Hadi

13 posts

Hadi

Hadi

@Hadiize4

Katılım Mayıs 2026
12 Takip Edilen3 Takipçiler
أبو قتيبة الحجازي
@aaabl107 You want to see the reality of Saleh al-Jewzan? Mention his name. Then look at the comments The abuse, the curses, the slander, the filthy language, all of it exposes the type of people gathered around him! A sound path produces humility, manners, and fear of Allah! Not filth.
English
3
2
13
604
Abu Ammar Al-Baloushi
You want to see the reality of AMJ? Mention his name. Then look at the comments. The abuse, the curses, the slander, the filthy language, all of it exposes the type of people gathered around him! A sound path produces humility, manners, and fear of Allah! Not filth.
Abu Ammar Al-Baloushi tweet media
English
27
10
75
13.4K
Hadi
Hadi@Hadiize4·
@aaabl107 no one is filthier in their manners than madkhalis by ijma of the ummah. Assume some have bad manners how is that his fault? When you madkhalis insult us we will attribute it to Fawzan. You just can’t tackle his points especially about Medina graduates so you cry like a women
English
1
2
18
784
Hadi
Hadi@Hadiize4·
@AhmedTayy What are you talking about, oh student of the cucks? What does the third state have to do with the first? Are you even aware of the betrayal by Abdul Azeez, and who rebelled against him? This extreme Sururi unity with extreme Madkhali is quite unusual.
Hadi tweet media
English
3
1
6
1K
Ahmed Al-Tayy
Ahmed Al-Tayy@AhmedTayy·
This is a strong argument, you cannot claim the legacy of Imam Muhammad Ibn Ibrahim whilst claiming the third Saudi state were Kuffar from its inception. Granted conditions today may be different but a much of the evil that is present today was also present in his time.
Muslim 🇸🇩@Alelislam

Muhammed bin Ibrahim VS AMJ AMJ: Saudi rulers ever since 1902 were Kuffar Imam Muhammed bin Ibrahim that Khawarij pretend to follow: Saudi RULES BY SHARIAH which was authored in 1979 His Manhaj was passed down from him till todays scholars who Khawarij call bootlickers

English
4
1
35
9K
Hadi
Hadi@Hadiize4·
@IbrmAnsari The one you post for is filthier. He has a vulgar manner of speaking and defends the fatwa of Alwan that permits voting. Initially, he uses offensive language to deny it, but later he concedes that Alwan permitted it in Kafir countries. He is a despicable filthy individual.
Hadi tweet media
English
0
0
0
36
Ibrahim Al Ansārī
Ibrahim Al Ansārī@IbrmAnsari·
Look at how the Salaf condemned the Murjiah and the scholars of the rulers. Imam Ahmad said “Whoever follows the rulers and judges is filthy.” And the rulers at that time were generally following the Sharia. Yet look at today, Shaykhs who label their groups "Salaf" yet they are the furthest from the actual Salaf. They dont just follow the rulers, but the apostate rulers who prevent the Sharia and instead implement Kufr man made laws. The rulers who have abandoned Islam and follow the democracy of the Jews and Christians. The rulers who ally with the worst of the Crusaders, the Hindus and other Kuffar and who imprison and attack the people of Islam. "Filthy men" doesn't even begin to describe such shaykhs..
Ibrahim Al Ansārī@IbrmAnsari

Filthy man Our righteous Salaf said: “Irjā’ is a religion loved by kings.” Know that among their most prominent signs, meaning the Murji’ah, is loyalty to the Tawaghit, hatred for the downfall of their rule, striving to subdue people to them and domesticate them for their sake, and deceiving people into thinking that the rule of the Taghut is better than chaos and Fitnas, as if there were no alternative except this or tha!! As if security, safety, and peaceful living can only exist under the rule of Tawaghit and the Sharia of Jahiliyyah!! Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah described them with similar words in a lengthy discussion on this serious matter, until he said: “The Murji’ah and those like them are among those who follow a path of absolute obedience to rulers, even if they are not righteous.” (Majmū‘ al-Fatāwā, 28/508) For this reason, Imām Aḥmad said about people like them: “A filthy man.” Mihna said: I asked Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal about Ibrāhīm ibn al-Harawī, and he said: “A filthy man.” I said: What do you mean by ‘filthy’? He said: “Whoever follows the rulers and judges is filthy.” (al-Ādāb al-Shar‘iyyah by Ibn Mufliḥ) Ibn Kathīr reported from al-Naḍr ibn Shumayl that al-Ma’mūn asked him: “What is Irjā’?” He replied: “A religion that agrees with kings, they gain from it their worldly matters, and lose from it their religion.” (al-Bidāyah wa al-Nihāyah, 14/221) And Raqabah ibn Maṣqalah, one of al-Bukhārī’s narrators, used to say: “As for the Murji’ah, they are upon the religion of kings.” (al-Ibānah al-Ṣughrā by Ibn Baṭṭah, p.163) So how many filthy ones there are today, may Allah not increase their number, and may He disgrace them. Shaykh Saadiq Al Hashimi (may Allah protect him)

