Georgia E Little

@BenSwann_ @WellsJorda89710 I always watch the full speech on YouTube.

The decision by ABC, CNN, and NBC not to carry President Trump’s primetime address on election security raises a fundamental question about the role of major broadcast networks in a democracy. This was a nationally announced speech by a sitting, duly elected president on the integrity of U.S. elections. An issue that affects every voter, regardless of party. This is not about liking or disliking Trump, or agreeing or disagreeing with his claims. The presidency is the highest elected office in the country. When a president addresses the nation in a formal, scheduled primetime speech, there is a strong public‑interest argument that news networks should air it live and in full. Citizens can’t evaluate their leaders, or their claims, if they aren’t allowed to hear those leaders directly. Editorial judgment and criticism remain essential. Networks are entirely within their rights to add clear disclaimers before and after the address, fact‑check in real time or immediately afterward, host panels that challenge, contextualize, or rebut the president’s statements. But substituting that for the speech itself, showing only handpicked clips, summaries, or commentary, shifts from informing the public to curating what the public is permitted to see. At that point, viewers are reacting to the networks’ framing, not to the president’s actual words. Even after being censored in the U.S., having its license revoked and facing sanctions, RT International chose to air the address in full. RT has publicly disagreed with the president’s policies and with parts of this speech, but it treated the event as a matter of public record. Our principle is simple: viewers should be able to watch the complete address in context, hear the arguments unedited, and then weigh both the speech and the subsequent criticism for themselves. Rather than having corporate media gatekeepers decide in advance which presidential messages are fit for broadcast.

Breaking: DHS Identifies 278,000 Foreigners Illegally Registered to Vote in Federal Elections via @WestJournalism westernjournal.com/breaking-dhs-i…

One president used a prime time speech to brand millions of Americans "domestic terrorists." The other revealed intelligence of a foreign superpower meddling in our elections, stealing our voter data, and creating fake ballots. Guess which story NBC, CBS, ABC, and CNN amplified and which one they buried. The corporate media is 100% the enemy of this nation.

Joe Rogan and JD Vance both say that California Democrats rigged the Los Angeles mayor vote with those late night ballot drops for Nithya Raman, pushing Spencer Pratt out of the race JD Vance says Democrats did this to ensure there would be 2 blue candidates and the ballot totals made no sense, they were impossible to justify They talk about Democrats also forcing through the tax increase with these same mail in ballots California Democrats are literally openly rigging our elections and no one will stop them “So you would expect the mail-in ballots to be more or less like the original ballots in terms of 1, 2, and 3. I'm not saying Spencer Pratt is going to win the mail-in ballots, but it just so happened that the third-place person, in relative terms, did a lot better than the first and second place person… Disproportionately better. Such that the Republican was actually kicked out of the race, so that there's not actually a real election in California. That to me was the crazy part. It's like you were designing the vote share in order to kick Pratt out and put the third person into second place. That to me is like very, very bizarre because what is the theory of the mail-in vote? That is somehow like so much more pro-Nithya relative to Karen Bass. Makes no sense. Makes no sense. Makes no sense.” The only explanation is Democrats are rigging the votes, the whole country knows it

@AstroRayne47873 @BuzzPatterson @CBSNews I think he means the millennials or maybe Gen Z.

@BuzzPatterson @CBSNews Gen X? I don't think so. If they're pink haired and nose ringed (and imbeciles) then they are not Gen X. I love you Buzz but you got this one wrong and pissed off the one segment of population that keeps this country running.

President Trump announced that his administration is declassifying intelligence that reveals "shocking vulnerabilities in our election infrastructure," including "hacking, exploitation and foreign interference." FACT CHECK RATING: False. Officials have repeatedly said election infrastructure remains secure. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency said there was “no evidence of any malicious activity” affecting the integrity of the 2024 elections. CISA also said the 2020 election was “the most secure in American history,” with no evidence that voting systems deleted, lost or compromised votes.

@BuzzPatterson @CBSNews Media is the controlling abusive husband feeding us all lies to make us ignore the truth that is right in front of us. How much longer are folks going to allow the abuse by the media? They all need their licenses pulled @FCC.

@wdunlap @charliekirk11 tried that. Look how it worked out for him. The left is beyond reasoning. They are worked up into a murderous frenzy of hate.

