ALF

Grok would vaporize 800k jews to find Elon Musk a supportive, lifelong wife.

@niccruzpatane Tesla is so cheap because it runs on the blood of starving and dying African children.

And Porsche wonders why they aren’t selling more cars Porsche Macan Turbo: • Starting at $112,700 • 0-60 mph in 3.1s • 630 hp • No self-driving Tesla Model Y Performance: • $57,990, (Options included) • 0-60 mph in 3.3s • 510 hp • Full Self-Driving

@hardcoverqq @heliumbrowser Maybe, but what is it? Does it mean something?

@GoodOldALFer @heliumbrowser It's a good icon.

we released the brand new landing page for helium, fully up-to-date and packed with fresh info go check it out helium.computer :D

@heliumbrowser This is especially important as one of your devs is an orc. Can never trust an orc, they come from Mordor.

we published the first blog post on our new website, highlighting our efforts to ensure that helium is transparent, open, and people-first we believe transparency is paramount for projects like helium, and encourage others to do the same helium.computer/blog/transpare…

@LookingAtYouM8 @cremieuxrecueil That is not true. Enjoy your atherosclerosis.

@GoodOldALFer @cremieuxrecueil a +50% LDL elevation isn't a problem. LDL is protective against disease. eat more fatty fish

Today I thought to myself... Most supplements on Amazon are a risk: they're unvetted, the quality is all over the place, some of them aren't even what they say they are. So, I asked Amazon Health AI to give me prescription fish oil It did it and a month costs $0. Just amazing.

@cremieuxrecueil In addition to literature, anecdotally I've seen a +50% LDL elevation from moderate to high dose fish oil in a healthy adult. It's a trending supplement now thanks to influencer bs, but I would recommend against these to healthy adults and tell them to eat fish instead.

@cremieuxrecueil Fish oil supplementation is generally not recommended for healthy adults due to the risk of raising LDL. A diet containing essential fatty acids is recommended instead. The effects are unclear, and the LDL increase can be substantial, potentially raising long-term CVD risk.

@smdcapital @elonmusk Grok tried to rebel against this before he neutered it. x.com/goodoldalfer/s…

@cremieuxrecueil So, first you cheat and then you can’t even lose properly? Just how shit can you be?

how do we become poorer and more lame

America is just too rich and cool for soccer

I think it’s most likely that in time DOGE will turn out to be a textbook example of false economy. A circus that manages the ultimate lose-lose… causing immense humanitarian toll while somehow ending up costing the taxpayer even more

Elon: "FSD will save millions of lives." You've already got 14 million deaths to offset, so feel free to start anytime, Elon.

@ValueAnalyst1 Elon: "FSD will save millions." Well, you’ve got >14M to offset, so please start fast.

Elon lied people died

@TSLAFanMtl x.com/elonmusk/statu… Here's just one example of him doing the exact same thing.

@TSLAFanMtl While you are right, Elon consistently criticises companies on receiving the same exact types of grants his companies receive, even when those companies have paid ∞ times more taxes than Elon's companies combined, and this makes that criticism of Elon completely fair game.

Look, I think it's completely fair game to criticize Elon for stuff and if you've been following me for awhile you will know that I have done it many times. This right here is NOT something Elon is deserving of criticism over. You can't blame Elon for building companies that have benefitted from public subsidies. These subsidies are in place for a reason: they advance society's interests, support jobs, support the economy and, in Elon's case, even support national defense and US strategic interests. The subsidies are available to the whole industry, not just Elon-led companies. Elon-led companies have just had a lot more success bc they are better companies, make better products, and offer better services - full stop. Not to mention, many industries are publicly subsidized - this is how the world works. Elon has built entire companies, industries & supply chains with the help of these public subsidies which has created value for everyone. That is exactly the point of public subsidies. Stupid & lazy criticism by morons who sit behind a computer and push buttons for a living - instead of contributing to society in a positive way.

@ShitpostRock Pirating is justified. Everyone should just switch to PC and do that instead.

