Mark

2.1K posts

Mark

Mark

@HackTheSim

0 days UFO sober

Katılım Haziran 2021
97 Takip Edilen281 Takipçiler
Mark
Mark@HackTheSim·
ok, back to analyzing neck folds
English
0
1
1
49
Mark
Mark@HackTheSim·
@cosmicfauxpas This also brings back fond memories of your Tim Tactician / Linda Howe clip. Hope he's doing well.
English
0
0
1
234
cosmicfauxpas
cosmicfauxpas@cosmicfauxpas·
people keep saying 4. it’s 27 species.
English
36
41
339
26.8K
Steven Greenstreet
Steven Greenstreet@MiddleOfMayhem·
The US gov't has released UFO information to the public at least 17 times since 1947. Anyone acting like the recent gov't drop of "UFO files" is something new is either ill-informed or trying to sell you something. And there's still not one shred of evidence of aliens.
Steven Greenstreet tweet media
English
25
22
103
7.5K
Mark
Mark@HackTheSim·
@SicCoP1 @TheUfoJoe Pop Mech, Grusch, and Garry Reid articles, to name just a few. Tim was practically Lue's go-to guy before Chris Sharp came along.
English
0
0
1
246
Daniel Miller - SiCcOp
@TheUfoJoe Respectfully disagree on this one. Not only was Kloor called out by Tim many times for quoting out of context (among other things), but his massive 2020 Pop Mech did more to verify Elizondo’s work as well as the Pentagon’s involvement with UFOs than anything else at the time
English
3
1
6
319
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
Interesting to see Tim post this (which is worth reading) when he himself was questioning Lue's role: "Like Greenewald, [McMillan] has come to doubt Elizondo's involvement with any government UFO program." ~June 2019 - The Intercept article by Kloor I've never had any doubt Lue was involved with AATIP and AATIP was about UFOs. And in March of 2019, @g_knapp told us that AATIP was, "not so much a program as it was a loose network of intelligence officials in different agencies, including the Air Force and the Navy, CIA, DIA, DARPA…there might be a couple of other agencies." ~ I've had various people tell me Tim works for an intel agency. Maybe CIA? Does that explain his PREPOSTEROUS theory that, in 2002, Eric Davis may have been fooled by an Admiral Wilson imposter sitting in the car with him? Trying to control the narrative away from crash retrievals? And before anybody says, "But why would Tim and The Debrief publish Blumenthal and Kean's article on Grusch in 2023 if he was trying to control the narrative away from crash retrievals?" Well, think of how it would have looked if The Debrief had turned down their article and that news gotten out. Yeah. He had no choice. In theory, of course.
Joe Murgia tweet media
Tim McMillan@LtTimMcMillan

Some Little-Known Behind-the-Scenes History🧵: “Chris Mellon knew folks in the SecDef front office and introduced us.” Several years ago, I personally spoke with a former member of SecDef Mattis’s senior staff who confirmed that throughout early 2017 they had been formally briefed on ATTIP and UAP by @LueElizondo. I believe @jaystratton was also a part of those briefings. However, at the time we spoke Jay was still at ODNI and we did not discuss him. The individual confirmed being shown videos and other information in a secure setting. They would not go into detail on what they were shown, aside from saying it seemingly defied conventional explanations. They never mentioned any requests for “material transfers.” But in fairness, I also never specifically asked about anything like that. This person also told me they felt responsible for AATIP and the UAP issue never making it to SecDeF Mattis. They said this wasn’t because of any orchestrated “cover-up.” Rather, this all occurred in the early months of the Trump administration’s first term. Many new senior officials weren’t settled into their offices yet. According to them there were also several very pressing national security issues involving North Korea and Syria which took precedence. Perhaps, the most fascinating part of our conversation was they recounted being stunned by the DoD’s initial public denials that AAWSAP/AATIP was involved in UAP investigations and Lue’s role. This person said they went so far as to personally speak with DoD Public Affairs to express their displeasure that the information being released was patently false. In response, they were effectively told by DoDPA that the public statements on AAWSAP/AATIP and Lue were formally accurate, but indeed functionally misleading. Essentially, senior staff at OUSDI and OSDPA preferred to play a game of semantics as opposed to offering clarity, in hopes it would make the entire AATIP/UAP thing go away. The PAO they spoke with, however, similarly expressed their disapproval of this approach. *For context, this was pre-Susan Gough. Once Gough was assigned as the public affairs UAP-Czar, OSDPA coalesced around a unified UAP messaging strategy. This included all DoD branches and components being required to route all UAP information to OSDPA/Gough. Other non-DoD agencies, for example FBI, DHS, etc., also largely complied with this as well. Whether that was by formal executive directive or simply a good excuse to pass off UAP inquiries, I don’t know. Component FOIA offices were also required to provide advance notice to OSDPA about upcoming UAP related FOIA releases. In another private conversation, a former high-ranking Under Secretary, told me OSDPA’s messaging strategy was to be very cautious and risk-averse. Effectively, OSDPA would only comment on information that had already become publicly available via FOIA, in some instances leaks, or occasionally comments by former officials. Candidly, the former Under Secretary said the goal was to convey the least amount of information, while still satisfying the requirement for public disclosure.

