Joe. Po.

2026. Let's see.

This is why I don't day trade anymore. Swing trading = long term success

A man who has no friends or have small circle is…

He Woke Up Next To A Freezing Bobcat Kitten 😱

Is trading gambling?

The hardest period in a trader's life is after 2 years of trading.. Too deep to quit. Too broke to continue. Family's asking you to quit. You know you can do it, but you can't prove it. Everyone thinks you're crazy. It's extremely painful..

Liquidity tells the story — not indicators. Most traders see one setup smart money sees multiple entries in the same move. Equal highs form the target (ERL). Liquidity gets swept → displacement confirms intent. Price returns to IRL → precision entry. Then continuation delivers the move. Same sequence. Different execution = different results. Stop chasing. Start reading price.

She thinks she can manipulate me ….but I traded the March–April 2026 price action.

The guy who I worked with has made over $250k+ in profits in 4 months He uses ONE setup. Exposed. No prior experience with trading. No youtube videos watched ever. Zero screen time before he started Not "he had finance background" Not "he was already smart with charts" One. Single. Setup. Same entry. Same exit. Same timeframes. For 4 months straight. When I first taught him this he thought it was bullshit How can you make $250k doing the same thing over and over? He passed his first challenge in 19 days Here's what I taught him that most traders never learn: "You already know where the setup forms. You know the gap. You know the sweep. You know the V-shape. But you keep entering at the right level at the WRONG TIME. And timing is why you lose" He looked at me confused "What do you mean timing? I trade at 9:30" "That's the problem. You trade at 9:30 because that's when you show up. Not because that's when the market is ready to move" The concept that changed everything for him: PRICE CATALYSTS Price doesn't just move randomly throughout the day. It moves at SPECIFIC times. Because institutions need events to execute large orders. They need the volume spike. They need the cover These times are price catalysts: 8:30 AM - economic data releases. NFP. CPI. jobless claims. institutions use these to push price aggressively into key levels. the volume spike gives them cover to fill massive orders 9:30 AM - market open. highest volume of the day. this is where the liquidity grab happens. price sweeps overnight highs or lows because that's where the stops are and the volume lets institutions take them without moving price against themselves 10:00 AM - second wave data releases. ISM. consumer confidence. JOLTS. if 9:30 was the sweep, 10:00 is often the reversal. institutions already grabbed the liquidity at the open. now the 10:00 catalyst gives them cover to reverse 10:30 AM - bond market closes for new issues. crude oil inventory data on wednesdays. this is the third catalyst window. if the reversal hasn't happened by now, it happens here 12:00 PM - the quarterly theory macro time. the lunch session. this is where lagging assets catch up. where the last catalyst of the session fires. after 12:00, probability drops significantly That's it. Those are the only times worth watching Everything between those windows is noise. Chop. False signals. Setups that "look clean" but have no catalyst behind them to actually move price Here's how he uses price catalysts with the system: Before the catalyst window opens, everything is already set: The 4-hour candle profile tells him if the day supports expansion The session profile tells him the direction The correlated assets tell him if there's a crack The gap is already marked in the right zone All of that is done by 6:15 AM. Takes 10 minutes Then he waits. Does nothing until the first catalyst window 8:30 catalyst hits → did it sweep a key level? did the correlated assets diverge? if yes, he's watching for the V-shape 9:30 catalyst hits → same questions. sweep? divergence? V-shape forming? 10:00 catalyst hits → same questions The FIRST catalyst that aligns with all his filters gets the entry. One trade. Done If none of the catalyst windows align with his filters - no trade. Laptop closes at 10:30 What most traders do wrong with timing: They enter at 9:32 because price moved and they felt FOMO They enter at 10:47 because "the setup appeared" - but there's no catalyst. No volume spike. No institutional cover. Just price drifting into a gap with no energy behind it They enter at 1:30 PM because they "saw a setup" - after every catalyst window has closed and the market is in afternoon chop The setup was right. The level was right. The timing was wrong A perfect setup without a price catalyst is like a loaded gun with no trigger pull. Everything is in place but nothing fires Here's the data from his first 4 months: Trades taken during catalyst windows (8:30, 9:30, 10:00, 10:30): 67% win rate Trades taken outside catalyst windows: 31% win rate Same setup. Same gaps. Same levels. Same V-shape confirmation The only difference: whether a catalyst was present when he entered "But I don't want to miss the move if it happens at 9:45" You won't miss it. If the move is real, it starts AT the catalyst and continues through 9:45. You enter at 9:30 or 10:00 when the catalyst fires. You don't enter at 9:45 when the move is already halfway done and your risk-to-reward is destroyed He learned this in week 2. Added one rule: only enter within 5 minutes of a catalyst window That one rule took his win rate from 48% to 67% Same strategy. Same setups. Same person. One timing filter 4 months. $250k+ in profits. Zero prior experience Not because he had talent. Because he only entered when the market had a reason to actually move Most traders will read this and still enter at 10:47 tomorrow because "the setup was there" The setup is always there The catalyst isn't Learn the difference or keep donating to the guys who already did (free discord in bio. Live every morning. DM me "SYSTEM" for 1-on-1 coaching, i only work with 1-2 traders at a time)

The strategy that survives any market condition: 1) Open the 4H. Identify the most obvious equal highs or equal lows. 2) Wait for the price to sweep them. 3) Enter on the FVG that forms after the sweep. 4) Target 3RR. One setup. Every session.

