GhostBTCBLD

13.2K posts

GhostBTCBLD banner
GhostBTCBLD

GhostBTCBLD

@GhostBTCBLD

memes, write articles, bitcoin maxi NOSTR: npub1042g2sfx7hj94jvd8a9vmh5y8eyjqa9nm939gl7r0g4pynwp7v7sh6ctmn

Multisig Katılım Temmuz 2020
1.7K Takip Edilen3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
GhostBTCBLD
GhostBTCBLD@GhostBTCBLD·
Once you truly understand #bitcoin you stop trading it.
English
16
23
219
0
GhostBTCBLD retweetledi
Nathan Halberstadt 🧊
Nathan Halberstadt 🧊@NatHalberstadt·
It’s probably in poor taste to say too much specifically about Justice KBJ. Her comments really speak for themselves. But it remains true that DEI systematically elevated a large number of deeply unqualified and unserious people to roles where they are now doing tremendous damage, partly due to sheer incompetence, partly due to the sorts of ideological factors associated with being a DEI beneficiary. The question of how we navigate unwinding this in the years ahead remains open.
End Wokeness@EndWokeness

Justice KBJ: "If I steal a wallet in Japan, I am subject to Japanese laws….. in a sense, it's allegiance." Her case for birthright citizenship:

English
245
796
5.1K
135.1K
GhostBTCBLD retweetledi
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Hello Senator Thune, At 3 AM on Friday, March 27th, in a near-empty chamber, you passed a bill by voice vote that excludes all funding for ICE and CBP. Let me repeat that: voice vote. No roll call. No record of who was there. No accountability. Just you, Barrasso, and a handful of senators shuffling paper in the dead of night while America slept. You could have demanded a recorded vote. You chose not to. You could have held the line for five more days until the House returned. You chose not to. You could have used the same procedural tools Democrats have used against you for 40 days. You chose not to. Instead, you gave Chuck Schumer exactly what he asked for, DHS funding minus immigration enforcement, and called it a win. Then you walked to the cameras and blamed the Democrats. Let's be precise about what you did: 1. You caved to a demand Democrats made on Day 1 of this shutdown. Forty-one days of supposed hardball negotiation, and you settled for their opening offer. 2. You handed them a template. The next time Democrats want to defund any agency — ICE, CBP, or anything else — they now know: just shut down DHS and wait. John Thune will fold at 3 AM. 3. You punted to reconciliation. "Good possibility," you said. Not "we will." Not "guaranteed." Just maybe. Meanwhile, ICE operates on fumes from last year's bill with no certainty of future funding. The precedent you set: You have argued for months that the filibuster is sacrosanct. That the 60-vote threshold protects minority rights. That we cannot bend Senate rules for policy wins. But at 3 AM on Friday, you bent every norm that actually mattered: • Voice vote to avoid accountability • Empty chamber to avoid debate • Midnight deal to avoid scrutiny • Immediate recess to avoid questions You'll bend the rules to avoid a fight. You just won't bend them to win one. What you've actually accomplished: Democrats demanded ICE restrictions. They got ICE defunded. Not reformed. Not restrained. Defunded. And you're out here tweeting about how Democrats are the "Defund the Police" party while you just voted to defund border enforcement at 3 in the morning. The question you should answer: Why did this deal have to happen at 3 AM? Why couldn't it happen at 3 PM, with cameras rolling and every senator on record? You know why. Because you didn't want your voters to see what surrender looks like. Here's my message: We saw it anyway. Stop hiding behind "Democrat obstruction." You're the Majority Leader. You set the schedule. You control the floor. You chose this outcome. Own it.
English
5K
32.6K
76.8K
1.2M
GhostBTCBLD retweetledi
TFTC
TFTC@TFTC21·
Folks, we told you this was coming, and today the mask is fully off. A couple weeks back we reported, based on solid sources, that Coinbase was quietly lobbying to kill a real de minimis tax exemption for Bitcoin while pushing one that applied only to stablecoins like USDC. We laid out the clear incentives in our deep dive. Coinbase made 1.35 billion dollars in stablecoin revenue last year, up 48 percent year over year, almost entirely from yield on the Treasuries backing USDC. A proper Bitcoin de minimis would let people spend sats on everyday purchases without triggering taxable events on every transaction. That directly competes with their centralized yield machine. We called it what it was. Policy that protects Coinbase’s float rather than advancing neutral Bitcoin adoption. Brian Armstrong pushed back hard. He called our reporting totally false and misinformation while insisting he was personally lobbying for Bitcoin de minimis. Some accused us of lying or spreading rumors. We stood firm. We offered to have Brian on the TFTC podcast to clear the air. We