English
11
9
61
8.7K
Mark
Mark@HackTheSim·
@LtTimMcMillan at least then Mattis wouldn't have felt blindsided by the resignation and the media would've had another reason to take it seriously
English
0
0
0
11
Tim McMillan
Tim McMillan@LtTimMcMillan·
@HackTheSim I do believe they would have eventually had an opportunity to brief the SecDef. But I’m also not sure what that outcome would have looked like in the long run.
English
1
0
1
48
Tim McMillan
Tim McMillan@LtTimMcMillan·
Some Little-Known Behind-the-Scenes History🧵: “Chris Mellon knew folks in the SecDef front office and introduced us.” Several years ago, I personally spoke with a former member of SecDef Mattis’s senior staff who confirmed that throughout early 2017 they had been formally briefed on ATTIP and UAP by @LueElizondo. I believe @jaystratton was also a part of those briefings. However, at the time we spoke Jay was still at ODNI and we did not discuss him. The individual confirmed being shown videos and other information in a secure setting. They would not go into detail on what they were shown, aside from saying it seemingly defied conventional explanations. They never mentioned any requests for “material transfers.” But in fairness, I also never specifically asked about anything like that. This person also told me they felt responsible for AATIP and the UAP issue never making it to SecDeF Mattis. They said this wasn’t because of any orchestrated “cover-up.” Rather, this all occurred in the early months of the Trump administration’s first term. Many new senior officials weren’t settled into their offices yet. According to them there were also several very pressing national security issues involving North Korea and Syria which took precedence. Perhaps, the most fascinating part of our conversation was they recounted being stunned by the DoD’s initial public denials that AAWSAP/AATIP was involved in UAP investigations and Lue’s role. This person said they went so far as to personally speak with DoD Public Affairs to express their displeasure that the information being released was patently false. In response, they were effectively told by DoDPA that the public statements on AAWSAP/AATIP and Lue were formally accurate, but indeed functionally misleading. Essentially, senior staff at OUSDI and OSDPA preferred to play a game of semantics as opposed to offering clarity, in hopes it would make the entire AATIP/UAP thing go away. The PAO they spoke with, however, similarly expressed their disapproval of this approach. *For context, this was pre-Susan Gough. Once Gough was assigned as the public affairs UAP-Czar, OSDPA coalesced around a unified UAP messaging strategy. This included all DoD branches and components being required to route all UAP information to OSDPA/Gough. Other non-DoD agencies, for example FBI, DHS, etc., also largely complied with this as well. Whether that was by formal executive directive or simply a good excuse to pass off UAP inquiries, I don’t know. Component FOIA offices were also required to provide advance notice to OSDPA about upcoming UAP related FOIA releases. In another private conversation, a former high-ranking Under Secretary, told me OSDPA’s messaging strategy was to be very cautious and risk-averse. Effectively, OSDPA would only comment on information that had already become publicly available via FOIA, in some instances leaks, or occasionally comments by former officials. Candidly, the former Under Secretary said the goal was to convey the least amount of information, while still satisfying the requirement for public disclosure.
Lue Elizondo@LueElizondo

