Gulch
304 posts

Gulch retweetledi

前 Google CEO 埃里克·施密特:“如果你真的想赚钱,其实很简单。去创办一家智能体 AI 公司。
未来一两年,每个人都会构建 AI 智能体,这些智能体将会相互竞争。
如果你构建的智能体比任何人都好,你很可能就能打造一家了不起的公司,并且完全拥有它。”
柴郡🔔|Crypto+AI Plus@0xCheshire
前谷歌首席执行官埃里克·施密特表示“电力即将耗尽”,美国需要约 92 吉瓦的新增电力,相比之下每个核电站仅约 1.5 吉瓦。 人工智能真正的瓶颈是电力,超大规模服务商目前正在竞相争夺吉瓦级的能源。
中文



BREAKING NEWS: France Declines Request to Deploy Warships to the Strait of Hormuz
A major diplomatic development is making headlines after France reportedly rejected a request linked to former U.S. President Donald Trump regarding military deployment in the strategically important Strait of Hormuz.
According to emerging reports circulating across international media and political networks, France has made it clear that it will not send warships to the region as part of the proposed military operations. French officials emphasized that decisions involving military deployments abroad must carefully consider national interests, international law, and the broader goal of maintaining regional stability.
The Strait of Hormuz, located between the Iran and the Oman, is one of the world’s most critical maritime routes. A significant percentage of global oil shipments pass through this narrow waterway, making it extremely important for global energy supply and international trade. Because of this, any military activity in the region often attracts worldwide attention.
Political analysts say France’s decision reflects growing caution among several nations when it comes to expanding military involvement in the Middle East. Governments across Europe and other regions are closely monitoring tensions and weighing whether military action or diplomatic engagement is the better path forward.
France has historically supported international cooperation on security issues, but it has also stressed the importance of diplomacy and multilateral decision-making through global institutions and alliances. Experts say this approach allows countries to balance defense commitments with the need to prevent wider conflicts.
The issue has sparked intense debate across social media platforms, where people are sharing different views on whether countries should increase military presence in sensitive regions like the Strait of Hormuz. Supporters of France’s stance argue that avoiding escalation may help prevent a larger regional conflict, while critics believe stronger security cooperation may be necessary to protect international shipping routes.
Observers also note that decisions like this highlight the complex relationships between global powers, allies, and international security organizations. Each nation must consider its own strategic priorities while also working with partners to maintain stability and peace.
As tensions in the Middle East continue to develop, the world will be watching closely to see how major nations respond and whether diplomatic solutions can reduce the risk of further escalation.
The debate continues online as citizens, analysts, and policymakers discuss what role global powers should play in protecting international waterways and maintaining peace.
Do you agree with France’s decision? Share your thoughts and join the discussion.

English
Gulch retweetledi

If the current U.S. press reporting on the military operation against the Islamic regime of Iran was the same press in WW2, we'd have seen following headlines in 1942-1944:
Japan Grows Stronger While U.S. Wastes Resources and Men on Small, Obscure Islands Like Guadalcanal in South Pacific
Nazis in Germany More Resilient After U.S. Invades Wrong Continent in North Africa
Disaster on French Beach as Massive Allied Casualties Result in Only Small Success, Experts Warn This Campaign is Unsustainable
Bombing Campaign of Germany Only Strengthens Support for Nazis, Say Experts
U.S. Violates Human Rights with Indiscriminate Bombing of German Cities
U.S. Terrorizes German Civilians by Bombing Factories, Power Plants, Bridges