waited. Now the latest draft from Reps. Horsford and Max Miller on the updated PARITY Act framework has dropped. It confirms exactly what we warned about. It gives a de minimis exemption to stablecoins but leaves Bitcoin out entirely. It keeps the punishing double taxation on Bitcoin mining fully intact while carving out relief for passive validation, basically staking. This is not an oversight or sloppy drafting. It abandons any pretense of technology neutrality and deliberately picks winners. Dollar-pegged stables and staking get the breaks, while actual Bitcoin usage as money and Proof-of-Work mining get kneecapped. Without de minimis for Bitcoin, every small Lightning payment or sat transaction still forces cost-basis tracking and IRS headaches. Paying your plumber in sats or grabbing lunch with Bitcoin remains a taxable event. Stablecoins, being pegged and low-volatility, get an exemption they barely need. The real beneficiary is protecting that massive USDC reserve float and the yield it generates. Meanwhile, American Bitcoin miners, already operating in one of the toughest, most capital- and energy-intensive industries, face continued double taxation while staking gets a pass. That is not neutral policy. It is industrial policy against domestic Bitcoin mining at a time when we should be leaning into energy abundance and securing the hardest monetary network. The Bitcoin Policy Institute is releasing a full statement soon, and we fully back the call for strong community pushback. Every Bitcoiner needs to contact their reps and make it politically radioactive to sideline Bitcoin while handing carve-outs to stables and staking. This language slows real adoption, entrenches custodians, and weakens American Bitcoin infrastructure. We weren’t lying. Our sources weren’t lying. The draft proves the reporting was on target. Those who rushed to call it misinformation owe the community some honest reflection. Brian, if you’re still open to that conversation, the invitation stands. Come on the podcast. No spin, just walk us through how this draft lines up with your stated support for Bitcoin de minimis. The mic is warm. This fight isn’t over. Bitcoin doesn’t need permission, but bad policy can delay sovereign adoption and punish the miners securing the network. We’re here to protect the protocol and the right of individuals to use sound money without turning every transaction into a compliance nightmare. Stay sovereign. Stack sats. Use Bitcoin as money anyway. Call your reps today.
TFTC tweet media
English
205
701
3K
184.5K
GhostBTCBLD
GhostBTCBLD@GhostBTCBLD·
It has been foreseen. Bitcoin following the 2022 liquidity path then a switch to late 2023-2024 liquidity path.
GhostBTCBLD tweet media
English
0
1
5
216
GhostBTCBLD
GhostBTCBLD@GhostBTCBLD·
@TaviCosta What year did you out Fourmile in Nevada? Its one of the most significant finds in 100 years and Barrick is saying its going to be tier 1
English
0
0
1
300
Otavio (Tavi) Costa
Otavio (Tavi) Costa@TaviCosta·
▪️Geopolitical risks accelerating ▪️Central banks having to accumulate gold ▪️Sovereigns building strategic resource reserves ▪️No major new metal discoveries being made ▪️No large-scale producing projects coming online ▪️Countries forced to cut rates to sustain their debt None of us own enough metals and miners. @tavicosta/p-189386649" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@tavicosta/p-1…
Otavio (Tavi) Costa tweet media
English
29
151
762
71.5K
Just Another Pod Guy
Just Another Pod Guy@TMTLongShort·
The question is if we get a Cambrian explosion of companies providing agentic infra like this or if it gets subsumed by models. I’d bet on the latter but regardless don’t underestimate what this accomplishes at scale when you try to evaluate incumbent moats at T+1 A lot of what you think of as proprietary is far more easily replicated when you have swarms of agents smarter than the median analyst at a data aggregator. To be clear the below is a simplistic example. Future iterations will be far more impressive as models get smarter. We will have satellite data of every square inch of earth and AI models that will have parsed through that data to produce every imaginable permutation. Starlink is going to become the generator of the most valuable information set ever known to humanity and it will commoditize wide swaths of existing datasets. Soon you’ll be able to model retailer earnings to the penny based on granularity of traffic etc. The world is about to change and many of you still lack the imagination to see what’s possible. It saddens me because if you did your days would be brimming with optimism instead of existential dread 🫡
Financial Datasets@findatasets

We’re indexing the full SEC corpus. Every 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K over 30+ years. Soon, agents will be able to answer questions about any public company, instantly. Perfect SEC search is coming soon.