Joe, I completely sympathize with those who are confused. In fact, there is definitely some blurring of the lines and grey areas. Let me see if this helps. 1. AAWSAP was the original contract vehicle that was approved and executed in 2008, although discussions occurred before that from my understanding. This included BAAS as the primary contractor. Focus included UAP and anomalies at Skin Walker Ranch 2. AATIP was created to focus solely on military encounters with UAP. The 2009 memo demonstrates this. Keep in mind that justifying the spending of military resources (people, travel, time, etc) requires a military focus. This means showing a clear connection to military equities. The perfect example is the Nimitz incident and investigation that Jay conducted. I was part of AATIP already but focusing on the security element. 3. From 2009 to 2012 both AATIP and AAWSAP were run simultaneously. Meaning, AAWSAP was focusing on the ranch and some archival UAP cases (for which I was not part of so I can’t really speak to any degree of authority involving AAWSAP. As for me, at AATIP we were focused on military encounters with UAP which there were many. 4. In 2012, funding for AAWSAP ended and from my understanding those efforts ended (I could be wrong here because I wasnt really involved with that effort. With the finding done for AAWSAP, AATIP continued. In 2013 and 2014, we had another 10 million that was provided to us (AATIP) through appropriations but the language was vague and so the money didn’t come to us and instead taken by another element in USD(I), much to our disappointment. Fortunately I managed activities that allowed me to use our own resources to keep the program alive. By this point, we had plenty of military incidents to review and triage. 5. AATIP continued throughout 2014, 2015, and 2016 but it became clear to me, Jay, and others we would need more resources and more top cover. We also wanted the Air Force to authorize material transfer from specific aerospace contractors to AATIP. Those elements said we needed a new memo from SecAF to replace an existing one that directed these contractors to maintain the material. We were unsuccessful getting that memo from SecAf. 6. When Gen Mattis became SecDef I saw it as an opportunity to see if we could get a memo from the SecDef, thereby trumping (forgive the pun) the SecAf. To do this, we would need to brief his staff. Please keep in mind that all the while AATIP had been placed into DoD control systems but very few people in the new chain of command were even aware of it. So this was the perfect opportunity to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. I.e. get top cover at the highest level while also getting a memo signed by SecDef to allow certain contractors to hand over the material they said they already had. Chris Mellon knew folks in the SecDef front office and introduced us. I already had served with Mattis overseas but I didn’t know anyone in his front office so Chris’ help was invaluable. 7. Jay and I along with our colleagues kept running into roadblocks with initiatives such as Interloper. As such, in 2017 we decided one of us would have to break cover in order to get the Secretary’s attention to this important matter. We decided it would be me that would go public while Jay remained in the shadows to continue AATIP from inside. 8. I believe it was in 2018 Jay becomes the new UAP Task Force Director. Unfortunately he faced sharp resistance from my old leadership but that is his story to tell because I was gone by then.

English
13
25
122
23.8K
Red Panda Koala
Red Panda Koala@RedPandaKoala·
Chris Bledsoe will be part of a Missing 411/Bigfoot themed Alaskan Cruise that departs on September 11th There is still time to purchase tickets if interested
English
54
7
123
12.2K
Mark
Mark@HackTheSim·
@RedPandaKoala Several statements don't add up: - it's an exomoon (orbits an exoplanet) - "near the sun" (another sun?) - "which is next to Neptune" (??) - "bigger than Earth" (Triton isn't close in size, and GTP didn't actually say Triton) Can you please clarify @GTP_Podcast?
English
0
0
0
112
Red Panda Koala
Red Panda Koala@RedPandaKoala·
Reports some DC lawmakers theorize red orb UFOs are demons from Neptune’s moon Triton “One of the theories that you’re going to hear is that they come from an exo moon. When Rep Burchett was on Rogan and he said Jupiter’s moon it was an error but what he was suggesting is actually the truth. That is one of the theories that they discuss in DC predominantly. These red orbs come from an exo moon near Neptune. They believe that they’re demons and they believe that is the holding place for them spiritually. They believe that the chains have been unleashed, meaning we’re living in the times of revelation and that’s where the demons are coming from.” Citizen journalist @GTP_Podcast sources relay that this theory is seriously considered in Washington DC and Rep Burchett and Vice President JD Vance may have already referenced it publicly.
Red Panda Koala@RedPandaKoala

🚨 Vice President JD Vance says he thinks aliens are demons He also acknowledges they mess with humans 4:00 JD Vance says aliens are demons and they mess with humans 6:28 Trump will release the alien files, will he say they're demons? 7:46 Tim Dillon speaks on Peter Thiel's obsession with the AntiChrist 12:47 Peter Thiel is funding half of the UFO field

English
112
55
504
132K
Daniel Miller - SiCcOp
New to me: “We… wanted the Air Force to authorize material transfer from specific aerospace contractors to AATIP. Those elements said we needed a new memo from SecAF to replace an existing one that directed these contractors to maintain the material. We were unsuccessful”
Lue Elizondo@LueElizondo