English

MAGA thinks Europe can't defend itself without America. Here's what they don't know.
1. France and Britain have 515 nuclear warheads and 8 nuclear missile submarines.
2. European defence spending hit €481 billion this year. That's more than Russia and China spend combined. The EU's ReArm Europe plan is mobilising another €800 billion.
3. European countries have over 1.7 million active troops. Russia has 1.3 million.
4. EU and UK air forces fly over 1,400 combat aircraft. Their navies have five aircraft carriers, over 60 submarines, more than 120 frigates and destroyers.
5. Europe has over 6,000 artillery pieces and that's before the biggest rearmament wave since the Cold War. Poland alone is adding 212 new howitzers.
6. The British SAS invented modern special forces. The US copied them to build Delta Force. From France's Foreign Legion to Poland's GROM, Europe's elite units are among the deadliest on earth.
7. Europe already has joint military commands ready to fight. The UK leads a 10-nation rapid reaction force across Northern Europe and the Arctic. Finland alone can mobilise 900,000 trained reservists all prepared to fight in arctic conditions.
8. Europe has its own satellite navigation (Galileo), its own defence programme (75 active projects) and is building its own rapid deployment force.
The "helpless Europe" story was never about defence.
It was about keeping Europe dependent and buying American weapons, relying on American intelligence, following American foreign policy.
Thanks to Trump, that now ends.

English
Gulch retweetledi

What’s happening in the US today reminds me of how Lebanon was destroyed by Hezbollah on the hands of some Christian useful idiots.
In 2005, after Hezbollah assassinated Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri, the Lebanese people revolted against the Syrian occupation and finally forced it out after 15 years.
Hezbollah was close to collapse, because its existence depended on the Syrian presence.
A Christian leader who loved himself more than he loved Lebanon saw an opportunity in allying with Hezbollah for electoral gain.
By doing so, he gave Hezbollah renewed legitimacy and saved it when it was close to dying.
The Christian followers of this man, Michel Aoun, out of hatred for rival Christian parties, began praising Hezbollah.
Some of them attended Hassan Nasrallah’s speeches and religious events, and wore the sword of Hussein as a necklace, not out of love for Hezbollah or Shia Islam, but out of hatred for other Christians.
Because of what Michel Aoun and his followers did, Hezbollah managed to take over Lebanon.
When Aoun became president, he effectively handed the country over to Hezbollah.
The woke reich in the US today reminds me of those Christians who saved Hezbollah and empowered it and destroyed Lebanon.
The woke reich, out of hatred for Israel, is empowering Islamic jihad, rebranding it in the West, and making the American people vulnerable and weak due to the confusion they spread.
If the woke reich keeps doing this, the Republicans will lose the election, and the left, which is already in a symbiotic alliance with Islamic jihad, will take over and deliver the US to ideologies that hate the West and seek its demise.
English


@Resistance_SM 事实证明,这只会是他愚蠢的一厢情愿!他梦想领导世界,梦想自己能够说服普京,结果受到普京毫不留情的羞辱。他就像一个疯狂寻求存在感的小丑
中文

🇲🇫🫵Qu’il est étrange, l’être humain. Il détruit son présent tandis qu’il se préoccupe de l’avenir, mais pleure dans l’avenir en se souvenant du passé. Cette sagesse millénaire, tirée d’un registre ancien, colle parfaitement au clown pathétique qu’est Emmanuel Macron.
Ce déchet de l’humanité ose se pavaner avec son idée visionnaire d’une prétendue troisième voie souveraine entre la Chine et les États-Unis, regroupant l’Europe, le Canada, le Japon, l’Inde, le Brésil et l’Australie dans une noble coalition d’indépendants.
En réalité, ce n’est que du pipeau de plus, du vent narcissique servi aux étudiants de Séoul ou ailleurs pour masquer son impuissance totale. Pendant qu’il pontifie sur la souveraineté et non la soumission, il a méthodiquement détruit la souveraineté française : industrie laminée, dette abyssale sur l’autel de son idéologie démoniaque, son influence internationale réduite à des discours creux.
Ce type vit dans un présent qu’il saccage allègrement par son incompétence crasse, obsédé par son image d’homme d’État visionnaire dans un avenir qu’il ne maîtrisera jamais, tout en pleurnichant sur un passé gaullien qu’il a trahi à chaque tournant.
Macron n’est pas un leader, c’est un mirage arrogant, un opportuniste qui vend du rêve géopolitique pendant que la France coule. Un conard de premier ordre, dont l’héritage se résumera à des citations creuses et un pays appauvri.

Français