English
34
26
472
71.5K
GhostBTCBLD retweetledi
The_Real_Fly
The_Real_Fly@The_Real_Fly·
$XYZ's headcount will revert back to pre-COVID levels at 6,000 employees. Here is Jack's stupidity in headcount over the years. 2019: 3,835 2020: 5,477 2021: 8,521 2022: 12,428 2023: 12,985 2024: 11,372 2025: 10-12,000 He's using AI as a excuse to mask his failure
English
143
261
3.6K
398.6K
GhostBTCBLD
GhostBTCBLD@GhostBTCBLD·
@balajis To be fair he overhired at X/twitter and Elon did more cuts then that without significant AI. It’s probably being a poor operator + AI
English
0
0
0
84
Balaji
Balaji@balajis·
This is the first AI cut. And it will send shockwaves. Remember: Jack is one of the greatest founders of all time. He created this platform that we’re all on, and has been early to many technological shifts. And Block was doing very well as a business. So, for him to cut 40% of headcount in this way is a signal to everyone in tech: get good now. Become indispensable. Work nights and weekends. Learn the AI tools and raise your game. Or you might not make the cut, as an employee or as a company. I know. That sucks. But capitalism is natural selection. The market is unforgiving, because you are the market. After all, it’s not like you’re buying some random gallon of milk from the store; you’re always buying the best product at the best price. So too for apps: your customers are always installing the best piece of code they can get. And because AI is going to create new winners, if you aren’t the best in your market, someone may become better with AI. Particularly with the new agentic workflows. To be clear: Block’s severance is generous by any measure. 20 weeks of pay, six months of health insurance and vested equity, all of that goes far beyond any typical package. Jack did his level best to cushion the disruption. The laid off are a temporarily unfortunate class, as opposed to a permanent underclass. But had he not leaned into the AI transition, he might have had to lay off more people, slowly, and over time, as faster competitors went after his market share. How would they do that? Sure, AI isn’t a panacea by any means, but the closer you are to software engineering the more aggressively you need to embrace agentic workflows. The AI companies are already doing that, and places like Stripe, Shopify, Coinbase, and now Block are pushing hard on this area. There will be overcorrection. But the fundamental technical innovation is real. And you need to either disrupt yourself or get disrupted.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
681
1K
9.5K
2M
Joe Consorti
Joe Consorti@JoeConsorti·
Jane Street is the latest scapegoat for the bitcoin bear market. First, it was Wintermute. Then, it was Binance. The reality? This is a standard deresking event across markets, and BTC is no exception. [Presented by @JoinHorizon]
English
15
5
78
9.1K
GhostBTCBLD retweetledi
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
Pesticides and Pedophiles. Why do both get immunity?
English
3.3K
19K
112.3K
1.7M
GhostBTCBLD
GhostBTCBLD@GhostBTCBLD·
@LeeSlusherLLC They need to spend that money upstream on mining, refining, trades, blue color messaging for those just now in middle school etc
English
0
0
0
162
Lee Slusher
Lee Slusher@LeeSlusherLLC·
Of course. Where would Washington even buy those weapons? The US doesn't make them in that quantity, nor can it. Same for "allies and partners." The only countries cranking out weapons at that scale are the very ones the US would need the weapons to fight.
Jeff Stein@JStein_WaPo

SCOOP: Trump aides are struggling to spend an extra $500 billion on the military, delaying budget Trump agreed to Hegseth’s bid for *~50%~* military spending boost Vought & others objected internally It’s so much $ they can’t figure out how to spend it

English
13
45
160
15K
All day Astronomy
All day Astronomy@forallcurious·
🚨: NASA reveals plans to land on Asteroid Psyche 16. It contains gold and rare metals worth over 700 quintillion dollars — enough to make every human on Earth a billionaire!
All day Astronomy tweet media
English
2.4K
1.1K
5.5K
918.8K
GhostBTCBLD
GhostBTCBLD@GhostBTCBLD·
@maxmarchione My test will be It recommends covid19 shots. Should be easy to tell how it aligns to dogma and policies/governance
English
0
0
0
74
Max Marchione
Max Marchione@maxmarchione·
Today, we share our AI doctor for the first time The future is an AI that knows more about your body than any human ever could. 247 commits. 140,000 lines of code. Months of engineering. Here it is:
English
433
552
5.1K
2.8M