Greg Snow ❄

@LeaderJohnThune Hey John, I say this with the upmost respect… You are a fcking FAILURE and a SELLOUT! DO YOUR FCKING JOB AND PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT. If you can lead it through, get the fck out of the way.

GULLIVER WAKES UP Watching the UN emergency meeting yesterday—as well as various world leaders like Starmer stepping up to their podiums and microphones—reminded me of Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels. America has been cosplaying as the world’s polite giant for decades—politely allowing a swarm of pint-sized parasites to tie us down with dental floss while they lecture us on “responsibility” and “shared values.” We don’t need NATO. We don’t need the UN. And the mask is slipping: the Lilliputians are starting to sweat. In “A Voyage to Lilliput” (1726), shipwrecked Lemuel Gulliver wakes up pinned to the beach by an army of six-inch egomaniacs. They’ve lashed him with thousands of threads, pegs, and stakes thinner than shoelaces. Then they strut: issuing proclamations, demanding tribute, conscripting him into their ridiculous egg-cracking civil war, treating the colossus like a rented mule. Gulliver—big-hearted fool—plays along at first. He doesn’t want to accidentally squash the little tyrants. He even drags their navy across the water like bath toys. But the “bonds” are laughable. One good shrug and they’re confetti. Gulliver’s captivity was never physical; it was consensual masochism. When he finally gets bored of the charade, he stands up, snaps the strings like birthday streamers, and strolls off. The Lilliputians’ empire of the absurd collapses in seconds. Sound familiar? Gulliver = America: the lone superpower that could end any conventional war in weeks, whose economy could buy and sell continents, whose tech sets the global pace. We could walk away tomorrow and the world would still run on dollars, Hollywood, and iPhones. The Lilliputians = Everyone else: NATO freeloaders who spend 1.2% on defense while we hit 3.5% and play global cop; UN diplomats in Turtle Bay who veto our moves, shield tyrants, and spend our money on “climate equity” junkets; European allies who virtue-signal about multilateralism while begging for our bases and our blank checks. They’ve tied us with “consultations” that paralyze action, “2% pledges” treated like polite suggestions, endless guilt trips about “alliance unity,” and bureaucratic quicksand designed to make unilateral moves politically radioactive. We’ve submitted—post-WWII habit, Cold War inertia, out of fear of looking like the bully. So we’ve hauled their fleets, rebuilt their economies, and let them ride shotgun on our wallet. But the giant’s eyes are opening. Why subsidize Europe’s welfare-state militaries? Why fund a UN that hosts anti-American circuses? Why let Brussels dictate our foreign policy? The threads are fraying because we’re noticing they’re made of nothing but hot air and bad faith. The Lilliputians feel the tremor. Panic ripples through NATO summits and Security Council chambers. They’re frantically weaving new strings—climate treaties with penalties, “rules-based order” sermons, more “allied” demands masked as solidarity. But Gulliver’s patience is gone. One yawn, one stretch, and the illusion shatters. Swift wrote satire to expose pretension and power’s absurdities. Today it’s prophecy: America’s voluntary self-shackling is over. Time to stand up, brush off the pygmies, and remind the world who actually carries the weight. Gulliver has had enough.

@lamps_apple At the UN, they steal money, bribe politicians, traffic humans, foment revolutions and wars, smuggle guns, facilitate genocide, poison our food and water supplies, enrich the Globalist Elite, lie to the world and promote vaccines that intentionally kill millions...

