Good Xplanations

949 posts

Good Xplanations

Good Xplanations

@GoodXplanations

Katılım Haziran 2021
706 Takip Edilen561 Takipçiler
Autism Capital 🧩
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapital·
There is no greater happiness than an autist with a sword. Pure joy. If your CEO doesn't have a sword, find a new company.
English
93
133
2.8K
152.5K
Good Xplanations
Good Xplanations@GoodXplanations·
Zcash shorts paying 170% annualized on Hyperliquid so either 1. Shielded ZEC holders are hedging their exposure (doubt it) or 2. Transparent chain maxi’s are sidelined and now betting on a crash Either way - adds liquidation fuel to the upside zillions
Good Xplanations tweet media
English
0
0
5
326
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io@EliBenSasson·
Privacy matters: (another very long tweet) I'm trying to explain the difference between TEE, ZK, MPC and FHE. If we're talking privacy, security and blockchains, this is important to understand. Last time I explained TEE, today I'll explain ZK: 📚 ZK stands for Zero Knowledge. Among the technologies I’m surveying (TEE, ZK, MPC, FHE) it's the most mature and battle tested one in blockchain settings. - @Zcash has been using ZK for privacy since we launched it in 2016 (the whitepaper we wrote on which it's based is from 2014). - @StarkWareLtd has settled over $1.4T on STARK technology since 2020, scaling Ethereum and Bitcoin, and saving users over $1B in transaction fees. Why am I mentioning this? Because no other technology surveyed here is as battle-tested and used as ZK. ZK has two super-powers: Privacy and Scalability. How does it work? There are two types of entities: A ZK prover and a ZK verifier. There is a separation of powers between them. 1. The prover does the heavy lifting -- it collects the data about all relevant txs, processes them, updates the state of the system based on these txs, and spits out a statement, and a proof. - A typical statement says "I, the prover, have started with state A, processed 1,000,000 transactions, and based on those, reached state B". - The proof is a short sequence of numbers and hashes that *proves* the integrity of the whole statement. 2. The verifier checks the proof to see if it's valid for that particular statement. The verifier typically sits onchain. The way a verifier works is by using math and cryptography, and I won’t explain it here. But suffice to say that the theorems we’ve proved about ZK over the years say that the verifier always accepts true statements and never accepts false statements (more precisely -- a malicious prover who wants to convince a verifier to accept a false statement has to do a similar amount of work to finding a collision in a cryptographic hash function, which cannot be done before our Sun cools down). Once the verifier checked the proof, the statement can be accepted. ZK is really good for allowing a single user to shield their data, and for scaling blockchains. Privacy is what we used it for on Zcash, and Scalabilty is what we (and, following us, others) use it at StarkWare. Note: ZK also has a safe, ergonomic and efficient smart contract language (Cairo). Developers can write and execute any smart contract offchain and guarantee its integrity onchain. You can write programs in Cairo (and in other languages) that you can prove in ZK. Challenges: - When it comes to UX and composability of smart contracts, it gets messy. - When there’s a computation that involves confidential data from more than one user, ZK isn’t good at solving it. For that you have to use a generalization of ZK called secure Multi Party Computation (MPC, I'll explain that too). Not impossible, but requires work. Next time: MPC. The END.
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io@EliBenSasson

Privacy matters – Difference between TEE, ZK, MPC and FHE Everyone is talking about Privacy on-chain these days, and a lot of cryptographic terms are discussed. As co-inventor of ZK STARKs (post-quantum secure ZK systems) I’ll explain these technologies, what they’re good for, and their limitations. This is a long explanation, so today we'll start with TEE: TEE stands for Trusted Execution Environment. I think of TEE as an attempt to solve the problems of Privacy and Integrity, but they have a serious Trust problem. Let's dive in 🤿 TEE - what is it exactly? - A TEE is like a computer that’s hidden inside an enclave (a place that no one can look into). - You send it information using a public key system, meaning everyone can send it encrypted data - Then, it can decrypt that data, process it with integrity, encrypt it back, sign it for integrity, and send it back to you (in encrypted form). In theory, it’s a bit like having a direct encrypted line to God, or to some trustworthy machine, and you ask it what to compute, and it does that without leaking any information, hence, you get privacy. The problem: This holds only in theory. Why? The mentioned enclave is a physical chip that sits inside a computer. Whoever is in possession of that computer and running it can mess around with the TEE and get it to leak information it's not supposed to. So the privacy you’re guaranteed by the brochures isn’t as tight as you’d think. The bigger problem: (aka the problem that implies you should never trust a TEE for running a truly decentralized blockchain) For a certain amount of $ someone (think Lazarus group) can extract the keys that a TEE uses to (a) decrypt your messages and (b) sign on the integrity of the computation it performs. Once the bad guys have this key, they can sign on *any* payload and also read your messages. It’s unlikely they’ll do this from afar to the TEE on your smartphone or laptop, which is why you can use it for your own wallet and for small sums. But, and this is the important part, you cannot have a consensus system relying on TEE for trust. So: TEEs can be used on end-user devices for securing small amounts of money, and they are OK as security theater, when there’s a central operator that you rely on (but in this case the system is better off acknowledging there’s a central party running it, and that it's not decentralized). TEEs cannot serve truly decentralized blockchains. Next time: ZK The END