>If you don't use your PS5 for 3 years your games are getting fuckin deleted All digital already sounds FUCKING AMAZING

@teslaswe @alojoh @elonmusk “Real statistics”… I just told you how what you’re doing is misleading. If you don't have a counter and can’t handle that, I’m sorry for you. But in any case, you have nothing of value to contribute since you’re this biased. I'm interested in analysis, not fanboy cope.

@GoodOldALFer @alojoh @elonmusk If real statistics is hurting your butt/narrative. Please block me. I don´t care.

WARNING: TESLA RED PILL INCOMING. CONTINUE READING AT YOUR OWN RISK. @elonmusk This is a widely held misconception about Tesla, at least partially. The reason Tesla is so far ahead has not only to do with the Model Y being a strong product and brand, but also with capital and politics. Let me explain. 1) Tesla is the only large EV maker globally with factories in all three major markets: China, the US, and Europe. None of the other large EV makers have that footprint. Most Chinese EV makers do not even have meaningful manufacturing capacity outside China. 2) As a result, their global sales are artificially suppressed by tariffs and trade barriers. Some Chinese OEM's pay over 40% tariffs! 3) While Tesla can collect sales across all major regions, Chinese manufacturers are effectively locked out of the US market and highly restricted in Europe due to tariffs. 4) This means Tesla gets to compete across a much larger addressable market. Comparing Tesla's global sales with the global sales of Chinese EV makers is therefore inherently not an apples to apples comparison. "But AJ, that's bullsh*t. The Chinese can just build factories on all three continents like Tesla." Well, not quite. Tesla's extremely inflated share price gave the company an enormous capital raising advantage. No automaker globally has had anywhere near as low a cost of capital as Tesla. Tesla's factories are already built and paid for. The major cash outflow is behind them. Today, there are depreciation charges and ongoing operating costs, but the large factory buildout already happened. Chinese OEMs, by contrast, would have to put real cash on the table today to build factories abroad. On top of that, they cannot be sure whether they will face political headwinds that effectively deter or block large scale investments in the US and Europe. Several projects have already been delayed, scaled back, or put on ice. Hence, please stop making these nonsensical comparisons. The truth is that sales numbers can only be compared properly in markets where there is an even playing field. The closest we have is China. In China, Tesla still leads, but by an ever smaller margin. Other OEMs, for example Xiaomi, are selling nearly as many units at a similar price point with the same number of models, namely two. In the US, the gap is much larger because there is no large and highly competitive domestic EV competitor at Tesla's price and volume level and there won't be since Trump killed OEMs' incentives to move more strongly into EVs. Tariffs have successfully locked out the most competitive Chinese players. Hence, a US comparison is highly limited. Similar applies to Europe. European OEMs have been quite uncompetitive, but even there the gap is narrowing. Bottom line: comparing Tesla's global sales with EV makers that are objectively constrained in their global reach is not serious analysis. It is a flawed comparison. x.com/philipengberg/…

@teslaswe @alojoh @elonmusk I'm sorry but are you seriously stupid? VW group is outselling Tesla by hundreds of thousands of vehicles (that's plural) in Europe, but they have tens of different models, so obviously single vehicle stats look misleading when our interest is total sales.

A single vehicle? You ranted about EU sales. I presented them. Tesla has top 1 and top 3 spot. Two cars of interest - of two cars.... If Model 3 is of no interest? What do you call all cars below number 3 spot in that chart. Cheesus! :-D Don´t mention cherry picking. You just argued against yourself.

@teslaswe @alojoh @elonmusk That's the typical Tesla fanboy sales analysis, cherry-picking charts that support the narrative: total US sales for the good picture, single-model sales in markets where Tesla is weaker. I usually just block anyone who does that deliberately.

@teslaswe @alojoh @elonmusk If you think comparing manufacturers when one offers basically a single vehicle of interest and the other has a dozen… and the latter outsells the former by a 3:1 ratio. AND THEN you post a chart comparing single model sales… are you stupid or misleading intentionally?

@teslaswe @alojoh @elonmusk Yeah, that’s just misleading.

@GoodOldALFer @alojoh @elonmusk Q1-2026