Ginger 🫚 Pronto

Hi Charlie, May I ask why you wrote that you contacted me to no avail when this did not happen? In fact you were in communication with and received a response from Mitchell regarding a separate matter this month and you never once asked any questions about access to donors who dispute this video. Separately, can you make any logical sense out of why they chose to introduce the audio to the public without the video component? Respectfully, is your skill set AI? Were you the correct person to assess whether the video was real or made by the Hollywood A.I company that Turning Point met with following Charlie’s death? Were you even aware they met with an A.I company that specializes in post-humous video making? Does that at all strike you as odd? I don’t doubt your sincerity, but you underestimate their cunning and technological capabilities. I am personally in possession of material from Aspen which could easily identify whether the video they showed you was adapted using A.I. I suspect they know that.

🚨BREAKING: John Travolta stuns at Cannes, looking 20 years younger and nearly unrecognizable.

They put this article behind a paywall because its contents are so absurd that even the journalists are too embarrassed to perpetuate it. Here is what it says: "Video of the Aspen donor conference has never been released publicly. But the Daily Mail has been given exclusive access to screen the full video, report on its contents and speak to individuals who were in the room in Aspen that day, as secrecy around the footage has become a major point of contention for critics of Turning Point and its new CEO, Erika Kirk." Yep, you read that right. They did a special screening JUST for Daily Mail writers and they are reporting that the video is like, totally legit! So why won't Turning Point USA just release it? Don't worry, I'll save you time. The first reason is because, well..does it even really matter if the video exists? "Several Turning Point allies feel that too much attention has been focused on the video from Aspen and said it was always clear to them that Charlie had intended for Erika to lead the organization in his absence. One board member, who wished to remain anonymous, confirmed to the Daily Mail he was personally involved with personal, financial and estate planning with the couple after they were married. During those discussions, they made it clear that if anything should happen to Kirk, his wife would be responsible for the organization that he had founded. 'Erika knows more about Charlie's feelings and emotions and where he wanted to bring Turning Point than anybody else out there,' the board member said. 'The board already knew what the plan was because they talked about it with Charlie, everybody knew.' Friends of Charlie Kirk also told the Daily Mail that he frequently spoke of his wife taking over the organization in his absence." And the second reason they won't release it? Because apparently Turning Point no longer remembers how to black out a body in editing. Or mute its voice. They want to protect the person asking the question: "While the public release of the video would prove Owen's suggestions of a fraud to be false, some in the organization believe good-faith efforts would be rejected and the video would be weaponized. On top of those concerns, the donor who asked the 'succession' question does not want her question and identity revealed to the public, sources within the organization told the Daily Mail." Yes, Turning Point USA now wants you to trust the experts! They continue to have ZERO respect for the public.

Today, I congratulate the State of Israel on the 78th anniversary of its founding. For nearly 8 decades, Israel has been our closest ally in the Middle East and been a source of inspiration and resilience for the Jewish people. Here's to continuing to strengthen the relationship between our two countries, rooted in our shared values of democracy, regional security, and the never ending pursuit of peace.

WHO Director Tedros Ghebreyesus said every country in the world is now expected to submit to his International Health Regulations because of Hantavirus. He called it a moral obligation for nations to obey the WHO’s Global Health Order and support each other by giving up their sovereignty.