 years and still just one preparatory hearing with recommendation... Also it's the first ICC hearings where the defence side was denied from hearings.

@Podrivel @CaolanReports You retarded or something? He’s had an arrest warrant out for the last 3 years

@CaolanReports Some of links are even about Hamas and say no word about this topic..... Wtf...

@CaolanReports I like how community notes links go only on western propagandistic media, The Guardian, BBC, Times of Israel..... But even they use source - "trust me bro cos specific side of the conflict we support said so...", it's like using Russian media as a source...

@CaolanReports The fact is - Ukraine is still unable to give a list of even a thousand, but gave of 339 and most of them were found in Europe (Germany, France and Poland mostly), not even in Russia...... 🤣🤣🤣