English
1
10
41
1.8K
Hadi
Hadi@Hadiize4·
@IbnalIskandar The true scholar, Comrade Fernando, and his only tālibatil îlm discussing satanic paintings.
Hadi tweet media
Català
1
2
4
331
Abu Najm Fernando bin al-Iskandar
Abu Najm Fernando bin al-Iskandar@IbnalIskandar·
It is peak cowardice to hide behind the anonymity of the Internet while making Takfir, insulting Muslims, and claiming to be students of knowledge. If that is the legacy found in the students of a particular scholar, then I must question that person's scholarship.
English
8
4
50
5.6K
Hadi
Hadi@Hadiize4·
@IbnalIskandar Stick to your shirk your old girlfriend and paintings, Fernando. You only resort to abrogation when you’re unable to reconcile the texts.
Hadi tweet media
English
2
1
1
338
Abu Najm Fernando bin al-Iskandar
Abu Najm Fernando bin al-Iskandar@IbnalIskandar·
{And obey not the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and harm them not (in revenge for their harming you till you are ordered).} [33:48; Al-Hilali & Khan Translation] Here's a list of Mufassireen who said the Ayah referred to is abrogated: Abu Is'haq Ath-Tha'labi Ibn Hazm Al-Wahidi Abu Muzaffar as-Sam'ani Al-Baghawi Al-Qadi Abu Bakr bin al-Arabi Ibn al-Jawzi Al-Qurtubi -et alia Even in the Al-Hilal & Khan translation, the parentheses contain the majority's understanding of the verse: "until you are ordered." That means until the command to fight comes. Then, the Hukm changed from "harm the not" to "harm them in every way possible." The idea that Muslims should simply "turn away" or "overlook" slander and insults against Islam & Muslims is not consistent with agreed-upon legal rulings in Fiqh for Ahl as-Sunnah. "Turning away" and "overlooking" became an exception in Fiqh based on "necessity" or "need" in which Muslims find themselves weak and unable to obey the obligation in Ayat al-Sayf wal-Qitaal. Have we become an 'Ummah of promoting and pursuing exceptions in Divine Legislation?
Al-Muwāhiddun@almuwahiddunrsa

A sign of success in Dawah, is having enemies.

English
6
6
51
5.7K
Hadi
Hadi@Hadiize4·
@AnalyticalTaymi @new_speculator @Suhaaaaaib Aside from this being a fraudulent document, it discusses conditions in prison. I spent three years in federal prison, and that statement is accurate, every classroom and chapel in every prison was monitored, how’s the spying ya zindeeq.
English
0
0
1
37
قناة | صهيب الحسن
Approximately 50M Muslims following deviants voices, this is a calamity. How can the Ummah regain honor when ignorance is elevated? Ahl-us-Sunnah takes knowledge from true scholars, not celebrity speakers. Innovation only leads to decline. May Allah (ﷻ) guide us all.
قناة | صهيب الحسن tweet media
English
40
10
80
14.1K
Hadi
Hadi@Hadiize4·
@AnalyticalTaymi @new_speculator @Suhaaaaaib That was debunked years ago by his students. A brother is showing documents from 2008 proving it was fraudulently filed, yet you continue repeating the same slander. I’ll also find the document from the individual who admitted to filing it fraudulently, I had it three years ago.
English
0
0
0
40
Hadi retweetledi
Disappear
Disappear@disappear30·
Disappear tweet media
ZXX
55
6.3K
12.4K
304.9K