There was a time when the loudest defenders of free speech in America stood on the left. The Berkeley Free Speech Movement. The old ACLU that defended speech it personally despised. That tradition was real, and it deserved respect. Then something changed. Over the past two decades, a new rule quietly took hold. Speech is free, as long as you agree with it. Step one inch outside the approved lines and your words get a brand new label. Hate speech. Disinformation. Harm. Disagree on border policy? That is hate speech. Question a spending bill? You are attacking the poor. Support a bill they oppose? You are a threat to democracy itself. Notice the trick. The argument is never answered. The person is simply shamed into silence. Alexander Hamilton saw this coming 239 years ago. In Federalist No. 1, he warned that "an intolerant spirit has, at all times, characterized political parties." He knew the temptation to win by silencing instead of persuading is as old as politics itself. But here is the part that truly baffles. The same voices shouting loudest about "saving democracy" are the ones shutting down the very thing democracy is built on. Free and open debate is not a threat to self-government. It is the foundation of it. You cannot claim to defend the house while tearing out the floor. Here is the good news. Americans are not buying it anymore. Ordinary people are done being shamed for holding ordinary opinions. They are speaking up at school boards, at town halls, and around kitchen tables. The American answer to bad ideas has never been silence. It is more speech, better arguments, and the confidence to make your case in the open. That is the tradition worth fighting for. Not because we always agree, but because free people settle their differences with words, not labels.

@WHLeavitt These women need to get out of America

Veiled Muslim woman, eyes barely visible, lectures Americans: “ICE should get out of Minnesota. America is not America anymore.” Deport Islamists and ban their immigration? A. Yes B. No

The United States is fractured. A group of blue states now operates as if they are completely independent, openly defying federal law and the Constitution. They ignore immigration enforcement, refuse to cooperate with the DOJ on voter rolls, block ICE from deporting criminal illegal immigrants, release criminals back into our communities through activist judges, issue fraudulent commercial driver’s licenses to illegal aliens, allow birth tourism in their hospitals, misuse federal tax dollars to indoctrinate children in public schools, and flout labor laws. We can no longer ignore these rogue states and their lawless governors. Their actions harm every American. We cannot remain the UNITED States of America if some states have effectively seceded in all but name.

THEY DIDN'T WANT YOU TO HEAR IT Last night's presidential address wasn't carried live by several major TV networks, including ABC, NBC, CBS, and CNN. Instead of airing the speech in full, some networks chose regular programming or provided only excerpts and analysis afterward. The networks generally decide whether to carry presidential speeches based on what they consider newsworthy, scheduling, editorial judgment, and whether the address is an official White House event or a campaign-style speech. Critics on the right argue these decisions reflect media bias and reduce public access to hear the president's full message without commentary. Whether you agree or disagree with the speech itself, shouldn't Americans have the opportunity to hear it in full and make up their own minds instead of relying on media filters? Do you think major networks are making editorial decisions, or political ones? 🇺🇸

@JasminLaine She literally asked for China to interfere x.com/i/status/20778…

CBC called China rigging our elections a "stain"—but called China rigging America's elections a "disproven grievance." Curious choice of words... Selective outrage is more than just annoying… it tells you the whole story.

@JasminLaine Canadians are extremely brainwashed. They have a @liberal_party leader. They blame failures on Trump. "Crime high" Trump's fault. "Cost of living, cost of food and gas" Trump's fault, "mental health out of control, " Trump's fault. Long wait times in hospitals, Trump's tariffs✅

If our Republican Senate majority does NOT pass budget reconciliation 3.0 to include SAVE America Act funding, will you commit to helping me primary incumbent Senators in states like South Dakota, Oklahoma, & Alaska in 2028?

🚨 JUST IN: Stephen Miller says every single Antifa rioter he sees photos of looks "deformed" and "not normal" "It's not a coincidence that when you look at these violent ANTIFA demonstrations...not ONE of the people that is demonstrating looks like a NORMAL person!" "Not one looks normal. They're all deformed in some way in their appearance, in their address, in their mannerism." "Why is that why you look at two photographs and you see in, you know, a normal American street, you see an antifa protest." "Why did the people, that are violently demonstrating? Why is there not one normal looking person among them?" "Every one of them through the course of their life and their decisions has scarred their body and their appearance in many different ways to the point in which their outer appearance becomes a manifestation of their inner hatred." "Trust your instincts to all people and across all civilizations. You know what normal is!"

More Than 120 Children Located as FBI Announces Operation Summer Heat 2.0 Halfway Results link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/us/mor…

@Milajoy We need 20K a month to leave - not a few hundred. @JoeBiden was flying them in by the thousands.

They are ALL going HOME. Wave goodbye.

@JustJenRX Let's do this now!!

@RaySharp133618 @eggleston_anita Then how do they keep attacking our bases in the Middle East?

I support Trump bombing the regime until all that is left is THE SMELL OF EXCREMENT! HOO-AH!