UN Security Council... I am still trying to figure out what they do

It ALWAYS comes back to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton “How did Iran get so close to a nuclear weapon? Let's follow the money Hillary Clinton becomes Barack Obama's Secretary of State in 2009. During her tenure from 09-13, there were 4 companies that donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation. Those companies are Boeing, Airbus Total and Siemens. Their donation amounts total up to $25 million, but no less than $5 million. There's not exact numbers. Perhaps. They were hoping to influence Obama and Hillary as they were negotiating with Iran trying to get the nuclear deal signed, which they eventually did In 2015. On July 14th, 2015, the JCPOA was signed lifting sanctions off of Iran and unfreezing 50 to $150 billion in cash assets. And then between January 17th and February 5th, 2016, Obama sent $1.7 billion in untraceable cash to Iran. This money presented an untraceable foreign currency was said to be a settlement for a 1979 arms deal with Iran. That was $400 million, but with $1.3 billion in interest, at least that's what the Obama administration said. It was later on that February, the Obama administration tried to secretly grant Iran access to U.S treasury payment system, which would have netted them $5.7 billion in currency conversion if it hadn't failed. (The banks were like, what the f*ck is this? Hell no.) Later on that year, in April of 2016, the Obama administration dropped charges to several Iranian arms dealers so they wouldn't derail the JCPOA. This really pissed off Obama's Department of Justice, but Obama had to maintain his legacy. And then between March and December of 2016 is when Airbus got an $18 billion contract because of the lifted sanctions in Iran. Boeing got a $16.6 billion contract total, got a $4.8 billion contract, and Siemens got a $1 billion contract with Iran, or I should say Iranian regime controlled companies. But then in November, the unthinkable happens and Hillary Clinton loses the 2016 election to Donald Trump, and suddenly these 4 companies no longer donate to the Clinton Foundation ever again. But they did give Obama a $1 million donation after he left the presidency. Huh? What was that for? And then Trump gets into office and he's like, what the fuck is this? He pulls out of the Iran deal, slaps the sanctions back on Iran. Those four companies lose their contracts, and it remains this way until Joe Biden, he tried to negotiate a deal with them, but he couldn't get it done. And then in 2023, inexplicably Biden gives $6 billion to Iran in a prisoner's spot. And even though the Trump sanctions are still in effect during the Biden presidency, he's pretty lax on enforcing them. Iran's profits from oil go up to $30 billion per year from $1.2 billion per year. The biggest buyer being China. It wasn't supposed to happen. They had sanctions, but Biden just let 'em do it anyway. And what a coincidence, once again, Iran is this close to reaching that nuclear capability. And the only question that I really have is, is this just purely greed or did they want Iran to get to this point? Both are bad, but one is much worse than the other.”

True. And guess where those Biden AI staffers went to work as soon as the admin was over? Anthropic.

@GrrrGraphics 👍

Reminder how they gaslighted us for years after 9/11- saying radical Islam was the "Religion of Peace" Like saying "Democrats love America"

Good seafood is expensive. We over-regulate our own stocks. We ship much of our domestically caught seafood overseas to be processed because our labor is too high, then buy it back. We are the only country without a national aquaculture policy. Most foreign countries subsidize their industry, we don’t. BUT we have the most abundant and healthy supply (which doesn’t benefit us at all).

The world’s largest meat packer is pumping billions into lab-grown meat while gutting independent ranchers. You think they care about nutrition? They care about control. We connect you straight to ranchers who still raise real animals on real land. 👉🏻 BeefMaps.com

@GrrrGraphics 😂👍

@Greg__Snow I think many of us did- they were FAGA not MAGA so actually good!

I lost 45 followers yesterday because I supported President Trump.. Oh well, their loss.

@DataRepublican End the Globalist Elite's International Institutions...

"end of international institutions" Oh no Anyway...

🤔LUXEMBOURG JUST KNOCKED ON THE SWISS PRIVATE BANKING DOOR. While everyone stares at War with IRAN, the Grand Duchy quietly lit up another node on the money map. This week Luxembourg police raided EFG Bank Luxembourg, the local arm of Swiss private bank EFG International. – Preliminary investigation opened in 2025 – Suspected money laundering and failures in counter-terrorist financing controls – Allegations of weak client vigilance and poor cooperation with authorities – 24 AML & “new technologies” officers + 2 prosecutors hit the offices on Feb 24 EFG’s Luxembourg shop is a wealth hub for high-net-worth and institutional clients, booking cross-border money across the EU out of a micro-state the size of a city. Now line this up with the rest of the board: – Edmond de Rothschild Europe (Luxembourg) paid €25M over 1MDB – the biggest fine ever for a European bank – Banque Havilland dropped into administration in 2024 – MBaer Merchant Bank in Zurich is being liquidated after the U.S. used Patriot Act Section 311 to flag it as a primary money-laundering concern tied to Russia & Iran And remember: Luxembourg is the 3rd-largest destination for Swiss foreign investment, with financial services dominating the relationship. That Swiss–Lux corridor isn’t a side story. It’s one of the main arteries of the old system and you’re watching prosecutors, Treasury departments, and AML cops start clamping it off from both ends. Timelines don’t lie. The micro-states are on the board. @Homeranger17 @TFL1728 @MRSRedVoteR

Santa Clara County’s primary water agency, Valley Water, announced that longtime CEO Rick Callender has resigned. The departure was revealed before the findings of an investigation were released, corroborating multiple allegations that he violated district workplace and ethics policies, including those involving sexual harassment.  Valley Water manages an integrated water system serving about 2 million Santa Clara County residents in the heart of Silicon Valley. Days before his resignation, the agency’s board voted 6-1 to retain Callender as a special advisor for one year, allowing him to keep his $512,886 salary.  "Instead of being fired, he was actually promoted