Joe, I completely sympathize with those who are confused. In fact, there is definitely some blurring of the lines and grey areas. Let me see if this helps. 1. AAWSAP was the original contract vehicle that was approved and executed in 2008, although discussions occurred before that from my understanding. This included BAAS as the primary contractor. Focus included UAP and anomalies at Skin Walker Ranch 2. AATIP was created to focus solely on military encounters with UAP. The 2009 memo demonstrates this. Keep in mind that justifying the spending of military resources (people, travel, time, etc) requires a military focus. This means showing a clear connection to military equities. The perfect example is the Nimitz incident and investigation that Jay conducted. I was part of AATIP already but focusing on the security element. 3. From 2009 to 2012 both AATIP and AAWSAP were run simultaneously. Meaning, AAWSAP was focusing on the ranch and some archival UAP cases (for which I was not part of so I can’t really speak to any degree of authority involving AAWSAP. As for me, at AATIP we were focused on military encounters with UAP which there were many. 4. In 2012, funding for AAWSAP ended and from my understanding those efforts ended (I could be wrong here because I wasnt really involved with that effort. With the finding done for AAWSAP, AATIP continued. In 2013 and 2014, we had another 10 million that was provided to us (AATIP) through appropriations but the language was vague and so the money didn’t come to us and instead taken by another element in USD(I), much to our disappointment. Fortunately I managed activities that allowed me to use our own resources to keep the program alive. By this point, we had plenty of military incidents to review and triage. 5. AATIP continued throughout 2014, 2015, and 2016 but it became clear to me, Jay, and others we would need more resources and more top cover. We also wanted the Air Force to authorize material transfer from specific aerospace contractors to AATIP. Those elements said we needed a new memo from SecAF to replace an existing one that directed these contractors to maintain the material. We were unsuccessful getting that memo from SecAf. 6. When Gen Mattis became SecDef I saw it as an opportunity to see if we could get a memo from the SecDef, thereby trumping (forgive the pun) the SecAf. To do this, we would need to brief his staff. Please keep in mind that all the while AATIP had been placed into DoD control systems but very few people in the new chain of command were even aware of it. So this was the perfect opportunity to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. I.e. get top cover at the highest level while also getting a memo signed by SecDef to allow certain contractors to hand over the material they said they already had. Chris Mellon knew folks in the SecDef front office and introduced us. I already had served with Mattis overseas but I didn’t know anyone in his front office so Chris’ help was invaluable. 7. Jay and I along with our colleagues kept running into roadblocks with initiatives such as Interloper. As such, in 2017 we decided one of us would have to break cover in order to get the Secretary’s attention to this important matter. We decided it would be me that would go public while Jay remained in the shadows to continue AATIP from inside. 8. I believe it was in 2018 Jay becomes the new UAP Task Force Director. Unfortunately he faced sharp resistance from my old leadership but that is his story to tell because I was gone by then.

English
7
13
72
6.4K
Novelist
Novelist@_Nov3L·
@SicCoP1 @disclosureorg Why would a tiny program with no funding that admittedly looked at military UAP reports receive the most valuable material from a defense contractor? For funsies?
English
2
0
2
69
Mark
Mark@HackTheSim·
@cosmicfauxpas thank you for your service. walking into the Oval Office now.
English
0
0
2
97
Mark
Mark@HackTheSim·
all the shitty UFO scientists wondering why nobody is sending them death threats
English
0
0
2
106
Mark
Mark@HackTheSim·
@cosmicfauxpas I need the Bloops to model the flight dynamics and thus derive the correct spacetime metric. Lives are at stake.
English
0
0
4
157
Mark
Mark@HackTheSim·
I am looking for 2 old Cosmic Judas clips - the Fravor "Bloop" montage - the Ross / Project Unity sexy chat about oversized object @cosmicfauxpas please advise
English
2
0
11
4.6K
Mark
Mark@HackTheSim·
@kimmono @TheUfoJoe @jaystratton yes - how did she substantiate Lue's role in AATIP (or the *existence* of AATIP) - did she speak with Stratton and Lacatski? was there a competing narrative? - with 9 years of hindsight, does she think she was misled? Perhaps she was a willing participant?
English
1
0
2
27
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
The problem, Lue, is that AAWSAP also had the nickname AATIP. I believe they did that to prevent certain anti-UFO folks from finding out about AAWSAP. Unfortunately, and apparently, it didn't work. And then we have @jaystratton saying he created AATIP in 2015, a few years after AAWSAP ended. Then we have KONA BLUE, which I think Lacatski will address more in depth with his next book. So, people would love a crystal clear timeline of everything and everyone involved. Because it's confusing.
Lue Elizondo@LueElizondo

For anyone who is wondering about AATIPs authenticity, here is documentation dated 2009 that clearly concerns AATIP and my participation early on. This memo was made by the program sponsor himself, senator Harry Reid. I’m not sure why there’s still a question about this?

