@FAE_Drones@miniapeur You can, in thid case F=m×a which means force and mass are directly proportional. There for mass can be represented as a force in this scenario
We have had a few NY enquiries about buying our national team jersey. So that we can see if there is sufficient demand for another pre-order period, please let us know if you would be interested in purchasing and we will then inform our producer and distributor, @S66Sportswear.
For Todd Murphy to miss selection for the fifth Test in Sydney, something has gone seriously, seriously wrong — whether pitch-related, selection-based or otherwise.
#Ashes
Beau Webster returns to the XI as Australia opt against picking a frontline spinner in Sydney for the first time in 138 years.
Full story: cricket.com.au/news/4427464
@thegameawards Not only is it worse than E33, it's actively mid. But there's been a rather weird "rally around the maypole" of hate on E33 ever since TGA, so it's no surprise... especially at these awards specifically.
The winners of the Steam Awards have been announced, with fans voting HOLLOW KNIGHT: SILKSONG as their Game of the Year.
See full list here:
store.steampowered.com/steamawards/20…
🚨 | The FIA now faces a dilemma: ban the Mercedes system and risk sidelining four teams, or approve it and trigger protests and possible disqualifications.
A reported compromise would allow Mercedes-powered teams to race with a non-compliant engine, provided they return to compliance in 2027 — a solution other teams oppose.
@Username19nll@cricbuzz Yes but it was given not out for it not hitting the glove even tho it did. The problem is the reason for the decision, not the decision it self which was correct
@RtTorrance54@cricbuzz What do you mean cheating? No one said he caught it and it was not out? The problem is it clearly hit the glove but 3rd ump said it didnt. Was 100% not out but only based on the bounce
@Username19nll@cricbuzz I think the reason its important is it shows the lack of ability of sniko. It was 100% not out but the 3rd umpire gave it not out because he said it didnt hit the glove. No argument it hit the ground
@FergiesRightRef@ESPNcricinfo What’s worse is, the onfield umpire didn’t even give it out, they just referred it, so how was there sufficient evidence to overturn the decision and give it out?
@Tsar_of_golf@TosBetting@cricketcomau@Westpac 3rd umpire said it didnt hit the glove when it clearly did and thats what the on field umpire told the aussies, thats why they were mad. If they were told it didnt carry (which it didnt) they wouldve understood fine