Arizona Department of Education finds just in 10 months at least $10.3 million taxpayer dollars were spent buying - Wedding gifts - Gift cards - Electric dirt bikes - Condoms - Custom tires - Luxury hotel stays - Insurance payments - Furniture - And much more

He works for the govt, and says he is simply not going to tell the British people what the government are discussing. 🤪 No, seriously. He says that below 👇

@ScaryEurope ✨✨🇬🇧✨Go @KTHopkins, Go! ✨🇬🇧✨✨

She walked into the morning studio as if she had no idea that just minutes later, every rule of so-called “safe television” would completely collapse. No script anticipated it. No control room could stop it. And when Fatima Payman slammed her hand on the table and shouted: “SOMEONE TURN HER MICROPHONE OFF IMMEDIATELY!” —the line had been crossed. The packed studio instantly turned into a pressure cooker on the verge of exploding. Every camera locked onto Katie Hopkins—no longer just a polarizing commentator defending her point of view, but the center of a storm unfolding live on national television. Hopkins leaned forward. No shouting. No theatrics. Only the sharp, distilled calm of someone who had spent her entire career being branded outrageous, silenced, and told to sit down. “LISTEN CAREFULLY, FATIMA,” Katie Hopkins said, each word heavy as lead. “YOU CANNOT SIT IN A POSITION OF POWER, CALL YOURSELF ‘THE VOICE OF THE PUBLIC,’ AND THEN IMMEDIATELY DISMISS ANYONE WHO DOESN’T CONFORM TO YOUR IDEA OF HOW THEY SHOULD SPEAK, THINK, OR EXPRESS THEMSELVES.” The room froze. Not a whisper. No one dared to move. Fatima Payman adjusted her coat, her voice suddenly cold and clipped: “THIS IS A BROADCAST—NOT A CAMPAIGN RALLY OR A POLITICAL STAGE—” “NO,” Hopkins cut in. Her voice didn’t rise—it was sharp and precise. “THIS IS YOUR SAFE SPACE. And you can’t tolerate someone walking in and refusing to make themselves ‘comfortable’ the way you want.” Analysts shifted in their seats. Other guests opened their mouths to interject—then stopped. “Oh my God…” someone whispered off-camera. But Hopkins didn’t back down. “You can call me divisive,” she said, placing her hand on the table. “You can call me controversial.” A brief silence followed. “But I have spent my entire life fighting for voices to be heard in a system that profits from silencing dissent—and I have no apologies for speaking out today.” Fatima Payman shot back, her tone sharper: “WE ARE HERE TO DISCUSS RESPONSIBLY—NOT TO COLLAPSE BECAUSE OF EMOTION!” Katie Hopkins laughed. Not a laugh of amusement. Not a laugh of sarcasm. Just the weary laugh of someone labeled “emotional” the moment she refuses to follow the rules. “RESPONSIBLY?” She looked directly toward the panel. “THIS IS NOT A CONVERSATION. THIS IS A ROOM WHERE PEOPLE ARE PRAISED FOR POLITENESS—AND PUNISHED FOR HONESTY.” The entire studio fell silent. Then came the moment that would spread across social media within minutes. Katie Hopkins stood up. No rush. No trembling. She removed the microphone from her jacket and held it for a moment—as if weighing every headline that would follow—then spoke, her voice eerily calm: “YOU CAN TURN MY MICROPHONE OFF.” A pause. “BUT YOU CANNOT LOWER MY VOLUME.” She gently placed the microphone on the table. A small nod—no apology, no plea. She turned her back to the camera. And walked straight out of the studio, leaving behind a broadcast that had completely lost control of its own narrative.

@ScaryEurope ✨✨🇬🇧✨Go @KTHopkins, Go! ✨🇬🇧✨✨

🚨🇬🇧Katie Hopkins is officially calling for Keir Starmer to surrender £95 million in profits allegedly gained through ties to the UK’s NHS reform legislation. Katie characterizes the situation as a “blatant influence” and a clear “abuse of public office,” arguing that the former Labour leader funneled resources through legislation tied to his own policy agenda while leveraging taxpayer-funded prestige. Katie Hopkins has issued a three-day ultimatum for a response, after which she says he will escalate the matter to the Crown Prosecution Service for a formal investigation. “There is nothing moral or legal about this.”