Gordon Danning
3.1K posts


@GordonDanning @BBGreatMoments buddy. trust me when i tell that GIVEN THE CHOICE no one (including yourself) would take peak Bernard Span over peak Alfonso Soriano. not one front office.
English

@KingHamlet23 @BBGreatMoments WAR doesn't say they had the same career. It says that they were equally valuable, despite having different careers. That's a strength, not a weakness.
English

@ProfMJCleveland If you don't understand the difference between literacy and reading at grade level, you shouldn't be opining on education policy.
English

@CodifyBaseball Are we assuming he never walks? A guy with a .700 OPS isn't a great offensive player. And note that he will never advance runners more than one base.
English

@StanfordBeddoe @mattyglesias @MattBruenig Except that outcomes are getting better, not worse. Eg:
healthline.com/health-news/u-…
aha.org/news/headline/…
English

@mattyglesias @MattBruenig When are Democrats going to wake up to the fact that insurance coverage is not our biggest healthcare problem? If it was, then health outcomes would have improved under Obamacare. Instead, they kept getting worse.
English

Useful @MattBruenig chart which reminds that “bottom 10% of income” does not line up that well with intuitive concepts of “the poor” since there’s a ton of retirees in there.

English

@NoyesArt @jamesetta_w No, I said deaths affect outcomes. The original post was about the economic team, who do not formulate COVID policy at any level, and certainly not at the state level.
English

@GordonDanning @jamesetta_w Dead people has a lot to do with economic policy you said so yourself
English

My unpopular opinion is that Biden’s econ team achieved their stated goal of world class Covid recovery, avoided recession (once thought inevitable), prioritized employment, navigated global inflation, and delivered benefits to the working class. it’s just that voters hated it.
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias
Definitely ... but how about not bringing the entire Bidenomics team while we're at it, too?
English

@NoyesArt @jamesetta_w Surely you know that COVID policies were largely state-level, not federal level. And that death rates tended to be higher in red states. statista.com/statistics/110…
But none of this has anything to do with economic policy.
English

@GordonDanning @jamesetta_w There were a million dead from covid in the US. So what you're saying is the economy could have been better if Biden were less negligent? Maybe the citizens feel that
English

@NoyesArt @jamesetta_w Killing people does not help the economy. It hurts the economy. You are just making things up.
English

@GordonDanning @jamesetta_w Killing people to get there is demonic. Trying to pretend the economic charts matter more than people's lives makes you complicit too
English

@NoyesArt @jamesetta_w They are talking about the economic recovery. Which was indeed world class. home.treasury.gov/news/featured-…
English

@jamesetta_w "World class covid recovery" was killing the most people in the world through public health negligence. Wonder why people hated it
English

@MarcGoldwein So what? The question is how much more that is than what people and employers pay for private insurance now. Why do I care if I pay for health insurance via a tax or through buying private insurance?
English

This kind of Medicare for all would cost About $30 trillion over a decade.
Financing that it would require a 32% payroll tax, a 25% income surtax, a 42% VAT, or a $12,000 per person “public premium”. crfb.org/papers/choices…
Dr. Abdul El-Sayed@AbdulElSayed
Medicare for All means no premium, no co-pay, no deductible. Doesn't matter if you get a job, lose a job, turn 26, turn 65, get married, get divorce — it is there for you.
English

@No1vakMarko @alphafox You think that because you're ignorant.
English

@GordonDanning @alphafox I can imagine a family living in NYC. It is the biggest trash accumulated in the world wandering around without a real reason with no future. And when I see that people are brainwashed that is luxury I know I am blessed.
English

@middle_class_us Im on the Target website now. 5 disposable razors = $7.55. 22 oz Suave shampoo = $2.59.
English

@cupcakesNar15s @Axelay_ @UziCryptoo No, how about you posting evidence? Because you can't, because your claim is just wrong.
English

@GordonDanning @Axelay_ @UziCryptoo Nope.
Go research it.
They just make people believe a deed = ownership.
English

You can't tax rich people on unrealized gains from stocks because "it's not real money until it's sold."
So explain to me why my property taxes keep going up based on the unrealized value of my house?
I didn't sell it.
I didn't cash out.
I didn't make a profit.
But somehow I'm paying taxes on paper gains every single year.
Interesting how "unrealized gains" only become a problem when wealthy folks are involved.
English

@mattyglesias Why is VAT relevant here? Is sales tax in the US a smaller % of GDP than VAT in Europe?
English

@No1vakMarko @alphafox Imagine being able to walk to world class museums, theater, art, film, restaurants, etc. Or imagine people having different preferences than you.
English

@beerandtokens Are you taking the astronomical mortgage rates of the 80s into account? fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAG…
English

“People make plenty of money.”
The median household income would have to be nearly $200k to have the same home buying power as the median household income in the 80s.
People.. PLEASE DO SOME RESEARCH.
Scott Hendricks@scottndricks
@ToddNidasqM @beerandtokens THIS. People make plenty of money. But they can’t buy all the newfangled luxuries that society has come up with, so they feel poor.
English

@Axelay_ @UziCryptoo What are you talking about? Of course you own the land. Go read a deed.
English

@UziCryptoo You own stocks.
You don't own your land.
You do own your 'house' (or more likely the bank does) but you pay rent for the land the house is built upon. Rent goes up over time as land values increase. (the never seem to go down though)
English

@rpondiscio @DavWarren3 4 million? The BLS projects 40,500 middle school openings per year over the next decade, 66,200 high school, and 103,800 kindergarten and elementary school. That is about 2 million over the next 10 years.
English

@DavWarren3 You could double salaries--even triple them--and still not match tech, medicine, law, or engineering. Which fields do you see luring teachers from for the salaries you envision? Also, we need 4 million teachers: that's more than law, medicine, and engineering combined.
English

I’m in favor of raising teacher pay. But I’m unclear how this will “fix” education: is it that teachers are not working hard but will for a raise? Or that higher salaries will lure capable people from law, medicine, tech, etc.?
Jen@jenteach13
You want to fix education? Pay teachers more.
English