English
65
78
476
162.7K
Cred
Cred@CryptoCred·
It’s cool to see @breakoutprop on Kraken’s site. Didn’t think I’d ever build anything in crypto. Started off as 3 mates in a Telegram chat a couple of years ago, and now here we are.
Cred tweet media
English
114
57
969
106.5K
//Bitcoin 𝕵ack 🐐
//Bitcoin 𝕵ack 🐐@bitcoinjack·
People want to see me rekt for suggesting a to market cap rato zec/btc position 0.31% of your btc stack, at today’s prices I know, that is insane
English
22
13
148
23.3K
Good Xplanations
Good Xplanations@GoodXplanations·
@jswihart curious to see how you applied the Hedgehog concept for ECC? related at the protocol level - this Venn diagram which summarizes my conviction (though not specifically answering Jim Collins' questions)
Good Xplanations tweet media
English
0
0
2
208
Arjun Khemani
Arjun Khemani@arjunkhemani·
The most hated rally. The most awaited flippening.
Arjun Khemani tweet media
English
28
20
325
18.7K
Good Xplanations
Good Xplanations@GoodXplanations·
In the battle for privacy coin supremacy, just a Shiba dog stands between Zcash and Monero Based on the current XMR price, the level required is $390 ZEC
Good Xplanations tweet media
English
0
0
2
206
Good Xplanations
Good Xplanations@GoodXplanations·
Zcash moves on weekends because that's when individuals manage their private finances
English
0
0
2
88
Good Xplanations
Good Xplanations@GoodXplanations·
Hey Sean @ebfull - I think your ideas should have more reach so have gifted a premium sub to appease the algo Thanks for all you are doing to make private money unstoppable (you may need to accept on your end) GX
Sean Bowe@ebfull

Tachyon consolidates the entire Zerocash protocol into a single distributed key-value store with an append-only log of test-and-set operations using recursive SNARKs. Almost everything is stripped from a txn before it is recorded, and *all* that remains is pruned.

English
1
0
34
1.8K
mert
mert@mert·
spot ZEC now coming to hyperliquid very soon with this and already good fills on Solana, we will have expanded private money to primarily trade on DEXes rather than CEXes unlike most coins, the CEX/DEX dichotomy actually matters when the coins will get delisted by states
mert tweet media
English
94
77
727
87.3K
CZ 🔶 BNB
CZ 🔶 BNB@cz_binance·
A US Senator can't get her facts right, in a public post about a person's charge. There were NO money laundering changes. The same Senator declared "war on crypto", on public TV, 5 days before my sentencing, during the Biden Admin. Need a better example of weaponization of "Biden's DOJ" against crypto?
CZ 🔶 BNB tweet media
Elizabeth Warren@SenWarren

CZ pleaded guilty to a criminal money laundering charge and was sentenced to prison. But then he financed President Trump’s stablecoin and lobbied for a pardon. Today, he got it. If Congress does not stop this kind of corruption, it owns it.

English
1.3K
1.2K
8.9K
977.4K
Good Xplanations
Good Xplanations@GoodXplanations·
@jaysonhobby Millions of JSON objects are created every week. Doesn't make you any less of a legend
English
1
0
1
234
JSON
JSON@jaysonhobby·
A million coins are created every week. That's not a good thing.
English
28
4
60
21K
Good Xplanations
Good Xplanations@GoodXplanations·
with all of CT's envy after the Echo sale, Cobie said he is 'energised by a lot of the cool things being built in crypto like hyperliquid and zcash' tourists levered up, the $300 break failed, and now the stops have been run expect a grind back up here no crying in the casino
Good Xplanations tweet media
Cobie@cobie

when i started building echo 2 years ago, i knew it had 95% chance of failing. to be honest, i couldnt really imagine any other outcome, but i thought at least it may be a noble failure worth attempting. i certainly didn't think echo would be sold to coinbase, but, here we are: today coinbase bought echo for ~$375m. echo will remain a standalone platform under its current brand for now, but we will integrate sonar's public sale product into coinbase, and likely introduce new ways for founders to access investors, and for investors to access opportunities into coinbase itself. over the years i have chatted to brian a handful of times, and mostly to complain at him honestly. i have always respected how brian would listen to an outsider chat shit at him on the phone and take the feedback seriously. now, instead of complaining, i will have the opportunity try to do the work to make things better. crypto itself has moved on a long way since we started working on echo. i guess partially this is because of the election result. but, i feel energised by a lot of the cool things being built in crypto again: hyperliquid, zcash, stablecoin supercyle, and so on. feels like a good time to be on the field instead of an idiot with a twitter account yapping nonsense. well, i guess i still will be that. anyway, job's not finished. onwards. oh fuck yeah, before i go, the final season of up only (now "unc only" due to our severe old age) will commence when we figure out who the guests should be lol cobber

English
0
0
0
163