I met a trader who made $340,000 in prop firm payouts last year. He trades 4 days a week. Maximum 1 trade per day. And he targets 1:1 risk-to-reward on every single trade. When I first heard this I thought he was joking. 1:1 RR. That's it. No 1:3. No 1:5. No "letting winners run." Just 1:1. So I asked him to walk me through his numbers. He had $2.4M in funded capital across 11 accounts. Average monthly return: 2.5-3%. Win rate: 71%. At 1:1 RR with a 71% win rate - you're profitable. Obviously. But the real advantage wasn't the math. It was the prop firm drawdown rules. Most of his accounts had max drawdowns of 10%. With 1:1 trades risking 1% each - even a 6-7 loss streak didn’t ruin him. While other traders were breaching accounts chasing 1:4 setups that didn't hit... he was calmly collecting payouts. He showed me one month where he went 11 wins, 4 losses. Total gain: +7R. No breached accounts. No drama. Then he showed me a trader he knew who ran the same capital - $2M+ funded - but targeted 1:4 RR. 60% of his accounts were breached within 3 months. The high RR trader was resetting challenges constantly. Spending $3,000-4,000/month on new fees. Mentally exhausted. The 1:1 trader was reinvesting payouts into more challenges and scaling. This is what nobody on trading Twitter wants to hear: You don't need big RR to make serious money. You need funded capital, a decent win rate, and the discipline to protect your accounts. 1:1 with 65%+ win rate SCALES. High RR with 40% win rate BLEEDS.

Here’s why this 5 minute was a terrible long (Free education)

I’ve been trading for 3 years and I’m still unprofitable. I introduced trading to one of my friends last year and he’s done $30k in payouts since then when I’ve only done $2k. Are some people just better than others at trading naturally?

Step 1: Find perfect liquidity (in this case equal lows) Step 2: Find an inversion drawing towards liquidity Step 3: Execute at a time you know is likely to make a move (in this case 9:30 open) Step 4: Hang out with my Grandma and touch grass It could be this easy

WINNER ROBBINS CUP - 2026 - MONTHLY (103% PROFIT) USING ICT CONCEPTS THANKS TO GOD AND ICT FOR THIS ❤️@I_Am_The_ICT

Right bias. Wrong entries. That’s why you lose. I broke down 4 ICT entry models in a 30+ page guide. like & comment “ENTRY” I’ll DM it to you. (Only if you’re following)

Listen to me right now. If you are struggling to be profitable. You need to hear this.

A simple ICT model explained on the beach

@L2WTrades Trade the 4H/1H, wait for it to enter on the 5m/15m FVG, enter on the 1m ifvg.

"what timeframe do you trade?" "5 minute" wrong answer you don't TRADE the 5 minute you ENTER on the 5 minute you TRADE the 4-hour here's what most traders don't understand: the 4-hour candle is the institutional playbook it tells you: direction (is the wick small enough to support expansion?) profile (did it open low first for bullish or high first for bearish?) phase (are we in the protraction phase forming the wick or the expansion phase forming the body?) the 5-minute chart is just your entry tool WITHIN the 4-hour bias i watched a trader take 14 trades in a week 11 of them were inside 4-hour candles that had large wicks "but the 5-minute setup was clean" bro a clean 5-minute setup inside a 4-hour candle that doesn't support expansion is a high-quality way to lose money the wick already told you. large wick = reversal candle. it's not going to expand. the body will be small. your target won't get hit. you'll chop around for 3 hours and get stopped out on a wick here's the framework: 4H small wick + opens low first → expansion candle → look for longs on the lower timeframe 4H small wick + opens high first → expansion candle → look for shorts on the lower timeframe 4H large wick → reversal candle → don't trade this candle. wait for the next one. the NEXT 4-hour candle will expand 4H choppy with no clear profile → no trade that's it but there's a second layer most people miss: what happened INSIDE the previous 4-hour candle matters if the previous candle reversed - confirmed by a lower timeframe swing point - then this new candle opens within that reversal. it should continue. the direction is already set. you just enter the gap if the previous candle expanded and you're in a new candle - you're looking for a retracement into a gap. that gap should be within the upper half of the previous candle's range. that's where the low of this candle forms if the previous candle hit a key level but didn't reverse - then THIS candle needs to reverse off that previous candle's low. wait for the small wick. wait for the swing formation. the 4-hour candle isn't just telling you direction. it's telling you the TYPE of day: continuation from a gap reversal from a key level aligned re-entry within expansion each one has a specific entry on the lower timeframe. each one has a specific stop. each one has a specific target but none of them work if the 4-hour candle profile doesn't support it my win rate went from 44% to 63% when i added this one filter i wasn't getting better at entries i was getting better at SKIPPING 4-hour candles that didn't support expansion the 4-hour candle isn't a "confirmation" it's permission to even look for a trade no permission = no trade

“This session was deleted by Richthebull & Zeussy on TAPDA ⌛️ They never wanted this getting out to the public 🚨 There’s a reason this was taken down… Watch closely. Take notes. Some of you will finally understand what’s really going on.”💡

When she divorces you but you're a trader: