
REMEMBER: If a UFO looks like a balloon, and acts like a balloon, it's probably an alien space monster.
Mark
2.1K posts


REMEMBER: If a UFO looks like a balloon, and acts like a balloon, it's probably an alien space monster.





Some Little-Known Behind-the-Scenes History🧵: “Chris Mellon knew folks in the SecDef front office and introduced us.” Several years ago, I personally spoke with a former member of SecDef Mattis’s senior staff who confirmed that throughout early 2017 they had been formally briefed on ATTIP and UAP by @LueElizondo. I believe @jaystratton was also a part of those briefings. However, at the time we spoke Jay was still at ODNI and we did not discuss him. The individual confirmed being shown videos and other information in a secure setting. They would not go into detail on what they were shown, aside from saying it seemingly defied conventional explanations. They never mentioned any requests for “material transfers.” But in fairness, I also never specifically asked about anything like that. This person also told me they felt responsible for AATIP and the UAP issue never making it to SecDeF Mattis. They said this wasn’t because of any orchestrated “cover-up.” Rather, this all occurred in the early months of the Trump administration’s first term. Many new senior officials weren’t settled into their offices yet. According to them there were also several very pressing national security issues involving North Korea and Syria which took precedence. Perhaps, the most fascinating part of our conversation was they recounted being stunned by the DoD’s initial public denials that AAWSAP/AATIP was involved in UAP investigations and Lue’s role. This person said they went so far as to personally speak with DoD Public Affairs to express their displeasure that the information being released was patently false. In response, they were effectively told by DoDPA that the public statements on AAWSAP/AATIP and Lue were formally accurate, but indeed functionally misleading. Essentially, senior staff at OUSDI and OSDPA preferred to play a game of semantics as opposed to offering clarity, in hopes it would make the entire AATIP/UAP thing go away. The PAO they spoke with, however, similarly expressed their disapproval of this approach. *For context, this was pre-Susan Gough. Once Gough was assigned as the public affairs UAP-Czar, OSDPA coalesced around a unified UAP messaging strategy. This included all DoD branches and components being required to route all UAP information to OSDPA/Gough. Other non-DoD agencies, for example FBI, DHS, etc., also largely complied with this as well. Whether that was by formal executive directive or simply a good excuse to pass off UAP inquiries, I don’t know. Component FOIA offices were also required to provide advance notice to OSDPA about upcoming UAP related FOIA releases. In another private conversation, a former high-ranking Under Secretary, told me OSDPA’s messaging strategy was to be very cautious and risk-averse. Effectively, OSDPA would only comment on information that had already become publicly available via FOIA, in some instances leaks, or occasionally comments by former officials. Candidly, the former Under Secretary said the goal was to convey the least amount of information, while still satisfying the requirement for public disclosure.



Joe, I completely sympathize with those who are confused. In fact, there is definitely some blurring of the lines and grey areas. Let me see if this helps. 1. AAWSAP was the original contract vehicle that was approved and executed in 2008, although discussions occurred before that from my understanding. This included BAAS as the primary contractor. Focus included UAP and anomalies at Skin Walker Ranch 2. AATIP was created to focus solely on military encounters with UAP. The 2009 memo demonstrates this. Keep in mind that justifying the spending of military resources (people, travel, time, etc) requires a military focus. This means showing a clear connection to military equities. The perfect example is the Nimitz incident and investigation that Jay conducted. I was part of AATIP already but focusing on the security element. 3. From 2009 to 2012 both AATIP and AAWSAP were run simultaneously. Meaning, AAWSAP was focusing on the ranch and some archival UAP cases (for which I was not part of so I can’t really speak to any degree of authority involving AAWSAP. As for me, at AATIP we were focused on military encounters with UAP which there were many. 4. In 2012, funding for AAWSAP ended and from my understanding those efforts ended (I could be wrong here because I wasnt really involved with that effort. With the finding done for AAWSAP, AATIP continued. In 2013 and 2014, we had another 10 million that was provided to us (AATIP) through appropriations but the language was vague and so the money didn’t come to us and instead taken by another element in USD(I), much to our disappointment. Fortunately I managed activities that allowed me to use our own resources to keep the program alive. By this point, we had plenty of military incidents to review and triage. 5. AATIP continued throughout 2014, 2015, and 2016 but it became clear to me, Jay, and others we would need more resources and more top cover. We also wanted the Air Force to authorize material transfer from specific aerospace contractors to AATIP. Those elements said we needed a new memo from SecAF to replace an existing one that directed these contractors to maintain the material. We were unsuccessful getting that memo from SecAf. 6. When Gen Mattis became SecDef I saw it as an opportunity to see if we could get a memo from the SecDef, thereby trumping (forgive the pun) the SecAf. To do this, we would need to brief his staff. Please keep in mind that all the while AATIP had been placed into DoD control systems but very few people in the new chain of command were even aware of it. So this was the perfect opportunity to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. I.e. get top cover at the highest level while also getting a memo signed by SecDef to allow certain contractors to hand over the material they said they already had. Chris Mellon knew folks in the SecDef front office and introduced us. I already had served with Mattis overseas but I didn’t know anyone in his front office so Chris’ help was invaluable. 7. Jay and I along with our colleagues kept running into roadblocks with initiatives such as Interloper. As such, in 2017 we decided one of us would have to break cover in order to get the Secretary’s attention to this important matter. We decided it would be me that would go public while Jay remained in the shadows to continue AATIP from inside. 8. I believe it was in 2018 Jay becomes the new UAP Task Force Director. Unfortunately he faced sharp resistance from my old leadership but that is his story to tell because I was gone by then.


🚨 Vice President JD Vance says he thinks aliens are demons He also acknowledges they mess with humans 4:00 JD Vance says aliens are demons and they mess with humans 6:28 Trump will release the alien files, will he say they're demons? 7:46 Tim Dillon speaks on Peter Thiel's obsession with the AntiChrist 12:47 Peter Thiel is funding half of the UFO field










For anyone who is wondering about AATIPs authenticity, here is documentation dated 2009 that clearly concerns AATIP and my participation early on. This memo was made by the program sponsor himself, senator Harry Reid. I’m not sure why there’s still a question about this?





@SicCoP1 @The_Astral_ Lue was pretty high up in a legacy CR program
