Georgios

193 posts

Georgios banner
Georgios

Georgios

@GeorgiosCanada

☦️🇨🇦🇺🇦🇬🇷 The Orthodox Catholic Church is the church founded by Jesus Christ

Toronto, Canada Katılım Nisan 2026
69 Takip Edilen12 Takipçiler
snsbjdkdbs
snsbjdkdbs@MarinaMosk31123·
@nicholasofronto @FreeMasonFBA @nightsferatu оно возникло из-за давление со стороны властей австрийской империи, которые с 1867 года использовали политический национализм в качестве принципа "разделяй и властвуй". Кстати, сионистский проект здесь в точности повторяет украинский - он стал возможен только после геноцида
Русский
2
0
0
229
Manny R. Jones
Manny R. Jones@ManassehRJones·
This is....HILLARIOUS! Unregenerate Ortho Bro @Alex_Ortodoxie quotes a text about the scriptures testifying of "Jesus Christ," and you Protestants don't "live" that, when in his entire 6 HOURS and 20 minute video he literally said the combined word "Jesus Christ" ZERO times.
English
14
0
14
3K
Georgios
Georgios@GeorgiosCanada·
@doomernat22 in soviet prison culture swastikas were used as a sign of rebellion against the prison system and ultimately the soviet state not as an expression of fascist ideology. in Ukraine, far right politics have never been dominant especially before the invasion.
English
0
0
0
68
Georgios
Georgios@GeorgiosCanada·
@AngloVarangian “zeus be with us” next to a flag with a cross in it as he shows an clip with a dude carrying an orthodox icon. pagan larpers are so lame
English
0
0
0
16
Georgios
Georgios@GeorgiosCanada·
@d_bahler @JPuncut @AL_J82 @HHS3239 @truthcartel816 i like how they are supposedly supporting ALL “christians” and saying the issue is more with the “orthobros” and not the “normal orthodox” but theyre out here making an effort to convert the orthodox. the sleeze couldnt be more obvious
English
0
1
8
83
JP
JP@JPuncut·
Another person has left Orthodoxy (This guy was an actual Orthodox member) That is 5 this month Credit to: @AL_J82 @HHS3239 @truthcartel816 (the guy also mentioned me) Continue the good work!
English
136
7
124
34.1K
Georgios
Georgios@GeorgiosCanada·
@mosesofseoul @LowStudies why would someone hate koreans based off a white American and where are you getting this idea that thousands of people hate them cus of him
English
3
0
3
100
☦️🇰🇷Hwa the Merchant of Seoul🇰🇵
@LowStudies that guy has single handedly made hundreds maybe thousands of people dislike koreans because they read his name and assume he's korean and he actively tries to subvert korean politics the e-begs for money constantly guy is trash. Too much disrespect
English
3
2
9
515
Philip Immanuel
Philip Immanuel@1krist1reagerar·
Online Orthoboys are seriously trying to defend modern icon veneration by appealing to a heretical document (heretical even according to their own church) in which St. John explicitly rebukes the practice as pagan. They reject the document as a whole, reject its theology, reject its authority, yet still try to salvage it with: “See? This proves Christians were venerating images back then.” Back then practiced by whom? Pagans, and according to the same text, explicitly corrected by the beloved disciple himself. They are genuinely arguing that one of the strongest pieces of evidence for Eastern icon veneration comes from a gnostic text where a pagan convert secretly commissions a portrait of St. John. When John discovers the image decorated with garlands, lamps, and altar-like honors in a recognizably pagan manner, he rebukes him: “I see that you are still living like a pagan.” Lycomedes (the ex-pagan convert) responds that he “crowns, loves, and reverences” the image. John then continues correcting him, redirecting the focus away from material portraiture and toward faith, virtue, and the state of the soul. The entire exchange is a rebuke of pagan patterns of honor being transferred onto an image of a holy man. And somehow this is supposed to be evidence for the icon veneration, and if you reject it you're “siding with the gnostics.” Lol. I’m not the one using a gnostic text as evidence. By that same logic, I could say: “See? This proves it was viewed as pagan.” That is genuinely delusional.
hEllolisTENER (Famous Liberal Account)@_hellolistener

@1krist1reagerar @ByJimbob There is a second century gnostic writing attacking the disciple of St. John for doing exactly that called “the Acts of John”. Is that early enough? Or are we going to move the goalpost?

English
18
0
7
2.9K
Georgios
Georgios@GeorgiosCanada·
@EthanWayne2001 did you consider that maybe father josiah isnt up to date on whats tending in the world of pornography lol
English
0
0
0
21
Georgios
Georgios@GeorgiosCanada·
@pudlasz @Franklin_Graham 1. i am well aware of the poor state of affairs in post soviet countries 2. orthodox for the most part dont proselytize 3. The U.S has no official religion and was founded by masons 4. 😭”protestantism was important” you should write that one in a joke book 5. so what?
English
0
0
0
16
pudlasz
pudlasz@pudlasz·
@GeorgiosCanada @Franklin_Graham Belarus is atheist. The Orthodox proselytize in the U.S. Protestantism was very important in Belarusian history for centuries. The Grahams are pals of the KGB Cyril.
English
1
0
0
10
Franklin Graham
Franklin Graham@Franklin_Graham·
I’m in Minsk, Belarus. Would you pray as I preach the Gospel tonight and tomorrow night?
English
449
918
7.2K
329.9K
Little Prairie Chick➕🇺🇸
When Jesus prayed and showed us how to pray did he say “Hail Mary” or did he say “our father who art in heaven”? Yeah, I thought so
English
248
46
666
60.3K
Georgios
Georgios@GeorgiosCanada·
@JPuncut we’ve been winning for 2000 years bro bro. thats like 1900 years before anything even resembling your fake sect of a sect of a sect even appeared
English
0
0
0
13
JP
JP@JPuncut·
Ortho-Bros, I know your desperate to get a W but if you use the talmud to say a first century rabbi was praying to the dead you're going to make a fool out of yourself. Ash accidentally misdated his source as the Rabbi he mentioned was in the THIRD century, not the first. Additionally he confused the names, "The tomb/cemetery quote in Ta’anit 16a is attributed to Rabbi Levi, an Amora from the 3rd century AD not the 1st century. That already leaves a significant time gap from the apostolic era. The “Rabbi Hanina” mentioned there is not Rabbi Hanina ben Dosa from the 1st century. There were multiple rabbis named Hanina. The 1st-century Rabbi Hanina would be Rabbi Hanina ben Dosa, who lived before the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD. But Ta’anit 16a discusses Rabbi Hanina alongside Rabbi Levi bar Hama, a 3rd-century Amoraic rabbi. The Rabbi Hanina there is understood to be Rabbi Hanina bar Hama, a known contemporary of Rabbi Levi. How could it be referring to the 1st-century Rabbi Hanina ben Dosa? Rabbi Hanina ben Dosa was not alive debating Rabbi Levi in the 3rd century. If Rabbi Hanina ben Dosa died around the 1st century, and Rabbi Levi lived around 250–300 AD, they were separated by roughly 150–200 years. So the passage is not referring to the 1st-century Rabbi Hanina ben Dosa; it is referring to the later Rabbi Hanina bar Hama from the 3rd century. That means the argument fails as evidence for a 1st-century Jewish practice. The passage is a later Amoraic discussion, not evidence from the 1st century and not even from the 2nd century."
JP tweet mediaJP tweet media
English
58
3
64
8.2K
Jonté
Jonté@IamJonte_·
Update: I am officially an Orthodox Christian!
English
207
91
2.5K
39.2K