English
12
8
147
37.8K
Lue Elizondo
Lue Elizondo@LueElizondo·
Joe, I completely sympathize with those who are confused. In fact, there is definitely some blurring of the lines and grey areas. Let me see if this helps. 1. AAWSAP was the original contract vehicle that was approved and executed in 2008, although discussions occurred before that from my understanding. This included BAAS as the primary contractor. Focus included UAP and anomalies at Skin Walker Ranch 2. AATIP was created to focus solely on military encounters with UAP. The 2009 memo demonstrates this. Keep in mind that justifying the spending of military resources (people, travel, time, etc) requires a military focus. This means showing a clear connection to military equities. The perfect example is the Nimitz incident and investigation that Jay conducted. I was part of AATIP already but focusing on the security element. 3. From 2009 to 2012 both AATIP and AAWSAP were run simultaneously. Meaning, AAWSAP was focusing on the ranch and some archival UAP cases (for which I was not part of so I can’t really speak to any degree of authority involving AAWSAP. As for me, at AATIP we were focused on military encounters with UAP which there were many. 4. In 2012, funding for AAWSAP ended and from my understanding those efforts ended (I could be wrong here because I wasnt really involved with that effort. With the finding done for AAWSAP, AATIP continued. In 2013 and 2014, we had another 10 million that was provided to us (AATIP) through appropriations but the language was vague and so the money didn’t come to us and instead taken by another element in USD(I), much to our disappointment. Fortunately I managed activities that allowed me to use our own resources to keep the program alive. By this point, we had plenty of military incidents to review and triage. 5. AATIP continued throughout 2014, 2015, and 2016 but it became clear to me, Jay, and others we would need more resources and more top cover. We also wanted the Air Force to authorize material transfer from specific aerospace contractors to AATIP. Those elements said we needed a new memo from SecAF to replace an existing one that directed these contractors to maintain the material. We were unsuccessful getting that memo from SecAf. 6. When Gen Mattis became SecDef I saw it as an opportunity to see if we could get a memo from the SecDef, thereby trumping (forgive the pun) the SecAf. To do this, we would need to brief his staff. Please keep in mind that all the while AATIP had been placed into DoD control systems but very few people in the new chain of command were even aware of it. So this was the perfect opportunity to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. I.e. get top cover at the highest level while also getting a memo signed by SecDef to allow certain contractors to hand over the material they said they already had. Chris Mellon knew folks in the SecDef front office and introduced us. I already had served with Mattis overseas but I didn’t know anyone in his front office so Chris’ help was invaluable. 7. Jay and I along with our colleagues kept running into roadblocks with initiatives such as Interloper. As such, in 2017 we decided one of us would have to break cover in order to get the Secretary’s attention to this important matter. We decided it would be me that would go public while Jay remained in the shadows to continue AATIP from inside. 8. I believe it was in 2018 Jay becomes the new UAP Task Force Director. Unfortunately he faced sharp resistance from my old leadership but that is his story to tell because I was gone by then.
English
34
88
509
56.9K
Mark
Mark@HackTheSim·
@LueElizondo @TheUfoJoe @jaystratton Thanks, Lue. Perhaps one big source of confusion is how the name "AATIP" was used during those intervening years, from the 2009 (Reid letter for denied SAP) until 2017 (handing over responsibilities to Mr. Tipton). Was "AATIP" borrowed retroactively or was it used throughout?
English
0
0
2
778
maya benowitz 🕰️
maya benowitz 🕰️@cosmicfibretion·
@LueElizondo It’s only a matter of time until you’re given the green light to talk about your direct first-hand experiences in the legacy program, Lue.
English
9
1
61
1.9K
Lue Elizondo
Lue Elizondo@LueElizondo·
For anyone who is wondering about AATIPs authenticity, here is documentation dated 2009 that clearly concerns AATIP and my participation early on. This memo was made by the program sponsor himself, senator Harry Reid. I’m not sure why there’s still a question about this?
Lue Elizondo tweet mediaLue Elizondo tweet mediaLue Elizondo tweet mediaLue Elizondo tweet media
English
118
123
819
69.3K